
Chinese beauty brands explore foreign M&A to spur growth
Some of China's top beauty brands such as Proya and
S'Young
are exploring acquisitions of smaller foreign rivals to expand their portfolios and replicate the success of global leaders like L'Oreal or Estee Lauder amid slowing growth at home.
While still relatively unknown internationally, these Chinese brands have found significant domestic success, even capturing market share from global players. But a prolonged property crisis and concerns about wage growth and employment security have dampened consumer spending in China - posing new challenges to their continued growth.
Proya Cosmetics
' founder, Hou Juncheng, said last month that the company's 10-year plan aims to position the firm among the top ten globally, a goal that would require an annual revenue of at least 50 billion yuan ($7 billion).
To do so, the Hangzhou-based Proya plans "to acquire some European brands with history and technology", local media reports cited Hou as telling shareholders at a meeting.
Proya, which specialises in science-backed skincare at mass market price points, became the first Chinese beauty player to surpass 10 billion yuan in annual revenue in 2024.
In comparison, Japan's Shiseido, currently ranked tenth globally, raked in $6.9 billion and market leader L'Oreal generated over $45 billion in revenue last year.
S'Young and
Ushopal
, two prominent Chinese beauty groups, have already made strides in international acquisitions.
S'Young owns French skincare brand Evidens de Beaute and U.S.-brand ReVive, while Ushopal added French brand Payot to a portfolio that includes British skincare label ARgENTUM and French fragrance Juliette has a gun.
William Lau, a partner at Ushopal, said the company plans to acquire one to two new brands annually.
Analysts say buying foreign brands can help Chinese beauty firms diversify revenue streams and reduce reliance on the domestic market, but they also note that some similar efforts by Chinese fashion groups had missed expectations in the past.
The beauty and personal care market is projected to generate a revenue of $677.19 billion globally in 2025, versus $41.78 billion in China, German data provider Statista estimates.
Chinese brands are likely to target premium-positioned European skincare, fragrance or haircare brands with valuations under $500 million, said Gregoire Grandchamp, co-founder of Next Beauty China, who has advised Chinese groups on global deals.
"In coming years, there will be a big Chinese company that will be the Chinese L'Oreal, Estee Lauder, Shiseido, or Amorepacific," Grandchamp predicted.
Global M&A 'Very Difficult'
Acquisitions have long been a growth strategy for beauty giants. L'Oreal's $2.5 billion purchase of Australian brand Aesop in 2023 added a premium, natural cosmetics brand to its portfolio, while Estee Lauder's $2.8 billion acquisition of Tom Ford in 2022 helped boost its array of high-end perfumes.
Chinese beauty brands
aim to borrow from this M&A playbook, but there are concerns about their ability to operate brands outside their home turf.
In the fashion space, state-owned textile giant Ruyi once made headlines for snapping up foreign brands and touting its ambition to become "China's LVMH" only to see those international deals unwound by creditors in a few short years.
But Ushopal's Lau says these challenges are not unique to Chinese groups, citing examples like Shiseido's buyout of Drunk Elephant to L'Oreal's purchase of some Chinese brands that struggled to meet expectations.
"Global acquisitions are very difficult" in general and part of the problem is that companies often try to localise brands too quickly after a deal, he said.
"One of the reasons you buy a brand is because it's an amazing brand, so if you then redo the entire DNA of the brand, what's the point of buying it?" he added.
