
AfD ‘extremist' label sets up political high-wire act for Merz
The decision by Germany's domestic spy agency to call the far-right Alternative für Deutschland party 'extremist' amounts to the starkest move yet by authorities to try to stop the advance of the populist political force.
Friday's classification by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) will open up the possibility for the security services to monitor the country's largest opposition party, including by recruiting people to inform against it and enabling interception of its communications.
AfD leaders denounced it as a 'blow against democracy', and nothing short of an attempt to disfranchise the more than 10 million people who voted for it in February's election.
Its leaders vowed to take legal action against what they called 'defamatory' and 'politically motivated attacks'.
According to the experts who compiled the BfV's 1,100-page report, the AfD is 'a racist and anti-Muslim organisation', which, through its strict, ethnically and ancestrally defined version of who is German and who is not, 'deprecates whole sections of the population in Germany and infringes their human dignity'.
It has also 'incited irrational fears and hostility' in society, steering the blame towards individuals and groups, the report read.
In itself, the step is not much of a surprise, although the timing is. The outgoing interior minister, Nancy Faeser, made the bombshell announcement on what is effectively her last day in office.
Faeser said that 'there was no political influence on the assessment', despite the AfD's insistence to the contrary. But the move puts the incoming conservative-led government of Friedrich Merz under great pressure, as well as Faeser's Social Democrat colleagues, who will be the junior partners in the new coalition which gets to work next Tuesday.
On the back of the decision, Merz will now be responsible – on top of the myriad other challenges in his in-tray – for deciding whether and how to ban the AfD, a decision which will involve the most precarious of political tightrope walks.
Migration, Ukraine, Trump and an ailing economy are among the burgeoning issues that he will also have to tackle with urgency. The growing mood of dissatisfaction over these and other issues, exacerbated by the six months of political deadlock that followed the premature collapse of the previous government – which induced an added layer of nationwide ennui – has already caused the AfD to creep up in the polls.
Having won second place in February's election – doubling its previous result and making it the strongest opposition party, second only to the conservative CDU/CSU – in recent days, the AfD has come top of the polls for the first time ever.
The ruling by the BfV is unlikely to put people off supporting the AfD.
Finding a way to reduce the AfD has been at top of the agenda among all of the political parties since it emerged as a protest force of professors and academics in 2013 on the back of anger over the Euro bailouts. The challenge has only grown in importance, as the populists – morphing from anti-Euro to anti-migrant over time – have grown their success at the ballot box.
Merz would like to be seen as a pragmatic rationalist, aiming to reduce the AfD to what he refers to as the 'marginal phenomenon' it once was by addressing the nation's concerns, taking the wind out of the sails of the AfD's successful modus operandi of inciting fear and insecurity.
Tackling 'irregular' immigration is therefore at the top of his domestic agenda, as he seeks to address the topic viewed as having added the most fuel to the AfD's fire.
But many others believe it is too late for that, arguing that an extremist classification, followed by a ban, would be the only way to stop the flourishing party.
Others say such a move would be grave danger of backfiring, arguing that the AfD would turn such a branding by the state into their own 'seal of approval', which will serve to enhance its already strong sense of victimhood or martyrdom.
Merz's party, the CDU, has been torn over how to deal with the AfD. Merz tacitly cooperated with the party earlier this year – despite insisting he would not – to push migration policies through parliament. And on the local level, his party and the AfD have cooperated on issues such as a ruling that the German flag should be hoisted in schools.
Jens Spahn, Merz's close ally, recently prompted scorn by suggesting the AfD should be treated as a 'normal opposition party', arguing that excluding the party from parliamentary procedures only boosted its popularity.
