NBA MVP Award Is Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's To Lose
With roughly three weeks left in the regular season, the Oklahoma City Thunder owns the best record in the NBA and has clinched the No. 1 seed in the Western Conference. It's been a phenomenal season for the young team, but also for several individuals on the roster. Most notably, the face of the franchise, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, appears to be on his way to his first-ever NBA Most Valuable Player Award.
His odds currently sit at -900, an implied probability of roughly 90%. Since ESPN's MVP straw poll last month — when Gilgeous-Alexander already had started to build a clear lead — the Thunder superstar has only elevated his play and has increased his case to win the award.
At this point, Nikola Jokic is the only actual competition for Gilgeous-Alexander. Given only a few weeks remain in the regular season, it would take a generational close to the season for Jokic to become the outright favorite for the award. His basic counting stats are better than Gilgeous-Alexander's overall, but Denver has won 14 fewer games than Oklahoma City to this point. That matters, as value often brings victories.
The MVP is an individual award, but Gilgeous-Alexander's impact on winning is undeniably the best in the NBA. The Thunder is on pace for 68 wins, with him leading the league in scoring while also being one of the most impactful defenders in the NBA. Gilgeous-Alexander isn't just a neutral defender. He's a top-ten Defensive Player of the Year candidate for the second-straight season.
Availability is also a key component for any player that is most valuable in any regular season campaign. Gilgeous-Alexander has played in 67 of 70 games for the Thunder this season. He's posted averages of 32.9 points, 6.3 assists and 5.1 rebounds per contest while shooting 58.4% from 2-point range, 37.4% from beyond the arc and 90.1% from the free throw line. Gilgeous-Alexander is second in the NBA in total steals (118), fourth in total blocks among guards (69) and 16th in total deflections (181) while being the NBA's top scorer. The two-way impact is undeniable.
This isn't to discount Jokic's impact, because he's had an unbelievable season to this point. He's the best player in the world and has won MVP in three of the last four seasons to prove it. But as it relates to the player who has been the best and most valuable in the 2024-25 campaign, Gilgeous-Alexander is the guy.
The NBA's Most Valuable Player Award will be voted on at the conclusion of the regular season but won't be announced until May. When that day comes, the expectation is that Gilgeous-Alexander and the Thunder will be amidst a playoff run to the NBA Finals. In the meantime, he'll continue to put together wins and dominant individual performances over the final few weeks of the regular season to officially lock down the award.
At this point, MVP is Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's to lose and only Nikola Jokic has the ability to overtake him for the honor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
41 minutes ago
- Fox News
Indiana Pacers Come Back from Behind and Take First NBA Finals Game Against Oklahoma City Thunder
The Indiana Pacers come back from behind and take the first NBA Finals game against the Oklahoma City Thunder. #IndianaPacers #Pacers #OKCThunder #NBA #NBAFinals Learn more about your ad choices. Visit FOX News Radio
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How historic was OKC Thunder's NBA Finals Game 1 loss vs. Pacers? Examining the numbers
The Oklahoma City Thunder opened the NBA Finals with a stunning defeat, falling 111-110 to the Indiana Pacers on Tuesday at the Paycom Center. Here's a look at the numbers behind the Thunder's loss: Pre-order our new book on Thunder's rise to NBA Finals Advertisement CARLSON: Thunder takes gut punch in Game 1. How it responds will decide who wins NBA Finals. Thunder can't take advantage of Indiana turnovers 20: First-half turnovers forced by the Thunder. 9: Points off those turnovers, helping Indiana remain within striking distance. 5: Turnovers in the second half by the Pacers, with Oklahoma City scoring just two points off those turnovers. More: OKC Thunder leads for all but 0.3 seconds before falling to Pacers in Game 1 of NBA Finals Mark Daigneault digs deep 11: Players used by the Thunder. Most of Ajay Mitchell's playoff minutes had come with the Thunder either winning big or losing big but Mitchell played 4:10 in the second quarter before Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Isaiah Joe re-entered the game. Mitchell was 0 for 3 during the stretch as Oklahoma City's lead went from nine to six with Mitchell on the floor. Pacers control second half Plus-13: The Pacers' scoring margin in the second half. Oklahoma City led 57-45 at the break, but was outscored 66-53 in the second half to give Indiana a chance to complete the comeback. Advertisement More: Carlson: Patience got Thunder to 2025 NBA Finals. Now, OKC needs to win its first title. Tyrese Haliburton does it again 4: Tyrese Haliburton shots in the closing seconds of regulation or overtime to win a game or force overtime in the playoffs. Haliburton hit a 3-pointer in the closing seconds of Game 1 of the Eastern Conference finals to force overtime against the Knicks in a game