
Trump chairing a major arts institution would be laughable if it weren't so deeply troubling
Donald Trump's announcement that he was installing himself as the chair of the John F Kennedy Center, Washington DC's temple to the performing arts, might have been mistaken for something petty or trivial – another random, Pollock-esque splatter of the policy paintbrush against the canvas of the world. On his favoured social media site he posted an image, presumably AI-generated, of himself as a dinner-jacketed orchestral conductor – the macho maestro of the US. But this is more than personal: it is political, and points towards the president's wider project.
To understand what is going on, it is necessary to consider Trump's favourite European authoritarian, Viktor Orbán. Hungary's prime minister has chipped away at his country's constitution and judiciary. But a no less powerful tool has been his attention to parts of society often regarded as unimportant compared with a country's constitution. Alongside crushing independent media, Orbán's government has co-opted the arts, appointing right-leaning directors to theatres, and instigating nationalist art exhibitions. Orbán understands that culture creates the climate for emotion and memory, imprints national myths, and – often intangibly – acts on politics.
The Kennedy Center is low-hanging fruit for Trump, in that he has some direct power over it. Trustees are presidential appointees, and federal funding is allocated for the upkeep of its building. It was founded as a bipartisan institution, and has normally had a mix of political views on its board – but that principle is capable of being abused, and it is being so right now. A statement, emphasising this bipartisan history, appeared and then vanished from the centre's website this week. Over the past few days, board members have been fired and 13 compliant ones – including Usha Vance, the wife of the vice-president, JD Vance – appointed. The president of the centre has been sacked, and a new interim (and unqualified) executive director announced: the foreign policy adviser Richard Grenell. 'NO MORE DRAG SHOWS, OR OTHER ANTI-AMERICAN PROPAGANDA', was Trump's salvo. (The centre had staged a minuscule number of events featuring drag acts, among the vaster diet of Shostakovich, Beethoven and Stravinsky.) On Wednesday, Trump was formally voted in by the board. 'Unanimously', his social media post said: a nice Putin-esque touch. 'There's no more woke in this country,' Trump told reporters. On Thursday morning, the entire Kennedy Center website was down, with 'technical difficulties'.
Other federally supported institutions such as the National Gallery of Art and the Smithsonian Institution, DC's consortium of national museums, are also vulnerable. After Trump's executive order of 20 January, they have said they will be closing their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) offices. It's a similar story with the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), the federal body that offers funding to arts organisations. A document that I have seen warns that NEA arts grants now need to be reviewed for the presence of 'certain ideological terms', including 'climate change', 'environment', 'immigrant', 'lesbian', 'gay', 'trans', 'drag' and even 'equal rights'. Applicants are being told that patriotic proposals relating to the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence will be prioritised. The NEA is a very different entity from Arts Council England. It does not give revenue funding for organisations – it has a limited budget that offers support to individual projects. Nevertheless, it is a respected body, and it has just received a full-fronted ideological assault on its operations.
These are some of the direct results of Trump's first three weeks. Indirect consequences will take longer to crystallise. US arts institutions rely on corporate sponsorship, but corporates who want anything from the government are moving smartly in line with Trump. The administration has insisted that the stop on DEI initiatives must also be observed by government contractors. Among such firms is the consultant Booz Allen Hamilton, which had long boasted of its inclusive policies for LGBTQ+ employees. In the past few days it has withdrawn its sponsorship from this spring's WorldPride in Washington DC. Again, webpages have simply vanished, or, in the case of a PR agency connected to Booz Allen Hamilton, remain ghostlike in the form of 404 error messages.
The speed and extremity of these measures is sending Washington reeling. There is the bizarre prospect of Trump exerting his personal programming ideas on the national performing arts institution (will it be the Village People, Kid Rock and Carrie Underwood from now on?) Nothing is too minor for his scattergun attention, after all: an idea for a 'national garden of American heroes' was instigated in an executive order of 29 January. I will leave to your imagination the full horror of the kitsch bronzes that might spring up as a result of that initiative.
The great bulwark against all of this, though, is the US tradition of philanthropists and trusts as the primary funders of the biggest arts organisations. Few receive federal funds. Powerful foundations such as Getty are – at least at present – sailing smoothly on despite Trump's agitations: see also powerful grant-giving bodies such as the Mellon Foundation and the Ford Foundation (the latter's website still states that 'diversity, equity and inclusion are core to our mission and to who we are'). Some of Trump's measures will be legally challenged. Resistance will be mounted at the level of the state and the city. Los Angeles and Chicago are a long way, physically and spiritually, from DC.