Those who reject that approach say Friday's ruling will now give them more justification to block the party at every opportunity – but they argue that this will only work if a cross-party consensus prevails.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
‘We couldn't have scripted this better': The White House is thrilled with how events are unfolding in LA
Los Angeles may resemble a war zone, with thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines deployed in response to widespread anti-immigration raid protests, but the Trump White House reportedly couldn't be happier about the politics of the situation. 'We couldn't have scripted this better,' a senior White House aide told The Atlantic of the dynamic inside the Oval Office. 'It's like the 2024 election never ended: Trump is strong while Democrats are weak and defending the indefensible.' Trump insiders reportedly believe that the images of the protests, which have featured both large-scale peaceful demonstrations and multiple days of violence against police and immigration officers, as well as protesters burning vehicles and holding Mexican flags, play into the administration's message. On the campaign trail, Trump frequently claimed Democrats are weak on law and order, while alleging most immigrants are violent national security threats, despite data showing the opposite. 'This is what America voted for, period,' a Trump adviser told NBC News. 'This is the America First focus that got the president elected and is driven by nothing else than what he promised American voters.' 'Look at the violence, the attacks on law enforcement,' the adviser added. 'If Democrats want to support that, let them. This is why we win elections and they do not.' Trump has long valorized the military and called for them to form part of an aggressive response to civil unrest, reportedly sparring with his first term Defense Secretary Mark Esper over his opposition to sending active-duty troops to counter 2020 Black Lives Matter protests and allegedly asking if troops could 'shoot them in the legs or something.' During his first term, Trump ultimately deferred to state governors on whether to call up National Guard troops to respond to the 2020 protests, and governors in 32 states and Washington, D.C., ultimately did. This time around, Trump does not want to appeal to local leaders and is forging ahead on his own, including federalizing the California National Guard over the wishes of Los Angeles and state leaders, who have sued. 'Trump seems super intent on a very different path now, with a serious show of righteous force to protect American lives and property,' Steve Cortes, a longtime Trump adviser, told Politico. Another key force for the military-led response has been White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, an immigration hard-liner who has repeatedly accused California officials of being in open rebellion against the government and its migration policies, a potential prelude to the White House invoking the emergency Insurrection Act. "Stephen has been clear in all the meetings: More military, faster," a Trump adviser told Axios. Top Democrats in California have accused the Trump administration of deliberately trying to provoke a crisis as a means to seize more power, first with heavy-duty immigration raids and then by invoking emergency powers to send military troops in to respond to the protests that followed. 'Authoritarian regimes begin by targeting people who are least able to defend themselves,' California Governor Gavin Newsom said in a nationally televised speech Tuesday evening. 'But they do not stop there. Trump and his loyalists thrive on division because it allows them to take more power and exert even more control.' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, meanwhile, has said the White House is using the crisis as a lab 'experiment.' 'This is chaos that was started in Washington,' Bass said Monday during a press conference. An outlier in his party, Senator John Fetterman has accused his fellow Democrats of losing 'the moral high ground' over the crisis by what he said was a refusal to 'condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement.' Democratic leaders have generally condemned the violence and called for peaceful protest, while being sharply critical of the Trump administration's response. The Los Angeles crisis has also likely provided a welcome distraction from last week's major political scandal, the acrimonious public split between Trump and his former top ally, Elon Musk, who savaged the president's Big, Beautiful Bill spending package and accused Trump of being tied to the Jeffrey Epstein pedophilia scandal. In recent days, Trump and Musk have signaled they could be open to a reconciliation.


New Statesman
5 hours ago
- New Statesman
Blind support for Israel has muzzled Bari Weiss's Free Press
Photo byfor The Free Press In the United States today, there are few more powerful or influential media start-ups than Bari Weiss's the Free Press. Founded in 2021 and run through Substack, the Free Press today boasts more than 750,000 subscribers, at least 100,000 of whom pay. Weiss, 41 and a former New York Times columnist, is a media mogul for the new age, and her reporters and columnists regularly publish pieces that are widely praised or reviled – either way, the work is rarely ignored. Weiss and her publication have been popular with those who resented the leftward cultural drift of the 2010s and craved a home for combative centrism. Before Donald Trump returned to the White House, so-called heterodox intellectuals and writers were in the ascendancy, defending free expression against the excesses of the left. Weiss, their leader, denounced self-censorship and ideological conformity, and her news organisation's website vowed to uphold 'honesty, doggedness, and fierce independence'. The Free Press's site still reads: 'We always aim to highlight multiple perspectives on complicated subjects. And we don't allow ideology to stand in the way of searching for the truth.' But that isn't true. Weiss's Free Press has one red line: Israel. The organisation is unapologetically hawkish and anti-Palestinian, and has little to say about the attacks on free expression the Trump administration has unleashed on pro-Palestinian activists. Whereas other prominent heterodox writers and publications have been willing to criticise the Trump administration and Benjamin Netanyahu's Israel, Weiss has stayed mum. Weiss's values have been made plain – she once