Mark Tanner, founder and managing director of Shanghai-based marketing and research agency China Skinny, said: "Opening doors to the Chinese market and capital injections, rather than a wholesale management takeover" are more likely to succeed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
28 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Aditya Birla Capital shares up 3%; Advent International likely offloads stake in block deal
Aditya Birla Capital shares went up 3% amid reports that Advent International has offloaded a stake in a block deal. The PE firm, which invested Rs 1,000 crore in 2020 in the stock, stands to earn a 138% return. A 30-day lock-in applies to the offloaded shares. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Aditya Birla Capital Q4 earnings Aditya Birla Capital share price target and performance Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Shares of Aditya Birla Capital jumped up to 3% to Rs 249.80 on the BSE on Wednesday, as US-based private equity firm Advent International is said to have pared its stake in the company through a block deal According to media reports, Advent affiliate Jomei Investments had planned to sell 3.6 crore shares — representing a 1.4% stake in Aditya Birla Capital — via open market transactions. The floor price for the deal was set at Rs 237.81 per share, nearly 2% below the previous NSE closing price. At this price, the deal size is estimated at around Rs 856 crore.A large block deal was observed in the counter this morning, though details of the buyers and sellers could not be independently originally invested Rs 1,000 crore in 2020 through a preferential allotment of 10 crore equity shares at Rs 100 apiece. Based on the current floor price, the firm stands to make a return of 138% on its the quarter ended 31 March 2025, Aditya Birla Capital reported a consolidated net profit of Rs 865 crore, marking a 6% year-on-year increase when adjusted for one-time gains. In Q4 FY24, the company had posted a net profit of Rs 1,245 crore, which included exceptional gains from a stake sale in its asset management business via an OFS. Excluding that, profit stood at Rs 812 income rose to Rs 12,239 crore in Q4 FY25, up from Rs 10,803 crore in the year-ago a separate statement, the company said its overall lending portfolio—including NBFC and HFC segments—grew 27% YoY to Rs 1,57,404 crore as of 31 March 2025. Total AUM across the AMC, life, and health insurance businesses rose 17% YoY to Rs 5,11,260 crore. Total premium collected from life and health insurance climbed 22% to Rs 25,579 crore in a standalone basis, profit after tax stood at Rs 654 crore in Q4 FY25, compared to Rs 616 crore a year earlier. Total income grew to Rs 3,879 crore from Rs 3,527 crore during the same to Trendlyne, the average target price for Aditya Birla Capital is Rs 254, implying an upside of around 5% from current levels. Of the 10 analysts tracking the stock, most have a 'Strong Buy' stock's Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 77.8, indicating overbought conditions and the potential for a pullback. The MACD is at 7.8, remaining above both its centerline and signal line—typically a bullish Birla Capital shares closed 1.04% higher at Rs 242.7 on the BSE in the previous session. The stock has gained 36% year-to-date and 54% over the past three months.


Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Eagle and Dragon find common ground? Tariff war with China under Donald Trump 2.0
Senior negotiators from the United States and China have reached a framework agreement to advance trade discussions, following a series of disputes that had put the negotiations at risk, according to Chinese state media on Wednesday. The tensions had disrupted a fragile truce brokered in Geneva last month, prompting a phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping last week to ease the escalating friction. Trump signed an executive order imposing a 10% tariff increase on imported goods from China, effective February 4, as part of efforts to combat the flow of fentanyl into the United States. The move specifically targeted Chinese imports believed to be tied to the trafficking of fentanyl and its precursors. In a broader crackdown, 25% tariffs were also imposed on Canada and Mexico, citing similar concerns over the role of cross-border shipments in the drug crisis. Moreover, Trump also eliminated the de minimis exemption, introducing stricter rules for packages handled by both postal services and commercial delivery companies. He argued that the exemption had allowed a surge of shipments from Chinese e-commerce platforms and was being exploited by traffickers of fentanyl and other illicit substances. The de minimis rule, in place since 1938, allowed low-value imports (under $800) to enter the U.S. without tariffs or rigorous screening. However, both Democratic and Republican lawmakers have increasingly criticized it, calling it a loophole that enables Chinese goods to evade tariffs and lets illicit drugs and fentanyl precursors slip into the country unchecked, according to Reuters. On February 4, China's Ministry of Commerce announced the introduction of counter-tariffs on a range of U.S. goods. The move was a direct response to the United States' recent tariff hikes, and marked a significant escalation in the ongoing trade tensions between the two countries. 'The purpose of the Chinese government's implementation of export controls on relevant items in accordance with the law is to better safeguard national security and interests, and to fulfill international obligations such as non-proliferation,' said the Commerce Ministry of China, reported the news agency Reuters. In a revision to his earlier executive order, Trump announced that eligible packages will continue to receive de minimis exemptions temporarily. The amendment stated that these exemptions will remain in effect until adequate systems are established to efficiently process incoming shipments and ensure full collection of tariff revenue. 