Hegseth warns of ‘imminent' China threat, tells Asian allies: Spend more on defence
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has warned that China poses a real and possibly immediate threat, and urged countries in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defence spending.
Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Saturday, Hegseth said the Indo-Pacific remains a top priority for the Trump administration. It was his first appearance at the annual forum, which brings together defence leaders and diplomats from across Asia.
'There's no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,' Hegseth said, according to Reuters. He added that any Chinese attempt to take control of Taiwan 'would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world,' and repeated President Trump's position that China would not invade Taiwan while he is in office.
China sees Taiwan as part of its territory and has said it could use force if necessary to bring the island under its control. It has been holding more military drills near Taiwan in recent months. Taiwan's government says only its people can decide the island's future.
Hegseth said: 'It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific.'
China responded to the comments, calling them provocative. 'Mr. Hegseth repeatedly smeared and attacked China and relentlessly played up the so-called 'China threat',' the Chinese embassy in Singapore said in a statement posted on Facebook. 'As a matter of fact, the US itself is the biggest 'troublemaker' for regional peace and stability.'
Hegseth also pushed US allies in the region to spend more on their own security. His remarks may raise concerns among partners, although the audience in Singapore was described as relatively receptive. China sent only an academic delegation to the event, skipping high-level participation.
This is not the first time Hegseth has urged allies to increase defence budgets. In February, at a press conference in Brussels, he said Europe should not treat the US 'like a sucker.'
On Friday, French President Emmanuel Macron said during a keynote address that Hegseth was right to call for more European defence spending.
Hegseth said NATO members were now pledging to spend up to 5 per cent of GDP on defence. 'Even Germany,' he noted, adding, 'So it doesn't make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defence in the face of an even more formidable threat, not to mention North Korea.'
Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans welcomed Hegseth's recognition that European nations were increasing defence investment. 'It was for me maybe the first time or one of the first times I heard the US administration acknowledge this explicitly,' he told Reuters.
But some in the US delegation voiced concern about the tone of Hegseth's speech. Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth, who is co-leading a bipartisan delegation to the forum, said his message about regional commitment was clear, but the way he addressed allies was unhelpful. 'I thought it was patronising of our friends in the Indo-Pacific in particular,' she said.
According to a study by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, which runs the forum, several Asian countries are already increasing spending on weapons and defence technology. Still, defence spending in the region remained steady at around 1.5% of GDP in 2024.
Hegseth said Europe should focus its defence efforts on its own region, allowing the US to concentrate more on the Indo-Pacific. 'We would much prefer that the overwhelming balance of European investment be on that continent,' he said, 'so that… we're able to use our comparative advantage as an Indo-Pacific nation to support our partners here.'
Hegseth also said the US is not trying to impose its politics or culture on other countries. 'We are not here to pressure other countries to embrace or adopt our politics or ideology,' he said. 'We are not here to preach to you about climate change or cultural issues. We respect you, your traditions and your militaries. And we want to work with you where our shared interests align.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
War Clouds Over Europe as Ukraine Hits Russia
On the eve of peace talks, Ukraine and Russia sharply ramped up the war with one of the biggest drone battles of their conflict, a Russian highway bridge blown up over a passenger train and an ambitious attack on nuclear-capable bombers deep in Siberia. After days of uncertainty over whether or not Ukraine would even attend, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said Defence Minister Rustem Umerov would sit down with Russian officials at the second round of direct peace talks in Istanbul on Monday. The first round of the talks more than a week ago yielded the biggest prisoner exchange of the war - but no sense of any consensus on how to halt the fighting. Amid talk of peace, though, there was much war. At least seven people were killed and 69 injured when a highway bridge in Russia's Bryansk region, neighbouring Ukraine, was blown up over a passenger train heading to Moscow with 388 people on board. No one has yet claimed responsibility. Ukraine attacked Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers at a military base deep in Siberia on Sunday, a Ukrainian intelligence official said, the first such attack so far from the front lines more than 4,300 km (2,670 miles) away. The official said the operation involved hiding explosive-laden drones inside the roofs of wooden sheds and loading them onto trucks that were driven to the perimeter of the air bases. A total of 41 Russian warplanes were hit, the official said. RUSSIA ACKNOWLEDGES AIR BASE ATTACKS, SAYS FIRES PUT OUT Ukraine did not tell the Trump administration about the attack in advance, Axios reporter Barak Ravid said on X, citing an unnamed Ukrainian official. Russia's Defence Ministry acknowledged on the Telegram messaging app that Ukraine had launched drone