Dutch government collapses after far-right leader Wilders quits coalition
By Bart H. Meijer and Stephanie van den Berg
The Dutch government collapsed on Tuesday, most likely ushering in a snap election, after anti-Muslim politician Geert Wilders quit the right-wing coalition, accusing other parties of failing to back his tougher immigration policies.
But Prime Minister Dick Schoof, an independent, accused the political maverick of irresponsibility, and the other coalition parties denied failing to support Wilders, saying they had been awaiting proposals from his PVV party's own migration minister.
PVV ministers will quit the cabinet, leaving the others to continue as a caretaker administration until an election unlikely to be held before October.
Frustration with migration and the high cost of living is boosting the far right and widening divisions in Europe, just as it needs unity to deal effectively with a hostile Russia and an unpredictable and combative U.S. president in the form of Donald Trump.
"I have told party leaders repeatedly in recent days that the collapse of the cabinet would be unnecessary and irresponsible," Schoof said after an emergency cabinet meeting triggered by Wilders' decision.
"We are facing major challenges both nationally and internationally that require decisiveness from us," he added, before handing his resignation to King Willem-Alexander.
The prospect of a new election is likely to delay a decision on boosting defense spending and means the Netherlands will have only a caretaker government when it hosts a summit of the transatlantic NATO alliance this month.
ELECTION MAY BE MONTHS AWAY
Wilders said he had had no option but to quit the coalition.
"I proposed a plan to close the borders for asylum seekers, to send them away, to shut asylum shelters. I demanded coalition partners sign up to that, which they didn't. That left me no choice but to withdraw my support for this government," he told reporters. "I signed up for the strictest asylum policies, not for the demise of the Netherlands."
He said he would lead the PVV into a new election and hoped to be the next prime minister.
An election is now likely at the end of October or in November, said political scientist Joep van Lit at Radboud University in Nijmegen. Even then, the fractured political landscape means formation of a new government may take months.
It remains to be seen whether right-wing voters will see the turn of events as Wilders' failure to turn his proposals into reality, or rather decide that he needs a bigger mandate to get his way, van Lit said.
Simon Otjes, assistant professor in Dutch politics at Leiden University, said the PVV must have calculated that the next election would be seen as a referendum on immigration policy, "because they know they would win that".
Amsterdam resident Michelle ten Berge hoped that "with the new election we will choose ... a government that's more moderate".
But florist Ron van den Hoogenband, in The Hague, said he expected Wilders to emerge the winner and take control of parliament "so he can do like Trump is doing and other European countries where the extreme right is taking over".
IMMIGRATION A DIVISIVE ISSUE
Wilders won the last election in November 2023 with an unexpectedly high 23% of the vote.
Opinion polls put his party at around 20% now, roughly on a par with the Labour/Green combination that is currently the second-largest grouping in parliament.
Wilders had last week demanded immediate support for a 10-point plan that included closing the borders to asylum seekers, sending back refugees from Syria and shutting down asylum shelters.
He also proposed expelling migrants convicted of serious crimes and boosting border controls.
Migration has been a divisive issue in Dutch politics for years. The previous government, led by current NATO secretary general Mark Rutte, also collapsed after failing to reach a deal on restricting immigration.
Wilders, a provocative politician who was convicted of discrimination against Moroccans in 2016, was not part of the latest government himself.
He only managed to strike a coalition deal with three other conservative parties last year after agreeing not to become prime minister.
Instead, the cabinet was led by the unelected Schoof, a career civil servant.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
5 hours ago
- NHK
NATO defense ministers to hold final talks on defense spending increase
The defense chiefs of NATO member countries are set to hold final-stage talks on a timeline for increasing defense spending. A meeting of NATO defense ministers opened on Thursday in the Belgian capital of Brussels. US President Donald Trump is pushing alliance members to raise their defense spending to 5 percent of GDP. Ahead of the meeting, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said: "You can't freeload. You need to spend." He added that NATO "cannot and will not be reliance on America in a world of a lot of threats." NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said European and Canadian allies are expected to step up defense spending. He said, "I'm pretty confident we will get there as a result." To meet the 5 percent target, the NATO chief has proposed that member nations increase their defense spending to 3.5 percent of GDP, with an additional 1.5 percent allocated to security-related expenditures by 2032. Some NATO officials suggest that timeframe is unrealistic. NATO aims to reach an agreement at a summit meeting scheduled to take place in the Netherlands late this month.