Indiana ultimately won. More: Tyrese Haliburton delivers stunner again as Pacers steal Game 1 vs Thunder in NBA Finals Oklahoma City Thunder guard Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (2) drives to the basket between Indiana Pacers guard Tyrese Haliburton (0), guard Andrew Nembhard (2) and forward Pascal Siakam (43) during Game 1 of the NBA Finals between the Oklahoma City Thunder and the Indiana Pacers at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City, Thursday, June 5, 2025. Indiana won 111-110. OKC lets lead slip away 15: Thunder's lead with 9:42 remaining after Jalen Williams caught a T.J. McConnell inbounds pass from under the basket in stride near midcourt and took it down for a dunk to give OKC its biggest lead of the game. Advertisement 32: Points scored by the Pacers after Williams' dunk, highlighted by Haliburton's game-winner with 0.3 seconds remaining. 1: Field goal for the Thunder in the last four minutes. Gilgeous-Alexander hit a driving layup with 4:01 left to put the Thunder up six, and made a pair of free throws 182: Consecutive losses in the NBA Finals by a team trailing by nine or more in the final three minutes since 1971 before Indiana's stunning comeback Thursday. 1: Lead by the Pacers. The Thunder led from the start until Haliburton's game-winner. More: Pacers 'cheated death' again to stun Thunder in NBA Finals: Social media reacts Shai Gilgeous-Alexander still historic 38: Points scored by Gilgeous-Alexander, the third-most all-time in an NBA Finals debut. Only Allen Iverson (48 in 2001) and George Mikan (42 in 1949) scored more in their first NBA Finals appearance. Both Iverson and Mikan, though, won their first Finals games. Mikan's Lakers went on to win the title, though Iverson's 76ers lost the next four games to the Lakers to give Los Angeles the title. Advertisement 2: Free throws attempted by Gilgeous-Alexander through three quarters. Gilgeous-Alexander made just one. 6: Free throws made by Gilgeous-Alexander in the fourth quarter. More: Mussatto: How Sam Presti, architect of OKC Thunder rebuild, followed through on blueprint Ryan Aber covers OU athletics for The Oklahoman. Have a story idea for Ryan? He can be reached at raber@ or on Twitter at @RyAber . Sign up for the OU Sooners newsletter to access more OU coverage. Support Ryan's work and that of other Oklahoman journalists by purchasing a digital subscription today at . This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Inside NBA Finals Game 1 stats in Indiana Pacers' rally vs OKC Thunder
New York Times
44 minutes ago
- New York Times
How the Thunder lost their way defensively late in Game 1 loss to Pacers
OKLAHOMA CITY — As Tyrese Haliburton's pull-up jumper caressed the bottom of the net and Aaron Nesmith met him near half court for a bear hug, the Indiana Pacers stormed the court — unconcerned with the 0.3 seconds left on the game clock. The Oklahoma City Thunder players, who attempted to wade through a sea of yellow back to their bench, were stunned, as was the rest of Paycom Arena. Advertisement Oklahoma City, like the rest of the NBA world, knew about Indiana's propensity for playoff comebacks. But witnessing it firsthand in a game and stage of this magnitude was different. 'The common denominator is them,' coach Mark Daigneault said following the Thunder's 111-110 loss in Game 1 of the NBA Finals. 'That's a really good team. Credit them for not only tonight but their run. They've had so many games like that that have seemed improbable. They just play with a great spirit, they keep coming, they made plays, made shots. They deserved to win by a point. We got to learn from it. Obviously, a lot of things we can clean up. Credit them, they went and got that game.' Oklahoma City's second-half defense — which gave up 31 and 35 points in the third and fourth quarters — indicated a larger issue with Indiana's offensive proficiency. But the Thunder should be worried about losing a game in which six different Pacers finished in double figures, despite none scoring more than 19 points. With 2:36 remaining on Thursday night, the Thunder were in control of the game with a 108-99 lead. But Oklahoma City's offense sputtered over the finish line, scoring just two points over the final 156 seconds of regulation. These Thunder, as talented as they are, have gone through offensive droughts during their postseason run — shot selection, execution issues, etc. Much more concerning is that the Thunder allowed their defense, the bedrock of their success, to fall apart in the game's most critical stretch, allowing the Pacers to slam the door with a 12-2 run. Game 1's fourth-quarter collapse was even more confusing considering how suffocating Oklahoma City's approach had been in the first half. For 24 mind-numbing minutes, the Pacers had nowhere to turn, no room to breathe. The Thunder's power, physicality, and pragmatism prevented Indiana, whose pace and precision have been the lifeblood of a team that has defied all odds this postseason — from getting into any sort of rhythm. The Thunder forced 19 Pacers turnovers, the most in a finals half in nearly three decades. Advertisement But in the second half, Indiana committed just six turnovers. It was a perfect storm of miscommunication, smart Pacers offense and coverage holes, especially in the final three minutes. Because of the Thunder's