logo
Florida criminalized homeless people sleeping in parks. They got creative.

Florida criminalized homeless people sleeping in parks. They got creative.

Yahoo10-05-2025

Florida has found a new way to criminalize homelessness. A state law that went into effect in October makes it a crime to sleep in public parks, the grounds of public buildings or other public property.
We're driving the homeless to improvise.
The proliferation of large indoor self-storage facilities have become a low-cost housing solution for some homeless people, I've been told. These facilities are air-conditioned, clean and locked at night. And they're available at low introductory rates.
I thought the notion of homeless people living in storage facilities was an urban legend. Then I rented space in a storage facility to handle my expanding universe of barely keepable possessions.
I went there recently as soon as the storage facility opened for the day. While inside the mostly darkened cavernous building, I heard the faint sounds of recorded music being played and then saw a woman in a bathrobe pushing a shopping cart.
'There's a homeless woman living in our self-storage place,' I told my wife after I got home.
On a subsequent trip, this time just before the storage facility closed for the night, my wife was with me when the same homeless woman appeared again. She was coming from outside, pushing a shopping cart and returning to the storage place for the night.
Opinion: I lived in a homeless encampment for a week. I saw how Housing First doesn't work.
The next day, I ran an errand at the local Publix market.
I'm one of those dinosaurs who still uses cash, and so I inevitably end up with pockets full of change. So, every day, I empty my pockets, dropping the change into a sturdy box. Over months of doing this, the box fills with coins. That's when I lug it to Publix, which has one of those machines that tally up all your change for a service charge.
On this day, I ended up cashing in more than $400 worth of loose change at the Publix. The worker at the service desk gave me the cash. I put it in my pocket and walked outside.
And there she was! The homeless woman from the storage unit was right there, a few feet from the store's entrance. I was sure of it. She had on the same bright pink T-shirt she had on the night before at the storage unit. And I recognized her long, stringy hair.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store.
She was sitting on the pavement outside Publix, leaning on a wall while eating supermarket sushi from a container she had placed on the pavement between her splayed out legs.
I stopped and reached into my pocket with the roll of bills in it. I peeled off a $10 bill and stood over her, extending my hand with the money.
She looked up and hesitated. I further extended my hand with the bill, and said, 'Here,' while smiling. She paused again, then took the bill without saying anything.
I walked away, thinking I had done my good deed for the day. But before I reached my car in the lot, I saw the homeless woman practically running up the next aisle and scampering into a Mini Cooper sports car.
That's a pricier car than my old Toyota. I was confused. So, I called my wife. She had me describe the woman eating the sushi outside the Publix.
'That's not the homeless woman,' said my wife between convulsions of laughter. 'She wasn't wearing a pink shirt and she didn't have long, stringy hair.'
And then my wife leveled a complaint I had heard many times before from her: 'And you have terrible facial recognition.'
That's because every time I try to describe somebody by likening that person's looks to a famous person, my wife will say they look nothing alike.
But I wasn't ready to take the blame for giving a well-heeled Boca Raton woman $10. Maybe she drives a Mini Cooper – and a shopping cart.
'If she's not homeless, then why is she eating supermarket sushi in a container on the ground?' I said. 'She sure was acting like somebody who is homeless.'
Opinion: He was rejected and homeless at 15. Now he leads the LGBTQ group that gave him acceptance.
It has been a few weeks now. The more I think of it, the murkier things get. Memory is a tricky thing. Upon further reflection, the woman outside the Publix did seem kind of young at close range.
Maybe she was just a middle-class 21st century suburban hippy with unorthodox eating habits who thought she was being hit on by some dirty old man in a pickleball hat outside the supermarket. And it freaked her out so much, she ran to her car and drove away.
You see my predicament? I go to that Publix all the time. One of these days I'm going to run into that woman again. What do I say?
'Sorry for the confusion, ma'am, but you looked and behaved like a homeless person. Can I get my $10 back?
'I want to give it to the woman living in my storage facility.'
Frank Cerabino is a news columnist with the Palm Beach Post, where a version of this column originally appeared. He can be reached at FCerabino@pbpost.com
You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Homeless people get creative when we make living a crime | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Denver police confront marchers upset with ICE in chaotic exchanges downtown, block group from accessing I-25
Denver police confront marchers upset with ICE in chaotic exchanges downtown, block group from accessing I-25

CBS News

time8 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Denver police confront marchers upset with ICE in chaotic exchanges downtown, block group from accessing I-25

Police in Denver responded in full force on Tuesday night to marches downtown after an early evening protest at the Colorado State Capitol. CBS Video captured near the intersection of 20th Street and Little Raven Street in Denver showed a large crowd of demonstrators and smoke just before 10 p.m. At one point in the video, a marcher threw an object that looked to be a pepper ball back at police. At least one person was detained on Tuesday night. Police also blocked the entrance to Interstate 25 at Broadway so marchers couldn't enter, and there was another large police presence at Market Street and 20th. Break-off groups from an earlier peaceful protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement grew more chaotic as the night went on. Denver police told CBS Colorado rocks and bottles were thrown at officers near Coors Field. Some video was circulating online showing smoke. CBS Colorado contacted police to find out what it was. Their final report is not available so it's not known what was used, but they confirmed to CBS Colorado that no tear gas had been used. Similar confrontations have been happening in several other cities across the country, including Los Angeles. Protests and marches have been going on there for days as demonstrators have been clashing with police. Many protests -- including in Texas, in Chicago, and now in Denver -- have come about in response to the situation in California.