The Mainichi
6 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Trump promised to welcome more foreign students. Now, they feel targeted on all fronts
(AP) -- To attract the brightest minds to America, President Donald Trump proposed a novel idea while campaigning: If elected, he would grant green cards to all foreign students who graduate from U.S. colleges. "It's so sad when we lose people from Harvard, MIT, from the greatest schools," Trump said during a podcast interview last June. "That is going to end on Day One." That promise never came to pass. Trump's stance on welcoming foreign students has shifted dramatically. International students have found themselves at the center of an escalating campaign to kick them out or keep them from coming as his administration merges a crackdown on immigration with an effort to reshape higher education. An avalanche of policies from the Trump administration -- such as terminating students' ability to study in the U.S., halting all new student visa interviews and moving to block foreign enrollment at Harvard -- have triggered lawsuits, countersuits and confusion. Foreign students say they feel targeted on multiple fronts. Late Wednesday, Trump himself took the latest action against international students, signing an executive order barring nearly all foreigners from entering the country to attend Harvard. In interviews, students from around the world described how it feels to be an international student today in America. Their accounts highlight pervasive feelings of fear, anxiety and insecurity that have made them more cautious in their daily lives, distracted them from schoolwork and prompted many to cancel trips home because they fear not being allowed to return. For many, the last few months have forced them to rethink their dreams of building a life in America. A standout student from Latvia feels 'expendable' Markuss Saule, a freshman at Brigham Young University-Idaho, took a recent trip home to Latvia and spent the entire flight back to the U.S. in a state of panic. For hours, he scrubbed his phone, uninstalling all social media, deleting anything that touched on politics or could be construed as anti-Trump. "That whole 10-hour flight, where I was debating, 'Will they let me in?' -- it definitely killed me a little bit," said Saule, a business analytics major. "It was terrifying." Saule is the type of international student the U.S. has coveted. As a high schooler in Latvia, he qualified for a competitive, merit-based exchange program funded by the U.S. State Department. He spent a year of high school in Minnesota, falling in love with America and a classmate who is now his fiancee. He just ended his freshman year in college with a 4.0 GPA. But the alarm he felt on that flight crushed what was left of his American dream. "If you had asked me at the end of 2024 what my plans were, it was to get married, find a great job here in the U.S. and start a family," said Saule, who hopes to work as a business data analyst. "Those plans are not applicable anymore. Ask me now, and the plan to leave this place as soon as possible." Saule and his fiancee plan to marry this summer, graduate a year early and move to Europe. This spring the Trump administration abruptly revoked permission to study in the U.S. for thousands of international students before reversing itself. A federal judge has blocked further status terminations, but for many, the damage is done. Saule has a constant fear he could be next. As a student in Minnesota just three years ago, he felt like a proud ambassador for his country. "Now I feel a sense of inferiority. I feel that I am expendable, that I am purely an appendage that is maybe getting cut off soon," he said. Trump's policies carry a clear subtext. "The policies, what they tell me is simple. It is one word: Leave." From dreaming of working at NASA to 'doomscrolling' job listings in India A concern for attracting the world's top students was raised in the interview Trump gave last June on the podcast "All-In." Can you promise, Trump was asked, to give companies more ability "to import the best and brightest" students? "I do promise," Trump answered. Green cards, he said, would be handed out with diplomas to any foreign student who gets a college or graduate degree. Trump said he knew stories of "brilliant" graduates who wanted to stay in the U.S. to work but couldn't. "They go back to India, they go back to China" and become multi-billionaires, employing thousands of people. "That is going to end on Day One." Had Trump followed through with that pledge, a 24-year-old Indian physics major named Avi would not be afraid of losing everything he has worked toward. After six years in Arizona, where Avi attended college and is now working as an engineer, the U.S. feels like a second home. He dreams of working at NASA or in a national lab and staying in America where he has several relatives. But now he is too afraid to fly to Chicago to see them, rattled by news of foreigners being harassed at immigration centers and airports. "Do I risk seeing my family or risk deportation?" said Avi, who asked to be identified by his first name, fearing retribution. Avi is one of about 240,000 people on student visas in the U.S. on Optional Practical Training -- a postgraduation period where students are authorized to work in fields related to their degrees for up to three years. A key Trump nominee has said he would like to see an end to postgraduate work authorization for international students. Avi's visa is valid until next year but he feels "a massive amount of uncertainty." He wonders if he can sign a lease on a new apartment. Even his daily commute feels different. "I drive to work every morning, 10 miles an hour under speed limit to avoid getting pulled over," said Avi, who hopes to stay in the U.S. but is casting a wider net. "I spend a lot of time doomscrolling job listings in India and other places." A Ukrainian chose college in America over joining the fight at home -- for now Vladyslav Plyaka came to the U.S. from Ukraine as an exchange student in high school. As war broke out at home, he stayed to attend the University of Wisconsin. He was planning to visit Poland to see his mother but if he leaves the U.S., he would need to reapply for a visa. He doesn't know when that will be possible now that visa appointments are suspended, and he doesn't feel safe leaving the country anyway. He feels grateful for the education, but without renewing his visa, he'll be stuck in the U.S. at least two more years while he finishes his degree. He sometimes wonders if he would be willing to risk leaving his education in the United States -- something he worked for years to achieve -- if something happened to his family. "It's hard because every day I have to think about my family, if everything is going to be all right," he said. It took him three tries to win a scholarship to study in the U.S. Having that cut short because of visa problems would undermine the sacrifice he made to be here. He sometimes feels guilty that he isn't at home fighting for his country, but he knows there's value in gaining an education in America. "I decided to stay here just because of how good the college education is," he said. "If it was not good, I probably would be on the front lines."
