Farms face being blocked from expansion by net-zero campaigners
Farms face being blocked from expansion by net-zero campaigners under possible action inspired by a legal challenge to oil and gas fields.
The same legal precedent that blocked production at Rosebank oil and Jackdaw gas fields could be used to mount a judicial review against new pig and poultry farms because of the implied emissions from their feedstocks.
Campaigners say the feed used for pigs and poultry contributes to deforestation in the Amazon rainforest and elsewhere, destroying the ability of the forest to suck up carbon.
Campaigners are now looking to a controversial proposed new mega-farm in Norfolk as a test case for their arguments.
The proposal to expand a facility to house up to 14,000 pigs and 714,000 hens near the villages of Methwold and Feltwell have already sparked significant opposition among residents regarding the impact it will have on the community.
According to Sustain, an NGO that campaigns for a healthy and sustainable food system, the facility would cause 120,000 tonnes of greenhouse gases to be released every year. That is the equivalent to 28,000 cars on the road, adding to the area's carbon footprint by up to 9 per cent.
The prospect of a new legal challenge could also spook future investors in large farms in the UK, as well as risk pushing production overseas, where standards are weaker and pollution is worse.
A Supreme Court ruling in June 2024 found that the greenhouse gas emissions of fossil fuel projects must be considered by relevant authorities within an environmental impact assessment.
The Finch ruling is named after Sarah Finch, an activist who led a lawsuit against a new oil well in the Weald area of Surrey.
The precedent was later applied by a Scottish court in ruling that the approval for the Rosebank oil and Jackdaw gas fields had been unlawful, because it did not consider the environment impact of using the oil and gas.
Ruth Westcott, a campaigner at Sustain said: 'The Finch ruling is a victory for communities. It's shocking that corporations have been able to hide the true environmental impact of developments like industrial livestock units.
'This ruling helps to empower communities and councils with knowledge of the harm these developments risk bringing to their doorstep, so they can stand up and protect their local environment.'
The number of intensive livestock farms, defined as those with more than 40,000 chickens or 2,000 pigs, grew 12 per cent between 2016 and 2023.
Beef, dairy and sheep farms are currently excluded from environmental impact assessments, meaning the Finch ruling could not be applied. But the Government plans to extend the environmental-permitting regime in England to dairy and intensive beef farms by 2025. New farms could then be subject to scrutiny over the methane produced by additional cow and sheep burps.
Cranswick, the company behind the plans for the facility in Norfolk, argues that the emissions from the facility are not significant 'in the wider context', according to reports.
Victoria Vyvyan, the president of the Country Land and Business Association said: 'Basing planning decisions on farm-emissions data means putting projects and livelihoods in the hands of unreliable numbers.
'Carbon calculators give substantially different answers depending on the model, making total emissions difficult to estimate with confidence.
'Poultry and pork have the lowest emissions of farmed meats and are important to provide protein for a growing population. CLA members reject policies likely to offshore production.'
Kings Lynn and West Norfolk county council is expected to make its final decision on the Methwold farm in coming weeks, but campaigners say they will launch a judicial review if planning permission is approved.
Jake White, the head of legal advocacy at the WWF, said the Finch ruling would likely already be making a difference to the way councils view new developments.
'It's pretty clear, now Finch has clarified the law. You do have to look much more widely across the supply chain, both the upstream impact, and the downstream impact,' he said.
It could also force new farms to make explicit how their feedstocks will be deforestation-free, which may add to costs of production.
A Cranswick spokesman said: 'Our plans involve modernising the site, ensuring high standards of animal welfare, including lower stocking density for chickens and more space to roam.
'Crucially, by redeveloping this farm, we will provide a strong supply of sustainable, affordable, high quality, British pork and chicken.