strikes against Russian military airfields across five regions on Sunday. It said the attacks repelled the assaults in all but two regions — Murmansk in the far north and Irkutsk in Siberia - where "the launch of FPV drones from an area in close proximity to airfields resulted in several aircraft catching fire". The fires were extinguished without casualties. Some individuals involved in the attacks had been detained, the ministry said. Russia launched 472 drones at Ukraine overnight, Ukraine's air force said, the highest nightly total of the war so far. Russia had also launched seven missiles, the air force said. Russia said it had advanced deeper into the Sumy region of Ukraine, and open source pro-Ukrainian maps showed Russia took 450 square km of Ukrainian land in May, its fastest monthly advance in at least six months. U.S. President Donald Trump has demanded Russia and Ukraine make peace and he has threatened to walk away if they do not - potentially pushing responsibility for supporting Ukraine onto the shoulders of European powers - which have far less cash and much smaller stocks of weapons than the United States. According to Trump envoy Keith Kellogg, the two sides will in Turkey present their respective documents outlining their ideas for peace terms, though it is clear that after three years of intense war, Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart. Putin ordered tens of thousands of troops to invade Ukraine in February 2022 after eight years of fighting in eastern Ukraine between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian troops. The United States says over 1.2 million people have been killed and injured in the war since 2022. Trump has called Putin "crazy" and berated Zelenskiy in public in the Oval Office, but the U.S. president has also said that he thinks peace is achievable and that if Putin delays then he could impose tough sanctions on Russia. In June last year, Putin set out his opening terms for an immediate end to the war: Ukraine must drop its NATO ambitions and withdraw all of its troops from the entirety of the territory of four Ukrainian regions claimed and mostly controlled by Russia. Ukrainian negotiators in Istanbul will present to the Russian side a proposed roadmap for reaching a lasting peace settlement, according to a copy of the document seen by Reuters. According to the document, there will be no restrictions on Ukraine's military strength after a peace deal is struck, no international recognition of Russian sovereignty over parts of Ukraine taken by Moscow's forces, and reparations for Ukraine. The document also stated that the current location of the front line will be the starting point for negotiations about territory. Russia currently controls a little under one fifth of Ukraine, or about 113,100 square km, about the same size as the U.S. state of Ohio.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Rubio condoles deaths as Ukraine blows up Russian bridges, discuss forthcoming Istanbul talks with Sergei Lavrov
The US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Sunday discussed the prospects for ways to settle the Russia-Ukraine conflict ahead of second round of direct peace talks in Istanbul on Monday. This comes as Ukraine and Russia sharply ramped up the war with one of the biggest drone battles of their conflict. "The situation linked to the Ukraine crisis was discussed," the ministry said in a statement on its website. "S.V. Lavrov and M. Rubio also exchanged views on various initiatives concerning a settlement of the Ukraine crisis, including plans to resume direct Russian-Ukrainian talks in Istanbul on June 2." Meanwhile, the US State Department said Rubio reiterated President Donald Trump's call for continued direct talks between Russia and Ukraine to achieve "a lasting peace." It also said that during the conversation Rubio expressed condolences over deaths that occurred when two bridges were blown up in separate Russian regions bordering Ukraine. "It was stressed on the Russian side that competent bodies will proceed with a thorough investigation and the results will be published. The guilty parties will be identified and will without doubt be subject to a worthy punishment." At least seven people were killed and 69 injured when a highway bridge in Russia's Bryansk region, neighbouring Ukraine, was blown up over a passenger train heading to Moscow with 388 people on board. No one has claimed responsibility. Ukraine attacked Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers at a military base deep in Siberia on Sunday, a Ukrainian intelligence official said, the first such attack so far from the front lines more than 4,300 km (2,670 miles) away. Ukraine's domestic intelligence service, the SBU, acknowledged it carried out the attack, codenamed "Operation Spider's Web," planned for more than a year and a half. The intelligence official said the operation involved hiding explosive-laden drones inside the roofs of wooden sheds and loading them onto trucks that were driven to the perimeter of the air bases. A total of 41 Russian warplanes were hit, the official said. The SBU estimated the damage at $7 billion and said Russia had lost 34% of its strategic cruise missile carriers at its main airfields. Zelenskiy expressed delight at the "absolutely brilliant outcome," and noted 117 drones had been used in the attack. (With inputs from Reuters)
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
There is an 'imminent' threat to Taiwan, America warns
