
When missiles rain down on Israel, Arab communities say they have nowhere to hide
When rockets and missiles are fired at Israel, sirens go off and Ilan Amit takes his family to the public shelter conveniently located four stories beneath his street in Jerusalem.
"When I'm down there, I feel completely safe," he told As It Happens host Nil Kӧksal.
"My thoughts are with my friends and colleagues and partners who don't have a bomb shelter where they live — not a public one, not one in their house, no ways to protect themselves at all."
Most municipalities in Israel have several public bomb shelters, but many Arab-majority communities lack that same infrastructure — especially desert settlements that Israel doesn't recognize as legal.
As Israel engages in wars in Gaza and Iran, advocates like Amit are highlighting that security disparity, and working to fix it.
Amit is co-CEO of the non-profit Arab-Jewish Center for Empowerment, Equality, and Co-operation (AJEEC), which is deploying mobile bomb shelters made of concrete to the communities that need them most. But, ultimately, he says it's a problem that won't be fixed without significant government investment.
Asked for comment, Israel's defence ministry directed questions to the Israeli Defence Force, which did not respond to CBC before deadline.
Family killed in town with no public bomb shelters
As of Tuesday, a fragile ceasefire took hold between Israel and Iran. But just a couple weeks ago, Iranian missiles struck the northern town of Tamra and killed a family of four.
Among them were Nidal Abu Al Heija's sister.
When a phone alert sounded on June 14 to warn of Iranian missiles flying towards Tamra, Abu Al Heija called his sister to tell her to take shelter with her daughters, but no one answered. After the alert, he rushed to the area where she lived. The street was full of people and littered with debris.
"I was asking people what happened and someone, he just said to me 'Oh, Nidal'. He didn't know what to say. And then the other one says, 'It's your own sister's house'," Abu Al Heija told Reuters four days after the strike.
The house had taken a direct hit.
"Darkness, dust, smell of bomb, something I don't want to remember," said Abu Al Heija. "I was just going there shouting 'Noura! Noura! Shada! Hala!' And then unfortunately I saw her coming, people holding her, with no breath."
Known to her family as Noura, Manar Abu Al Heija Katib, 45, and two of her daughters, Shada, 20, and Hala, 13, were killed, along with Manar's sister-in-law, Manar Diab Katib, 41.
The only survivors were Manar Abu Al Heija Katib's husband, Raja Katib, and their third daughter, Razan.
Unlike many Arab households, the Katibs had reinforced safe rooms on the top floor of their house, in keeping with Israeli construction standards put in place in the 1990s.
But it wasn't enough to protect them. Part of the roof had collapsed, crushing the top floor. Windows and walls were blasted out and rubble tumbled down the side of the house.
On the heels of the tragedy, Tamra Mayor Musa Abu Rumi pointed out that his town — which has 37,000 residents — doesn't have any public shelters.
"The government has never financed the construction of shelters in our town, because they have other priorities," he told CNN.
A longstanding concern
The problem is not new.
The Israel Democracy Institute (IDI), an independent research centre, noted in a recent report that people in Tamra raised alarms about the lack of public bomb shelters after a Hezbollah rocket strike injured three people there in October 2024.
Since then, it says, "Israel has continued to wage a sustained military campaign on several fronts," while the security discrepancies in Arab communities "remain unaddressed."
In fact, the IDI and other advocacy organizations say there has been little to no progress on this front since a 2018 State Comptroller's report in Israel found that 60 out of 71 Arab municipalities in Israel have no public shelters.
"This situation is not only immoral but also unconstitutional and grossly violates the right to equality, and the state's obligations to protect the right to life, protection and security," Abir Joubran, an attorney for the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, said in a press release issued after the Tamra strike.
The report also found that 46 per cent of Israel's Arab citizens live in houses without any reinforced safe rooms, compared to 26 per cent for the wider population.
Unrecognized villages have 'no way to protect themselves'
Amit says the situation is even worse for the roughly 150,000 Arabs who live in Bedouin villages that are not recognized by the Israeli government.
"Those are villages in the Negev, in a desert in the south of Israel, that have zero shelters, no public shelters, no domestic shelters, no mobile bomb shelters, no way to protect themselves while missiles are falling," Amit said.
"And unfortunately, that population … lives adjacent to Israeli air bases, which means that the Iranian rockets are focusing precisely on those areas. That's the population we're worried about."
AJEEC runs an emergency response centre to address the specific needs of unrecognized villages.
