The Tension Between Trump, Israel and Iran — Last Week in Your Words
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
We're back with another look at the standout comments you shared over the past week. One story dominated the headlines: President Donald Trump and the conflict between Israel and Iran.
The topic sparked fierce debate and fueled a wide range of opinions and discussions. Once again, Newsweek is proud to highlight your voices. Your comments continue to add depth to the conversation—offering insight, challenge, and thoughtful reflection.
U.S. President Donald Trump stops and talks to the media before he boards Marine One on the South Lawn at the White House on June 15, 2025 in Washington, DC.
U.S. President Donald Trump stops and talks to the media before he boards Marine One on the South Lawn at the White House on June 15, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Tasos Katopodis/Getty
Here are some of your highlighted comments:
On Elon Musk's Controversial Comments About Manned Aircraft
Original Article: B-2 Strikes on Iran Expose Limits of Elon Musk's 'Drone Swarms'
Background: The strike, using B-2 Spirit bombers, reaffirmed the value of manned stealth aircraft at a time when some of the biggest Silicon Valley voices are calling them obsolete relics.
Original Comment: "Did anyone believe Musk when he said that manned military aircraft are obsolete? As successful as he's been, he doesn't seem to grasp that government isn't a business, and everything isn't about the bottom line." - Jeffjeffries43
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter taps into skepticism surrounding Elon Musk's views on military strategy and challenges his vision of an unmanned future. They cut to the core of the debate: are tech moguls overreaching into areas they don't fully understand?
On Iran and Their Response to Trump's Strikes on Nuclear Sites
Original Article: Iran Admits Heavy Nuclear Damage as Israel Backs Trump
Background: President Trump had said the strike resulted in "total obliteration" of the Fordow facility, which is deep underground inside a mountain.
Original Comment: "Would anyone expect Iran to say anything else- especially if they actually still have nuclear capability in the near future?" - jimmy_mcgill
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter raised questions about the credibility of Iran's official statements following the strike. They suggest that, especially if Iran still retains nuclear capabilities, it would be expected to downplay or deny the extent of damage.
Continuing the Discussion in the Same Article
Original Comment: "So basically Iran agrees with US/Israel claims, then proceeds to arrest hundreds of possible spies and goes quiet, no talks, no deal and just agrees...sure we've stopped them for say a year but...
Now we're back to where we started as diplomacy was the only way to get insight into their future plans. That's DOA at this point." - bigcheezer
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter highlighted the potential fallout from the strikes, particularly their impact on diplomatic efforts and intelligence gathering. Their perspective echoed a widespread concern shared by many readers.
Original Article: Trump Bombed Iranian Nuclear Sites—Was It a Good Idea? Newsweek Contributors Debate
Background: Newsweek contributors debate whether the strikes a good idea and whether the United States should seek regime change in Tehran.
Original Comment: "Donald Trump's Approval Rating Plunges in Multiple Polls. Apparently most Americans don't think it was a good idea." - Reality
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter connects public opinion data to the broader debate, implying that military action may be politically unpopular. It adds a real-world consequence to the theoretical discussion over the strikes.
On Pete Hegseth's Remarks and Questions of Leadership
Original Article: Pete Hegseth Trashing Former Fox News Colleague Sparks Fury from Critics
Background: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly criticized his former colleague Jennifer Griffin during a press briefing, taking issue with her reporting and line of questioning on the administration's recent strikes against Iran.
Original Comment: "Hegseth calling someone else "about the worst". Seriously? The US has never had a defense secretary with so little experience, either with the military or with a massive budget.
What does it take for someone like this to genuinely feel embarrassment?" - ninetynine
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter expresses sharp criticism of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's public remarks, highlighting widespread skepticism about his qualifications and experience. Their comment reflects broader concerns about leadership credibility during a tense geopolitical moment.
