logo
As retaliatory tariffs mount, recyclers worry what goes around, comes around

As retaliatory tariffs mount, recyclers worry what goes around, comes around

NBC News01-04-2025

Other industry stakeholders are sounding similarly circumspect on the eve of what Trump has dubbed 'Liberation Day' on Wednesday. The Aluminum Association, for example, supports some but not all of the president's duties on the key metal.
'Increasing recycling by a few percentage points can drastically reduce our reliance on primary aluminum from foreign sources,' said Charles Johnson, CEO of the trade group, but he noted exports are crucial for the industry, too.
About 20% of recycled steel and 37% of recycled aluminum are sold abroad, according to the Recycled Materials Association, or ReMA. That totaled about $26.7 billion in exports in 2023, the organization estimates, sales that foreign governments' retaliatory tariffs could choke off.
In 2018, Trump's steel and aluminum tariffs excluded scrap metal, but ReMA said it hasn't been able to determine whether that will hold true this time around, including under his blanket duties on Mexico and Canada.
Industry groups have voiced particular dismay that Trump picked a fight with Canada, a major U.S. supplier of both steel and aluminum. The country accounted for over 50% of aluminum imports and over 20% of steel and iron imports as of 2023, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
Given these interdependencies, ReMA says it's crucial that the $11 billion worth of recycled materials continues to trade freely within North America.
'Our materials move to where there's the most demand for them,' said Adam Shaffer, vice president of international trade and global affairs at ReMA.
While the Aluminum Association has long supported curbing low-cost Chinese imports of 'unfairly traded aluminum,' it opposes tariffs on Canadian aluminum. Johnson said he was optimistic that Trump would consider certain exemptions, as he did in 2018. That would help the domestic industry continue to 'secure a reliable supply of primary metals for U.S. producers,' Johnson said.
The United Steelworkers has asked the administration to avoid unnecessarily antagonizing one the industry's biggest trade partners.
'While our union absolutely views tariffs as one of many important tools we need to employ to rebalance our trade relationships, we urge a measured approach that both strengthens our manufacturing sector and accounts for our relationships with our allies, like Canada, who play by the rules,' the labor union said in a Feb. 10 statement.
Michael E. Hoffman, CEO of the National Waste and Recycling Association, which represents mostly consumer goods recyclers, likewise said it's common for recycled materials to move relatively freely between Mexico, Canada and the U.S.
'It's a North American model,' he said.
A White House spokesperson didn't respond to a request for comment.
Even if tariffs succeed in making domestic steel and aluminum — both newly made and recycled supplies — more competitive with foreign counterparts, global retaliation threatens to destabilize commodity markets for these products. Higher prices at home are only good for American businesses if there's enough demand to support them, Shaffer pointed out.
'It would be harmful for both the recyclers [and] also for the environment if there's no market for these materials domestically,' he said.
Some Trump administration officials have said their sweeping trade policy changes could cause some short-term pain on the way to reinvigorating American industry. But even within sectors the White House is looking to bolster, there's skepticism that the gamble will pay off.
'Some things make sense to be made overseas versus here,' said Lincoln, the Pennsylvania recycling plant owner. 'I don't see the infrastructure coming immediately.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Justice Department fires two tied to Trump probes, people familiar say
US Justice Department fires two tied to Trump probes, people familiar say

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US Justice Department fires two tied to Trump probes, people familiar say

WASHINGTON, June 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department this week fired two more employees who worked on investigations into President Donald Trump's retention of classified records and efforts to overturn the 2020 election, according to three people familiar with the matter. Including those two, the Justice Department has fired 17 people who worked on former Special Counsel Jack Smith's team prosecuting Trump since he returned to power in January. One of the people fired on Monday worked as a lawyer on Smith's team and also previously helped prosecute some of the defendants who stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 in a failed bid to block Congress from certifying Democratic President Joe Biden's election win over Trump. The second person who was also fired Monday worked in a support staff role for Smith's team, the people added. The firings were ordered by Attorney General Pam Bondi, the people said. Both people were most recently working in different divisions at the department. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment. Fourteen attorneys were fired en masse on January 27 because of their work on the cases against Trump. In April, the Justice Department fired a career public affairs employee who had served as a spokesperson for Smith. Trump, who faced criminal charges in four different federal and state prosecutions, campaigned for president on a vow to exact retribution against his political enemies. He has long accused the Justice Department of targeting him for political reasons - a claim that Smith's team repeatedly denied in court filings.