"We're currently focusing on purchasing mobile bomb shelters," Amit said. "Those are huge pieces of concrete, basically, and placing them next to clinics and schools."
Before the Oct. 7 attack on Israel by Hamas-led militants, Amit says Israel's Iron Dome missile defence system wasn't covering huge swaths of Bedouin communities. Because Israel does not officially recognize the villages, the system saw those parts of the map as open agricultural areas, he said.
"Today, we're in a bit of a different situation. The military is intercepting those ballistic missiles coming down on the Negev in those areas, but there's so much debris coming down on those villages," he said.
"Those are burning pieces of metal coming down from the sky from the interception of those missiles. And we are seeing more and more hits in houses, people that are being injured."
Amit has been addressing Israel's parliament, writing op-eds in local newspapers, and reaching out to lawmakers to push Israel to bridge the security gap between Arab and non-Arab populations.
While the current government is not always easy to work with, he says he believes they are making progress.
Still, he says, there's "a lot to do."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
22 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
In his sole full day at the NATO summit, Trump faces an alliance further shaped to his liking
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — President Donald Trump on Wednesday will meet with members of a NATO alliance that he has worked to bend to his will over the years and whose members are rattled by his latest comments casting doubt on the U.S. commitment to its mutual defense guarantees. Trump's comments en route to the Netherlands that his fidelity to Article 5 'depends on your definition' are likely to draw a spotlight at the NATO summit, as will the new and fragile Iran-Israel ceasefire that Trump helped broker after the U.S. unloaded airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. At the same time, the alliance is poised to enact one of Trump's chief priorities for NATO: a pledge by its member countries to increase, sometimes significantly, how much they spend on their defense. 'NATO was broke, and I said, 'You're going to have to pay,'' Trump said Tuesday. 'And we did a whole thing, and now they're paying a lot. Then I said, 'You're going to have to lift it to 4% or 5%, and 5% is better.'' Spending 5% of a country's gross domestic product on defense is 'good,' Trump pronounced, adding, 'It gives them much more power.' The boost in spending follows years of Trump complaints that other countries weren't paying their fair share for membership in an alliance created as a bulwark against threats from the former Soviet Union. Most NATO countries, with the key exception of Spain, are preparing to endorse the 5% pledge, motivated to bolster their own defenses not just by Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine but also, perhaps, to placate Trump. As a candidate in 2016, Trump suggested that he as president would not necessarily heed the alliance's mutual defense guarantees outlined in Article 5 of the NATO treaty. In March of this year, he expressed uncertainty that NATO would come to the United States' defense if needed, though the alliance did just that after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. On Tuesday, he told reporters aboard Air Force One on his way to The Hague for the summit that whether he is committed to Article 5 'depends on your definition.' 'There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right?' Trump said. 'But I'm committed to being their friends.' He signaled that he would give a more precise definition of what Article 5 means to him once he is at the summit. Trump also vented to reporters before leaving Washington about the actions by Israel and Iran after his announced ceasefire. He said, in his view, both sides had violated the nascent agreement. After Trump arrived in the Netherlands, news outlets, including The Associated Press, published stories revealing that a U.S. intelligence report suggested in an early assessment that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months by weekend strikes and was not 'completely and fully obliterated,' as Trump had said. The White House called the report 'flat-out wrong,' and Trump posted in all-caps on social media early Wednesday that any reporting that the strikes weren't 'completely destroyed' was an attempt to 'demean one of the most successful military strikes in history.' The White House has not said what other world leaders Trump would meet with one-on-one while in The Hague, but he said he was likely to cross paths with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Globe and Mail
4 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Donald Trump's F-word and his discovery of some hard truths about the world