'This will reduce the need for more foreign food imports and reduce emissions from the production and transportation of foreign pork and chicken into the UK.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democratic governors confer as Trump looks to spread militarized deportation frenzy
Jen Psaki reports on the absurdity of Donald Trump's military deployment to Los Angeles, and the expectation that similarly militarized actions are expected in other major cities across the United States as Trump's deportation frenzy intensifies.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump 'gold card' website opens. Here's how to join the $5 million waitlist
President Donald Trump's long-touted "gold card," which offers foreigners a path to U.S. citizenship after paying $5 million to the government, is open for business. But even if you have the money, there's a waitlist at And read the fine print carefully: Your $5 million doesn't buy you immediate citizenship. Trump has said that he is not seeking approval from Congress as he is not providing gold card buyers with citizenship - only a path to citizenship. The path to citizenship requirements for card buyers are unclear and White House officials have said more details will be provided soon. The most common path to U.S. citizenship through naturalization is being a lawful permanent resident for at least five years. It requires the applicant to be least 18 years old when they apply, be able to read, write, and speak basic English (depending on age) and be of "good moral character." Trump has described the card, which he has also dubbed the Trump card, as 'somewhat like a green card, but at a higher level of sophistication.' 'FOR FIVE MILLION $DOLLARS, THE TRUMP CARD IS COMING!,' President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social on June 11. 'Thousands have been calling and asking how they can sign up to ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere in the World.' The website shows an image of the gold-colored card, emblazoned with a likeness of Trump's face, and asks a few questions including name, region, email address and if an applicant is applying for themselves or as a business. The new website asks interested people to fill out a form that specifies eight regions: Europe, Asia (including Middle East), North America, Oceania, Central America, South America, Caribbean and Africa. Other countries also offer immigration programs that offers permanent residency or citizenship to foreign investors in exchange for investment. Portugal, for example, offers residency and a path to EU citizenship after five years. When he first floated the idea in February, Trump said the card would replace the "EB-5" immigrant investor green card visa program, The EB-5 visa allows immigrant investors the option to invest between $800,000 and $1.05 million to obtain a green card. The investment money is used to help create or preserve U.S. jobs. 'Wealthy people will be coming into our country by buying this card,' Trump said in February. 'They'll be wealthy, and they'll be successful, and they'll be spending a lot of money, and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people.' 'It's a road to citizenship for people and essentially people of wealth or people of great talent where people of wealth pay for those people of talent to get in,' he said. Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump 'gold card' is open for business. Waitlist is open


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
With Trump as ally, El Salvador's President ramps up crackdown on dissent
SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador (AP) — Days before his arrest outside his daughter's house in the outskirts of San Salvador, constitutional lawyer Enrique Anaya called Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele a 'dictator' and a 'despot' on live TV. This week, lawyer Jaime Quintanilla stood outside a detention facility in El Salvador's capital with a box of food and clothes for his client, unsure if Anaya would ever be released. The Saturday arrest of Anaya, a fierce critic of Bukele, marks the latest move in what watchdogs describe as a wave of crackdown on dissent by the Central American leader. They say Bukele is emboldened by his alliance with U.S. President Donald Trump, who has not only praised him but avoided criticizing actions human rights defenders, international authorities and legal experts deem authoritarian. Authorities in El Salvador have targeted outspoken lawyers like Anaya, journalists investigating Bukele's alleged deals with gangs and human rights defenders calling for the end of a three-year state of emergency, which has suspended fundamental civil rights. Some say they have been forced to flee the country. 'They're trying to silence anyone who voices an opinion — professionals, ideologues, anyone who is critical — now they're jailed.' Quintanilla said. 'It's a vendetta.' 'I don't care if you call me a dictator' Observers see a worrisome escalation by the popular president, who enjoys extremely high approval ratings due to his crackdown on the country's gangs. By suspending fundamental rights, Bukele has severely weakened gangs but also locked up 87,000 people for alleged gang ties, often with little evidence or due process. A number of those detained were also critics. Bukele and his New Ideas party have taken control of all three branches of government, stacking the country's Supreme Court with loyalists. Last year, in a move considered unconstitutional, he ran for reelection, securing a resounding victory. 