Miriam Lord: Sinn Féin's ‘Mr Angry' meets immovable object that is Micheál
The Taoiseach is not a fan of the Opposition's shoot-first-and-ask-questions-later approach.
Can deputies not just wait until they have the whole story?
'The audit will be ready fairly imminently, I hope,'
Micheál Martin
told the Dáil, mentioning the end of next week.
'I have no interest in hiding anything. None. Why would I? Why would I?' he told
Cian O'Callaghan
of the
Social Democrats
and
Sinn Féin
leader
Mary Lou McDonald
, who were sure he was trying to pull a fast one.
READ MORE
'For God's sake, reflect on what you're trying assert. I'm as serious about this as anybody is. It's horrendous if anything wrong was done, but we need to find out the full facts.'
Day two of the standoff between the Taoiseach and the Opposition.
Neither side is getting anywhere.
[
Over 2,200 families of children who received hip surgeries over 15 year period written to by CHI and Cappagh Orthopaedic Hospital
]
But for all the angry words between them, the Taoiseach's tone and demeanour indicate he isn't a million miles away from the Opposition's view that yet another disturbing
HSE
scandal is about to break. This one is about a large number of children possibly undergoing unnecessary hip surgeries in three Dublin hospitals with cases perhaps going back as many as 15 years.
Possibly. Perhaps.
The words being used for now.
Deputies have seen a leaked draft report revealed by online news site The Ditch, which makes for alarming reading. And as an independent audit into the situation nears completion, they want more details now from the Taoiseach.
They also want to know about letters sent on foot of this audit to parents of children who had operations as far back as 2010, reminding them to return to their hospitals for routine follow up care.
How many of these were sent and why now?
This issue was raised in the Dáil on Tuesday and again on Wednesday, with similar results. Angry interventions from Sinn Féin in particular did not help to move the matter on. And the Taoiseach, vehemently rejecting charges of some sort of cover-up, stuck to his line that he cannot comment or act until he has seen the final, independent report.
The Soc Dems deputy leader wanted answers now for parents wondering whether the serious surgery they watched their child suffer through was really necessary at all.
Why can't he just tell them when he will answer their questions? It's 'insulting' not to do so, particularly when he 'hinted' earlier in the week that he knows more than he is willing to say.
'Taoiseach, can you stop with the evasion and just level with us?'
More frustration from Micheál.
'No one's insulting anybody, deputy ... it's too serious for that. We're talking about children who've had operations. So the least we owe to the parents and the families is the facts.'
As for the number of letters sent out, Micheál said Minister for Health
Jennifer Carroll MacNeill
was on the case. He seemed confident she would come up with the goods before the day was out.
One person who is never unsure of her facts is Mary Lou McDonald, who just had to butt in during Cian's slot to dispute one of the Taoiseach's statements.
Micheál immediately had one of his 'Aaaw-would-ya-ever-stop, Mary Lou' moments. These are a regular thing.
'Sorry, please now. This is not about politics, deputy. This is outrageous behaviour by you now ... It's not your question and you've been doing this since this Dáil began and I'd ask you to stop because it's too serious.'
Then he launched into his impassioned 'I'm not hiding anything' mini-speech.
Obviously, it fell on deaf ears.
Later, during questions on policy, Mary Lou returned to the subject to tell him he misled the Dáil on the reason the letters were sent to parents. She also suspected he knew the number of letters which were sent out to parents, but was choosing to say nothing.
'Hear, hear!'
Pearse Doherty
boomed in an extra-shouty mood. It must have been the good weather.
There was brief row over what the letter contains.
The Taoiseach complained he wasn't trying to cast aspersions on anyone asking questions, but 'aspersions are being laid against door of the Government'.
It could have been worse. They might have been accused of having aspirations.
As an example, Micheál harked back to Tuesday's sitting when she accused him of 'ducking, dodging and diving' on the issue.
'Yes,' Mary Lou nodded, totally unanimous with herself on this.
It's a false assertion, Micheál retorted. 'The Government wants the facts here and I want the facts'.
'Well, share them,' she shot back.
'When the audit is complete,' the Taoiseach responded, emphasising every word, fixing a knowing eye on the Sinn Féin leader.
'I know what you're at.'
