What Was Said at the TIME Impact Dinner: The Road to Justice
Dylan Penningroth, Raquel Willis, Tarana Burke Credit - Courtesy; Robin L Marshall—Getty Images for ESSENCE; Steven Ferdman—Getty Images
Sunday, May 25, marks five years since George Floyd was murdered by a Minneapolis police officer—a moment captured on video that sparked global protests and a nationwide reckoning with racism and police violence. Since then, many of the demands for justice voiced in the streets in 2020 have been met with retrenchment: calls for police reform have been rolled back in cities across the country; diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs have ended; and laws banning certain ways of teaching history have taken effect in dozens of states.
Against that backdrop, TIME convened an Impact Dinner on Tuesday night in Washington, D.C. Under the theme The Road to Justice, the evening featured reflections from six speakers, who spoke about what it means to remember, to tell the truth, and to defend hard-won progress in the face of mounting political and cultural backlash.
The dinner coincided with the release of TIME's special report, 'Five Years Later: America Looks for a Way Forward After George Floyd,' which features a collection of interviews and essays from scholars, activists, and artists, exploring why the pursuit of racial justice remains so challenging in America.
Dr. Phillip Atiba Solomon, the co-founder and CEO of the Center for Policing Equity—which presented the event—began by asking attendees to reflect on how they felt five years ago when Floyd was murdered. He noted that while the conviction of involved officers offered a measure of accountability, it fell short of the deeper, systemic justice that protesters had called for. The goal, he suggested, was never just to see a few individuals imprisoned but to transform the conditions that allowed such violence in the first place.
He warned that without a shared commitment to the truth, accountability—and by extension, justice—becomes impossible. 'If we can't tell our truths, then the ways that we try to become a better version of ourselves are not possible,' Solomon said. 'So in this moment, it is more important than ever that we be truth-tellers.'
That theme—the necessity of truth-telling—reverberated throughout the evening. Several speakers warned that efforts to suppress historical realities and silence honest reflection are themselves barriers to justice.
Below are highlights from each of the toasts.
Legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw, who coined the term 'intersectionality,' explained that the battle for our democracy is the battle for memory: 'If we can't tell the story about the inequality,' she said, 'we can't demand that it be fixed.'
A driving force in the evolution of critical race theory, Crenshaw spoke about the hopeful signs she saw in the weeks after Floyd's murder—mass protests, corporate statements, a sense that the country might be ready to confront its history more honestly. Yet even in that moment of apparent progress, she could see the beginnings of a backlash. 'In that moment, I was both happy and terrified,' she said, in part because she knew retrenchment was already forming. 'It's going to cause the others in the room to dig deep into history to find things to repress us.'
Fast forward to 2025, she said, and those fears have been realized. 'They found [that they] can repress us by saying 'certain words you can't say anymore.' So literally, the story of George Floyd could not be written today in the federal government, because you can't say words like 'racism', 'discrimination', 'Black', 'African American'—I can go on and on. The basic point is, if you can't tell the story, you can't demand reform.'
Crenshaw ended by raising a glass 'to the importance of memory, the importance of courage, and the importance of understanding that we cannot save our democracy without saving anti-racism.'
Former WNBA star Maya Moore, who retired from basketball in 2023 to work on criminal justice reform, described the U.S. prison system as a pipeline fueled by poverty, prosecutorial misconduct, and systemic neglect driven in part by a lack of investment in education.
'The prison pipeline is overflowing with a culture of hyper-punitive, dehumanizing practices that lead to more violence and higher recidivism, that makes the exit to the pipeline essentially a pathway back to the entry,' she said. 'But I get so inspired because I see people working to expose the pipeline, to disrupt the pipeline, and to reform the pipeline.'
Moore recounted how her advocacy began with the case of Jonathan Irons, a man she helped free after he spent over two decades in prison for a crime he did not commit. The two married nine days after his release in July 2020, and together they run Win With Justice, a nonprofit she founded that's focused on prosecutorial reform. 'Let's keep inviting everyone you can into exposing and disrupting and reforming these losing ways that don't work,' she said. 'There's a better way, a more humanizing way.'
Moore urged the audience to think of justice as a collective project: 'A real championship is all of us thriving,' she said, closing her toast by invoking the language of teamwork. 'We can't be true champions if we don't first embrace that we're all meant to be teammates.'
Historian Dylan Penningroth shared a personal story about his great-great uncle, who was born in 1892 to formerly enslaved parents in southern Virginia and recorded an oral history in the 1970s. His relatives weren't famous historic figures; they were just regular folks whose stories about slavery were often not taught in schools or textbooks.
