logo
‘It's the Tariffs, Stupid': Ontario Premier Doug Ford Gets Real About the Canada Elections

‘It's the Tariffs, Stupid': Ontario Premier Doug Ford Gets Real About the Canada Elections

Politico28-04-2025

TORONTO —
Ontario Premier Doug Ford is a canny politician, a throwback to a more ideologically flexible but no-bullshit archetype common in 20th-century, big-city American politics.
Ford's shrewdest play may have been his most recent, when he called for a snap election earlier this year, and his Progressive Conservatives won decisively. Yet it's how he went about pursuing victory that's so instructive.
Ford threw on a blue 'Canada Is Not For Sale' cap, modeled after a MAGA hat, threatened to cut off power from Canada to American households and generally
made himself
Captain Canada. Loudly denouncing President Donald Trump's tariff and annexation threats, the leader of the country's most populous province became ubiquitous on TV on both sides of the border in the tenuous interregnum between when former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced he'd resign and before Prime Minister Mark Carney took office. He also shuttled between Toronto and Washington, pitching to
anybody who'd listen
about his Fortress Am-Can plan for the two countries to team up against China.
Ford was also, he thought, modeling how Conservatives could run in the federal election, which concludes Monday. Yet standing up for Canada and against the U.S. incursion is not, to Ford's befuddlement, how Conservative Pierre Poilievre ran his race.
Chatting last week in his office in the elegant Queen's Park provincial legislative building — think 19th century state capitol meets mini-Parliament — Ford did little to hide his disappointment in how Poilievre campaigned.
Surrounded by images of Ontario, one of Winston Churchill and a couple of his late brother, former Toronto Mayor, Rob Ford, the premier pulled few punches — on Poilievre's lack of coalition building, the roots of his rivalry with the Conservative leader and on how he would've run the federal campaign. We began by talking about the not-quite-declared battle to lead Canada's Conservatives if Poilievre falls short, and the step that one premier has already taken to position himself as the future of the party.
This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
Have you seen
this ad that Nova Scotia
Premier Tim Houston has? It about made me want to go spend the summer there