Thank you for continuing to engage in the discussions and debates that shape our world. Your voices are being heard—and they will continue to be shared. Stay tuned for more highlighted comments in the weeks to come.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
22 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
What to Know About Medicaid
Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income Americans that provides coverage for more than 70 million people, faces its biggest overhaul in decades under President Donald Trump's 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill,' a massive tax and spending package now being considered by the Senate that would slash its funding. Both the House and Senate versions of the bill, which is still undergoing changes as the upper chamber votes on amendments, would reduce funding for the program by hundreds of billions of dollars, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Nearly 12 million adults could lose health insurance because of the proposed cuts in the Senate's revised bill over the next decade, the CBO estimated in a Saturday report. Much of the cuts are expected to come through imposing new administrative requirements on enrollees, or risk losing their coverage. The White House has rejected the CBO's findings, insisting that the cuts to the program will only reduce fraud and waste. 'President Trump pledged to protect and preserve Medicaid, and that's exactly what The One, Big, Beautiful accomplishes by kicking illegal immigrants off the program, implementing commonsense work requirements, and enforcing basic eligibility verification to combat fraud,' White House spokesman Kush Desai wrote to TIME. The House narrowly passed the bill in May, and lawmakers are now working in an effort to pass the proposed legislation by a July 4 deadline imposed by Trump. The proposed Medicaid cuts have been contentious among Republicans, some of whom have been wary of their potential impact. Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican of North Carolina, has vowed to vote against the bill unless his concerns over the cuts are addressed. Here's what to know about Medicaid. What is Medicaid? Medicaid was created following the passage of the 1965 Social Security Amendments under President Lyndon B. Johnson, according to the National Archives. The law established both Medicare, which generally provides health insurance coverage for Americans aged 65 and older, and Medicaid, which serves low-income people. Medicaid is financed jointly by state and federal governments and accounts for about a sixth of health care spending in the U.S. It's a hugely popular program among Americans: More than 80% have a positive view of Medicaid, according to a survey conducted earlier this month by nonpartisan research organization KFF. The Affordable Care Act enabled states to expand Medicaid eligibility to include non-elderly adults whose income was up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level—a national median of $44,367 for a family of four this year. Forty states and Washington, D.C., have so far adopted the expansion, 90% of which is funded by the federal government. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress allocated additional Medicaid funds so recipients could maintain "continuous coverage,' requiring states to keep most people enrolled in the program regardless of income in exchange for the enhanced federal funding. Continuous enrollment concluded at the end of March 2023, and an 'unwinding' process began. Some states have alternative names for Medicaid, such as DenaliCare in Alaska, KanCare in Kansas, and SoonerCare in Oklahoma. How many people are enrolled in Medicaid? Medicaid enrollment has stood at around 20% of the total U.S. population for the last several years, the Pew Research Center reports. Some 71.3 million low-income people in the U.S. were enrolled in the program in March 2025, more than half of whom were adults, according to a report from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). The figure was notably higher in recent years: Roughly 100 million people were enrolled in Medicaid at some point in 2023, according to a December 2024 report by The Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission. The numbers have declined following the end of continuous enrollment, however, as states have resumed disenrolling people from the program. The proportion of people enrolled in the program varies significantly between states. More than 30% of residents in Louisiana and New Mexico are covered by Medicaid, according to KFF, compared to just 12% in Wyoming and North Dakota. Who is eligible for Medicaid? The federal government sets broad eligibility requirements for Medicaid. It requires states to cover some groups when they fall below certain income levels, including pregnant women, families with children, disabled people, and most children in foster care. But since the program is state-administered, Medicaid qualifications vary on a state-by-state basis. For instance, some immigrants may be eligible for coverage in states such as New Jersey or New York. One of the provisions in the Senate version of Trump's tax and spending bill was intended to cut federal funding to states that use Medicaid to provide health care to undocumented immigrants. However, that part of the bill is in limbo after the Senate parliamentarian found that the measure did not comply with Senate rules. Are Medicaid recipients required to work? Current regulations in most states do not require Medicaid recipients to work. In Georgia, however, applicants are required to prove that they completed at least 80 hours of work or volunteer services to receive coverage. Because of this verification system, a ProPublica report found that Georgia enrolled only a fraction of Medicaid-eligible people: some 7,500 of the estimated 250,000 eligible residents. Attempts to implement work requirements in Arkansas were struck down by a federal court in 2019. A federal judge blocked similar requirements in Kentucky from taking effect the previous year, and Governor Andy Beshear halted efforts to impose them in 2019 shortly after taking office. Idaho, Kentucky, and Indiana have adopted legislation to impose work requirements this year, according to KFF. Other states are weighing imposing similar measures. And potential work requirements are being considered on a federal level in Trump's 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill.' The package would require Medicaid recipients from ages 19 to 64 to verify that they work at least 80 hours a month, or are training for a new job, studying, or volunteering. People's work status would be checked twice a year. Most working-age adults on Medicaid are employed, or have a disability or caregiving responsibilities, according to KFF.
