Harris committed to truth on Dublin and Monaghan bombings
The Government is committed to securing truth and justice for the Dublin and Monaghan bombings, Tánaiste Simon Harris has said.
Mr Harris was speaking on the 51st anniversary of the series of no-warning blasts which claimed more than 30 lives and injured hundreds.
No-one has ever been convicted over the bombings but the loyalist Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) admitted responsibility in 1993.
It remains the biggest loss of life on any single day of the Troubles.
The anniversary was marked with a service at a memorial to the atrocity on Talbot Street in Dublin city centre.
Mr Harris described a "most horrific act of violence that shocked our country to its core".
He said he hopes the publication of the Operation Denton report, expected in the coming months, "will shed new light on the terrible events of May 17 1974".
In a statement, the Tánaiste said: "Five decades on, I am conscious that time can never truly erase the pain of their absence. My thoughts are with their families on this difficult day.
"We remember also the hundreds injured in the brutal attacks and all those who were left behind to face the significant challenges of lives forever changed."
Mr Harris said the day is an opportunity to remind ourselves of the questions that remain unanswered.
"It remains deeply regrettable that no person has been held responsible for the attacks to date," he said.
"The publication of the Operation Denton report is expected in the coming months. It is my sincere hope that these findings will shed new light on the terrible events of May 17 1974.
"This Government remains committed to finding truth and justice. I have raised the case of the Dublin Monaghan bombings with the British government – highlighting the successive motions passed in the Dail with the unanimous support of all political parties.
"I am committed to taking this forward in a bid to get long-awaited answers."
Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan said the Government "will not forget our duty to the victims and survivors".
"We will persevere in our efforts to seek out the truth behind the tragic events of 17 May 1974 and, hopefully, secure some measure of comfort for those effected by these callous attacks," he said.
"We have worked consistently to implement the all-party motions which call on the British government to allow access to all relevant documents relating to the Dublin-Monaghan bombings and I specifically raised this issue with the British government at the recent meeting of the British-Irish Intergovernmental Conference at Hillsborough Castle.
"The investigation into the bombings remains an open case in this jurisdiction. Any new evidence that comes to light will be fully investigated by An Garda Síochána."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
33 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Families paying highest childcare costs to benefit from cap in September
Families paying some of the country's highest childcare fees will see costs reduced in September after the Department of Children confirmed new caps on what providers can charge. The new ceilings should mean no parents pay more than €295 per week for a child attending a service participating in the Government's Core Funding scheme for between 40 and 50 hours a week. That figure will, in most cases, reduce to €198.70 after other supports are factored in. The caps vary according to the number of hours involved. The reductions, however, will only affect those parents whose children attend the most expensive services in receipt of Core Funding, with about 10 per cent of the almost 4,500 Government-supported providers charging at least one type of fee that will have to be reduced. In many cases, however, the savings should amount to more than €100 per child per month. READ MORE The imposition of fee caps from September on service providers in receipt of Core Funding had been scheduled for some time, but they had only previously applied to services that signed up to Core Funding for the first time. The department said on Thursday that the new caps would bring the gross fees paid by parents at more expensive services closer to the national average cost of €197 per week. At the announcement, Minister for Children Norma Foley acknowledged the Government still has considerable ground to cover to honour commitments that costs to parents will be cut to €200 per month. She said this would be done during the life of the Government, but said it was too early to indicate what scale of reductions might be funded in this year's budget. The childcare sector funding year runs from September to August and most of the big funding changes set to take effect later this year were announced before the current Government was elected. 'The programme for government has a very clear commitment around the €200 and that is our absolute goal,' she said. 'I've been very clear that we will do that over the lifetime of this Government. It will be incremental, and we're starting at the very top where there are extraordinarily high costs to parents, and we're beginning to bring that down.' Ms Foley said Core Funding would increase from €331 million in the current year to at least €350 million in the year from September with up to €45 million in additional funding to support pay in the sector which is widely seen as a barrier to the provision of additional places and services due to the difficulty in attracting and retaining staff. Minimum rates in the sector are only fractionally above the minimum wage. Talks between employer groups and unions on a new sector-wide agreement on minimum rates are ongoing and while progress is said to have been made, it is not clear that any new deal would be in place by September. If it is not, or the increases agreed are too small, some of the €45 million will be retained by the department. 'This funding is welcome, but the scale of it has to be reflected in the pay of staff in the sector,' said Darragh O'Connor of Siptu. 'Otherwise, it will be impossible for anyone to go back and make the case for similar supports in future years.' Karen Clince, chief executive at one of the country's largest providers, Tigers, welcomed the increased levels of Core Funding to be provided. But she said 'it doesn't go nearly far enough to address the horrific staffing we find ourselves in. We need more focus on pay and conditions rather than just vote-winning affordability.'