'Exports of steel from the People's Republic of China (China) have recently surged, exceeding 114 million metric tons through November 2024 while displacing production in other countries and forcing them to export greater volumes of steel articles and derivative steel articles to the United States,' according to the official statement by the White House. Trump on February 10 said that he would impose 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium imports into America, reported the news agency AFP. The newly imposed 25 per cent tariffs will be applicable to 'everybody' which includes countries such as Canada, Mexico, allied nations, and other large trading partners, as per the report. Donald Trump signed a memorandum directing the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to impose new restrictions on Chinese investments in strategic sectors. According to a report by Reuters citing a White House official, the memorandum states that China is leveraging American capital and innovation to modernise its military, intelligence, and security apparatus, which the administration views as a direct threat to U.S. national security. The Commerce Ministry announced that U.S.-grown chicken, wheat, corn, and cotton would be subject to an additional 15% tariff. It also stated that tariffs on sorghum, soybeans, pork, beef, seafood, fruits, vegetables, and dairy products would be raised by 10%. Speaking on the same lines, the ministry said in a statement, 'The US's unilateral tariff increase damages the multilateral trading system, increases the burden on US companies and consumers, and undermines the foundation of economic and trade cooperation between China and the US.' On April 2, Trump imposed a 34% reciprocal tariff on Chinese imports, declaring the date 'Liberation Day' to mark what he framed as a turning point in US economic independence from China. This was in addition to an earlier 20% tariff introduced as punishment for China's alleged role in supplying fentanyl, a synthetic opioid that has contributed to the US drug crisis. The move marks one of the most aggressive steps in Trump's trade agenda, aimed at what he described as the 'economic liberation' of the United States from foreign dependence—particularly on China's manufacturing and supply chains. China announced on April 4, that it is set to impose an additional 34 per cent tariff on all goods imported from the United States as a counter-move after US President Donald Trump announced his reciprocal tariff move on Liberation Day, April 2. 'The purpose of the Chinese government's implementation of export controls on relevant items in accordance with the law is to better safeguard national security and interests, and to fulfill international obligations such as non-proliferation,' said the Commerce Ministry of China, reported the news agency Reuters. The White House on April 8 confirmed that steep 104% tariffs on Chinese goods will officially gone into effect, marking a dramatic escalation in trade tensions between the world's two largest economies. The additional duties will be collected starting April 9, as announced by Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre. China on April 9, responded to US President Donald Trump's tariffs on Chinese exports by levying 84 per cent on its imports from America, intensifying the trade war between the world's top two economies. China also added six US firms to its unreliable entity list, the Commerce Ministry announced. Disregarding strong opposition from China, these companies have participated in arms sales to Taiwan or engaged in military technology cooperation with Taiwan, undermining China's sovereignty, security, and development interests, news agency Xinhua reported. China's Ministry of Finance raised tariffs on US exports to 125%, intensifying the trade conflict. Despite the sharp hike, the ministry signalled it would no longer engage in tit-for-tat responses, stating, 'China does not want to fight these wars but is not afraid of them. If the US continues its tariff 'numbers game', China will ignore it.' "If the US insists on continuing to substantively infringe upon China's rights and interests, China's response will continue to the end," the ministry said. Donald Trump said that he had struck a "fast deal" with China and accused China of "totally violating" the agreement, suggesting a breakdown in compliance shortly after the deal was made. On Truth Social, Trump wrote, "Two weeks ago China was in grave economic danger! The very high Tariffs I set made it virtually impossible for China to TRADE into the United States marketplace which is, by far, number one in the World. We went, in effect, COLD TURKEY with China, and it was devastating for them. Many factories closed and there was, to put it mildly, 'civil unrest.' I saw what was happening and didn't like it, for them, not for us. I made a FAST DEAL with China in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation, and I didn't want to see that happen." 'Because of this deal, everything quickly stabilized and China got back to business as usual. Everybody was happy! That is the good news!!! The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!,' he added. In a key breakthrough during trade talks held in Geneva, Chinese and US officials reached a temporary agreement to de-escalate tariff tensions, with both sides agreeing to reciprocal tariff reductions totaling 115%. 1. The US tariff rate on Chinese imports will be brought down to 30%. 