Wednesday's Pacers game could snarl traffic in downtown Indianapolis. How to get around it
If you commute regularly through downtown Indianapolis, you might want to plan a different route Wednesday. The Indiana Pacers return to Indy this week to play their first NBA Finals home game in 25 years, which could snarl traffic near Gainbridge Fieldhouse.
Here's what you should know about anticipated traffic delays, downtown parking and possible road closures.
The Pacers play in Indianapolis at 8:30 p.m. both Wednesday, June 11, and Friday, June 13. If the NBA Finals go into Game 6, the Pacers will return to Indy on Thursday, June 19.
In a media briefing Tuesday, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Chief Christopher Bailey said people can expect traffic restrictions on South Pennsylvania Street and Delaware Street.
No definitive road closures were announced, but Bailey said lanes will be open and shut as necessary. Live updates will be posted on IMPD's X account, he said.
Beginning at 5 a.m. Saturday, June 14, I-65 southbound will be closed through June 16 as part of the first in a series of weekend closures. Traffic can be detoured using I-465 and I-70.
Story continues after photo gallery.
Indy residents should expect increased traffic June 11 and June 13 as watch parties will take place outside the soon-to-be-packed stadium.
Somewhere between 1,000 and 1,500 watch party tickets will be available for purchase, likely on June 11, according to CEO of Pacers Sports & Entertainment, Mel Raines.
If you're headed to the game, you can use the Northeast Lot at 126 S. Delaware Street, which allows you to book a parking spot online near Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Otherwise, you might want to check the dozen other parking facilities around downtown Indy.
The Downtown Indy website has a Park Whiz map that shows the cost of parking when you enter the date and time. You can see rates for Indianapolis parking at ParkWhiz.com, or download the Park Whiz app on your smart phone or mobile device.
More about Pacers vs Thunder: How much are tickets to Game 3 of the NBA Finals?
Worried about getting stuck in downtown Indy traffic? Drivers can stay use a free live traffic map from Waze. The navigation app from Waze provides traffic updates, road condition information and offers directions.
(*-if necessary; all games are ET and on ABC)
IndyStar Pulliam Fellow Matthew Cupelli contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thunder vs. Pacers NBA Finals: OKC looks uncomfortable, and now its dream season is suddenly at risk
INDIANAPOLIS — As Oklahoma City Thunder general manager Sam Presti turned the corner of the concourse in the bowels of Gainbridge Fieldhouse, following a 116-107 loss to the Indiana Pacers in Game 3 of the NBA Finals, a look of concern covered the face of one of the smartest men in basketball. This is what the Pacers do. This is what they have been doing. They make opponents uncomfortable, and the Thunder, now trailing the best-of-seven championship series, 2-1, are as uncomfortable as they have been all season. Presti's 68-win juggernaut — the one so heavily favored in this series; the one we figured for a budding dynasty — is two losses from the franchise's best season ending short of a championship. Advertisement Thunder head coach Mark Daigneault found all sorts of ways to describe this loss by his young team as "uncharacteristic," and he found even more ways to say, "They outplayed us the majority of the game." "The turnovers were uncharacteristic," Daigneault said of his team's 19 giveaways, one shy of a season high. "Obviously we're usually pretty clean there. I give them credit. I thought they played really well." The Pacers played phenomenally, mostly because the Thunder did not apply the defensive pressure that they usually do. Indiana had something to do with that, too, playing so fast that Oklahoma City could not settle into its defensive pressure. It is hard to be physical with someone when you cannot catch them. "Just the pace of their offense was sharper than our pressure and physicality tonight," said Daigneault. "That's just what it came down to. They got the ball ahead of us more easily tonight than they did in the first two games. That led to a lot of the downstream effects of their offense and our defense tonight." Advertisement Mostly, though, the Thunder were not themselves, especially in the fourth quarter, when the league's