it was a good sell, he's selling that province.
Selling himself for leadership, that's what I figure. I busted his chops, I said: 'Can't you wait till the body gets cold first?'
[Editor's note: Houston is widely seen as having ambitions to succeed Poilievre should the Conservative leader be deposed after the election.]
In any event, this has been some campaign. This election feels like it's as much about our craziness as anything else in Canada.
Yeah, I don't disagree. But we'll see what happens on the 28th, and it'll give us a little bit of certainty. I say a little bit because I think it's going to be a minority government either way.
Have you ever seen anything like this? You've been in politics a long time. Your family obviously has. Does this remind you of anything? Or is this a total outlier?
This is an outlier. Who would have ever thought in January that we'd be going to the polls and then the feds would be, too, and that the prime minister would step down! No one would have thought.
And you were sort of the de facto prime minister for six weeks, right? Or Captain Canada, at least.
We had to protect the rest of the country. No one else was standing up, per se.
And the pitch was good. The Am-Can was a really smart idea and a way to get to Trump to think 'Hey, China's the real issue here.'
Absolutely it is. It's still the real issue. I've been saying that for a few years now. We have to keep an eye on China, and it's come to fruition. Hopefully we can get through this and put a ring around, as they say, the Am-Can fortress.
Obviously you scared the shit out of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on cutting off electricity, and he responded. But have you been able to get to Trump at all and pitch the Am-Can at all?
No.
I think Trump would like that.
I'm sure he would. But he thinks he's taking over Canada. We can work together, have a strong alliance without saying that they're going to take over the country.
What drives that? Is that because he thinks that Canada has a better economic deal going, and we're kind of the same, so we might as well just be one big country? Is it that simple?
Well, I think when
Trudeau went to visit him
, Trudeau said that we'd get annihilated if this deal doesn't go through. Either way, you tell Trump that and his ears pop up and bingo, he's latched on ever since.
Did this start as a way just to screw with Trudeau, do you think?
I think it started that way. Absolutely. And then he just kept going.
Don't you think Trump and Carney would actually get along better? Because Trudeau is like the kind of person Trump would hate. Whereas Carney is the kind of person Trump has been trying to impress for 50 years: Harvard, Goldman Sachs, all the credentials
And Brookfield, a chair at Bloomberg.
All those credentials are the ones Trump looks for and craves.
We'll see what happens. If Mark wins, I think we'll have a half decent relationship. Because they're all from that New York group, Lutnick, the whole thing.
One thing that seems unusual for Canada in this race is the threat of Trump has elevated the two major parties here and marginalized the minor parties because folks don't want to waste their vote
100 percent. The New Democratic Party shifted — they're in a freefall. And their votes usually go to the Liberals. That's what's going to make the difference. You have to win Ontario.
Yeah, talk to me about Ontario.
You have to win Toronto and the Greater Toronto area. And if you win those two areas, more than likely you'll win the country.
But it doesn't sound like Poilievre is getting that done right now.
It doesn't appear that way. So we'll see what happens.
Somebody told me that the two of you guys have never really met in person. How is that possible?
You're going to have to ask him. I think seven years ago, I met him once in Ottawa. A breakfast right after one of my events. But we never really talked there.
That's malpractice on his part. Why wouldn't he make the effort?
You're going to have to ask him that. But I think it's common sense when you're in an election, you reach across to as many people as you can.
But apparently he doesn't have a relationship with the premier in Nova Scotia either.
Yeah. Not at all. Or local mayors. Or anyone. I don't understand it.
And he worked in politics, he understands politics.
It's his campaign manager, Jenni Byrne, in my opinion. But he's still the boss, right?
Yeah, you're the principal. You're the candidate. Somebody told me it's because in an earlier life, Byrne worked for you and one of your staffers fired her.
Absolutely. That's pretty accurate.
A 15-year-old staff fight is the reason he's pissing away the biggest endorsement in Ontario?
I don't understand. I don't understand it.
Has Carney reached out to you at all?
Yes. And I have an obligation as the chair of the federation that represents all the premiers that changes every year — it falls on my lap this year ironically.
He said all the right things?
Very nice.