Associated Press
23 minutes ago
- Associated Press
What's in the latest version of Trump's big bill moving through the Senate
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans are inching closer to getting their tax and spending cut bill through Congress with a final Senate vote likely late Monday or early Tuesday. At some 940-pages, the legislation is a sprawling collection of tax breaks, spending cuts and other Republican priorities, including new money for national defense and deportations. President Donald Trump has admonished Republicans, who hold majority power in the House and Senate, to skip their holiday vacations and deliver the bill by the Fourth of July. Democrats are united against the legislation and were offering scores of amendments to alter it Monday as the Senate slogged through what is known as a vote-a-rama. Senators can offer an unlimited number of amendments, with each receiving a vote. Once the bill clears the Senate, it would have to pass the House before Trump can sign it into law. Here's the latest on what's in the bill. There could be changes as GOP lawmakers continue to negotiate. Tax cuts are the priority Republicans say the bill is crucial because there would be a massive tax increase after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. The legislation contains about $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. The existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. It temporarily would add new tax breaks that Trump campaigned on: no taxes on tips, overtime pay, the ability to deduct interest payments for some automotive loans, along with a $6,000 deduction for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year. It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200. Millions of families at lower income levels would not get the full credit. A cap on state and local deductions, called SALT, would quadruple to $40,000 for five years. It's a provision important to New York and other high tax states, though the House wanted it to last for 10 years. There are scores of business-related tax cuts, including allowing businesses to immediately write off 100% of the cost of equipment and research. The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, which would cost the poorest people $1,600 a year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House's version. Middle-income taxpayers would see a tax break of $500 to $1,500, the CBO said. Money for deportations, a border wall and the Golden Dome The bill would provide some $350 billion for Trump's border and national security agenda, including $46 billion for the U.S.-Mexico border wall and $45 billion for 100,000 migrant detention facility beds, as he aims to fulfill his promise of the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. Money would go for hiring 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, with $10,000 signing bonuses and a surge of Border Patrol officers, as well. The goal is to deport some 1 million people per year. The homeland security secretary would have a new $10 billion fund for grants for states that help with federal immigration enforcement and deportation actions. To help pay for it, immigrants would face various new fees, including when seeking asylum protections. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for ship building, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defense system. The Defense Department would have $1 billion for border security. How to pay for it? Cuts to Medicaid and other programs To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans aim to cut back on Medicaid and food assistance for the poor. Republicans argue they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and food stamps, including older people up to age 65. Parents of children 14 and older would have to meet the program's work requirements. There's also a proposed new $35 co-payment that can be charged to patients using Medicaid services. More than 71 million people rely on Medicaid, which expanded under Obama's Affordable Care Act, and 40 million use the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program. Most already work, according to analysts. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law and 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps. The Senate proposes a $25 billion Rural Hospital Transformation Program to help offset reduced Medicaid dollars. It's a new addition, intended to win over holdout GOP senators and a coalition of House Republicans warning that the proposed Medicaid provider tax cuts would hurt rural hospitals. A 'death sentence' for clean energy? Republicans are proposing to dramatically roll back tax breaks designed to boost clean energy projects fueled by renewable sources such as energy and wind. The tax breaks were a central component of President Joe Biden's 2022 landmark bill focused on addressing climate change and lowering