commitment to a compact defensive shell, which is loosely defined as the connective area around all five defenders on the floor, corner 3s are exposed. It's a simple concept; no defensive strategy is 100 percent foolproof, and elite teams can make even the most adept defenses suffer on occasion. According to tracking data, the Thunder give up the most corner 3s among playoff teams (12.6), but opponents were shooting a shade over 31 percent on such shots. Most teams will live with that math. But the Pacers aren't quite like other teams the Thunder have faced in these playoffs, especially not from a shot-profile standpoint. Indiana is a middle-of-the-pack team in terms of corner 3 quantity, but it is lethal when it takes them, hitting a whopping 48.5 percent of such shots. In Game 1, the Pacers shot 10-of-16 from the corners, good for 62.5 percent. Oklahoma City was guilty of some head-scratching decisions, such as in the possession below, in which there's no communication between Alex Caruso and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander on approaching an Obi Toppin screen. Nesmith, who shot 43.1 percent from the perimeter during the regular season, is shooting 50 percent in the playoffs (on a slightly increased volume). Leaving him with airspace is asking for trouble. 'You have to eliminate the ones that we give up, that are out of rotation where we don't get there in time,' Caruso said, 'or in early transition where we're not matched up. I give them credit. They made big shots.' One prominent theme late in Game 1, which Thunder All-NBA forward Jalen Williams mentioned during his news conference, was the Thunder's rather slow offense, which carried over into their effort and aggression. And judging from the postgame appearances from Daigneault and multiple players, Indiana's pace played a part. Advertisement Pay attention to the lack of communication as Oklahoma City gets back in transition. Both Lu Dort and Cason Wallace are making different observations and, as a result, doing different things. Ideally, Dort would be matched up with Andrew Nembhard, not stationed with Toppin in the corner. In critical moments, the Pacers got favorable matchups on switches, keeping players like Caruso and Dort away. SGA is far from a defensive liability and had several solid possessions in Game 1, but he's the weakest link in their small-ball group and thus the target of any isolation play. This is a tough shot with a high degree of difficulty (multiple crossovers plus a stepback), but Gilgeous-Alexander shouldn't be in that position in the first place. Indiana's penultimate possession — a Pascal Siakam putback which set up Haliburton's eventual winner — was indicative of a Daigneault gamble gone awry and another momentary lapse by Gilgeous-Alexander. The Thunder's bold lineup change ahead of Game 1 — moving Isaiah Hartenstein to the bench in favor of Wallace— certainly had its benefits. It gave Oklahoma City more speed with the starters and prepared them for an expected track meet with Indiana. Hartenstein was still effective in his minutes, finishing with nine points and nine rebounds. But it also put the Thunder at a constant disadvantage on the boards. Hartenstein played just 17 minutes, with Caruso (essentially a sixth starter) logging 29 minutes. But the Pacers dominated in the rebounding department (56 to 39). Below, Wallace defends Nembhard well and contests the shot, but watch Gilgeous-Alexander's eyes. It only takes a second for him to ball watch to not notice Siakam creeping toward the restricted area for potential cleanup. 'Some of it is the cost of doing business,' Daigneault said of playing small. 'To be able to get perimeter speed on the court, get more switching in the game. It's obviously something that is a tradeoff. I thought the small lineup at the end of the first half looked pretty good. That's why I went back to it down the stretch. When we're small, we have to be pressure-oriented and contain the ball. I thought they got some cracks against us that hurt us a little bit more than the post-ups did.' Fortunately for the Thunder, this is a position they've been in before, in terms of letting go of a game they feel they should have won. Oklahoma City played below its standard in Game 1. Gilgeous-Alexander finished with a game-high 38 points but needed 30 shots to get there. The Thunder forced 25 turnovers but scored just 11 points off the Pacers' mistakes. The Thunder team reached this stage by being above the rest of the pack. We've seen this group finish off opponents on both ends of the floor with its connectivity. During the regular season, the Pacers committed 20 or more turnovers just eight times (and once in Game 5 of the Eastern Conference finals against the New York Knicks). Oklahoma City knows how to throw teams in disarray. The Thunder need to recalibrate themselves. It's easier said than done, though, against a brilliant, decisive Pacers group led by Rick Carlisle. But the Thunder are here for a reason. And it's time to prove why. Again. Advertisement 'We lost Game 1,' Gilgeous-Alexander said. 'We've lost Game 1 before. On the other side of that, we came out a better team. That's our goal. That's our mentality, to try to learn a lesson from the loss, like we always do, and move forward and be better.' (Photo of Pascal Siakam: Matthew Stockman / Getty Images)
