Trump claims Iran strikes caused ‘severe' damage despite inconclusive intelligence
THE HAGUE, June 25 — US President Donald Trump said today that the damage to Iranian nuclear sites from missile strikes over the weekend was severe, though he also acknowledged that the available intelligence on the matter was inconclusive.
His comments followed reports by Reuters and other media outlets yesterday revealing that the US Defence Intelligence Agency had assessed that the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear programme by just a few months, despite administration officials saying the programme had been obliterated.
'The intelligence was very inconclusive,' Trump told reporters before joining a Nato summit in The Hague. 'The intelligence says we don't know. It could've been very severe. That's what the intelligence suggests.'
Later, during the same round of comments, Trump argued that Iran's nuclear deal had been set back 'basically decades, because I don't think they'll ever do it again'.
Trump was sitting alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, who both also cast doubt on the reliability of the DIA assessment.
Rubio said the US was opening an investigation into the leak of the DIA report. He also suggested the report's contents had been misrepresented in the media. — Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
43 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
UK to deploy nuclear-capable F-35A jets in Nato's biggest deterrence shift in decades
LONDON, June 25 — Britain will reintroduce fighter jets capable of carrying atomic weapons to support Nato's nuclear mission, expanding the country's deterrence arsenal, which is currently limited to submarine-launched missiles, Prime Minister Keir Starmer's office said yesterday. The country will purchase 12 nuclear weapon-capable F-35A fighters, in the 'biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation', Downing Street said, adding Starmer would announce the plan at a Nato summit today. 'These F35 dual capable aircraft will herald a new era for our world-leading Royal Air Force and deter hostile threats that threaten the UK and our Allies,' Starmer said in a statement. Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte was quoted in the statement as saying: 'I strongly welcome today's announcement,' calling it 'yet another robust British contribution to Nato'. Since the end of the Cold War, British nuclear deterrence within the Atlantic alliance was provided solely by missiles aboard Royal Navy submarines. At that time, 'there was no longer any real interest in tactical nuclear weapons in Europe, because the threat had disappeared,' Heloise Fayet, a nuclear specialist at the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri), told AFP. She said yesterday's announcement illustrates 'the continued re-nuclearisation of Europe, the renewed need for nuclear weapons, and the strengthening of Nato's deterrence, in the face of an adversary, Russia', which has been at war with Ukraine for three years. The F-35A, manufactured by US company Lockheed Martin, is a variant of the F-35B already used by the United Kingdom, but which can carry nuclear warheads in addition to conventional weapons. The acquisition has been a long-standing request from the Royal Air Force. The planes are expected to be stationed at Marham Air Force Base in eastern England. — AFP
Malay Mail
43 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Hope, heartbreak and hesitation: LA's Iranian community dares to hope for ‘regime change'
LOS ANGELES, June 25 — At his grocery store in an Iranian neighbourhood of Los Angeles, Mohammad Ghafari is worried sick about his brothers and sisters since the United States bombed the Islamic republic's nuclear sites. But as he stands among his dates, dried plums and pistachios, he also cherishes the hope of change in his native country. Iran 'is not capable of providing food to the Persian people,' said Ghafari, who left to study abroad before the 1979 revolution and never returned. 'If the people (there) were happy about a change of regime, I would be too.' 'Everyone would be happy,' agreed Fereshteh, one of his customers and a fellow resident of so-called 'Tehrangeles' — a mash-up of Tehran and Los Angeles. For Fereshteh, who gave only her first name to protect her identity, 'Donald Trump is a hero.' The American president ordered strikes against three Iranian nuclear sites last weekend, providing unprecedented support to Israel in its offensive against Iran. He even raised the possibility of 'regime change,' before backing away and saying it would sow chaos. Any talk of ousting Iran's clerical leadership resonates strongly in the Los Angeles area, where nearly 200,000 Iranian-Americans live, making the Californian metropolis the diaspora's global hub. Many of its members live in the west end of the city, near the UCLA campus. Filled with Middle Eastern grocery stores, carpet merchants and bookstores selling books in Farsi, the neighbourhood is also known as 'Little Persia.' The immigrants who have made it their home include minorities often seen as discriminated against in Iran, such as Jews, Christians and Assyrians. A US flag hangs in a street of Los Angeles' 'Little Persia' where about 500,000 Iranian-Americans live, in Los Angeles, California June 21, 2025. — Reuters pic 'Rise up' 'It's time for the Iranian people to rise up, because right now, the regime is very weak,' said Fereshteh, herself Jewish, who fled Iran in the 1980s during the war between her country and Iraq. Trump was elected on a promise to focus on America and stay out of foreign wars. But among the grocery store's customers, some would like him to push his intervention in Iran to the limit. 