declared herself 'guilty as charged' to being a 'Zionist fanatic'. She seems to have little interest in rethinking a conflict that has led to the deaths of more than 50,000 Gazans. Recent evidence of the Free Press's propagandising includes a column by Michael Ames which declared war-torn Gaza wasn't at risk of a famine – though he concedes 'it was never in doubt that the Israel-Hamas war brought immense human suffering to Gaza, including from food shortages'. There is something insidious about squabbling over the definition of a 'famine' while referring to 'food shortages'. At the time, a total Israeli blockade of aid deliveries to Gaza was approaching its third month. Israel has since allowed small amounts of aid into the Strip, but distribution has been marred by chaos and shootings that have killed dozens of Palestinians. Even centrist and conservative institutions have acknowledged the disaster that is unfolding in Gaza. Glenn Loury, the American economist who has long been a prominent voice among the heterodox elite, has come out against Israel's conduct in the war. So has Andrew Sullivan, the leading political commentator who has also railed against 'woke' (and Trump) a great deal over the last few years. The Free Press stands apart. The greater question is how sustainable this will be. Weiss found her success speaking to disaffected liberals who believed that on cultural issues the Democratic Party had swerved too far left. The Free Press was a clearing house for readers who were anxious and aghast over the dominance of identity politics in academia, the media, and elsewhere; the audience demand was real, and business for Weiss boomed. With the Democrats out of power and woke on the retreat, the Free Press's purpose grows less clear. It has relatively little to say about Trump's frontal assault on democratic institutions or his systematic violations of free speech. Meanwhile, its defence of the Israeli government holds little appeal for anyone who isn't a hardcore Republican or ardent Zionist. Neoconservatives have also found a home in the Free Press, which fills a niche but demonstrates how out of step the publication is with current trends. Fiscally conservative economics paired with muscular military interventions around the globe are not popular with Republicans or Democrats in America. Trump's ascension can be read, in part, as a repudiation of neoconservatism. Meanwhile, many of the Maga-curious independents who gave Trump another shot last year are drifting leftward again. The Trump chaos is too much to stomach. He has lost popularity faster than any president in modern times. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Weiss's ideology has prevented her publication from adequately covering the failures of the new US administration. Weiss is blinded by her uncompromising support for the Israeli government. Netanyahu can do no wrong. To punish Hamas, all of Gaza must be punished, and there's seemingly no limit to the amount of suffering inflicted on civilians in retaliation for the 7 October attacks. It's hard to think of another recent war that has lacked such a sense of proportion. The ultra-religious, ethno-nationalist right wing governs Israel, and that is not going to change in the foreseeable future. Any commentator who cannot acknowledge that reality is lying to their audience or lying to themselves. That is where Weiss and the Free Press have now gone. They cannot comprehend that Israel has abandoned all pretext of a two-state solution, that the annexation of the West Bank and ethnic cleansing in Gaza are Netanyahu's only goals, and that Israel may, in time, become a genuine pariah state – which would be disastrous for the Israelis themselves and do the Jewish diaspora, to which I belong, no favours. Or the Free Press can comprehend all of this, and simply does not care. [See also: Syria may be broken, but it's energised by hope] Related


Scottish Sun
7 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Donald Trump reveals huge new plans for Aberdeenshire golf course
The golf courses will combine to create 'The Greatest 36 Holes in Golf' on the Aberdeenshire coast TOP TRUMP Donald Trump reveals huge new plans for Aberdeenshire golf course DONALD Trump has unveiled huge new plans for his Aberdeenshire golf course. The site is currently undergoing an expansion, with a new 18-hole course set to open later this summer. 2 Donald Trump has revealed new plans for his Aberdeenshire golf course Credit: AFP 2 Trump and his Scots mum Mary Anne MacLeod Credit: Getty Known officially as the Old and the New, the golf courses will combine to create 'The Greatest 36 Holes in Golf' on the Aberdeenshire coast. And as part of the upgrades, the 47th US President is creating a memorial garden to his late mum Mary Anne MacLeod at the golf resort. The main feature of the garden will be a tribute carved in stone, specially imported from her birthplace and original home, the Isle of Lewis. Trump's mum was born and brought up in the fishing town of Tong on the Hebridean island of Lewis but emigrated to New York to live a very different life. She was one of tens of thousands of Scots who travelled to the US and Canada in the early years of the last century, looking to escape economic hardship at home. She first left Lewis for New York in 1930, at the age of 18, to seek work as a domestic servant. Six years later, she was married to successful property developer Frederick Trump, the son of German migrants and one of the most eligible men in New York. The fourth of their five children, Donald John, as he is referred to on the islands, is now US president for the second time. Mary Anne died in 2000 aged 88 and is buried in New York. Sarah Malone, executive vice president of Trump International, said: 'With the New course opening now fast approaching, we are delighted to share the final layout of this extraordinary links and the completion of The Greatest 36 Holes. Watch the supercringey moment Donald Trump gets a rocking bagpipe welcome to his first Scots golf course 'It has been a phenomenal journey to create two truly exceptional world-class championship golf courses, across this magnificent stretch of North Sea coastline. 'The Trump family has a deep affection for Scotland – not only as the home of golf – but as the ancestral home of President Trump's beloved mother, Mary Anne MacLeod.' We told previously how a man who claims a farmer's hedge has ruined his views of Donald Trump's Aberdeenshire golf course has taken his fight to the government.