The sportswriter Bill Simmons coined the phrase 'the Tyson Zone' to describe the rarified state of being – named after Mike Tyson – in which a celebrity's behaviour becomes so unglued that nothing you hear about them seems impossible anymore. It was almost 20 years ago in his ESPN column that he originated the idea, but Donald Trump was a little later in discovering the powerful sorcery of occupying the Tyson Zone in politics. He does and says whatever he wants to such extremes that none of it shocks or even matters anymore. The more outrageous his actions, the more he expands the comfy cocoon of the Tyson Zone around himself. And yet, somehow, the F-word was a new bridge to cross. This he hadn't done before; this was a surprise. There was something in this reaction that mattered. How Trump's Israel-Iran ceasefire agreement came together in a chaotic 48 hours Trump pivots from budget bill to big, beautiful Middle East settlement On Tuesday as he prepared to leave for a NATO summit in the Netherlands, Mr. Trump faced a barrage of questions about the ceasefire he had declared the previous night between Israel and Iran, which had been breached immediately and explosively. 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing,' Mr. Trump snarled, physically leaning into the end of the sentence. He finished by barking 'Do you understand that?' at the reporters crowding around, before stalking away to his helicopter. It read like a true temper tantrum: naked, overwhelmed, a bubbling over of the insides. On one hand, Mr. Trump may have been simply expressing intense frustration about a long-running conflict that is intractable, destructive, bloody and, yes, incredibly frustrating on a geopolitical scale. There appeared to be an element of aggrieved surprise, as though he had thought he could quell a roiling sea just by saying so. He didn't seem to have accounted for 75 years of conflict in the Middle East, burning even hotter in the past few years, and still more in the past couple of weeks. But Mr. Trump's reaction to the world around him – particularly his most energetic responses – are never about the world, but rather about the centre of the universe: Donald J. Trump. What we saw on Tuesday was the President discovering in real time that some forces in the world will not be bent to his will, no matter how badly he wants to claim a big win. Around 1 a.m. ET on Monday, Mr. Trump posted on his social-media network, Truth Social, 'THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT. PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!' The prim, limp politeness of that was overshadowed in strangeness only by the way he signed it, like an official, enforceable order, 'DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!' By the time day broke in Washington, the ceasefire had been breached and Israel and Iran were each blaming the other. During the same press gaggle in which he launched that expletive, the President said he 'didn't like the fact that Israel unloaded right after we made the deal.' Mr. Trump thinks of himself as the consummate dealmaker. And here he was trying to broker the biggest deal imaginable – what could be more consequential or difficult, after all, than peace in the Middle East – and the whole world could see it failing. It's plain that Mr. Trump sees the ability to end conflicts as a demonstration of authority and negotiating prowess. He has repeatedly asserted that Russia's invasion of Ukraine would not have happened on his watch, and in the last several days, he's taken to listing off all the accomplishments for which he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize. On Monday, a Ukrainian parliamentarian who had nominated Mr. Trump for the Nobel for brokering negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv withdrew the nomination. Then a Republican congressman stepped in on Tuesday to nominate him for the hours-old ceasefire. Re-posting that nomination letter was among the manic blizzard of social-media activity Mr. Trump mashed out aboard Air Force One as it hummed toward The Hague, following his meltdown on the White House lawn. He posted a praise-filled message from the NATO Secretary-General, he wrote a long tirade that combined the alleged stupidity of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez with a flex about his own cognitive testing, and he shared multiple posts about his approval ratings and various brownnosers declaring he should win the Nobel Peace Prize. In the decade that he's dominated world news, Mr. Trump has said and done so many things that breach unthinkable boundaries that it's not even worth trying to count them. But he's never dropped an F-word before. Consider how many times the President – who grew up as a boy with a rich and ruthless father who paved New York City for him, before he became a rich and ruthless man himself – has been told 'no' in his life. How often has he not gotten something he really wanted? How many times in the past 10 years? (Once at least, in November, 2020, and we know how that went.) How many times since election night last fall? Later in the day on Tuesday, Iran and Israel confirmed the ceasefire, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pronounced that 'Donald Trump is the greatest friend that Israel has ever had in the White House.' By the time he gaggled with reporters aboard his plane, Mr. Trump seemed to be feeling more optimistic and in control. 'Israel, as you know, turned back. They didn't do that raid this morning,' he said. He added, 'So the ceasefire is very much in effect and I think we're going to keep it there for a very long time.' Now, the President figured he was on his way to NATO to 'solve a new set of problems.' He answered more questions, and then when he'd had enough, he turned away from the reporters to walk back to his private section of the plane. 'Do you think you'll get the Nobel Peace Prize now, sir?' a reporter called after him. Mr. Trump mustn't have heard her, because he didn't turn back.