2. China's tariff rate on U.S. goods will be reduced to 10%. 3. A 90-day freeze will be placed on introducing any new trade barriers. 4. The two countries also agreed to further amend the de minimis rules, specifically targeting low-value shipments from China, to improve oversight and enforcement. The US Court of International Trade in New York issued a major ruling, declaring that Trump lacked the legal authority to impose certain broad tariffs, including several targeting Chinese imports. The court said, 'The question in the two cases before the court is whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 ('IEEPA') delegates these powers to the President in the form of authority to impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world.' In response to US President Donald Trump's accusation that China had violated the recent trade agreement reached in Geneva, China's Ministry of Commerce issued a sharp rebuttal on June 2. According to an official translation, a spokesperson for the ministry said the U.S. actions had 'seriously undermined' the trade truce, citing several recent U.S. measures. 'The spokesperson said that following last month's Geneva talks, the US had successively introduced a number of discriminatory restrictive measures against China, including issuing export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software (EDA) to China, and announcing the revocation of Chinese student visas.' Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump held a lengthy phone conversation on Thursday to address escalating tensions stemming from their tit-for-tat tariff war, according to China's state-run Xinhua News Agency. During the call — which Xinhua noted was held 'at the latter's (Trump's) request' — both leaders agreed to continue trade negotiations through their respective representatives in an effort to resolve the ongoing standoff. After the phone calls, Trump in a post on Truth Social said 'I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi, of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal'. 'The call lasted approximately one and a half hours, and resulted in a very positive conclusion for both countries. There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products', he said, referring to Beijing blocking rare earth metals exports crucial to manufacturing automobiles, phones and missiles. Donald Trump announced that the United States will send a high-level delegation to London for the next round of trade negotiations with China, set to begin on June 9. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Senior US and Chinese negotiators have agreed on a framework to resume and advance trade negotiations, according to Chinese state media reports on Wednesday. 'Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters in London, as reported by Bloomberg. The breakthrough came after two days of high-stakes talks in London, which concluded late Tuesday. Li Chenggang, a vice minister of commerce and China's international trade representative, said the two sides had agreed in principle on a framework for implementing the consensus reached between the two leaders and at the talks on Geneva, the official Xinhua News Agency said. (With inputs from agencies)


News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Maruti Suzuki Shares Falls On e-Vitara Delay, Cuts Production Target; Key Points
Last Updated: Shares of Maruti Suzuki fell following reports that the launch of its much-anticipated e-Vitara electric SUV is likely to be delayed Shares of Maruti Suzuki fell 1% to Rs 12,427 on June 11, following reports that the launch of its much-anticipated e-Vitara electric SUV is likely to be delayed. According to sources cited by CNBC-TV18, the setback comes amid China's tightening of export controls on rare earth magnets—a move viewed as a strategic response to US-led trade pressures under the Trump administration. As a result, India's largest carmaker has scaled back its electric vehicle (EV) production targets for FY26, reducing the goal from 88,000 units to 67,000 units. The initial plan to produce 26,500 EVs by September this year has also been cut to just 8,200 units, sources said. Despite the early hiccups, Maruti Suzuki expects production to ramp up from October onwards, aiming to meet the revised full-year target. While the e-Vitara is already under production, current volumes remain constrained. The e-Vitara, Maruti's first electric SUV, was initially set for launch in overseas markets like Japan and Europe before arriving in India. The delay could temporarily impact the company's domestic electrification strategy, although sources maintain that Maruti's long-term plans remain unchanged. Maruti is not alone in facing these challenges. Two-wheeler majors Bajaj Auto and TVS Motor Company have also expressed concerns, warning that production may stall as early as next month due to the magnet shortage. 'With China accounting for nearly 90% of global magnet output, finding substitutes is neither easy nor quick," said Shrirdhar Kallani of Axis Securities. 'Alternatives from Malaysia, Vietnam, or Australia lack scale and cost competitiveness, and testing and validating new sources could take years." Meanwhile, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal stated from Bern, Switzerland, that India is actively exploring alternatives through diplomatic efforts and supply chain development. The Indian embassy has initiated discussions with Chinese authorities, and the commerce ministry is engaged in resolving the issue. At around 9:45 am, Maruti Suzuki shares were trading at Rs 12,485, down 0.3% from the previous close. However, the stock remains up 11% so far in 2025. First Published: