logo
ICJ urged not to throw Sudan's UAE genocide case out on a 'technicality'

ICJ urged not to throw Sudan's UAE genocide case out on a 'technicality'

Middle East Eye30-04-2025

A group of prominent international judges and legal experts have urged the International Court of Justice (ICJ) not to throw out Sudan's genocide case against the United Arab Emirates on a 'technicality'.
The ICJ will deliver its emergency order in the case on 5 April, with the verdict expected to turn on the question of the UAE's reservation to an article of the Genocide Convention.
In an exclusive legal opinion shared with Middle East Eye, prominent international jurists argue that states 'should be compelled to account for their actions in a court of law'.
The signatories include South African judge Richard Goldstone, who was the UN's chief prosecutor at the tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and Hans Corell, formerly the UN legal counsel.
Melanie O'Brien, president of the International Association of Genocide Scholars, and Irwin Cotler, Canada's former attorney general, are also among the opinion's signatories.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
On 10 April, a UAE delegation to the ICJ argued that 'there is clearly no basis' for the court's 'jurisdiction in this case'.
The UAE is one of a handful of countries that have signed the Genocide Convention but made a reservation to Article IX, which stipulates that the ICJ is responsible for 'addressing disputes related to the interpretation, application or fulfilment of the Genocide Convention'.
The Emirati delegation at the ICJ says this reservation, which argues that the UAE cannot be tried for genocide at the World Court, is a 'legitimate exercise of state sovereignty'.
Previously, the ICJ has ruled that the United States, Spain and Rwanda's reservations to Article IX were fair.
Yonah Diamond, the legal counsel of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights and an author of the opinion, told MEE the ICJ 'has authority over state conduct for violations of international law'.
He said that upholding reservations like the UAE's 'is like allowing a perpetrator of genocide to evade legal accountability as long as they say, 'I guarantee I won't commit acts of genocide, but cannot be brought to a court of law if I do'.'
The ICJ is the only court in the world with the power to investigate and bring cases against states accused of breaking the Genocide Convention, which has been effective since 1951 and which the UAE acceded to in 2005.
The court has the power to issue emergency measures, including halting weapons transfers and the laying down of arms.
'To dismiss this case on a technicality alone would be to abandon these communities,' Diamond said, speaking of those in Darfur subjected to attacks by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which the UAE is accused of supplying.
'The law exists to bring perpetrators to court, not to shield them from accountability.'
UAE arms to Sudan
On 6 March, Sudan filed an application to open proceedings against the UAE before the ICJ over alleged complicity in acts of genocide against the Darfur's Masalit community.
The application said that the RSF, which has been at war with the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) since April 2023, had perpetrated genocide, murder, theft, rape and forcible displacement, and that it was 'enabled' to do so by direct support from the UAE.
MEE has reported extensively on the network of supply lines through which the UAE arms and supports the RSF.
Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, the RSF chief better known as Hemeti, has for years exported gold from mines in Sudan to the UAE. The Dagalo family has a string of businesses based in the Emirates.
Abu Dhabi has, throughout the war, denied supporting the RSF.
But on 18 December last year, Brett McGurk, an official in the outgoing US administration of US President Joe Biden, wrote to Senator Chris Van Hollen that 'the UAE has informed the Administration that it is not now transferring any weapons to the RSF and will not do so going forward'.
This was seen by multiple diplomatic sources as a tacit admission that the UAE had been supporting the RSF up to that point. Just over a month after receiving the letter, Van Hollen confirmed that the UAE 'is providing weapons' to the RSF.
RSF massacres
The RSF has committed massacres across Darfur, the vast western region that it almost completely controls.
Most recently, its fighters have attacked el-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur, and Zamzam, a camp for people displaced during the Darfur genocide of the early 2000s.
In Zamzam and el-Fasher, the RSF has used four Chinese lightweight AH4 howitzers, the only known buyers of which are the UAE.
The paramilitary has also, according to Yale's Humanitarian Research Lab, used three Chinese-made drones 'consistent with FH-95s' flown into the RSF-controlled Nyala airport.
In April last year, the Raoul Wallenberg Centre concluded there was 'clear and convincing evidence' that the RSF and its allied militias were committing genocide against 'non-Arab groups' in Darfur, such as the Masalit.
The ICJ said 74 years ago that the principles of the Genocide Convention 'are recognised by civilised nations as binding on states, even without any conventional obligation'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli hard-liners Ben-Gvir and Smotrich hit by UK-led sanctions
Israeli hard-liners Ben-Gvir and Smotrich hit by UK-led sanctions

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Israeli hard-liners Ben-Gvir and Smotrich hit by UK-led sanctions

Two senior Israeli cabinet ministers have had sanctions imposed in a British -led move, leading to a major diplomatic fallout. Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich face travel bans and financial restrictions from the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway. In an official statement, the British government said the pair were 'now sanctioned for their repeated incitement of violence against Palestinian civilians, effective immediately'. We expect the UK government to recognise the state of Palestine. This is good but does not get us to that point Husam Zomlot In a joint statement with foreign ministers from Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights. These actions are not acceptable. This is why we have taken action now – to hold those responsible to account. 'We will strive to achieve an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the immediate release of the remaining hostages by Hamas, which can have no future role in the governance of Gaza, a surge in aid and a path to a two-state solution.' It is a significant escalation in political pressure against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government. The souring of relations with friendly western countries was further cemented after a senior Israeli cabinet minister condemned the sanctions as 'outrageous' and 'unacceptable'. The US State Department also condemned the sanctions against the two Israeli ministers. 'We find that extremely unhelpful,' department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters. 'It will do nothing to get us closer to a ceasefire in Gaza. 'If our allies want to help, they should focus on supporting special envoy Steve Witkoff's negotiations and back the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation when it comes to food and aid.' Husam Zomlot, the head of the Palestinian m ission to the UK, welcomed the government's response to the ministers repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities. Speaking exclusively to The National, he called the move a 'significant step in the right direction'. 'These two ministers have been publicly calling for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, not only by words but by deeds,' Mr Zomlot said. 'These two ministers have been literally physically arming illegal settlers [who are] going on the rampage, committing all the crimes that the world has been following.' 'Sanctioning these ministers is absolutely the right step in the right direction.' Mr Zomlot called on London to make further changes to its policy in response to developments across the Palestinian territory. 'This is not a substitute for the arms embargo, not a substitute for sanctions on the entire ecosystem of illegality, including settlements, and not a substitute for the recognition of the state of Palestine.' With a French and Saudi-sponsored conference on advancing the two-state solution taking place on June 17 to 20 at UN headquarters, Mr Zomlot said the opportunity was looming for the UK to announce that step. 'We are awaiting that conference next week, we expect the UK government to recognise the state of Palestine. This is good but does not get us to that point.' But Israel's renewed Gaza offensive, which has seen the death toll of Palestinians increase to 55,700, has turned international opinion against Israel. British MPs from all parties have in recent weeks become angry at Israel's actions and condemn the UK government's failure to impose sanctions or recognise the Palestinian state. Mr Lammy and Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer have faced accusations of Israeli killings and inhumane treatment of Palestinians. From January last year to April this year extremist settlers have carried out more than 1,900 attacks against Palestinian civilians, the UK government said. The diplomatic fallout began even before the sanctions were officially announced with Israel's government reacting furiously after Minister of Foreign Affairs Gideon Saar condemned the 'British sanctions list'. 'It is outrageous that elected representatives and members of the government are subjected to these kind of measures.' Mr Netanyahu will hold a special government meeting early next week 'to decide on our response to this unacceptable decision', he added. Mr Ben-Gvir posted a message on X, saying: 'We survived Pharaoh, we will also survive Keir Starmer. I will continue to work for Israel and the people of Israel without fear or intimidation.' In further retaliation to the sanctions Mr Smotrich allegedly threatened to stop transferring funds to the Palestinian Authority. Even the pair's political foe, Benny Gantz, said that while he 'deeply' disagreed with their views, the sanctions were a 'profound moral failure and a bad message to the entire world' that he claimed would 'fuel global terrorism'. Tuesday's action could have a unifying effect on the Israeli government, which is comprised of a fragile coalition that includes hard-right and ultra-Orthodox figures. This has allowed Mr Smotrich to approve the expansion of illegal West Bank settlements while he has also vigorously campaigned against allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza, He caused outrage after stating that he would allow 'not even a grain of wheat' to enter the territory and only last month stated that Gaza would be 'entirely destroyed'. He also referred to ethnic cleansing by suggesting that Palestinians should 'leave in great numbers to third countries'. His colleague Mr Ben-Gvir, who was convicted of incitement to racism in 2007, has also stoked fires by advocating the replacement of the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem with a synagogue. He has also called for Palestinians to be expelled from Gaza and stated that 'there is no need to bring in aid, they have enough'. Among senior MPs who have called for stronger action against the pair has been Emily Thornberry, chairwoman of the foreign affairs committee. 'I and others have been calling for sanctions on these extremist Israeli ministers for the better part of a year,' she posted on X. 'The government is finally doing the right thing.' In reference to the summit jointly hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, she argued that the sanctions 'must be a precursor to recognising a Palestinian state next week – not an alternative to it'.

US Secretary of State Rubio terminates all USAID positions abroad: Report
US Secretary of State Rubio terminates all USAID positions abroad: Report

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US Secretary of State Rubio terminates all USAID positions abroad: Report

By the end of September, there will be no such thing as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), The Guardian reported on Monday, because all of its overseas staff will be terminated. Many, if not most, are local hires who have depended on a USAID salary for years and sometimes decades to support their families. The Guardian attributed the revelation to a State Department cable that it had obtained. It said the chiefs of mission at embassies in more than 100 countries have been notified that a significant overhaul is coming. 'The Department of State is streamlining procedures under National Security Decision Directive 38 to abolish all USAID overseas positions,' the cable said. The State Department and Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'will assume responsibility for foreign assistance programming previously undertaken by USAID' from 15 June, it added. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In early March, Rubio said that US President Donald Trump's purge of the six-decade-old USAID was complete and that 5,200 of its 6,200 programmes had been eliminated. The remaining programmes, he said, would now be administered 'more effectively' under the State Department and in consultation with Congress. The axing of the aid agency was an initiative from the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency, which aimed to save Washington billions in what it believed was unnecessary spending. Among its earliest finds was what the administration described as $50worth of condoms sent by the US "to Hamas". It was then revealed that it was a programme to prevent sexually transmitted diseases in the rural province of Gaza, Mozambique. Musk departed the administration two weeks ago. Since the Trump administration announced an immediate suspension of all foreign assistance, blocking ongoing aid programmes and freezing new funding, humanitarian workers around the world have been trying to work out exactly what this means for the millions of vulnerable people they are trying to keep alive. Middle East Eye reported on the impact of the initial USAID cuts on 1.8 million Sudanese experiencing famine. Food boxes sent by the US were rotting in warehouses because the agency no longer provided the money needed for the actual distribution. Since 1946, the Middle East and North Africa have been the biggest recipients of US financial assistance. Between April 2023 and April 2024, Congress appropriated around $9bn for the region. While most of the aid went towards military assistance, a fraction was funnelled into democracy programmes via USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy, a quasi-autonomous agency funded largely by the US Congress. MEE reported in May of this year that the Trump cuts to USAID have already impacted human rights defenders in the region who were reliant on the small grants to relocate and resettle abroad. Although modest in scope, the money provided a lifeline for exiled human rights activists.

US sanctions charities it says are linked to Hamas's armed wing
US sanctions charities it says are linked to Hamas's armed wing

Middle East Eye

time3 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US sanctions charities it says are linked to Hamas's armed wing

The US on Tuesday sanctioned five individuals and five charities that it said were providing financial support to Hamas's military wing, the al-Qassam Brigades, in addition to one charity it said was supporting the Popular Front For The Liberation Of Palestine (PLFP). 'Today's action underscores the importance of safeguarding the charitable sector from abuse by terrorists like Hamas and the PFLP, who continue to leverage sham charities as fronts for funding their terrorist and military operations,' Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender said in a statement. 'Treasury will continue to use all available tools to prevent Hamas, the PFLP, and other terrorist actors from exploiting the humanitarian situation in Gaza to fund their violent activities at the expense of their own people,' he added. The US has long designated Hamas and the PLFP as terror organisations. The sweeping sanctions hit organisations from the Middle East and Europe. Filistin Vakfi, a Turkey-based charity that the US said 'campaigned and raised funds with the clear intention of funding Hamas terrorist activities', was sanctioned along with its president, Zeki Abdullah Ibrahim Ararawi. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The sanctions also targeted the Netherlands-based Israa Charitable Foundation and the Italy-based Associazione Benefica La Cupola d'Oro. The US said the former 'reports directly to the Hamas military wing and is composed of additional US-designated organizations that generate revenue for Hamas under the guise of legitimate charitable work'. The US said the Italy-based organisation was founded by Mohammad Hannoun, previously sanctioned in October 2024, 'who publicly promoted the charity and used it to continue evading sanctions and raising revenue for the Hamas military wing through donors, many of whom were unwitting of the links to Hamas'. The US also sanctioned Al Weam Charitable Society in Gaza for allegedly supporting Hamas's military wing and the Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association in the occupied West Bank over its alleged links to the PFLP. The US sanctions will freeze any assets the organisations or people have within the US and bar them from conducting any US dollar-based financial transactions. US sanctions carry heft because the dollar is the world's reserve currency. The US has rolled out a steady stream of sanctions on Hamas since its military wing led attacks on southern Israel on 7 October 2023. In response, Israel unleashed a devastating assault on the Gaza Strip. According to the Gaza health ministry, at least 54,981 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces since October 2023, including more than 28,000 women and girls. The figure also includes at least 1,400 health sector professionals, 280 United Nations aid workers - the highest staff death toll in UN history - and 227 journalists, the highest number of media workers killed in conflict since the Committee to Protect Journalists began recording data in 1992.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store