'We should send troops there,' says Mehrnoosh, a 45-year-old woman who arrived in the United States in 2010. 'The people there have their hands tied,' she said, adding that 'the regime killed so many Iranians three years ago during the protests following the death of Mahsa Amini,' a student arrested for allegedly flouting dress rules for women. But on the patio of the 'Taste of Tehran' restaurant, one man hopes the United States will pull back to avoid its fate in Iraq and Afghanistan. 'Change by force never pays off... Change must come from within, by the people, for the people, and we're not there yet,' said the 68-year-old engineer, who wished to remain anonymous. The conflict has so far claimed more than 600 lives in Iran and 28 in Israel, according to authorities in both countries. A fragile ceasefire in the war between Iran and Israel war appeared to be holding on Tuesday — a relief for the engineer, who had recently spoken to his aunt on the phone. For several days, she fled Tehran for the northwest of the country to escape Israeli bombardments. 'Is it worth it? Absolutely not,' he said, recalling he lost his grandparents to bombs during the Iran-Iraq War. 'My hope is for all this to end soon.' — AFP
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
US Supreme Court ending term with birthright, porn, voting rights
WASHINGTON: As the US Supreme Court winds down its term ahead of the summer break, there are a number of cases still to be decided. The court is scheduled to issue opinions on Thursday and these are the major outstanding cases: Birthright citizenship The case is ostensibly about Donald Trump's bid to scrap birthright citizenship but it actually turns on whether federal judges have the right to issue nationwide blocks to presidential decrees. It is perhaps the most significant of the remaining cases since it could have far-reaching ramifications for the ability of the judiciary to rein in Trump or future US presidents. Trump's executive order ending automatic citizenship for children born on American soil has been paused by district courts in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington that deemed it unconstitutional. But the question before the Supreme Court is whether a single district court can freeze an executive branch move with a universal injunction. The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to restrict the application of a district court's injunction solely to the parties who brought the case and the district where the judge presides. Whatever the nine justices decide, the actual question of whether Trump can legally end birthright citizenship is expected to be back in front of the top court before long. Porn site age verification The case -- Free Speech Coalition vs Paxton -- involves a Texas law requiring pornographic websites to verify visitors' ages, part of a growing effort to limit access by minors to online sexual content. Texas is one of nearly 20 states to institute such a requirement, which critics argue violates First Amendment free speech rights. A district court sided with a challenge by an adult entertainment industry trade group, the Free Speech Coalition, saying the law restricted access by adults to constitutionally protected content. But a conservative-dominated appeals court upheld the age verification requirement, prompting the trade group to take its case to the Supreme Court, where conservatives have a 6-3 supermajority. Students and LGBTQ-themed content This religious rights case examines whether parents have the right to pull their children from public school classes when books containing LGBTQ-related content are read or discussed. The schools, in a Maryland county, had offered parents the chance to opt out of classes featuring books aimed at combating prejudice and discussing gender identity and homosexuality, but later retracted the option. Parents are suing because the opt-outs were canceled. They say the schools' inclusive curriculum choices infringe on their Christian and Muslim faiths and First Amendment rights. Court precedent has generally established that exposing students to ideas contrary to religion does not constitute coercion. Planned Parenthood funding South Carolina's Republican governor, Henry McMaster, issued an executive order in 2018 cutting off reimbursements to the two Planned Parenthood clinics in the state for services the reproductive health organization provided to low-income Americans under the government Medicaid program. The Medicaid reimbursements were not for abortion-related services, but McMaster said providing any funding to Planned Parenthood amounts to a taxpayer 'subsidy of abortion,' which is banned in South Carolina for women who are more than six weeks pregnant. Planned Parenthood, which provides a range of health services, filed suit against the state arguing that Medicaid patients have the right to receive care from any qualified provider. An appeals court ruled that Planned Parenthood cannot be excluded from the state's Medicaid program and South Carolina appealed to the Supreme Court. Voting rights This case is a challenge by a group of white voters to a congressional map adopted last year by the state legislature of Louisiana creating a second Black majority district. Black people make up one-third of the population of Louisiana, which has six congressional districts, and generally vote Democratic. Opponents of the redrawn map argue that using race to design congressional maps is racial gerrymandering prohibited by the Constitution. The eventual Supreme Court ruling could have an impact on whether Democrats or Republicans control the House of Representatives in the 2026 midterm elections.