For Penningroth, a professor at the University of California at Berkeley who received a MacArthur Fellows Program grant, listening to his great-great uncle's story was a bridge between the distant past and the present. 'History is not just about the past; history is literally present in all that we do,' he said, citing James Baldwin.
Penningroth warned about the resurgence of what W.E.B. Du Bois called the 'propaganda of history'—narratives that minimize or distort the realities of slavery and its aftermath. He cited new restrictions on how race and history are taught in schools as a sign that we are once again in a fight over who gets to tell the story of America.
He encouraged attendees to treat history not as a closed chapter, but as a living force. 'We become connected with a past that is more beautiful and terrible than we can imagine,' he said. 'I'd like to raise a glass to the never ending struggle for a history that is true and that could bring us together, even if it sometimes hurts.'
Raquel Willis, cofounder of the Gender Liberation Movement and a 2025 TIME100 honoree, connected the struggle for transgender rights to broader fights for racial and gender justice.
'As a Black trans woman, I carry within me the fight of all of my ancestors, seeing injustice anywhere as injustice everywhere,' she said. Raised in Georgia, Willis said she grew up knowing that 'a vast constellation of folks had fought for my generation demanding to be fully human in a country that was obsessed with denying it.' But it wasn't until adulthood that she learned about queer and trans leaders, like Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, and how their stories had been marginalized. 'They did not march and organize and survive so that their descendants could be policed and silenced,' she said.
Willis reflected on her work with the Gender Liberation Movement, a grassroots collective responsible for the Brooklyn Liberation Marches that drew thousands of people in 2020 and 2021. Last year, GLM organized an inaugural Gender Liberation March in Washington, D.C.
'Despite our steadfast presence … we consistently had our leadership and experiences cast aside as footnotes,' she said, noting the disparity in public response to the deaths of Breonna Taylor and Tony McDade. 'But I'm proud to say that in that moment, we surprised even ourselves when nearly 20,000 people gathered outside the Brooklyn Museum… and for the first time, we chanted in a righteous chorus that we believe in Black trans power.'
Willis ended by raising a glass 'to a prismatic racial justice lens that does not retreat from nuance but holds it close as crucial to the fight for Black liberation.'
Artist Tajh Rust, whose painting of a Black family standing in water appears on the cover of TIME's special report, gave a toast to authorship: the power of being able to tell one's story. 'We have the ability to create our own narratives,' he told the audience, 'and we don't have to leave it to a select few to determine our story.'
'When news cycles were portraying people who looked like me and my brothers as victims and criminals, I knew I wanted to make paintings to address these forms of representation and also give a chance for the people in my community to have a say in how they were represented,' Rust added. 'Our stories aren't over, and everything we do as citizens in this country can help us author our present and future.'
His painting on TIME's cover—titled Holding On (Blue)—involves a water motif that speaks to a shared history and a collective memory across the Black diaspora, giving viewers a chance to reflect on its meaning. He said that he would not be an artist today if he hadn't been introduced to other Black artists or hadn't read books by Black authors. 'To visualize something for oneself, you have to believe it is possible,' he said. 'And it helps to have examples that have come before you to model yourself after.'
Rust added that 'it is not uncommon for women or people of color to be relegated to the margins with the discussion around programs like DEI' and that 'we're made to believe that the success of people in these demographics were given and not earned.'
'But as this room is evidence,' he said, 'that's just not true.'
Tarana Burke, founder of the #metoo Movement, concluded the evening by reflecting on what gives her hope in this moment regarding racial justice in America. 'I thought for weeks about how to answer this question without platitudes and cliches,' she said. Then she saw an Instagram post from Dr. Bernice King:
'Being truthful about the state of our nation and world does not equal losing hope. Hope sees truth and still believes in better; and is willing to strategize and work for it,' the post read.
It was a reminder, Burke said, that Black people in America 'have always had the truth on our side.'
'The truth don't flinch, no matter who speaks it,' she explained. 'Black people have endured, and we have the receipts that prove not only that endurance is possible but that victory is possible. That's true; it has always been true; and it will remain true regardless of who tries to obscure it.'
Burke, whose work with sexual violence survivors has received global attention over the past decade, went on to explain how every significant social justice movement in America has been built on the foundation of truth-telling: speaking truth to power, documenting injustice, recording stories, preserving history. 'When truth is your foundation, what you build will stand, even against the strongest headwinds,' she said.
Burke then raised a glass to 'the steadfast, the bravehearted, and the hopeful': 'To truth as our foundation. To hope as our strategy. And to liberation as our destination.'
TIME Impact Dinner: The Road to Justice was presented by The Center For Policing Equity.