A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction
A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction

Washington Post

time9 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction

NEW YORK — President Donald Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction heads to a federal appeals court Wednesday. It's one way he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned. A three-judge panel is set to hear arguments in Trump's long-running fight to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds. The Republican is asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene after a lower-court judge twice rejected the move. As part of the request, Trump wants the federal appeals court to seize control of the criminal case and then ultimately decide his appeal of the verdict, which is now pending in a state appellate court. The 2nd Circuit should 'determine once and for all that this unprecedented criminal prosecution of a former and current President of the United States belongs in federal court,' Trump's lawyers wrote in a court filing. The Manhattan district attorney's office, which prosecuted Trump's case, wants it to stay in state court. Trump's Justice Department — now partly run by his former criminal defense lawyers — backs his bid to move the case to federal court. If Trump loses, he could go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump was convicted in May 2024 of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, whose affair allegations threatened to upend his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump denies her claim and said he did nothing wrong. It was the only one of his four criminal cases to go to trial. Trump's lawyers first sought to move the case to federal court following his March 2023 indictment, arguing that federal officers including former presidents have the right to be tried in federal court for charges arising from 'conduct performed while in office.' Part of the criminal case involved checks he wrote while he was president. They tried again after his conviction, arguing that Trump's historic prosecution violated his constitutional rights and ran afoul of the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling , which was decided about a month after the hush money trial ended. The ruling reins in prosecutions of ex-presidents for official acts and restricts prosecutors in pointing to official acts as evidence that a president's unofficial actions were illegal. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied both requests, ruling in part that Trump's conviction involved his personal life, not his work as president. In a four-page ruling, Hellerstein wrote that nothing about the high court's ruling affected his prior conclusion that hush money payments at issue in Trump's case 'were private, unofficial acts, outside the bounds of executive authority.' Trump's lawyers argue that prosecutors rushed to trial instead of waiting for the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision, and that prosecutors erred by showing jurors evidence that should not have been allowed under the ruling, such as former White House staffers describing how Trump reacted to news coverage of the hush money deal and tweets he sent while president in 2018. Trump's former criminal defense lawyer Todd Blanche is now the deputy U.S. attorney general, the Justice Department's second-in-command. Another of his lawyers, Emil Bove, has a high-ranking Justice Department position. The trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, rejected Trump's requests to throw out the conviction on presidential immunity grounds and sentenced him on Jan. 10 to an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction intact but sparing him any punishment. Appearing by video at his sentencing, Trump called the case a 'political witch hunt,' 'a weaponization of government' and 'an embarrassment to New York.'

A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction
A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction

Associated Press

time17 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction

NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction heads to a federal appeals court Wednesday. It's one way he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned. A three-judge panel is set to hear arguments in Trump's long-running fight to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds. The Republican is asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene after a lower-court judge twice rejected the move. As part of the request, Trump wants the federal appeals court to seize control of the criminal case and then ultimately decide his appeal of the verdict, which is now pending in a state appellate court. The 2nd Circuit should 'determine once and for all that this unprecedented criminal prosecution of a former and current President of the United States belongs in federal court,' Trump's lawyers wrote in a court filing. The Manhattan district attorney's office, which prosecuted Trump's case, wants it to stay in state court. Trump's Justice Department — now partly run by his former criminal defense lawyers — backs his bid to move the case to federal court. If Trump loses, he could go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump was convicted in May 2024 of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, whose affair allegations threatened to upend his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump denies her claim and said he did nothing wrong. It was the only one of his four criminal cases to go to trial. Trump's lawyers first sought to move the case to federal court following his March 2023 indictment, arguing that federal officers including former presidents have the right to be tried in federal court for charges arising from 'conduct performed while in office.' Part of the criminal case involved checks he wrote while he was president. They tried again after his conviction, arguing that Trump's historic prosecution violated his constitutional rights and ran afoul of the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling, which was decided about a month after the hush money trial ended. The ruling reins in prosecutions of ex-presidents for official acts and restricts prosecutors in pointing to official acts as evidence that a president's unofficial actions were illegal. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied both requests, ruling in part that Trump's conviction involved his personal life, not his work as president. In a four-page ruling, Hellerstein wrote that nothing about the high court's ruling affected his prior conclusion that hush money payments at issue in Trump's case 'were private, unofficial acts, outside the bounds of executive authority.' Trump's lawyers argue that prosecutors rushed to trial instead of waiting for the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision, and that prosecutors erred by showing jurors evidence that should not have been allowed under the ruling, such as former White House staffers describing how Trump reacted to news coverage of the hush money deal and tweets he sent while president in 2018. Trump's former criminal defense lawyer Todd Blanche is now the deputy U.S. attorney general, the Justice Department's second-in-command. Another of his lawyers, Emil Bove, has a high-ranking Justice Department position. The trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, rejected Trump's requests to throw out the conviction on presidential immunity grounds and sentenced him on Jan. 10 to an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction intact but sparing him any punishment. Appearing by video at his sentencing, Trump called the case a 'political witch hunt,' 'a weaponization of government' and 'an embarrassment to New York.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store