Winnipeg Free Press
5 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Beijing, a longtime friend of Tehran, turns to cautious diplomacy in Iran's war with Israel
When Israel attacked Iran nearly two weeks ago, the Chinese government, a longtime friend of Iran, jumped into action — at least, when it came to words. It condemned the attacks. Its leader, Xi Jinping, got on the phone with the Russian leader and urged a ceasefire. Its foreign minister spoke with his counterpart in Iran. But that's where China stopped. The usual rhetoric was delivered. De-escalation and dialogue were trumpeted. Yet China offered no material support. Despite Beijing's clout as a near-peer rival to the United States and its ambition to play a bigger role on the world stage, Beijing refrained from offering military support to Iran, let alone getting directly involved in the conflict. The decision underscored the limitations it faces in the Middle East. 'Beijing lacks both the diplomatic capabilities and the risk appetite to quickly intervene in, and to think it can successfully navigate, this fast-moving and volatile situation,' said Jude Blanchette, director of the China Research Center at RAND. Given the tangled politics of the Middle East, where China holds substantial economic and energy stakes yet wields minimal military influence, Beijing 'isn't inclined to stick its neck out,' Blanchette added. Instead, the Chinese government opts to remain 'a measured, risk‑averse actor.' China weighs commercial interests Zhu Feng, dean of the School of International Relations at Nanjing University in eastern China, said volatility in the Middle East is not in China's interests. 'From China's point of view, the Israel-Iran conflicts challenge and impact China's business interests and economic security,' Zhu said. 'This is something China absolutely does not want to see.' After the Iranian parliament floated a plan to shut down the strategically located Strait of Hormuz over the weekend, China spoke against it. 'China calls on the international community to step up efforts to de-escalate conflicts and prevent regional turmoil from having a greater impact on global economic development,' said Guo Jiakun, a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry. On Tuesday, following the ceasefire announcement, U.S. President Donald Trump wrote in a social media post: 'China can now continue to purchase Oil from Iran,' suggesting the ceasefire would prevent the disruption of Iranian oil production. A 2024 report by the U.S. Energy Information Administration contained estimates suggesting that roughly 80% to 90% of the oil exported by Iran went to China. The Chinese economy could struggle to preserve its industrial production without the roughly 1.2 million barrels of oil and other fossil fuels provided by Iran. Craig Singleton, senior China fellow at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies, summed up Beijing's responses as 'steady oil buys and ritual calls for 'dialogue'.' 'That's about it,' Singleton said. 'No drones or missile parts, no emergency credit line. Just words calibrated to placate Tehran without rattling Riyadh or inviting U.S. sanctions.' Beijing's muted responses also expose the gap between China's great-power rhetoric and its real reach in the region. Said Singleton: 'China's Gulf footprint is commercial, not combat-ready. When missiles fly, its much-touted strategic partnership with Iran shrinks to statements. Beijing wants discounted Iranian oil and a 'peace-broker' headline, while letting Washington shoulder the hard-power risks.' In statements, China sides with Iran and pledges to mediate Since the onset of the war, Beijing — which brokered a diplomatic rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2023 — stood by Iran's side and urged talks. At the United Nations, China, a permanent member of the Security Council, teamed up with Russia and Pakistan in putting forward a draft resolution condemning 'in the strongest terms' the attacks against peaceful nuclear sites and facilities in Iran. They called for 'an immediate and unconditional ceasefire' even though the United States, another permanent member on the council, is almost certain to veto the proposal. Shortly after Israel attacked Iran, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had a phone call with his Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, and told him that 'China explicitly condemned Israel's violation of Iran's sovereignty, security and territorial integrity.' Wang, using common diplomatic language, said China was 'ready to maintain communication with Iran and other relevant parties to continue playing a constructive role in de-escalating the situation.' Wang later spoke with foreign ministers of Oman and Egypt; both nations are key mediators in the region. And late last week, before the U.S. got involved militarily, Xi spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin; the two agreed to stay in closer contact over Iran and work toward de-escalation. But China stayed away from any direct involvement, and Russia also had muted responses to the Israel-Iran conflict. Iran is an important link in Xi's ambitious global project Belt and Road Initiative, and in 2023 joined the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a security group by Russia and China to counter the U.S.-led NATO. It has conducted joint exercises with China, including this year's 'Maritime Security Belt 2025' in the Gulf of Oman, in which Russia also took part. On Wednesday, Beijing will convene a meeting of defense ministers of SCO member nations. As important as Iran is to China, it is only part of Beijing's calculus, according to an analysis by the Soufan Center, a New York-based organization that focuses on global security challenges. In an intel brief, the center said the conflict has revealed that Beijing's support for its partners, especially those in confrontation with the United States, 'is limited by a complex matrix of interests, including its desire to avoid alienating major economic partners and escalating tensions with the West.' ___ AP researcher Yu Bing in Beijing and writers Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations and Josh Boak in Washington contributed to this report.