Watch live: House Oversight and Reform Committee hearing on government efficiency
The House Oversight and Reform Committee will hear testimony Wednesday morning from Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) about the Hawkeye State's efforts to promote government efficiency.
Reynolds announced last month that Iowa would create its own Department of Government Efficiency, in an effort to slash wasteful spending modeled after President Trump's latest federal agency helmed by tech billionaire Elon Musk.
Thomas A. Schatz, the president of Citizens Against Government Waste, will also be a witness.
The 'Rightsizing Government' hearing is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. EST.
Watch the live video above.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
37 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk and President Trump Clash Heads on X amid 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
The last few days on X have been a showdown between President Trump and his longtime friend, Elon Musk. They have gone back and forth with each other, with Elon being very vocal about his disapproval of the One Big Beautiful Bill. This has been surprising for many observers, given the well-known and open relationship between the President and the tech billionaire. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Over the last 140 days of President Trump's second term, we have seen the close-knit relationship between him and Elon Musk. Elon served as the head of DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) for the first 130 days of Trump's second term, wiping out more than $170 billion from U.S. government spending. Elon's last day in office included a meeting with President Trump in the Oval Office to praise Elon and the DOGE team for the work they had been doing. 'Elon is really not leaving, he's gonna be back and forth, I think I have a feeling,' Trump said. Musk added, 'The DOGE team is doing an incredible job. They're going to continue doing an incredible job, and I will continue to be visiting here and be a friend and advisor to the President.' The One Big Beautiful Bill Looking at President Trump's new bill, which he wants the Senate to pass by July 4th, there is a lot to uncover and discuss about what he wants for America. To begin with, he starts with lots of tax relief for American families and workers. He permanently extends lower federal income tax brackets and repeals the deduction for personal exemptions. He permanently doubles the child tax credit to $2,000 and then implements a temporary boost to $2,500 until 2028 to adjust for inflation. Additional tax benefits include deductions on tips and overtime pay for workers. He includes major Medicaid cuts by adding work requirements, frequent eligibility checks, and restrictions on who can be covered (transgender care ban, caps on undocumented immigrants). Looking now at national defense—this is where the bill has seen some negative feedback. Trump wants to have a massive defense boost by spending $150 billion on new defense projects and a new 'Golden Dome' weapon system. Within this $150 billion investment, about $50–$70 billion would be allocated for new border wall construction and an increase in CBP and ICE agents. Finally, looking at energy, Trump wants to end the tax break for electric cars, which would also eliminate credits to make solar panels and wind farms cheaper to install. In addition, he wants to cut renewable energy capacity in half, which could lead to more fossil fuels and ultimately more pollution. All in all, this would reduce current government revenue by $3.7 trillion through tax breaks and deductions, offset by government spending cuts of $1.3 trillion through reductions in government programs. The net result, however, is that this would add more than $2.5 trillion of new debt for the U.S. over the next decade. Elon Musk Calls Out President Trump on New Bill Musk has turned against Trump and the bill because it ultimately goes against all the work he and the DOGE team accomplished over the last 130 days—reducing U.S. spending, promising to begin balancing the budget, and lowering national debt levels. On Wednesday, Elon started sharing his views about the bill on X: 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok, KILL the BILL.' The main issue Elon has with the bill is that it adds more than $2.5 trillion back into the nation's debt; in contrast, his job at DOGE and Trump's promise to America were to cut government spending and decrease the national deficit. He continued to vocalize his opinions about the bill all day Thursday. While he agrees with parts of the bill—including cutting the tax break for electric vehicles—Elon tweeted: 'Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill; Slim and beautiful is the way.' During President Trump's press conference on Thursday with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, he finally had a chance to give his opinion: 'I'm very disappointed with Elon. I've helped him a lot. He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut the EV mandate.' Elon was quick to respond by saying: 'False. This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' The two continued later into Thursday, going back and forth, with Trump even threatening to terminate Elon's Tesla (TSLA) and SpaceX government-backed contracts and subsidies. Elon's comments on Thursday led Tesla stock to decrease 15%, wiping out more than $150 billion in market cap—one of the largest single-day declines and the largest single-day dollar loss in Tesla's history. Since then its been able to correct itself just slightly, but not a full rebound to Wednesdays price. Elon has continued to be vocal on X in showing his displeasure with the new bill, calling on U.S. Senators to take a close look at it over the next few weeks and implement major changes. Conclusion
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says