NHK
7 hours ago
- NHK
NATO chief shares insights in exclusive interview with NHK World
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte visited Japan in April ― six months after he took office ― seeking stronger ties with the country. NHK World's Sugita Sachiyo had an exclusive interview with the political heavyweight who shared his insights on issues ranging from Japan's technological prowess to concerns about China. Rutte also revealed his own personal connection with Japan. Sugita offers a firsthand account of the visit, followed by a transcript of the pair's interview which was originally broadcast on April 10. Rutte arrived at the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force base in Yokosuka, on a sunny spring day. Standing over 190 cm tall, he stood out among his Japanese hosts onboard a frigate. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte visited a Maritime Self-Defense Force base in Yokosuka on April 8. During the tour, he was briefed on the installed military equipment, including United States-made underwater drones and Canadian sonars. I had a chance to ask a question at a brief press conference on site, but the microphone handed to me would not work, even after several attempts. "Here, let's do this. You can use my mic," Rutte said with a laugh, and stepped down from the podium. He held his microphone towards me. "When it comes to maritime security, Japan faces difficulties with China destabilizing the region and ignoring the international laws. So is your presence here, your visit here at the Marine Self Defense Forces, kind of like a message towards China and your support towards Japan?," I asked. Rutte replied: "I would argue that we have this cooperation now with Japan, but also with Korea, with Australia, with New Zealand, for now, for many years now, So that is important, and of course, it also has to do with the role China is playing. Let's not be naive about it. China is supporting the Russian war effort. China is building up its armed forces, including its navy, at a rapid pace. So we cannot be naive, and we really have to work together to assess what is happening." Japan's tech capabilities The administration led by US President Donald Trump has been pushing Europe to bolster its defense capabilities. Rutte's trip included a visit to a facility operated by Mitsubishi Electric, which is involved in a project to create a next-generation fighter jet being co-developed by Japan, Britain and Italy. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte visited a Mitsubishi Electric facility in Kanagawa Prefecture on April 8. "We need this next-generation fighter jet to be available as soon as possible," said the NATO chief, noting Japan's high-tech capabilities. "Air defense systems, but also space, these are all areas where we really, as NATO, want to work more closely with Japan." Officials from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry arranged a meeting for Rutte with Japanese startups developing dual-use products that have civilian and military applications, including drones and quantum technologies. Rutte also met Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru during his visit, and the two leaders agreed to expand cooperation in the defense industry, as well as other fields. In June, the NATO Summit will be held in the Hague – Rutte's hometown – and Ishiba is expected to attend. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte met with Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru on April 9. NHK World spoke one-on-one with Rutte during his stay in Tokyo This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity. NHK World's Sugita Sachiyo: You have been stressing defense cooperation, but now many allies are wondering if they should continue to buy from, and rely on, the US. With this unpredictability, would cooperation with Japan's defense industry offer attractive alternatives? NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte: I would not say alternatives, because I think that allies will still work very much together within the alliance, including with the United States. But we also need – and this is not instead of, but 'and' – the Japanese industrial base, to become even more involved. And anything you guys here in Japan can do to make sure when it comes to the rules and the regulations, et cetera, to make it even easier to buy into the Japanese industrial base, will be highly appreciated, because we need this collective industrial base within the alliance, but also with our partners. One-on-one with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on April 9 Sugita: Japan has specific restrictions towards the export of weapons. So would you welcome it if the Japanese government lifted these kinds of regulations? Rutte: Of course, I have to be hesitant in advising, through the media, the Japanese government. But whatever we can do to expand that, of course we would love it, because you have a huge and successful defense industry. By the way, China is still suggesting that they are sort of neutral when it comes to