Amazon Tribe Sues NYT Over Porn Addiction Claims
A recent New York Times story covered how the Marubo people of Brazil were adjusting to life with the internet. They had received Starlink only months earlier, and according to the NYT piece, it had introduced serious problems into their society. Chief among those was "minors watching pornography."
Representatives of the Marubo people took issue with the story and the tabloid headlines it spawned on sites like TMZ and Yahoo. They claimed it was not just insulting and inaccurate but damaging in an actionable way, so they took legal action.
The Marubo community just filed defamation charges in an LA court, seeking $180 million in damages from the NYT, TMZ, and Yahoo.
The Marubo people number about 2,000 in all. They live in villages along the Ituí River of the Javari basin. Their population has steadily grown over the past 50 years, coming back from the disease and violence of first contact in the 19th century.
In 2022, the Marubo tribe received 20 Starlink antennas thanks to the efforts of community leader Enoque Marubo and Brazilian activist Flora Dutra. Nine months later, Jack Nicas hiked through the jungle in order to visit the tribe and report on how the internet was affecting them. The tribe invited him to stay for a week, but Nicas left after about 48 hours.
He did not mention his early departure in the NYT piece. Published in June of 2024, the article claimed that the Marubo were now struggling with "teenagers glued to phones; group chats full of gossip; addictive social networks; online strangers; violent video games; scams; misinformation," and, of course, pornography.
Classy as ever, TMZ took the story and ran with it, publishing a piece titled Tribe's Starlink hookup results in porn addiction! Similar headlines echoed across the internet. Realizing the narrative had perhaps gotten away from him, Nicas published a follow up: "No, a remote Amazon tribe did not get addicted to porn."
For Morubo representatives, it was too little, too late.
According to the complaint, the news story and the dozens of salacious articles that followed damaged Enoque Marubo and Flora Dutra personally, as well as the tribe as a whole. It was they, after all, who introduced the internet. And they were the ones receiving the most online abuse. They claim to have received thousands of hateful online messages. These included "death threats, racist and misogynistic abuse, and reputational smears."
They allege that the articles launched "a global media storm" that subjected them to "humiliation, harassment, and irreparable harm to their reputations, safety, and standing both within their own people and on the world stage."
The New York Times agreed that other outlets had incorrectly reported on the story. But they had never averred that the Marubo people had become addicted to pornography, the outlet insisted.
Maybe so, the suit alleges, but their initial story had at the very least struck the match that became the firestorm.
The NYT story has uncomfortable echoes with past representations of Indigenous people. There are centuries of patriarchal depictions of Indigenous people as falling from Edenic innocence to debauched ruination as soon as they encounter the sins of Western civilization.
See, for instance, the "noble savage" of 18th-century philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau. He described Indigenous people in the Americas, the Caribbean, and Africa as living in an ideal state of nature. But when they encountered civilized men, they fell from this state of grace, and struggled to cope with the vices and complications of "civilized" life.
The English writer and explorer John Lawson wrote that in Carolina, "Most of the Savages are much addicted to Drunkenness, a Vice they never were acquainted with, till the Christians came amongst them." Recent reporting on the Marubo discusses their internet usage in similar terms.
"These statements were not only inflammatory but conveyed to the average reader that the Marubo people had descended into moral and social decline as a direct result of internet access," the complaint alleges. "They directly attack the character, morality, and social standing of an entire people, suggesting they lack the discipline or values to function in the modern world."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
See photos of the National Guard confronting protesters in Los Angeles
California National Guard members at the Paramount Business Center in Paramount, Calif. ALEX WELSH/NYT A protester with a Mexican flag stands near authorities in riot gear in Paramount, Calif. MARK ABRAMSON/NYT A federal agent agent with members of the California National Guard near protesters, whose reflection is visible in his helmet visor, in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday. GABRIELA BHASKAR/NYT Federal agents and members of the California National Guard stand in front of protesters in downtown Los Angeles. GABRIELA BHASKAR/NYT Members of the California National Guard stand outside the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles. PHILIP CHEUNG/NYT A protester shouts to US National Guard deployed in downtown Los Angeles. Eric Thayer/Associated Press Members of the California National Guard stand outside the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles. PHILIP CHEUNG/NYT US Representative Maxine Waters speaks to the US National Guard in downtown Los Angeles. Eric Thayer/Associated Press US National Guard stand their line in the metropolitan detention center of downtown Los Angeles. Eric Thayer/Associated Press A protester confronts a line of US National Guard in the metropolitan detention center of downtown Los Angeles. Eric Thayer/Associated Press Smoke rises as protesters clash with members of the California National Guard in downtown Los Angeles. GABRIELA BHASKAR/NYT Members of the California National Guard deploy tear gas to protesters in downtown Los Angeles. GABRIELA BHASKAR/NYT Smoke rises as protesters clash with members of the California National Guard in downtown Los Angeles. GABRIELA BHASKAR/NYT Protestors against immigration raids march toward downtown Los Angeles on June 08 in Los Angeles. Mario Tama/Getty Protestors against immigration raids march toward downtown Los Angeles on June 08. Mario Tama/Getty Protestors against immigration raids march toward downtown Los Angeles on June 08. Mario Tama/Getty National Guard soldiers stand guard as protestors gather outside the Metropolitan Detention Center. Mario Tama/Getty Protestors against immigration raids march toward downtown Los Angeles on June 08. Mario Tama/Getty Protestors against immigration raids march toward downtown Los Angeles on June 08. Mario Tama/Getty Protestors are seen among smoke as confrontation with National Guard soldiers and US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Police officers, take place outside the Metropolitan Detention Center. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images Protestors are seen among smoke as confrontation with National Guard soldiers and US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Police officers, take place outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images Immigration rights supporters and protesters confront with National Guard soldiers and US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Police officers, outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images National Guard troops stand outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC on June 08. Spencer Platt/Photographer: Spencer Platt/Gett National Guard soldiers and US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Police officers clash with demonstrators outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images National Guard soldiers and US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Police officers clash with demonstrators outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images National Guard soldiers stand guard alongside federal officers as protestors gather outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC. Spencer Platt/Getty Protesters stand off with National Guard soldiers and police outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC on June 08. Spencer Platt/Getty National Guard soldiers stand guard alongside federal officers as protestors gather outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC. Spencer Platt/Getty Protesters stand off with National Guard soldiers and police outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC on June 08. Spencer Platt/Getty Protesters stand off with National Guard soldiers and police outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC on June 08. Spencer Platt/Getty Protesters stand off with National Guard soldiers and police outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC on June 08. Spencer Platt/Getty US Department of Homeland Security Police officers and members of the National Guard stand guard outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images California National Guard members at the Paramount Business Center in Paramount, Calif. ALEX WELSH/NYT Members of the National Guard stand guard outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC, in downtown Los Angeles. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images Members of the National Guard stand guard outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC, in downtown Los Angeles. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images Members of the National Guard stand guard outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC in downtown Los Angeles. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images Shanna Kelly can be reached at
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gerry Adams's lawyer to pursue chatbots for libel
The high-profile media lawyer who represented Gerry Adams in his libel trial against the BBC is now preparing to sue the world's most powerful AI chatbots for defamation. As one of the most prominent libel lawyers in the UK, Paul Tweed said that artificial intelligence was the 'new battleground' in trying to prevent misinformation about his clients from being spread online. Mr Tweed is turning his attention to tech after he recently helped the former Sinn Fein leader secure a €100,000 (£84,000) payout over a BBC documentary that falsely claimed he sanctioned the murder of a British spy. The Belfast-based solicitor said he was already building a test case against Meta that could trigger a flurry of similar lawsuits, as he claims to have exposed falsehoods shared by chatbots on Facebook and Instagram. It is not the first time tech giants have been sued for defamation over questionable responses spewed out by their chatbots. Robby Starbuck, the US activist known for targeting diversity schemes at major companies, has sued Meta for defamation alleging that its AI chatbot spread a number of false claims about him, including that he took part in the Capitol riots. A Norwegian man also filed a complaint against OpenAI after its ChatGPT software incorrectly stated that he had killed two of his sons and been jailed for 21 years. Mr Tweed, who has represented celebrities such as Johnny Depp, Harrison Ford and Jennifer Lopez, said: 'My pet subject is generative AI and the consequences of them repeating or regurgitating disinformation and misinformation.' He believes statements put out by AI chatbots fall outside the protections afforded to social media companies, which have traditionally seen them avoid liability for libel. If successful, Mr Tweed will expose social media companies that have previously argued they should not be responsible for claims made on their platforms because they are technology companies rather than traditional publishers. Mr Tweed said: 'I've been liaising with a number of well-known legal professors on both sides of the Atlantic and they agree that there's a very strong argument that generative AI will fall outside the legislative protections.' The lawyer said that chatbots are actually creating new content, meaning they should be considered publishers. He said that the decision by many tech giants to move their headquarters to Ireland for lower tax rates had also opened them up to being sued in Dublin's high courts, where libel cases are typically decided by a jury. This setup is often seen as more favourable to claimants, which Mr Tweed himself says has fuelled a wave of 'libel tourism' in Ireland. He also said Dublin's high courts are attractive as a lower price option compared to London, where he said the costs of filing libel claims are 'eye-watering'. He said: 'I think it's absurd now, the level of costs that are being claimed. The libel courts in London are becoming very, very expensive and highly risky now. The moment you issue your claim form, the costs go into the stratosphere. 'It's not in anyone's interest for people to be deprived of access to justice. It will get to the point where nobody sues for libel unless you're a billionaire.' Meta was contacted for for comment. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Abcarian: Did the MyPillow guy, clinging to the Big Lie, defame a Dominion exec?