Donald Trump makes huge World War I blunder in fiery speech as LA riots rage
Donald Trump makes huge World War I blunder in fiery speech as LA riots rage

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Donald Trump makes huge World War I blunder in fiery speech as LA riots rage

Donald Trump made a huge blunder about World War I in a fiery speech at Fort Bragg, as the U.S. continues to be rocked by riots over the President's mass deportation order US President Donald Trump delivered a speech at Fort Bragg on Tuesday, as unrest continued in Los Angeles between protesters and ICE officials over his far-reaching deportation order. Fort Bragg, situated near Fayetteville, North Carolina, is home to the military's Special Operations Command, which includes elite units such as the Green Berets and Rangers. ‌ During his address, Trump made a significant historical blunder, claiming that many countries had recently commemorated the end of World War I, while the US did not participate in the celebrations, despite asserting "we're the ones who won the war." ‌ "Without us," Trump said, "You'd all be speaking German right now." "Maybe a little Japanese thrown in. But we won the war," he added. "We're gonna celebrate on Saturday." However, Trump's claim that citizens would have been speaking Japanese is inaccurate, as Japan was an ally of the US, France, Great Britain, Russia, and Italy against the Axis powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire, reports the Mirror US. It appears the President was actually referencing WW2, which was commemorated recently during VE celebrations. The end of WW1 is traditionally commemorated on "Armistice Day" on November 11 each year. The event at Fort Bragg was also attended by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, and included both active service members and their families. The speech comes ahead of the 250th anniversary of the army and coincidentally, Trump's 79th birthday, which will be marked with a parade in Washington, D.C. ‌ The city is bracing for a massive turnout at the parade this Saturday, with officials already setting up 18 miles of "anti-scale fencing" and deploying drones, despite the usual no-fly zone rules. City representatives have told The Associated Press they're expecting an "preparing for an enormous turnout." ‌ Secret Service's Matt McCool from the Washington Field Office is preparing for "hundreds of thousands" to line the streets, while military sources estimate around 200,000 will join the celebrations. "We have a ton of magnetometers," McCool said. "If a million people show up, then we're going to have some lines." To manage the expected crowds, 175 magnetometers will be in place at security checkpoints throughout the day and for the evening parade. ‌ Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith has warned of "major impacts to traffic" and advises attendees to consider using the Metro instead of driving. "This is a significant event with a large footprint," she stressed. "We're relying on the public to be an extra set of ears and eyes for us." ‌ The event has hit the headlines as a National Special Security Event, with security measures on par with presidential inaugurations or state funerals. This elite status is reserved for high-profile functions drawing sizeable gatherings and the likelihood of significant protests, triggering an increased security collaboration between local officials, the FBI, Capitol Police, and the National Guard, all led by the watchful Secret Service. Officials are also on high alert for possible immigration-related protests, mirroring those in Los Angeles, potentially hitting D. C. 's streets. "We're paying attention, obviously, to what is happening there. We'll be ready," affirmed McCool, underlining the extensive preparations in place to manage any civil unrest.

Trump ally's support for raising the federal minimum wage could set up a wild showdown with the administration
Trump ally's support for raising the federal minimum wage could set up a wild showdown with the administration

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump ally's support for raising the federal minimum wage could set up a wild showdown with the administration

Top Republican threw his support behind raising the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour in 2026 - and it could spark a showdown with President Trump. The current federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour, and has not been raised since 2009. Hawley's proposal, called the 'Higher Wages for American Workers Act' is also cosponsored by Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt). 'For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline,' Hawley (R-Mo.) told CBS News. 'One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hard-working Americans every day. This bipartisan legislation would ensure that workers across America benefit from higher wages,'the Missouri senator added. Trump has teased lukewarm ideas about potentially raising the federal minimum wage, acknowledging it's 'pretty low' currently. But he's generally favored a state-led approach to the issue rather than stepping in on a federal level. On the campaign trail last year, Trump championed proposals such as eliminating taxes on tips, as well as on overtime wages. Those campaign promises are presently one step closer to becoming policy realities, as they are provisions included in the budget reconciliation package which passed the U.S. House of Representatives before Memorial Day. It's unclear if Hawley has discussed his legislation with the White House and whether Trump is supportive. The Daily Mail has reached out to his team for comment. Ten states, as well as Washington, D.C., have a minimum wage of over $15. Democrat-led California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Washington also have the high pay level. Twenty states set their minimum wage at the $7.25 level, 19 of which supported President Donald Trump's reelection last year. In Hawley's home state of Missouri, voters passed a measure last November to raise the state's minimum wage to $15 per hour in 2026. It included provision passed by voters that would also institute annual raises to keep minimum wage increases on pace with inflation was later struck down by the Missouri legislature this spring. Hawley's proposal is not the only one in the Senate aimed at raising the federal minimum wage. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) introduced legislation in April to raise the federal minimum wage to $17 per hour by 2030. At the time, Sanders argued that 'the $7.25 an hour minimum wage is a starvation wage. It must be raised to a living wage – at least $17 an hour.' 'In the year 2025, a job should lift you out of poverty, not keep you in it. At a time of massive income and wealth inequality, we can no longer tolerate millions of workers trying to survive on just $10 or $12 an hour. Congress can no longer ignore the needs of the working class of this country. The time to act is now,' Sanders noted in an April press release. Republicans including President Trump are pushing to increase the dollars Americans bring home in their pockets via other methods. Trump's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was asked about raising the federal minimum wage at his Senate confirmation hearing earlier this year. At the time, Bessent said that he believes 'that the minimum wage is more of a statewide and regional issue' when answering a question posed by Senator Sanders. The libertarian Cato Institute, a D.C. think tank noted in a 2022 policy guide for lawmakers that 'very few studies find that minimum wages boost employment and that a significant minority find no to small employment effects.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store