logo
We live in time: Daylight Savings and the 'Time Lords' of Congress

We live in time: Daylight Savings and the 'Time Lords' of Congress

Fox News07-03-2025

We live in time.
We can both make time. Even double time. And we can also lose time.
But it's Congress and Presidents who control time.
Politicians have the power to dictate time. Down to the hour and the minute of what time it is. That's why we spring forward this weekend. And when you lose your hour of sleep, you know who to blame.
No. Not DOGE.
But Congress, of course.
This dates back more than two centuries.
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to "fix the Standard of Weights and Measures."
That's listed right next to Congressional authority over bankruptcies and punishment for counterfeiters.
After all, we lose an hour this weekend like a thief in the night.
Congress formally established Daylight Saving Time with the Uniform Time Act of 1966. It also established time zones in the 1880s to help the railroads coordinate. Before that, time hinged on whatever locals said it was. That led to 144 distinct local times in the U.S. The Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul even went by different clocks, despite only being separated by the Mississippi River.
So, lawmakers are kind of like "Time Lords" from Doctor Who. But while they have not waged the Last Great Time War, for some lawmakers, time has expired for the biannual time change.
"I haven't had anybody come to me and say, 'This is something that benefits our society.' Why do we have it around anymore? Let's get rid of the antiquated stuff that hold us back from advancement," said Rep. Rich McCormick, R-Ga.
Florida lawmakers push especially hard to codify the time change in law. After all, Florida is the Sunshine State. Much of the state's economy is based on what you can do outdoors. Sunbathe. Golf. Walk on the beach. Go to amusement parks.
"In tourism, it's huge," said Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla. "Instead of getting dark at 5:39, it gets dark at 6:30. It makes a big difference. A lot of times the weather's nice (people) like to be outside eating."
Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., pushed time change legislation when he served as governor of the Sunshine State. He's authored a bill which he believes will give all states more sunshine – by effectively freezing time.
"It will lock the clock. So stop going back and forth between Daylight Savings Time and Standard Time," said Scott.
Former Sen. and now Secretary of State Marco Rubio, R-Fla., authored a bill to mandate Daylight Saving Time year-round several years ago. To everyone's surprise, the Senate approved the bill by unanimous consent in 2022. But the bill then died in the House.
Congress approved the Standard Time Act to create the first version of Daylight Saving time in 1918 during World War I. Proponents of the legislation argued that there was "wasted light" at the beginning of the day. Shifting the clocks would reward Americans with "extra" hours of daylight in the evening.
"I used to think my state legislature had the foolishiest ideas in the world," said Rep. Robert Thomas, D-Ky., of the measure at the time. "But it never tried to change the sun in its orbit."
Farmers and residents of the west opposed the plan.
President Woodrow Wilson wanted to keep the time change. But Congress voted to repeal it. Wilson then vetoed the bill.
What comes next is one of the most fascinating aspects of time legislation, Congress and the presidency. There have only been 112 successful overrides of a presidential veto in American history. One of them is on a piece of time legislation. Congress overrode Wilson's veto and gave back the hour it picked up during World War I.
Presidents have tinkered with changing the time via executive order to maximize daylight during times of crisis.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt shifted the clocks during World War II. President Richard Nixon did the same during the OPEC oil shocks of the 1970s.
It was thought that President Trump may wade into the time waters. He's berated the seasonal time changes for years now, dating back to his first term in office. Mr. Trump posted about the time switch on Truth Social as recently as mid-December.
"The Republican Party will use its best efforts to eliminate Daylight Saving Time, which has a small but strong constituency, but shouldn't! Daylight Saving Time is inconvenient, and very costly to our Nation," wrote the president.
But President Trump wasn't inclined to turn back time when pressed about it by colleague Peter Doocy on Thursday.
"It's a 50/50 issue. And if something is a 50/50 issue, it's hard to get excited about it. I assume people would like to have more light later. But some people want to have more light earlier because they don't want to take their kids to school in the dark," said Mr. Trump.
The problem is that most people abhor changing the clocks. But they worry about it getting dark way too early in the winter. Or the sun "rising" at absurd times in the summer.
It depends on where you live.
The country may harbor deep political divisions. But at least one lawmaker believes it's time Americans rally around something.
"I'd love for us to not have to switch our clocks if that's something that actually probably can unite Americans right now," said Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J.
But at least once senior lawmaker hasn't given the time of day to clock shifting efforts.
"You have thoughts on daylight savings?" asked colleague Ryan Schmelz of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.
Jeffries chuckled.
"There's a lot going on in the United States of America. I haven't been able to give a thought to daylight savings," replied Jeffries.
Shakespeare wrote that "let every man be master of his time." But that's hard to do when Congress decides the time. Of course, the Bard also declared that "what is past is prologue."
And that means that despite the legislative efforts, everyone will probably have to change the clocks again in October when we fall back.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Johnson: Deploying Marines to Los Angeles protests would not be ‘heavy-handed'
Johnson: Deploying Marines to Los Angeles protests would not be ‘heavy-handed'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Johnson: Deploying Marines to Los Angeles protests would not be ‘heavy-handed'