healthcare costs. Democratic Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden went so far as to call the GOP provisions a 'death sentence for America's wind and solar industries and an inevitable hike in utility bills.' Under the bill, a tax credit that subsidizes the production of electricity would be eliminated for any wind and solar plant not plugged into the grid by the end of 2027. But Republicans aren't just looking to roll back the tax breaks Biden put into place: they're also looking to add a tax for new wind and solar projects that use a certain percentage of components from China. A tax break for people who buy new or used electric vehicles would expire on Sept. 30 of this year, instead of at the end of 2032 under current law. Meanwhile, a tax credit for the production of critical materials will be expanded to include metallurgical coal used in steelmaking. Trump savings accounts and so, so much more A number of extra provisions reflect other GOP priorities. The House and Senate both have a new children's savings program, called Trump Accounts, with a potential $1,000 deposit from the Treasury. The Senate provided $40 million to establish Trump's long-sought 'National Garden of American Heroes.' There's a new excise tax on university endowments. A $200 tax on gun silencers and short-barreled rifles and shotguns was eliminated. One provision bars money to family planning providers, namely Planned Parenthood, while $88 million is earmarked for a pandemic response accountability committee. Another section expands the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, a hard-fought provision from GOP Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, for those impacted by nuclear development and testing. Billions would go for the Artemis moon mission and for exploration to Mars. The bill would deter states from regulating artificial intelligence by linking certain federal AI infrastructure money to maintaining a freeze. Seventeen Republican governors have asked GOP leaders to drop the provision. Additionally, a provision would increase the nation's debt limit, by $5 trillion, to allow continued borrowing to pay already accrued bills. What's the final cost? Altogether, the Congressional Budget Office projects that the bill would increase federal deficits over the next 10 years by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034. Or not, depending on how one does the math. Senate Republicans are proposing a unique strategy of not counting the existing tax breaks as a new cost because those breaks are already 'current policy.' Republican senators say the Senate Budget Committee chairman has the authority to set the baseline for the preferred approach. Under the alternative Senate GOP view, the bill would reduce deficits by almost a half-trillion dollars over the coming decade, the CBO said. Democrats say this is 'magic math' that obscures the true costs of the tax breaks. Some nonpartisan groups worried about the country's fiscal trajectory are siding with Democrats in that take. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget says Senate Republicans are employing an 'accounting gimmick that would make Enron executives blush.'
CNBC
28 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump rips AT&T service weeks after Trump Mobile licensing deal announced
President Donald Trump criticized AT&T in consecutive Truth Social posts on Monday, writing that the country's third largest wireless carrier "ought to get its act together." The president said he was trying to hold a conference call with "faith leaders," but that "AT&T is totally unable to make their equipment work properly." "If the Boss of AT&T, whoever that may be, could get involved, it would be good," he wrote. The chairman and CEO of AT&T is John Stankey. "AT&T obviously doesn't know what they're doing!" Trump wrote in a second post minutes later. "We may have to reschedule the call, but we'll use another carrier the next time," said the president. The company responded to the White House via social media. The broadside sent AT&T shares down on high volume temporarily before they bounced back. Trump's back-to-back posts were just weeks after the Trump Organization announced it had licensed the Trump name to a new wireless phone service, Trump Mobile, that also sells a $499 smartphone. The "T1" mobile service will operate over all three major wireless carriers, according to the company's website. The terms of the financial arrangement between the president's family business and the wireless service that licensed his name have not been made public. The White House did not immediately reply to a request for comment from CNBC Monday on the launch of Trump Mobile and the timing of the AT&T posts. Trump Mobile is only the latest instance of the Trump Organization and the president's family using his political brand to promote new commercial ventures while he is in office.