Irish Times
33 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Nine e-scooters seized as gardaí use new safety technology in Dublin
Gardaí have begun trialling new safety devices that can measure the speed of e-scooters and e-bikes. The portable devices, called mobile dynamometers, can determine the maximum speed that the vehicles are capable of. New laws governing the use of e-scooters were introduced in May 2024 and include limiting their maximum speed to 20km/h. They must also meet lighting and braking standards. The use of such vehicles by those under the age of 16 was also banned. READ MORE Any e-scooters that do not comply with these requirements can be seized by gardaí and a fixed charge notice can be issued to the user. In a post on X, the Garda said checks were carried out using the new dynamometer technology in Dublin on Thursday. Nine e-scooters were seized for a range of offences, including speeding and exceeding the maximum rated power output. [ E-scooters perceived as most dangerous form of transport in Ireland, report finds Opens in new window ] Fine Gael councillor for Dublin's north inner city Ray McAdam welcomed the new technology. 'We see e-scooters and similar machines travelling at speeds much greater than 20km/h across our city streets'. 'Those that ride those machines, I believe, are at risk because of the speeds they travel at, but they're also a huge risk to other road users and other pedestrians in the city centre'. Janet Horner, a Green Party councillor in the same district, said that while the speed enforcement is generally positive, 'it will also exasperate some road safety campaigners who have been calling for more enforcement on cars and other vehicles in the city. 'There is widespread and blatant flouting of the current speed limits around the city by all vehicles and we urgently need more enforcement mechanisms, including speed cameras, red light cameras and more visible traffic policing.'
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Dozens of politicians' print requests refused, including 2,000-page document for Simon Harris
TDS AND SENATORS have had dozens of print jobs refused by the Oireachtas over the last few years. Politicians at Leinster House are entitled to have tens of thousands of items printed for free every year to help promote their work. However, a strict policy is in place that covers only 'parliamentary duties' and not material related to elections, political parties, or fellow candidates. Between 2022 and 2024, a total of 125 print jobs were rejected by the Oireachtas for a variety of different reasons. Records released under FOI show that Fianna Fáil were behind more than half the refused batches – 67 in total. Fine Gael had 22 print jobs refused, Labour 11 and Sinn Féin 8; there were also lower numbers recorded for other smaller groupings or Independents. High-profile political figures were among those who had printing rejected with three jobs refused for Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers. Little detail was provided on the reasons why, with Oireachtas records simply saying they were not in line with the 'service level agreement.' Both Tánaiste Simon Harris and Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan had a single print job refused. Harris' 2,000-page-print job was rejected as outside the bounds of the 'service level agreement' while Mr O'Callaghan's newsletter was declined due to 'overtelectioneering.' Advertisement Former Taoiseach Leo Varadkar also had a 5,000-batch constituency update refused during 2023 – it was simply marked 'rejected' in the Oireachtas files with no further information provided. There were other reasons for refusal too with one newsletter denied because it breached rules about the promotion of a business. A note said this was based on: 'Material which is or could be construed as being related to or promoting a private commercial endeavour, for example a newsletter which promotes, whether directly or indirectly, a company, business or product.' Another was refused because it was considered to be promotion of a political party. It said that was covered by rules covering a ban on 'political party/independent members' corporate material e.g. headquarter type printing, such as application forms for party membership; material which is either directly or indirectly aimed at party fundraising; information notes to party members.' Other jobs were rejected for more banal reasons including faulty file types, defective documents, and one case where a senator exceeded their monthly printing allowance. One job for a batch of 1,500 printed leaflets was refused because it contained information on an upcoming referendum. A note on the file said: 'It is the responsibility of the members and qualifying political parties to ensure that items printed in the printing facility that could be said to be designed to influence voters on how to vote in a Referendum are not distributed after the passage of a [bill].' Fianna Fáil's John Lahart, who had four separate jobs refused, said: 'I don't remember the specific ones offhand, but it often relates to materials about councillors. 'We have had generic material sent back and generally where that might be about the Fianna Fáil team in our area and they would have come back and said that wasn't allowed.' Under Leinster House's printing policy, jobs can also be declined where they have information that could be considered a crime or encouraging others to commit a crime. However, there were no refusals under that section according to the documents that were released. Asked about the records, the Oireachtas said it had no further comment to make. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