Write to Nik Popli at nik.popli@time.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oregon bill would reduce administrative burden for patients seeking physician assisted suicide
A doctor holds a hospital patient's hand. (Getty Images) Terminally ill people who want their doctors' help in dying could do so twice as quickly under an Oregon bill that would cut the waiting period between asking for a lethal dose of medication from 15 days to seven. Oregon is one of 11 states and Washington, D.C., that allow terminally ill individuals to choose to end their lives by asking a physician for a lethal dose of medication. Only adults who are given six months to live and who can effectively communicate for themselves can elect for physician-assisted suicide. In 2023, the state removed a residency requirement, enabling people from other states to travel to Oregon to die. Patients must make two oral requests to their physician for the medication, each separated by at least 15 days. But Senate Bill 1003, as amended, would change the law and reduce that time frame from 15 days to seven days. The bill would allow electronic transmission of prescriptions and filings, and it would require hospices and health care facilities disclose their physician-assisted suicide policy before a patient is admitted and publish the policy on their websites. The bill would also broaden who can prescribe lethal drugs by replacing 'attending physician' and 'consulting physician' in the law with 'attending practitioner' and 'consulting practitioner' while retaining the requirement that they are licensed physicians in Oregon. The bill is sponsored by the Senate Judiciary Committee. The bill received a public hearing Monday afternoon in the Senate Committee on Rules, with dozens of individuals testifying and submitting letters mostly in opposition. It has yet to receive a vote by either chamber. The state's policy, called the 'Death by Dignity Act,' was created through a 1994 citizens initiative that passed with 51% of the vote. A lawsuit paused the act from taking effect for three years, but in 1997 that injunction was lifted and an attempt to repeal the act in a citizens initiative failed the same year. In 2024, 607 people received prescriptions for lethal doses of medications, according to the Oregon Health Authority. Most patients receiving medications were 65 or older and white. The most common diagnosis was cancer, followed by neurological disease and heart disease. Most individuals, including mental health providers and Christian medical groups, testified in opposition to the bill, saying it would undermine the time needed for patients to process their diagnosis, disregard alternative health solutions and ignore mental health concerns. The committee received 429 letters in opposition to the bill and only 12 letters in support. Rep. E. Werner Reschke, R-Malin, said it 'creates a culture of death over that of life.' But a few proponents, such as Portland resident Thomas Ngo, said it would make the process smoother and less of an administrative burden for patients enduring terminal illness and pain. Ngo said his mother used the Death with Dignity Act to die after she was diagnosed with terminal cancer. 'Her passing was peaceful and on her teams,' Ngo told the committee. Ngo's father's partner died of the same disease but could not opt for physician-assisted suicide because they were at a religiously-affiliated health care provider. Oregon health care providers are not obligated to participate in the Death by Dignity Act, and many religiously affiliated hospitals do not participate. The bill will be scheduled for a work session for a later date where the committee can decide to hold the bill — killing it for the remainder of the session — or advance the bill to the Senate floor for a vote. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE


CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
Asia-Pacific markets set to mostly rise after Wall Street looks past global trade frictions
Aaron Foster | The Image Bank | Getty Images Asia-Pacific markets were set to mostly rise Tuesday following gains on all three Wall Street benchmarks overnight, despite mounting global trade frictions. China pushed back against the U.S.' accusations that it had violated a temporary trade agreement. Instead, the Asian powerhouse blamed Washington for failing to uphold the deal — a sign that negotiations between the world's two largest economies are deteriorating. Menawhile, the European Union criticized U.S. President Donald Trump's intention to double steel tariffs to 50%, saying that such a move "undermines" its own negotiations with the U.S. An EU spokesperson said that the bloc was "prepared to impose countermeasures." Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 was set to open higher, with the futures contract in Chicago at 37,720 while its counterpart in Osaka last traded at 37,770 against the index's last close of 37,470.67. Futures for Hong Kong's Hang Seng index stood at 23,138 pointing to a flat open compared to the HSI's close of 23,157.97. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 is set to start the day higher, with futures tied to the benchmark at 8503.0 compared to its last close of 8,414.10. Economists polled by Reuters estimated the country's current account balance for the first quarter of 2025 - expected to come later in the day - to hit 13.1 billion Australian dollars ($8.51 billion), from 12.5 billion in the previous quarter. Meanwhile, a separate Reuters poll forecast that China's Caixin Manufacturing PMI will reach 50.6 in May, from 50.4 in the month before. South Korean markets were closed for polling day. — CNBC's Lisa Kailai Han and Sean Conlon contributed to this report.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