No decision will be taken on the winter fuel allowance until the Autumn budget – dispelling speculation that the government would make an announcement on it at next week's spending review. Sir Keir Starmer last month announced his intention to give more people access to winter fuel payments, just months after Labour decided to means test the previously universal payment. But weeks later, chaotic government messaging had left millions of pensioners with no idea what the changes will look like or when they will be announced. Asked about the changes, Peter Kyle, the secretary of state for science, innovation and technology, told Sky News: 'These issues are going to be dealt with in the run up to the autumn where these decisions are going to be taken and announced. 'But this is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years.' Pressed on whether that means no details will be unveiled on winter fuel next week, the technology secretary said: 'I think what you're going to see is the overall spending constraints and allowances for each government department, and then each department is then going to start talking about how it's going to allocate those.' Last week, Rachel Reeves confirmed the expected U-turn on the controversial cuts would be in place for this winter, meaning that the government will be faced with a scramble to get the changes rolled out between the October budget and the winter months. While the chancellor had previously confirmed that they would not set out how the changes would be paid for until the autumn, there was a growing suggestion from the government that details on who the changes would affect could be set out at next week's spending review. The chancellor is expected to unveil a swathe of spending cuts on Wednesday as she attempts to walk the tightrope between delivering on the party's election promises and sticking within the bounds of her self-imposed fiscal rules. Mr Kyle's comments come days after pensions minister Torsten Bell confirmed there was no prospect of returning to a universal winter fuel payment for all, saying that '95 per cent of people agree that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that.' Winter fuel payments are a £300 payment to help with energy costs in the colder months. In July, the chancellor announced that pensioners not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits would no longer receive the benefit. As a result, just 1.5 million pensioners received the payment in winter 2024-25 – a massive drop from the 10.8 million pensioners who received it the year before. The cuts were deeply unpopular because they were seen as being disproportionately damaging to vulnerable people, and were criticised for leaving thousands of poorer pensions who were on the borderline missing out on the payment. In November, it was revealed that the government's own figures indicated it would force 100,000 pensioners into poverty in 2026. The policy was partly blamed for Labour's poor performance at the local elections – which saw them lose two-thirds of the council seats they had in 2021– as well as the previously Labour-held Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary seat to Reform UK. The cuts – combined with the £5bn welfare cuts and the party's decision to keep the two child benefit cap in place – have sparked growing concern over the direction of the government among Labour MPs.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voices: Government needs the can-do mindset I experienced in the Army to push change through fast
Government moves too slowly. That's not just the fault of the current government or the last one – it's the system. Slowed down by bureaucracy. Paralysed by 'can't-do' figures. Obsessed with process over progress. I come from a background of delivery. In the Army, working in a 'human intelligence unit' – liaising with agents and special forces – we had to move from first gear to fifth in an instant. Lives depended on it. Getting ahead of the enemy, protecting our people and achieving results was the mission – not talking it to death. Confirming the location of a high-value target, whilst also ensuring they were alone and targetable, or identifying the precise site of an improvised explosive device factory, required creativity and a determined mindset – a willingness to take calculated risks to save lives and win. When I worked in counterterrorism at the Ministry of Defence, delivery wasn't optional. We built a culture of 'can-do'; creative, risk-aware and focused on action. It wasn't about perfection. It was about progress. Government could learn a lot from the mindset of the finest military in the world and the departments that work every day to protect the public from the threat of terrorism. An unstoppable political will must go hand in hand with a mindset of delivery. I think back to our counterterror planning meetings. The mission? To stop terrorists attacking our great country. No timewasters. Just serious professionals putting ideas on the table, pulling them apart, war-gaming every outcome, then locking in a plan and going all-out to deliver. That mindset – challenge, rigour and rapid execution – is what the system of government has desperately lacked for decades. Too often, it's delay by design. Endless consultations. Five-year strategies that take ten. Pet projects blocked by internal turf wars. Take the Lower Thames Crossing: more than £1.2 billion spent before a single spade in the ground – all because of drawn-out decision-making and red tape. Or the A9 dualling project in Scotland – promised by 2025, now pushed back to 2035. Ten years of drift. These delays are not acts of God. They are failures of will. The truth is, Whitehall needs reform. There are dedicated, brilliant people across the civil service – but too many are trapped in a system built to say 'no'. Risk aversion is often rewarded, not challenged. Delivery is too often deprioritised in favour of process, and meaningful reform is blocked by a sprawling web of arms-length bodies and quangos that diffuse responsibility and stifle urgency. We need a leaner, more focused state – one that empowers departments to move at pace and is held accountable for outcomes, not paperwork. That means streamlining quangos where appropriate, ending duplication, and changing the mindset within government itself. Ministers must be prepared to challenge officials – not to attack, but to sharpen decision-making and force clarity on delivery. Wes Streeting's approach to the NHS offers a blueprint. He's made clear that, as health secretary, he expects faster delivery, more accountability, and a culture that doesn't settle for 'this is just how things are done'. Abolishing NHS England shows a steely commitment to the change he expects. But reforming structures is only half the battle – changing the culture is the real prize. Government must operate with a sense of mission, not maintenance. The British public doesn't care whether a successful policy comes from Bevan or Thatcher. They care that it works. That it's delivered. We need to strip out the ideology and face complex problems with a solutions-based mindset. Let the evidence lead. Move fast. Be willing to make mistakes in the name of making progress. And above all, get things done. Because there's serious work to do.