From the perspective of the UK, Trump's coup at the Kennedy Center may look clumsy, outlandish and an impossibility here. A month ago, though, his actions might have looked impossible in the US. A brief glance at Britain's recent history should act as a warning. The Tories made a concerted attempt to pervert independent appointment processes in order to insert ideologically aligned people into positions of cultural power. Their success at so doing, however limited, illuminated the fact that the guardrails of liberal institutions are a tradition of shared values, rather than enforceable rules. The former culture secretary Nadine Dorries blatantly broke the British principle that government should be at arm's length from the arts when she intervened in a funding process to insist on her own policy priorities. This looks subtle when compared with Trump's brash interventions – but it's a sign of the fragility of the arm's-length principle and of how fiercely it should be protected.
John Maynard Keynes set up what was then called the Arts Council of Great Britain after the second world war for two reasons: to ensure the provision of culture across the country and to protect artists from direct political influence. You needed only look to Germany or Italy, or the Soviet Union, to understand how important that was. EM Forster, in a series of wartime broadcasts, laid out how political and artistic liberty were inextricably connected, and that there would need to be a fresh, postwar struggle 'for the restoration and extension of cultural freedom'. As the memory of the war receded, the threat to the arts from fascism looked fanciful and distant. Now, maybe not so much.
Where to find hope in all this? I find plenty. Artists – history tells us – will turn out to be the most creative and subversive documenters of the historical moment, and among the most nimble resisters of society's corruption. Trump will not win this fight.
Charlotte Higgins is the Guardian's chief culture writer
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
The Documentary Podcast No, there isn't a ‘white genocide' in South Africa
On 12 May, 59 Afrikaners arrived in Washington to receive 'refugee' status. At a press conference, President Trump said he had acted because Afrikaners - the white minority community that ruled South Africa during apartheid - face an existential threat. His words echoed the views of his South African born former adviser, Elon Musk, who has repeatedly used his X platform to amplify false claims of a 'white genocide'. Many South Africans, including several Afrikaners that we have spoken to, dismiss the idea that they are under attack as wild misinformation. So where does the idea that white South Africans are being uniquely targeted come from? And what impact is it having on the diplomatic relationship between the White House and Pretoria? This episode of The Documentary, comes to you from BBC Trending in-depth reporting on the world of social media.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Hillary Clinton turns comments off after posting her take on LA riots
Hillary Clinton turned off comments after she fired a post to X condemning Donald Trump for deploying the National Guard to what she called 'peaceful demonstrations' in Los Angeles. The former Secretary of State and First Lady slammed Trump in the Tuesday afternoon post. ' California Governor Newsom didn't request the National Guard be deployed to his state following peaceful demonstrations. Trump sent them anyway. It's the first time in 60 years a president has made that choice,' she wrote. 'Trump's goal isn't to keep Californians safe. His goal is to cause chaos, because chaos is good for Trump,' she added. Many noted that Clinton turned off the comments on her post, not allowing anyone to reply to her opinion. However, they could still quote tweet and expressed their displeasure with the one-time Democrat nominee for president. 'A public figure and a fraud like herself shouldn't be able to lock her replies,' wrote one, tagging X CEO Elon Musk at the end. 'Turn on your replies. Let the world really see what we think about what you've got to say,' wrote another. Another asked: 'Ever notice that only leftists disable comments?' 'Nothing shouts accountability like limiting comments,' added another conservative. One more questioner asked what was on everyone's mind: 'Why are you hiding from comments?' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth revealed the military will stay in Los Angeles for 60 days to combat violent 'rioters, looters and thugs'' during the immigration riots. The chaos began on Friday when anti-ICE protesters seized on a handful of police raids across the city, taking to the streets to burn cars and march against what they say are unfair deportations. Local business owners are outraged as destructive looters continue to target downtown stores as the protests rage on. President Donald Trump is deploying another 2,000 National Guard troops, along with 700 Marines, to LA today after Monday marked a fourth day of destructive protests. California has filed a lawsuit over the use of National Guard troops following the first deployment, telling reporters that Trump had 'trampled' the state's sovereignty. Trump claims the city would have been 'completely obliterated' if he had not deployed the Guard. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass appeared to threaten the looming World Cup as she begged Trump not to deport more migrants on Tuesday. Bass, speaking at a press conference, said the city's economy will 'collapse' if Trump deports more illegal migrants, and taunted him: 'Don't you want the World Cup to be a success for you?' She insisted the city is not 'in flames' but slammed vandals spraying graffiti and destroying businesses.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
California's First Lady shrugs off riots crisis to shop in Beverly Hills