UNTIL RECENTLY America reassured nervous Asian friends that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan was 'neither imminent nor inevitable". But in a dramatic shift on May 31st Pete Hegseth, the defence secretary, said the Chinese threat 'could be imminent"; and he implied any assault would lead to war with America. China sought 'hegemonic power" in Asia but America 'will not be pushed out of this critical region, and we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated". Mr Hegseth's tough talk appears designed to deter China and reassure allies worried about President Donald Trump's 'America First" foreign policy. Yet it raises two questions. The first is whether his assessment of Chinese intentions is correct. The second is whether his tough talk and effort to rally America's friends in Asia is credible, given the Trump administration's record of erratic behaviour and contempt for its allies. The speech was the clearest declaration yet of the administration's stance on Asia. The defence secretary spoke during his first appearance at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a gathering of defence establishments in Singapore run by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a think-tank. He pointed to China's military build-up, threatening exercises around Taiwan and 'grey-zone" bullying of the Philippines. China, he said, was 'credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific". It wanted its forces to be capable of taking Taiwan by 2027, and was 'rehearsing for the real deal". Any attempt to use force or coercion to change the status quo in the 'first island chain" (which runs from Japan to Malaysia), was 'unacceptable". An invasion of Taiwan 'would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world". And in a phrase that made the audience sit-up, he added: 'The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent." Is Mr Hegseth's assessment correct? In fact a fog of uncertainty hangs over Taiwan. Last year American officials played down the importance of 2027 as a target date for the Chinese government, and suggested that the danger of invasion had receded. They cited China's shortage of amphibious landing craft and repeated anti-corruption purges in the top ranks of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) that suggest Xi Jinping, China's leader, lacks confidence in his commanders. Western defence officials say there is no intelligence indicating an imminent assault on Taiwan. They note, however, that Chinese war games have become so large and frequent that a limited attack—the takeover of outlying islands, say, or a blockade—could take place at any moment. China's defence minister, Dong Jun, stayed away from the conference. But Rear Admiral Hu Gangfeng, of the PLA's National Defence University, rejected Mr Hegseth's 'unfounded accusations" against China, suggesting they were designed to 'provoke, split and instigate confrontations" in the region. The second question is whether Mr Hegseth's warning of American intervention is credible. The urgent call to confront the threat from China is striking from an administration that says it seeks peace in a strife-torn world. Mr Trump has accused Taiwan of 'stealing" the chip industry. Even a stalwart defender of Taiwan, Elbridge Colby, the under-secretary of defence for policy, seems to have bent to isolationism, saying this year that an invasion of Taiwan would not be an 'existential" threat to America. After imposing 145% tariffs on China earlier this year Mr Trump backed down. That indicates that he would lack the stomach to impose a crippling economic embargo on China in response to any Taiwan coercion. Some Chinese delegates implied Mr Hegseth lacked authority to speak about China. A few non-Chinese delegates may have wondered about that, too. The defence secretary, a former major in the National Guard and Fox News talk-show host, has made headlines for his culture war to purge 'woke" ideology from military ranks and kindle the 'warrior ethos". Like many in the administration his attitude towards allies has been erratic. He shocked Europeans in February by dismissing much of the three-year Western effort to help Ukraine repel Russia's invasion. He said Ukraine could not regain territories it had lost to Russia, and could not join NATO. He admonished allies about low defence spending: 'President Trump will not allow anyone to turn Uncle Sam into Uncle Sucker." In Singapore he re-embraced Western and Asian allies alike, and several officials were pleasantly surprised by his willingness to listen. He adopted something akin to Mr Colby's earlier view that Taiwan must be defended through 'deterrence by denial", ie, by deploying sufficient mobile defensive weapons to make a Chinese invasion too costly. He hailed America's network of allies as an advantage that China 'envies" and a 'force multiplier" for Uncle Sam. Unexpectedly, he said European countries were models to emulate as they have rushed to raise defence spending, up from about 2% of GDP to perhaps 3.5%. Nonetheless his warming to allies in Singapore had limits. Mr Hegseth indicated Europe should stay out of the Indo-Pacific, notably the naval patrols there featuring British, French and Italian aircraft-carriers. 'We believe that N in NATO stands for North Atlantic and that our European allies should maximise their comparative advantage on the continent." That position is in tension with America's military leaders who privately welcome the European presence as raising the political cost to China of any military action. The tensions and contradictions in the Trump administration's position were highlighted by the comments of Shangri-La's other headline speaker, Emmanuel Macron. The French president called for a 'coalition of action" between European and Asian countries to promote trade, support global order and avoid 'being bullied" by America and China. In any regional war in Asia, Mr Macron admitted, Europe would offer little military help. 'The day China decides a big operation [...] will you intervene on day one? I would be very cautious." But, he added, 'everybody will be very cautious"—by implication, even America. Mr Hegseth insisted that President Trump had promised that 'Communist China will not invade Taiwan on his watch." Informed sources said he was referring to private comments by the president, omitting an important rider: that Mr Trump thinks China will take Taiwan after he has left office.