Ukraine. They still try to project this position of neutrality when it comes to Ukraine and Russia. This is crazy, because they are not neutral. They are very much involved. They are one of the key enablers. So let's not be naive. They're delivering dual-use goods. They are helping with sanctions, circumstances, and in the meantime, they are building up the Chinese armed forces at a staggering rate. For example, when it comes to space, where Japan is really at the cutting edge, I think that will be helpful, particularly now with what is happening in China. Sugita: So you have mentioned China. The US has said that they want NATO to take seriously the threats emanating from China. How will NATO respond to this? Rutte: Let's not be naive about China. As I said, China is a key enabler of the Russian war effort in Ukraine. China is rapidly building up its own armed forces. I think Japan clearly has acknowledged this, and the US administration wants NATO, when it comes to the projection of the collective impact, to become more involved when it comes to our Indo Pacific partners – Japan, but also Korea and Australia and New Zealand. And we are doing that, and that is important. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte Sugita: And maybe this trip, you in Japan…will also be, in that context, a part of it? Rutte: Yes and that's why I wanted to be here early in my tenure as Secretary General of NATO. Of course, we also have strong partnerships with the other IP4 countries [Indo-Pacific Four – Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea]. But Japan is by far the biggest economy in the IP4. You are the only G7 economy not in NATO. So cooperation is important – and not to extend Article Five [of NATO's founding treaty] to a collective defense clause to the Indo Pacific. That will not happen, I believe. But to have this practical cooperation when it comes to defense, industrial production, innovation – for example, working on joint standards to make that all possible. Sugita: I have heard from many NATO diplomats commending you on your good relations with President Trump. Could you maybe share with us, what's the secret recipe to getting along with him? Rutte: I don't think there is a recipe. We just like each other. Yes, we just like to work together – take, for example, on Ukraine, the fact that he broke a deadlock and said, we cannot accept the killing to continue at this rate. We cannot accept the fact that so many cities and their infrastructure are being destroyed. We have got to stop this. I really commend him for that and I think the US – being the world's strongest economy, the most powerful ally in NATO – for him, as president of that country, to take that initiative was important, and he broke the deadlock. Let's hope that he can bring this, and we will all support him, to a durable and lasting peace. But personally, yes, I like to work with him, and I think that this goes both ways. Sugita: On the US again – currently, there are many concerns from allies about the tariffs it is imposing. I know you've been repeatedly saying that this isn't for NATO, but how will you strive to keep the alliance together, and strong, despite these situations? Rutte: The tariff fight will have an impact on individual allies. And of course we are worried about that, because that could also impact their power in terms of investing more in defense when it comes to the real money. So that could be an impact. But collectively, as an alliance, of course, we have nothing to do with these terms. Sugita: What is your ideal picture of how the war in Ukraine will end? Rutte: The end has to be that Ukraine is there as a sovereign nation – that when there is a peace deal, that Putin will never, ever, ever try to capture one square mile, slash one square kilometer of Ukraine in the future again. And it means that a ceasefire – slash, a peace deal – has to be, as I said, lasting. We should make sure of that, not like in 2014 when he [Russian President Vladimir Putin] captured Crimea, and we had these Minsk accords and then, basically, 12 to 18 months later, he started again. We cannot have that again. We have to be clear [to him], when there's a peace deal, it is there, and [he] can never do this again. Flags of NATO and its member countries Sugita: I've heard from NATO sources that you speak a little Japanese. Rutte: No, I just can count to 10. But let me not do it, because probably it is totally wrong. My parents lived between Osaka and Kobe in the 1950s. So at home, there were so many Japanese discussions, about Japan and their lovely living here. I was really raised with a lot of respect for Japan. Thank you for the leadership Japan is now taking. We really want even more of that, because we need you, Japan, with all its strength and its power and its economy and its defense industrial base now, when it comes to China. We cannot be naive about China, and we've seen what is happening there. We have to work together on this. So I really want to thank you [for] what you're doing, and whatever you can do more of. It's highly appreciated.