Her husband is fighting for his life politically for the second time this year while another crisis grips their state. But California's First Lady Jennifer Siebel Newsom shrugged off the chaos on Monday as she stepped out in under-siege Los Angeles. Jennifer, 50, was spotted at One Beverly Hills - a luxurious complex of wellness centers and spas in the city's most exclusive zip code. She was dressed the part in a pair of $500 Common Project sneakers and a $2,500 Goyard tote bag, her bodyguard trailing behind her as she offered a coy smile. Siebel Newsom, a documentary filmmaker, seemed upbeat and calm. At the same time, Marines were marching towards Los Angeles under orders from President Trump while businesses recovered from looters. The unrest took a dark turn on Tuesday morning with the discovery of a body outside one of the trashed stores. Newsom's representatives angrily denied any suggestion that she was luxuriating amid the chaos, telling Daily Mail: 'The First Partner didn't have a spa treatment yesterday, but she does have a prior skin cancer diagnosis and was picking up skin care products on her personal time.' Jennifer previously shared her battle with skin cancer in 2023. Her husband, meanwhile, continues to do battle with the president and his supporters, insisting he has the situation under control. Both he and LA Mayor Karen Bass have demanded that Trump withdraw military troops from the streets. The protests erupted on Friday when anti-ICE demonstrators seized on a number of police investigations unfolding around the city. California First Lady Jennifer Newsom was spotted leaving the One Beverly Hills complex in LA on Monday President Donald Trump has activated 4,000 National Guard troops and deployed hundreds of US Marines to the city to quell protests despite objections from Newsom and other local leaders. Newsom said that Trump's deployment of National Guard troops has only inflamed the situation and made it more difficult for local law enforcement to respond to the demonstrations. Trump claims the city would have been 'completely obliterated' if he had not deployed the Guard. The chaos began on Friday when anti-ICE protesters seized on a handful of police raids across the city, taking to the streets to burn cars and march against what they say are unfair deportations. Trump claims the city would have been 'completely obliterated' if he had not deployed the Guard. Jennifer Newsom, carrying a $2,650 Goyard Saint Louis bag and wearing $485 sneakers, sported a soft smile at the One Beverly Hills plaza Governor Gavin Newsom taunted Trump and his border czar, daring them to 'arrest him' and insisting he has the riots 'under control' Protesters threw rocks and other objects at officers and vehicles, blocked a major freeway and looted downtown businesses. Police responded by firing projectiles like pepper balls, as well as flash bang grenades and tear gas. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered again on Monday outside a federal detention center in downtown LA where immigrants have been held. They chanted 'free them all' as they waved Mexican and Central American flags. National Guard forces formed a human barricade to keep people out of the building, and police dispersed the crowd using gas canisters and arrested some protesters. At dusk, officers had running confrontations with protesters who had scattered into the Little Tokyo section of the city. As people watched from apartment patios above street level and as tourists huddled inside hotels, a large contingent of LAPD and officers and sheriff's deputies fired several flash bangs that boomed through side streets along with tear gas. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told KABC that more than 100 people had been arrested on Monday but that the majority of protesters were nonviolent. Newsom with wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom. Her office insisted she was picking up skincare on her 'personal time' Anti-ICE demonstrators clash with police near the federal building and detention center in LA on Monday as protests over immigration raids continue for a fourth day US Customs and Border Patrol agents and the California National Guard protect the federal building in Los Angeles as protesters rally Monday for the fourth day in a row Fireworks explode around police officers in riot gear during a protest in response to federal immigration operations in the Little Tokyo neighborhood of downtown LA on Monday Trump's decision to mobilize 700 Marines based in Southern California escalated his confrontation with Newsom, who filed a lawsuit on Monday asserting that Trump's deployment of Guard troops without the governor's consent was illegal. The Guard deployment was the first time in decades that a president activated the Guard absent a request from a sitting governor. While the Marines are only tasked with guarding federal property temporarily until the full contingent of 4,000 Guard troops arrives, the use of active military to respond to civil disturbances is extremely rare. 'This isn't about public safety,' Newsom wrote on X on Monday. 'It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego.' The top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Jack Reed, said he was 'gravely troubled' by Trump's deployment of active-duty Marines. 'Since our nation's founding, the American people have been perfectly clear: we do not want the military conducting law enforcement on US soil,' he said. Trump has justified his decision to deploy active military troops to LA by describing the protests as a violent occupation of the city, a characterization that Newsom and Bass have said is grossly exaggerated. The president, in a Tuesday morning post on his Truth Social platform, claimed LA would be 'burning to the ground right now' if he had not deployed troops to the city. Protests spread to neighboring Orange County on Monday night after immigration raids there, with demonstrators gathering at the Santa Ana Federal building, according to local officials and news reports. Protests also sprang up in at least nine other US cities on Monday, including New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco, according to local news reports. In Austin, Texas, police fired non-lethal munitions and detained several people as they clashed with a crowd of several hundred protesters. Trump officials have branded the protests as lawless and blamed state and local Democrats for protecting undocumented immigrants with sanctuary cities. Meanwhile. US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged on Monday to carry out more operations to round up suspected immigration violators.