This was too much for the loyal Pearse, who started spluttering about the audit and what the Taoiseach professed to know about it: 'Jesus Christ!'
The Ceann Comhairle had a conniption.
'Excuse me. That is uncalled for!'
And now Micheál was in on the action, glaring at Pearse.
'He's shouting again. Mr Angry is at it again now. Mr Angry is at it!'
'Do you not know?' Pearse bellowed.
'Angry theatrics is par for the course from you and it's wrong to do it,' Micheál bristled as Pearse and Mary Lou huffed themselves to a standstill.
Clarity and confusion
But it was not over for Micheál yet as
Aontú
's
Peadar Tóibín
returned to the letters sent out to patients and their parents.
He kept to the medical theme. 'Taoiseach, you are injecting confusion into the hip operation scandal at the moment.'
Peadar said Micheál gave the Dáil contradictory answers about why these letters were sent out.
But just like Micheál knows what Mary Lou is at, he also knows what Peader is about.
'Look, I have the experience. I know what's going on here. So you call for clarity, but what you want is confusion.'
He said deputy Tóibín wanted to paint a picture of an 'incoherent, drip-drip, bit by bit' evasive attitude from him 'whereas I'm saying, Can we not wait for the audit to be completed and given to the Minister?'
Then she can share it with the Dáil and the public and, above all, with the families and children that may be affected.
'That's all I'm saying.'
By the evening, Jennifer had concluded her mission.
A statement from the hospitals confirmed that more than 2,000 letters had been sent to parents of children who had hip dysplasia surgery in the past 15 years, giving the Opposition renewed reason to demand answers.
The Minister says the audit 'will be finalised and completed imminently.'
By the end of next week, the Opposition shouldn't be shouting into a vacuum.
Because the Taoiseach will be free to say all he has to say on the matter.
He had better not hold back.
After all, his Government has absolutely nothing to hide.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Young people and AI
Sir, – In one of his first speeches as pope, Leo XIV outlined his priorities for his papacy. Interestingly, one of these is the challenges posed by artificial intelligence (AI). The pope believes that AI is a threat to 'humanity, justice and labour'. He said that this was one of the key reasons for him choosing the name Leo XIV. He had spoken previously about the impact of the industrial revolution on workers' rights. We are now arguably going through another 'industrial revolution' of sorts. Before, it was concerns that machines would replace people and take their jobs. Now it's the same but with AI. We adapted before and we can adapt again; not by trying to beat AI by being robots but by fully embracing our humanity – the qualities that set us apart from AI, qualities like our emotions, our ability to connect and build strong, trusting relationships and our ability to empathise. READ MORE If we are fully human, if we stop trying to beat AI at its own game, AI can never truly replace us, never truly do away with the need for real, human people in the workforce and in society. As a young person, I'm often asked the question, 'what do you want to be when you grow up?' Whatever answer I give, the response is usually: 'Oh, that job will be done away it; AI will be doing it in the future.' But I remain hopeful, faithful that I will be needed in society. And that AI can't replace humans if we are truly human, fully ourselves. – Yours, etc, TESS LIFFEY, Birr, Co Offaly.