Is part of Poilievre's challenge stylistically that he's a little too much like Trump?
I don't know about that. Trump's unique. But there's four or five different types of conservatives across the country. You're focusing on your base when you should be focusing maybe on other areas like Ontario.
The G7 is meeting in Alberta this summer. Is Canada going to have to think about its security alliances, too, going forward?
It's critical. Number one, Canada has to meet its 2 percent NATO commitment. And it's easy enough to do: Buy more planes, maybe ships from the U.S. We're not far away. We spent 1.4 percent. We need to get up to 2 percent. It can be done.
Do you think this will be the impetus — the current unpleasantness — to get to 2 percent?
It has to. We're all in favor of it. All the premiers.
If the U.S. isn't reliable, you need to start arming yourself?
I think they'll always be reliable. We'd be in deep trouble if they weren't. And we make so many different components for your military, and the critical minerals.
Well, so that brings up something looming out there that nobody wants to talk about, but I think is important. There's talk in Alberta about the possibility of a ballot measure about secession. Obviously it's a loud but fairly small group that's eager to do that. But what happens when somebody tells Trump or Trump figures out that the minerals and the oil and gas that he craves most in this country is mostly in one part of the country? And it happens to be in the part of the country that's putting a ballot measure that wants to secede from Canada. Is that a little dangerous?
I think it will be. We're a little worried here in Ontario. We have more critical minerals than anywhere in the world. They have a ton of oil in Alberta. Why don't we leverage that and all work together? It's the easiest thing. Because China is cutting the U.S. off with their critical minerals that they need for their military, aerospace manufacturing. And who has it? We have it here.
I just worry about Trump finding out that some in Alberta want to leave and saying alright…
He'll find out.
And then he says, come on in, water's warm.
Absolutely.
What's your bottom-line? How concerned are you about the U.S.-Canada relationship? Do you think things will be better a month from now?
I'm really hoping so. I always look at the glass half full. And I'm hoping we can get this done. I think with some tough conversations, back and forth, I'm confident we'll get it done.
When you and Carney talked, did you tell him the importance about getting this thing done?
Oh, 100 percent.
What does he say?
He agrees. He spent a lot of time in the U.S. like I did. And he understands. You can't just all of a sudden cut off your largest customer on both sides. The U.S. is our largest customer. We're their largest customer. And he just can't say no
.
Even hardcore Trump supporters — one guy said to me,''I love Trump. I think I'll vote for him. But I can't stand that he's attacking our little brother.' That's what he said.
Especially if you live on the border and you fish or hunt up here, you have a summer place up here, you've been up here over the years, it's bizarre to suddenly be adversaries.
Millions and millions of people go back and forth across the border.
Seemingly every person I've met the past three days here said, 'Oh yeah, I've got a place in Florida or a place in Arizona…'
So there's 3.2 million visitors to Florida every year from Canada. They own $30 billion worth of real estate. They pay a billion in taxes. They spend $11 billion a year in Florida. And now, people have stopped going.
One last thing: If you were running for prime minister, if you were the Conservative leader, how would you have pivoted once Trump became the issue? Once Trudeau stepped down and this race was no longer about Trudeau and was about Trump, what would you have done?
I'd have a deal within a month of the day I got elected. I feel like I could talk to him.
Because Poilievre never pivoted towards a Trump-centered election. He never recognized that once you lost Trudeau, you lost the carbon tax, and you had to make a switch.
100 percent. I ran my whole election on Trump and protecting Ontarians, protecting communities and jobs and businesses.
Right, like the Carney campaign now.
I didn't keep any secrets. I told Pierre, he called me once after a little while — people said, 'You've got to call him' — and said: What advice can I get?
It's one thing, our polling shows it. We just came off a big victory. It's the tariffs. A number of years ago James Carville said, 'It's the economy, stupid.' Well, it's the tariffs, stupid. That's what it is.
Why didn't he do it?
I can't figure it out.
By the way, that phone call must have been hard to make. Did somebody put a gun to his head?
That's exactly what happened.
Ben Johansen contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LA Clashes Escalate as Trump, Newsom Spar Over National Guard
LA Clashes Escalate as Trump, Newsom Spar Over National Guard