'I don't care if you call me a dictator," Bukele said earlier this month in a speech. "Better that than seeing Salvadorans killed on the streets.' In recent weeks, those who have long acted as a thorn in Bukele's side say looming threats have reached an inflection point. The crackdown comes as Bukele has garnered global attention for keeping some 200 Venezuelan deportees detained in a mega-prison built for gangs as part of an agreement with the Trump administration. 'Of course I'm scared' Anaya was detained by authorities on unproven accusations of money laundering. Prosecutors said he would be sent to 'relevant courts" in the coming days. Quintanilla, his lawyer, rejects the allegations, saying his arrest stems from years of vocally questioning Bukele. Quintanilla, a longtime colleague of Anaya, said he decided to represent his friend in part because many other lawyers in the country were now too afraid to show their faces. On Tuesday, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights expressed 'deep concern' over Anaya's arrest. Anaya, 61, is a respected lawyer and commentator in El Salvador with a doctorate in constitutional law. He has criticized Bukele's crackdown on the gangs and Bukele stacking of El Salvador's high court. Last year, he was among those who unsuccessfully petitioned the country's top electoral authority to reject Bukele's re-election bid, saying it violated the constitution. Days before his arrest, Anaya railed on television against the detention of human rights lawyer Ruth López, who last week shouted, 'They're not going to silence me, I want a public trial,' as police escorted her shackled to court. 'Of course I'm scared,' Anaya told the broadcast anchor. 'I think that anyone here who dares to speak out, speaks in fear.' While some of Bukele's most vocal critics, like Anaya and López, have been publicly detained, other human rights defenders have quietly slipped out of the country, hoping to seek asylum elsewhere in the region. They declined to comment or be identified out of fear that they would be targeted even outside El Salvador. Fear and an ally in Trump Last month, a protest outside of Bukele's house was violently quashed by police and some of the protesters arrested. He also ordered the arrest of the heads of local bus companies for defying his order to offer free transport while a major highway was blocked. In late May, El Salvador's Congress passed a 'foreign agents' law, championed by the populist president. It resembles legislation implemented by governments in Nicaragua, Venezuela, Russia, Belarus and China to silence and criminalize dissent by exerting pressure on organizations that rely on overseas funding. Verónica Reyna, a human rights coordinator for the Salvadoran nonprofit Servicio Social Pasionista, said police cars now regularly wait outside her group's offices as a lingering threat. 'It's been little-by-little,' Reyna said. 'Since Trump came to power, we've seen (Bukele) feel like there's no government that's going to strongly criticize him or try to stop him.' Trump's influence extends beyond his vocal backing of Bukele, with his administration pushing legal boundaries to push his agenda, Reyna, other human rights defenders and journalists said. The U.S. Embassy in El Salvador, which once regularly denounced the government's actions, has remained silent throughout the arrests and lingering threats. It did not respond to a request for comment. In its final year, the Biden administration, too, dialed back its criticism of the Bukele government as El Salvador's government helped slow migration north in the lead up to the 2024 election. On Tuesday, Quintanilla visited Anaya in detention for the first time since his arrest while being watched by police officers. Despite the detention, neither Anaya nor Quintanilla have been officially informed of the charges. Quintanilla worries that authorities will use wide ranging powers granted to Bukele by the 'state of emergency' to keep him imprisoned indefinitely. Journalists stranded Óscar Martínez, editor-in-chief of news site El Faro, and four other journalists have left the country and are unable to return safely, as they face the prospect of arrest stemming from their reporting. At a time when many other reporters have fallen silent out of fear, Martínez's news site has investigated Bukele more rigorously than perhaps any other, exposing hidden corruption and human rights abuses under his crackdown on gangs. In May, El Faro published a three-part interview with a former gang leader who claimed he negotiated with Bukele's administration. Soon after, Martínez said the organization received news that authorities were preparing an arrest order for a half-dozen of their journalists. This has kept at least five El Faro journalists, including Martínez, stranded outside their country for over a month. On Saturday, when the reporters tried to return home on a flight, a diplomatic source and a government official informed them that police had been sent to the airport to wait for them and likely arrest them. The journalists later discovered that their names, along with other civil society leaders, appeared on a list of 'priority objectives" held by airport authorities. Martínez said Anaya's name was also on the list. Now in a nearby Central American nation, Martínez said he doesn't know when he will be able to board another flight home. And if he does, he doesn't know what will happen when he steps off. 'We fear that, if we return — because some of us surely will try — we'll be imprisoned,' he said. 'I am positive that if El Faro journalists are thrown in prison, we'll be tortured and, possibly, even killed." Janetsky reported from Mexico City. ____