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Lift trapped group assessing Leinster House accessibility
A group of people with disabilities who were invited to Leinster House to deliver training on accessibility ended up "trapped" and "embarrassed" after a lift broke down in the parliamentary complex. The organisation, which provides disability awareness training, said they were "astonished" at how inaccessible Leinster House was after their visit to Dublin last year. In an email, they described supposedly accessible toilets that were not large enough to cater for wheelchairs, buses being refused access to drop off people with mobility issues, and a broken-down lift that left five members "stranded". They told the head of the Oireachtas that members were stuck in a corridor and "very embarrassed" as able-bodied people had to "edge" their way past them on their way to offices or lunch. A message said: "From the moment of our arrival, we encountered barriers and exclusion." The visit was made by members of the HSE Gold Star Disability Awareness Training programme and volunteers from Tipperary last June on the invitation of an Oireachtas member. In the email, they said the room where they delivered their training session was inaccessible on "a number of disability access levels". Then, when members were trying to go downstairs to the restaurant, one lift broke down and another was discovered to be out of service. The email said: "The lift to offer access to the lower corridor en route to the restaurant broke down when we had five people safely down, leaving others stranded at the top. "Once these five people tried to continue to access the restaurant, they were met with a note on the second lift that said, 'temporarily out of order'." The email continued: "Every person there was tired, embarrassed, disappointed, hungry and let down once more in terms of their rights to universal access and the dignity of using a toilet privately." It said these were just some of the issues that needed to be addressed and asked for a meeting with Oireachtas management. 'Sincere apologies' In response, Clerk of the Dáil Peter Finnegan expressed his "sincere apologies" for how the visit had unfolded. "We fell well short of the standards that people are entitled to expect when they visit their National Parliament," he said. A representative of the group returned in July to give advice on how Leinster House could be made more accessible for people with disabilities. However, progress has been slow, in particular around the replacement and upgrading of lifts, work that has be carried out by the Office of Public Works (OPW). In September, the representative of the group wrote again to ask if there had been any update. The Oireachtas said a public procurement process for a new lift would start soon and that an additional accessible toilet would be provided. A message said some toilets that had previously been marked "accessible" were no longer signposted as such and that training for all staff was scheduled for this year. In December, the group responded saying members were "very patient" but were "anxious to know that they are not forgotten". By April, they said they were "quite anxious" to see if changes had taken place and whether a return visit was possible. In response, Mr Finnegan said the new accessible toilet project was complete and a job coach [and] disability liaison officer was to be appointed imminently. However, the lift problem was proving a bigger challenge. "The advice provided by the OPW is that the project to install a new platform lift for the Member's restaurant will be more complex than just simply replacing the existing lift," Mr Finnegan said in an email. "The overall solution for the area requires changes to access and egress and some internal changes to offices and security posts." He added that while progress had been made, they were not "as far advanced" as they hoped, especially on the provision of a new elevator.
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Families deported to Nigeria could have left voluntarily, says Minister
Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan has defended the State's handling of the deportation of 35 people to Nigeria on Wednesday, saying those removed had previously been asked to leave voluntarily. Speaking on Sunday on RTÉ Radio 1's This Week programme, the Minister said: 'Each person who was on the aeroplane that went back to Nigeria had their own individual narratives of persecution assessed by the International Protection Office , and on appeal, and subsequently they got a deportation order that wasn't responded to. 'They were requested to leave voluntarily and that didn't happen.' The Garda National Immigration Bureau carried out the operation, which involved 21 men, nine women and five children, who were deported on a chartered flight from Dublin Airport to Lagos, Nigeria on Wednesday night. The children involved were deported as part of family groups. READ MORE Friends of the families deported, who were living with them at an International Protection Accommodation Services (Ipas) centre in west Dublin, described the scenes last week as upsetting and 'traumatising'. Farhiya Ali, a mother living with her four children in the centre, said: 'The kids were coming down for breakfast when these five men wearing cargo pants, big jackets arrived. 'They came into the third floor, stood in front of the bedroom door, took the three kids back in and told them to pack up. We heard them say: 'You are going to be deported.' As soon as the other children heard then they were all crying. It was such a horrific scene.' Three siblings from one family were among those deported. They had lived at their accommodation since January 2022 with their mother and father. [ Families facing deportation are 'at serious risk of destitution', warns refugee council Opens in new window ] Asked about the criticism from families at the Ipas centre about the manner of the deportation of children, Mr O'Callaghan said: 'This is not a pleasant part of my job. I don't relish doing this, but it has to be done. If we have an immigration system or an asylum system that doesn't have a consequence for people who are ruled not to be entitled to stay here then the system becomes meaningless.' Asked whether he would put Nigeria on Ireland's safe list of countries, Mr O'Callaghan said: 'There's a difference here between putting a country on the safe list for the purposes of international protection under the [International Protection] Act, and determining whether or not to send somebody back to a country from whence they came.' [ Ministers accused of giving 'half the picture' on refugees as more than 40% get positive decisions Opens in new window ] Applicants from designated safe countries of origin receive their interview date on the day they apply for international protection, reducing their waiting time for an interview. 'There's faster time frames for Nigeria at present anyway because of the heightened number of people from Nigeria claiming asylum in Ireland,' said the Minister. 'It doesn't mean if you're not on the safe list of countries from international protection, we can't send you back to the country where you came from.'