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

LA Clashes Escalate as Trump, Newsom Spar Over National Guard

(Bloomberg) -- Tensions flared in Los Angeles on the third day of anti-deportation protests, as demonstrators clashed with law enforcement while President Donald Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom exchanged blame over the unrest and responsibility for restoring order. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn The arrival of National Guard troops deployed by Trump over the weekend inflamed residents protesting the sweeping deportation policies of the administration, local officials said. Clashes escalated Sunday evening, with some committing vandalism and violence, including burning cars. The heightened federal response over the objections of state and city officials led to growing friction between local leaders and the Trump administration. Newsom said he formally requested the White House rescind the 'unlawful' deployment and return the troops to his command, warning it would only ramp up tensions. The governor also said Sunday that he planned to sue the administration over the action. LA Police Chief Jim McDonnell said Sunday evening many of the earlier protests around the city had been peaceful, but that conditions deteriorated as people committing vandalism and violence replaced daytime demonstrators. 'This violence that I've seen is disgusting,' McDonnell said at a press conference. 'What we saw the first night was was bad. What we've seen subsequent to that is getting increasingly worse and more violent.' In a series of Truth Social posts late Sunday, Trump described the unrest as an attack on immigration enforcement efforts. 'A once great American City, Los Angeles, has been invaded and occupied by illegal aliens and criminals,' he wrote. Trump called the demonstrations 'migrant riots' and said federal agencies were directed to take 'all such action necessary' to restore order and continue deportation operations. He later urged law enforcement to escalate their response, including arresting people wearing face masks. Meanwhile, Newsom urged protesters to remain peaceful, an admonition some demonstrators ignored as crowds blocked a major roadway through downtown and people set fire to several self-driving ride-hailing vehicles nearby. Newsom met Sunday evening with law enforcement leaders in Los Angeles, he posted on X. 'We're here to keep the peace — not play into Trump's political games,' he wrote. According to LAPD officials, nearly 30 people were arrested Saturday. At least 10 arrests were made Sunday and three officers were injured. The California Highway Patrol made 17 arrests and the LAPD said more are likely as the immigration raids continue and the violence that's already taken place is investigated. Federal law enforcement officials clashed briefly with a smaller group of demonstrators earlier on Sunday when a crowd gathered outside a federal building in downtown LA. The LAPD declared the gathering an unlawful assembly, using less than lethal munitions, like tear gas and batons to chase the crowd back. The LAPD said some people in the crowd threw bottles, chunks of concrete and other objects. The ICE raids are sending a sense of fear and chaos into the city, LA Mayor Karen Bass said during a press conference late Sunday afternoon, adding that people who want to protest should do so peacefully. The First Amendment grants a right to peaceful protest 'but it does not give you the right to be violent to create chaos, or to vandalize property, and that will not be tolerated,' she said. National Guard The tense demonstration follows two days of protests sparked by sweeping US immigration raids across the region. Trump directed US Northern Command to assume control of the National Guard and dispatch 2,000 soldiers to the area 'for 60 days or at the discretion of the Secretary of Defense,' the White House said in a statement. About 300 soldiers from the California National Guard's 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team have been deployed to three locations in greater LA, according to US Northern Command. The Guard is focused on 'safety and protection of federal property and personnel,' the command said in a post on X. The 79th IBCT is primarily a combat unit, though it has previously been called up to support civilian authorities, and a unit most recently responded to the LA-area wildfires earlier this year. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that Marines could be sent next if protests intensify. Newsom called Hegseth's suggestion of deploying the Marines from nearby Camp Pendleton 'deranged.' Hegseth on Sunday countered that Newsom had allowed violence to get out of hand. 'Deranged = allowing your city to burn & law enforcement to be attacked,' Hegseth said in a post on X. 'There is plenty of room for peaceful protest, but ZERO tolerance for attacking federal agents who are doing their job. The National Guard, and Marines if need be, stand with ICE.' Facing mounting pressure from the White House, ICE has ramped up arrests in recent weeks, averaging about 2,000 detentions per day nationwide — still falling short of the administration's goal of at least 3,000 daily arrests. The stepped-up enforcement is part of Trump's vow to carry out the largest deportation campaign in US history. In the LA area, ICE reported 118 arrests this week, though the agency has not released updated figures as of Sunday morning. The protests were triggered in part by federal immigration raids that swept through the city from late Friday. Demonstrators gathered outside the federal building downtown, including outside a detention center. Other protests broke out in Compton and in Paramount, south of the city, where a crowd formed near a Home Depot as raids were reportedly underway. Tensions escalated when some protesters threw objects at officers, prompting the LAPD to declare an unlawful assembly and order the crowd to disperse, according to local media reports. Riot police used tear gas and flash-bang grenades. US Representative Nanette Barragan, a Democrat whose district includes Paramount and other parts of Los Angeles County, accused the Trump administration of using federal troops to suppress dissent. By the time the more violent skirmishes broke out Saturday night, the original protesters had already cleared out and the 'unruly folks' had arrived, she said. 'It's going to escalate the situation,' she said Sunday on CNN's State of the Union. 'People are going to protest because they're angry about the situation. And we have to just reiterate the people to do it peacefully.' Barragan described ICE agents stopping 'anybody at a bus stop that's going to shop' and said she was warned to expect 30 days of stepped-up enforcement. 'Form of Rebellion' Trump has repeatedly threatened to cut off federal funding to cities and states that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities — so-called 'sanctuary' jurisdictions — including LA. California law bars local law enforcement from using resources to assist in most federal immigration actions. In response to past federal crackdowns, California Attorney General Rob Bonta has defended the state's sanctuary policies and sued the Trump administration over attempts to force local compliance, arguing that California has the right to set its own public safety priorities. In an interview with NBC News, Trump border czar Tom Homan said Newsom and Bass should be thanking the president for helping to restore order. Homan warned the leaders could face arrest if they obstruct immigration enforcement efforts. The White House said the National Guard was being deployed to protect federal personnel and property, including immigration detention centers, citing what Trump described as credible threats of violence that could obstruct enforcement efforts and 'constitute a form of rebellion' against the US government. But the legal basis for the decision could face challenges. Federal law strictly limits the deployment of federal troops within US borders. The 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, along with amendments and supporting regulations, generally bars the use of the active-duty U.S. military — the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines — from carrying out domestic law enforcement. The law doesn't apply to state-controlled National Guard forces. --With assistance from María Paula Mijares Torres, Catherine Lucey, Isabela Fleischmann, Virginia Van Natta, Kevin Whitelaw and Kara Wetzel. (Updates with additional details of protests, law enforcement response. An earlier version was corrected to remove a video that included an erroneous description of Trump's comments on Marines.) The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? What Does Musk-Trump Split Mean for a 'Big, Beautiful Bill'? Cuts to US Aid Imperil the World's Largest HIV Treatment Program ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call
US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call

LONDON (AP) — High-level delegations from the United States and China are meeting in London on Monday to try and shore up a fragile truce in a trade dispute that has roiled the global economy, A Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng is due to meet U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at an undisclosed location in the city. The talks are due to last at least a day. They follow negotiations in Geneva last month that brought a temporary respite in the trade war. The two countries announced May 12 they had agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. The U.K. government says it is providing the venue and logistics but is not involved in the talks. 'We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks,' the British government said in a statement.

US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call
US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call

LONDON (AP) — High-level delegations from the United States and China are meeting in London on Monday to try and shore up a fragile truce in a trade dispute that has roiled the global economy, A Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng is due to meet U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at an undisclosed location in the city. The talks are due to last at least a day. They follow negotiations in Geneva last month that brought a temporary respite in the trade war. The two countries announced May 12 they had agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. 'We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks,' the British government said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store