There's a line in Eric Coomer's defamation lawsuit against Mike Lindell, the MyPillow guy, that strikes me as the perfect description of what happens when influential partisans belch lies about innocent people in these insanely charged political times: 'The real world consequences for the subjects of those lies,' says the lawsuit, 'have been devastating.' Indeed. Think of Georgia poll workers Ruby Freeman and her daughter Shaye Moss, whose lives were destroyed when Rudy Giuliani, once President Trump's top campaign lawyer, claimed the pair had rigged the 2020 election outcome in their state. Giuliani even invented a blatantly racist story about the women passing drugs to each other at their Fulton County polling place. Trump amplified the claims. The two women received death threats, were loath to leave home even for groceries and had to go into hiding. I will never forget how sad and broken they seemed during their testimony before the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection. Happily, Freeman and Moss won a $148-million settlement from Giuliani, leading the former New York mayor to unsuccessfully sue for bankruptcy in an effort to dodge his obligation. Now stripped of his license to practice law in New York, Giuliani has fallen so far he's not even a punchline on late night TV anymore. Just like Freeman and Moss, Coomer, the former director of product strategy and security for Dominion Voting Systems, was subjected to a torrent of false claims about election rigging by Lindell and other right-wing conspiracy theorists and media outlets. Like Freeman and Moss, he was terrorized and driven into hiding. He left his job, moved to a new location, placed guns around the house he borrowed from a friend, experienced depression and panic attacks, and believes he will not be able to return to his profession. 'People were essentially taking bets on how my brother's corpse would be found and which nefarious shadow group would be behind his death,' Coomer's brother told the New York Times in 2021. 'He would be executed by the state or he would be found with a falsified suicide note and two gunshots in the back of his head.' Coomer, like others, became collateral damage in the misbegotten MAGA campaign to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Fox News hosts, including Sean Hannity, Jeanine Pirro and Lou Dobbs, completely lost their minds, and the company allowed its highest-profile stars to spew lie after lie about the election in general and Dominion Voting Systems in particular, knowing full well (as News Corp. chairman Rupert Murdoch admitted under oath) that Dominion was blameless and that Joe Biden had won fair and square. That unsavory chapter ended up costing Fox $787.5 million in a settlement to Dominion, which allowed the right-wing network to avert a trial. Coomer, who has filed lawsuits against Giuliani and several others who spread lies about him, now gets his day in court against Lindell. The defamation trial, which began Monday, is expected to last through the end of this week. (Coomer settled suits against conspiracy theorist Sidney Powell; Newsmax; One America News Network, or OAN; and an OAN correspondent. His suit against Guiliani is pending.) The false claims against Coomer were dreamed up by a conservative Colorado podcaster, Joseph Oltmann, who told listeners that he had infiltrated an 'Antifa conference call' in which 'Eric, the Dominion guy' claimed to have rigged the election against Trump. (Coomer's defamation suit against Oltmann is also pending.) 'Oltmann,' says Coomer's lawsuit, 'claimed this supposed call happened on some unspecified date months before the election, but that he did not think to take action until after the election was called for President Biden …. Oltmann's story is inherently implausible.' Not to mention, outlandish and preposterous. In his campaign against Coomer, Oltmann posted a photo of the Dominion executive's home on his social media and urged his followers to 'blow this sh— up. Share, put his name everywhere. No rest for this sh—bag … Eric we are watching you.' Lindell, who seems never to have come across a right-wing conspiracy theory he couldn't embrace, picked up on Oltmann's fantasies about Coomer and began spreading them far and wide — in interviews, on his website, in social media, etc. On his FrankSpeech media platform, Lindell addressed Coomer directly: 'You are disgusting and you are treasonous. You are a traitor to the United States of America.' (Classic case of projection, imho.) Lindell could have settled as so many others have done. Instead, he has chosen to fight on, hawking pillows, sheets and slippers to pay his legal bills as he goes. His attorney said that because he believed what he was saying was true, it's not defamation. 'It's just words. All Mike Lindell did was talk,' Lindell's attorney told the jury. 'Mike believed that he was telling the truth.' Before the trial, Lindell stood on the federal courthouse steps in Denver and proclaimed that his only goal in all this was to ban electronic voting machines and replace them with paper ballots. 'If we can get there,' he said, 'I would sacrifice everything.' If Coomer wins his defamation case against Lindell — and I really hope he does — Lindell will have lost a lot and gained very little. First, the case has nothing to do with the validity of voting machines. Second, an estimated 98% of American voters already cast ballots that leave a paper trail because that's one way voting machines record votes. But Lindell, like so many of his MAGA compatriots, still won't let reality stand in the way of Trump's Big Lie. @ Threads: @rabcarian If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.