MVP, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, a machine, attempted only three shots and failed to register an assist. "It felt like they won all the 50/50 plays," Gilgeous-Alexander said of the fourth quarter. "They executed on both ends of the ball. When you give those two things up, no matter what quarter, you're probably going to lose the quarter, especially on the road in a hostile environment as the crowd is behind them." "Their overall tone was better than ours for the majority of the game," added Daigneault. "Like I said, I thought we had some really good stretches, but we just made one too many mistakes and had one too many possessions on both ends of the floor where they were more tied to their identity than we were." Even Shai Gilgeous-Alexander looked out of rhythm in Game 3, as Indiana's pressure pushed OKC into unfamiliar discomfort. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy) (ASSOCIATED PRESS) Another point of evidence: The Thunder, the NBA's best free-throw shooting team, missed seven of their 30 attempts. All the coach could say to that: "It was an uncharacteristic night in a lot of ways for us." Advertisement The question, then: Why was everything about this game so uncharacteristic for Oklahoma City? Why did the real Thunder not stand up? Why, conversely, as Daigneault said, were the Pacers "in character in terms of their physicality, their pressure on defense" and "in character in terms of their pace on offense"? It is not like the Thunder did not know what to expect. This was a tied series. A championship is on the line. The Pacers did not defend them any differently, other than attacking pick-and-rolls at a higher point. "They were above the screen," said Gilgeous-Alexander. "When you come off it, you got to go backwards. It goes back to a little bit more force. If we're more aggressive setting up the pick-and-roll, then we get a better angle. Things like that usually come down to who throws the first punch. That's what that was." There it is again. The Pacers were throwing the punches. The Thunder were merely trying to avoid them. Advertisement It is curious, considering Oklahoma City lost Game 3 in its previous two series, including the Western Conference semifinals, which they also trailed to the Denver Nuggets, 2-1. The Thunder were well aware of the importance of this one, and still they took the court with a lack of force that was unrecognizable. "We've been in that exact same kind of predicament," said Oklahoma City forward Jalen Williams. "This Game 3 was a better Game 3 than the ones we've had, so we'll take that and run with it. Yeah, I mean, it's very pivotal. Obviously you don't like being down in a series. But we have been here before." Only they have not. Not at this level. "It's the Finals, so it's a little different here," said Alex Caruso, the only member of the Thunder to have reached this level before, having won a title with the Los Angeles Lakers. "You're probably just slightly more frustrated with it. You just put in so much effort to not come away with a win when you have a chance to, especially on the road, it definitely stings a little. That's part of the playoffs, part of the Finals." Advertisement It would be easy to blame this on the Thunder's youth, their inexperience at this level of basketball. But it is not like Indiana has been here before. Their superstar, Tyrese Haliburton, is only 25 years old, a year younger than Gilgeous-Alexander, and the Pacers have no more experience than OKC on this stage. Maybe, then, the Pacers are playing freer in this series — clear of the expectations that come with being one of seven teams ever to win 68 games and one of the biggest betting favorites in NBA Finals history. Whatever the reason for OKC's shortcoming, they now face the prospect of a Game 4 in Indiana, where the crowd is its own animal — where the pressure will only be more intense. The winner of a pivotal Game 3 has won the series 80.5% of the time. Should the Pacers manage to take Game 4, too, that figure would increase to 95.6%, putting them on the brink of arguably the biggest Finals upset in NBA history. Advertisement "We've got to learn from it and then tap back into being who we are in Game 4," Daigneault said of his team's poor Game 3 performance. "If we do that, I think we'll have a much better chance to win." And if they don't? If they are uncharacteristically outplayed again? Then the Thunder are in real trouble.
Indianapolis Star
39 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Tyrese Haliburton said his game will have 'ebbs and flows' but remains focused on winning NBA Finals
"The commentary is what it is at this point," Haliburton said. "We're here, in the NBA Finals, two wins away from an NBA championship." Dustin Dopirak and Nate Chute Tyrese Haliburton discusses the Pacers' Game 3 win over the Thunder Andrew Nembhard discusses the Pacers' Game 3 win over the Thunder Aaron Nesmith discusses the Pacers' Game 3 win over the Thunder. Pascal Siakam discusses the Pacers' Game 3 NBA Finals win over the Thunder
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Doyel: Pacers win state's first NBA Finals game since 2000. How? Because this is Indiana
INDIANAPOLIS – At the first NBA Finals game in Indianapolis since 2000, they're wearing gold shirts at Gainbridge Fieldhouse and waiting for something to happen. No, they're waiting for Indiana to happen. Because the shirts for Game 3 of the 2025 NBA Finals between the Pacers and Thunder, they have a message — the final words of a slogan that begins, 'In 49 states, it's basketball…' But this is Indiana. That's what the shirts say. Here's something Indiana Pacers coach Rick Carlisle says, and he says it all the time: 'Hard things are hard.' Pacers win: Bennedict Mathurin, Tyrese Haliburton lead Pacers to 2-1 series lead This wasn't going to be easy. It's the fourth quarter of Game 3, the most pivotal game, historically, in the NBA Finals. When the series is tied at 1-1, the team that wins Game 3 eventually wins the series 80% of the time. Pretty good, right? Well, this looked pretty hard. The Oklahoma City Thunder are leading by four with less than nine minutes left, they're dominating the glass, and they have the MVP in Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. What do the Pacers have? They have T.J. McConnell, who is almost always the smallest, oldest guy on the floor. They have Bennedict Mathurin, who spent last year rehabbing from shoulder surgery, missing the Pacers' run to the 2024 Eastern Conference Finals, using his time to attack his rehab, marking his progress by peeling each day off a small calendar at the Pacers' practice facility. They have Myles Turner, struggling through a miserable game, probably because he's struggling through a miserable cold. And they have Tyrese Haliburton, whose overall sluggish play in the 2025 NBA Finals — that Game 1-winning shot notwithstanding — has been the talk of the commentariat for three days. But it's like their coach tells them, 'hard things are hard,' and as Haliburton will tell reporters later, 'People follow the leader — and (Carlisle) is the leader.' So it starts with Andrew Nembhard grabbing an offensive rebound and scoring from 12 feet. The crowd is still cheering the basket when McConnell leaps to pick off the Thunder's inbounds pass — his third such steal of this game — and scores immediately. Now the score is tied, and the Thunder are about to experience that Rick Carlisle axiom. Hard things are hard. Because this is Indiana. You know who won the game, right? I mean, this is the NBA Finals. You know. The Pacers beat the Thunder 116-107, which you knew. But I'm trying to show you how it happened, why it happened, why this keeps happening with these 2025 Indiana Pacers. No, they don't win the same way every time. Haliburton doesn't always hit a shot at the buzzer to win — it just feels like he does. 'This is the kind of team we are,' Carlisle is saying later. 'We need everybody to be ready. That's how we've got to do it.' So this is how they do it: With Mathurin, who didn't play in the first quarter and who has been held scoreless in two 2025 playoff games, and held to five points or less five other times. But Mathurin came into this game in the second quarter and scored within 34 seconds after the first of T.J. McConnell's steals under the basket, turning one Pacers field goal into another within seconds. Mathurin scores again moments later, a 16-footer. Then he's hitting a 3-pointer, then a layup in transition, then two free throws. By the time this game is over, Mathurin will have 27 points in 22 minutes — and that is the second-most impressive individual stat line on the team. Well, maybe the third. We can debate Haliburton vs. Mathurin, because Haliburton fooled around and almost had a triple-double: 22 points, nine rebounds and 11 assists. But there's no debate who has the most startling individual stat line from this game, and it's neither Mathurin nor Haliburton. It's McConnell, who becomes the first player in NBA Finals history to come off the bench and post 10 points, five assists and five steals. And he does it in 15 minutes. And he does it at 6-1, and at age 33. A unique player, T.J. McConnell. 'His energy is unbelievable,' Haliburton says of McConnell. 'I think you guys know he's a crowd favorite. I joke with him. I call him 'the Great White Hope.'' That's what Haliburton said. Here's what Carlisle said: 'T.J. brings some very unique elements to our team, and he brings unique elements to the game in general,' Carlisle said. 'We need all of our guys to bring whatever is their thing to our thing — and have it be part of our thing. But he's a guy that inspires a lot of people. He inspires our team a lot.' When the second quarter begins, the Pacers are trailing 32-24. But the second unit is on the floor, led by Mathurin, McConnell and Obi Toppin (eight points, six rebounds, two blocks off the bench), and soon the Thunder's lead is gone. Now the Pacers are leading 49-42. After the game, after the deal is done, Pacers sideline reporter Pat Boylan is interviewing McConnell on the court. They're playing the conversation on the giant scoreboard, and Boylan is reminding McConnell how the Pacers' second unit turned the game around. 'How,' Boylan is asking McConnell, 'did you turn the tide?' McConnell is smiling. The crowd, wearing those gold T-shirts, is roaring. Now McConnell is gesturing around the arena. 'I mean,' he says, 'do you hear this?' Doyel this week: Herb Simon, 'a reluctant receiver of attention,' is on a HOF and NBA Finals roll All right, so it's the fourth quarter. The Pacers, as a franchise, have decided it's time for their secret weapon — so they give the mic to Pat McAfee. And McAfee delivers. 'It's been 9,126 days since our state hosted an NBA Finals,' McAfee is shouting into the microphone. He might have looked up that fact or guessed or, honestly, done the math in his head. He has a pretty quick brain, this guy. Photographic memory, among other things. Anyway, McAfee is still shouting into the mic. 'Everyone's talking about Oklahoma City fans,' McAfee says, then challenges Pacers fans to be even louder. 'Let's turn this city up! Let's go!' Now it's bedlam, and they're playing 'Welcome to the Jungle' over the loudspeakers, and almost immediately Andrew Nembhard is scoring and McConnell is stealing the inbounds pass and scoring, and the hard things are just getting started for Oklahoma City. Mathurin's hitting a 3. Now it's Haliburton's turn to hit a 3, and the Thunder want a timeout to cool off the Pacers, and the crowd. Yeah, good luck with that. 'They were great,' Carlisle said of the crowd, 'especially in the fourth quarter. It just went up a few decibels.' So did the Pacers. Haliburton has room to operate, and that spells trouble for OKC. After being bottled up for two games, Haliburton has been getting space in Game 3 by playing off screens or passing the ball to a teammate and rushing to get it right back, or by starting his sprint with the ball — getting downhill, you call that — before even crossing halfcourt. Now he's playing off three screens, forcing the Thunder to switch time and again, until he's alone on 7-1 Chet Holmgren and running the pick-and-roll with Turner, who scores at the rim on his new (smaller) defender. Soon Haliburton is getting to the rim and missing, but Toppin is flying through the air to slam home the rebound and it's 107-100. This game is almost over, if the Pacers can get just one stop … and there it is. Holmgren shoots a 3, and Turner swats it out of the air. Holmgren grabs the offensive rebound and hurries to the rim to beat the shot clock, but Turner blocks that one, too. Turner doesn't feel well, and he doesn't shoot well — nine points on 3-for-11 shooting — but he blocks five shots. And now it really is over. The young, deep, athletic Pacers tend to tire out their opponents — 'the wear-down effect,' they call it — and now they're doing it to the younger, deeper, more athletic Thunder. The Thunder enter the fourth quarter leading 89-84, but over the final 12 minutes they will go just 6-for-17 from the floor (35.3%) and miss all four 3-pointers and get outrebounded by three, after winning the battle on the glass 35-26 through three quarters. They will have two assists in the quarter, and five turnovers. They will look, decisively, like the second-best team in the NBA. And normally I wouldn't be saying that with only 80% certainty. But this is Indiana. Find IndyStar columnist Gregg Doyel on Threads, or on BlueSky and Twitter at @GreggDoyelStar, or at Subscribe to the free weekly Doyel on Demand newsletter.