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Sunday that deploying the Marine Corps to Los Angeles to suppress protests, as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has suggested, would not be 'heavy-handed.' 'Secretary Hegseth said that active-duty Marines there at Camp Pendleton, there by San Diego, are on high alert and could be mobilized. Could we really see active-duty Marines on the streets of Los Angeles?' ABC News's Jonathan Karl asked on 'This Week.' 'You know, one of our core principles is maintaining peace through strength. We do that on foreign affairs and domestic affairs as well. I don't think that's heavy-handed,' Johnson responded. Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard members to the Los Angeles area on Saturday amid protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the action was due to 'violent mobs' attacking federal agents 'carrying out basic deportation operations.' 'The National Guard, and Marines if need be, stand with ICE,' Hegseth said in a post on the social platform X on Sunday morning. Deploying active-duty forces against Americans on U.S. soil would be an extraordinary move and would require bypassing laws that prevent the military from being used for domestic law enforcement purposes. There's also little precedent for deploying the National Guard to states that have not requested the help. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Sunday went after Trump over the deployment of the National Guard to the Los Angeles area, saying the president 'thinks he has a right to do anything.' 'He does not believe in the Constitution; he does not believe in the rule of law,' Sanders told CNN's Dana Bash on 'State of the Union.' 'My understanding is that the governor of California, the mayor of the city of Los Angeles, did not request the National Guard, but he thinks he has a right to do anything he wants,' he added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Zelensky says he understands Putin ‘much better' than Trump
Zelensky says he understands Putin ‘much better' than Trump

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Zelensky says he understands Putin ‘much better' than Trump

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Ukrainian officials understand Russian leader Vladimir Putin 'much better' than President Trump, who has repeatedly said Putin wants peace, even as he rejects U.S. proposals for a ceasefire. 'With all due respect to President Trump, I think it's just his personal opinion,' Zelensky told Martha Raddatz on ABC's 'This Week' in an interview that aired Sunday morning. 'Trust me, we understand the Russians much better, the mentality of the Russians, than the Americans understand the Russians. I know for sure Putin doesn't want to stop the war.' Zelensky also took issue with Trump's comments in the Oval Office this week comparing Ukraine and Russia to children fighting. 'We are not playing in the park with the Russians like two boys, two kids. Putin is not a kid,' Zelensky said. 'So we can't compare, and we cannot say, 'OK, let them fight for a while.'' 'And it's not about President Trump,' he added. 'Anyone living thousands of miles away can't fully understand the pain, even parents who live in Ukraine cannot feel the pain of those who lost their children.' Ukraine stunned Russia last weekend with drone attacks on Russian air bases, which it said destroyed dozens of bombers. The drones were smuggled into Russia on 18-wheeler trucks, which were parked near military bases and remotely opened ahead of the attack. Trump spoke with Putin on Wednesday, telling reporters that Russia planned to retaliate for the drone strikes. Russia killed five people in Ukraine in drone attacks the next day. Raddatz asked Zelensky if he believed Trump thinks Russia is winning the war. 'I think he's publicly said about it, and I know that he shared this information with some people around him, and I think the separation — and I said it a lot of times, it's not true. It's not a victory when you spent, really spent 1 million people,' he said. Zelensky added that Trump 'must' impose stronger sanctions on Russia. Trump this week said he had yet to look at Sen. Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) Russia sanctions bill, which is co-sponsored by more than 80 senators, but the president said senators would not move without his blessing. Senators in both parties are itching for the green light. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters that the bill could hit the floor during the current four-week work period. '[The White House is] still hopeful they'll be able to strike some sort of a deal, but … there's a high level of interest here in the Senate on both sides of the aisle in moving on it,' he said. 'I think a genuine interest in doing something to make clear to Russia that they need to come to the table … I think that would have a big impact.' The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store