'We're All Going to Die': GOP Fumbles Defense of Medicaid Cuts
Senator Joni Ernst speaks at an event at tThe U.S. Capitol Visitor Center in Washington, DC, on April 30, 2025. Credit - Tasos Katopodis—Getty Images for 137 Ventures/Founders Fund/Jacob Helberg This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME's politics newsletter. Sign up here to get stories like this sent to your inbox. Donald Trump's demand for a sprawling legislative package of expensive tax cuts and big spending reductions is running into trouble as even his strongest Republican allies are having a tough time defending it. Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa leaned into tongue-in-cheek gallows humor last week, telling an audience 'Well, we all are going to die,' in response to concerns that kicking millions off Medicaid would lead to more deaths. House Speaker Mike Johnson, meanwhile, is simply repeating the inaccurate statements that the White House keeps putting out, asserting—very wrongly—on Sunday that 'we're not cutting Medicaid,' and last month claiming that the bill's deepest cuts would target migrants in the country without proper documentation. 'The numbers of Americans who are affected are those that are entwined in our work to eliminate fraud, waste and abuse. So, what do I mean by that? You got more than 1.4 million illegal aliens on Medicaid,' Johnson said on CNN on May 25. And just this week, he told NBC another disproven assertion: 'I am telling you this is going to reduce the deficit.' It all points to how openly frustrated Republicans on Capitol Hill are about walking a plank of their own making. Trump's demands to take on his second-term agenda in one bite has boxed in his party and they're plenty steamed about the blatant lack of an off-ramp. As one Hill aide put it to me, it's like watching what can most generously be called an 'Ostrich Strategy'—head in the sand, hoping no one notices the reality happening above ground. The fissures are there for anyone who dares see them. Sen. John Hawley of Missouri on Monday said the President had told him not to cut Medicaid benefits, despite the House-passed version doing exactly that with Trump's enthusiastic endorsement. The so-called Medicaid Moderates like Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have already balked at the House's version, which the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office says would boot roughly 10 million people from current coverage. But other Republicans, like Sens. Rick Scott of Florida and Mike Lee of Utah, have a very different complaint—that the bill doesn't cut enough. Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin says he would be fine leaving his seat if it means tanking a proposal that would balloon the debt by over $1 trillion even when factoring in economic growth. Sen. Rand Paul is objecting to a provision that increases the credit limit on the national credit card to cover purchases already made, also known as raising the debt ceiling. And these are nominal Trump allies. These big-ticket ideas rise and fall on salesmanship. At the height of debate over the Affordable Care Act, as Republicans were making hay out of so-called death panels, then-White House adviser David Axelrod had to tell President Barack Obama a hard truth: 'A whole bunch of facts and figures won't change that' opposition. Eventually, Obama's flood-the-zone approach powered Obamacare across the finish line, but it was plenty messy. The measure has proven durable because its benefits were tangible, and voters seldom surrender benefits. But that is not the norm. The wasteland of these policy failures is crowded. Bill Clinton's attempts to overhaul health care in the 1990s doomed his fellow Democrats to a hellish 1994 midterm cycle. George W. Bush's efforts to privatize Social Security after his re-election bid ran headlong into a woodchipper. Obama's second-term quest at a border bill similarly crashed into unbending opposition. Trump's first-term Infrastructure Week never really got off the ground as he lurched from tweet to tweet. Which explains why so many Republicans are squeamish about this current package. As passed by the House, Medicaid spending would be cut by at least $600 billion over a decade, reducing the rolls by 10.3 million people. The biggest chunk of that, $280 billion, would come from requiring Medicaid recipients to prove they are working. That work requirement is seen as bureaucratic red tape targeting a small pool of able-bodied participants who aren't currently working, while potentially kicking out many others who are already working but making too little to afford health coverage. Ultimately, this is going to come down to a simple truth in politics: the biggest bullhorn wins. With an ambitious timeline of getting the 'big beautiful bill' to the White House for the President's signature by the July 4 holiday, Senate Majority Leader John Thune has to work fast. The House bill as it arrived cannot pass, meaning the Senate needs to take up the shell and do a pretty hefty rewrite. Working with a 53-vote GOP majority in a 100-member chamber, Republicans are working under a rule loophole that will allow them to get to the finish line with a bare majority, and a tie-breaking vote from Vice President J.D. Vance if needed. That means Thune can lose just three of his own, and there are at least five nos at the moment, with a few others hinting that they want their seat at the rewrite table. Republicans have ownership of the House, Senate and White House. That doesn't mean they have control over every corner of them. Make sense of what matters in Washington. Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter. Write to Philip Elliott at