The Alabama Legislature's Late Gothic period
A partial view of the roof of the Milan Cathedral in Milan Italy as seen in Ooctober 2021. The cathedral shows elements of the late Gothic style, which emphasized elaborate decorative motifs and was traditionally considered a sign that the earlier Gothic style had run out of ideas. A month into its legislative session, the Alabama Legislature also appears stuck in the past and out of ideas. (Juana)
GI can't go to Goat Hill lately without feeling déjà vu.
It started with Gov. Kay Ivey's State of the State address on Feb. 6. There was the trite invocation of the 'Gulf of America.' The vicious attacks on transgender Alabamians. And the constant talk about job creation and business investment that never seems to dent Alabama's high rates of poverty or low rates of workforce participation.
Go after immigrants. Back The Blue. Make vague commitments to broaden a potentially catastrophic voucher program in the Education Trust Fund.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
It's all been done.
There were a few departures from the theme. Like parental leave; a Glock switch ban and the Second Chance Act. But those variations underlined the roteness of the performance.
You'll never lose money betting that a Republican politician will talk about crime until you think America is the latest installment of the Fallout franchise. But the time to tackle that was four years ago during the pandemic. Not when crime rates as a whole are on the way down.
The craven attacks on immigrants, a small and vulnerable group? They're in line with the priorities of the GOP nationwide. But we already did this with HB 56, the 2011 state law that authorized legal harassment of the foreign-born and the people, organizations and churches that provide them aid.
HB 56 was a disaster for immigrants in the state and businesses that counted on their work. You think we'd have learned not to throw Alabama's workforce into chaos in a moment of financial uncertainty, in an aging state that desperately needs young workers.
But we have not.
Nor have we made any efforts to address the state's actual problems. Alabama House leadership has already ruled out Medicaid expansion this year. So our rural health care crisis will continue. And for all the stated concerns for public safety, the Legislature is rejecting modest bills to address our appalling rate of gun deaths.
There are a few ways to look at this.
Republicans around the nation are engaged in Donald Trump cosplay, and are far more interested in his needs than the voters'. Ivey and the Alabama Legislature are not alone in parroting whatever lumpy batter of nouns and superlatives come out of the president's mouth.
The state budgets appear to be less flush than they were in the past three years, when we had COVID relief money — from the bad, bad federal government — pouring into the Treasury. Lawmakers are understandably wary about rolling out new initiatives. Playing the hits is easier.
But it also seems that our political class is out of ideas. Worse, they're trapped in politics that lead them to reject obvious solutions.
The governor and the Legislature tell us how important it is to improve the state's workforce participation rate. You know one really effective way to do that? Encourage immigration. It creates jobs and expands the workforce.
You want to tackle crime in Alabama? Make it harder to obtain a firearm. A Glock switch ban would be a good start; requiring gun owners to lock up their weapons would be better; restoring the concealed carry permit requirement would be better still.
But our legislators are stumbling through an ideological rut, where new ideas are absent and old ones just trap us deeper in the mire.
If ever you took an art class, you might have learned that in the Middle Ages, there was a Romanesque style of cathedral construction that emphasized heavy, solid forms. Then came the Gothic style, which brought light and height into the sanctuaries.
And what came after that? Late Gothic. Which, in the traditional telling, made the old form more elaborate. Artists didn't look for innovative ways to raise walls or ceilings or inspire the faithful. They just caked the standard forms with saints and monsters and gaudy sculptures.
It was an endpoint. Artists couldn't do anything more with the old style but couldn't think of anything new.
It was, of course, more complicated than that. But that traditional picture seems to reflect where our not divinely-inspired state government is.
A month into the 2025 legislative session, we have no focus; no overarching theme; nothing new worth exploring. We have a political class enthralled to a distant figure who wants to act like a king. And a government that seems more interested in catching his attention than serving the people who live in Alabama.
We are stuck in the past. And putting a misguided faith in forms, ideas and structures that no longer have the ability to inspire. If they ever did.
Maybe some issue will break through in the next few weeks that shakes off the exhaustion and brings innovation and new approaches forward.
But for now, legislators don't seem interested in building something inspirational. They want to use the arches straining to support the state as canvases for the monsters inside their heads.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Terminally ill New Yorkers would have the legal ability to end their own lives with pharmaceutical drugs under a bill passed Monday in the state Legislature. The proposal, which now moves to the governor's office, would allow a person with an incurable illness to be prescribed life-ending drugs if he or she requests the medication and gets approval from two physicians. A spokesperson for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she would review the legislation. The New York Senate gave final approval to the bill Monday night after hours of debate during which supporters said it would let terminally ill people die on their own terms. 'It's not about hastening death, but ending suffering,' said state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Democrat who sponsored the proposal. Opponents have argued the state should instead improve end-of-life medical care or have objected on religious grounds. 'We should not be in the business of state-authorized suicide,' said state Sen. George Borrello, a Republican. The state Assembly passed the measure in late April. The proposal requires that a terminally ill person who is expected to die within six month make a written request for the drugs. Two witnesses would have sign the request to ensure that the patient is not being coerced. The request would then have to be approved by the person's attending physician as well as a consulting physician. The legislation was first introduced in 2016, Hoylman-Sigal said, though it has stalled year after year in the New York statehouse. Dennis Poust, executive director of the New York State Catholic Conference, which has opposed the measure, said 'This is a dark day for New York State." Eleven other states and Washington, D.C., have laws allowing medically assisted suicide, according to Compassion & Choices, an advocacy organization that backs the policy. Corinne Carey, the group's local campaign director, said lawmakers had 'recognized how important it is to give terminally ill New Yorkers the autonomy they deserve over their own end-of-life experiences.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Terminally ill New Yorkers would have the legal ability to end their own lives with pharmaceutical drugs under a bill passed Monday in the state Legislature. The proposal, which now moves to the governor's office, would allow a person with an incurable illness to be prescribed life-ending drugs if he or she requests the medication and gets approval from two physicians. A spokesperson for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she would review the legislation. The New York Senate gave final approval to the bill Monday night after hours of debate during which supporters said it would let terminally ill people die on their own terms. 'It's not about hastening death, but ending suffering,' said state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Democrat who sponsored the proposal. Opponents have argued the state should instead improve end-of-life medical care or have objected on religious grounds. 'We should not be in the business of state-authorized suicide,' said state Sen. George Borrello, a Republican. The state Assembly passed the measure in late April. The proposal requires that a terminally ill person who is expected to die within six month make a written request for the drugs. Two witnesses would have sign the request to ensure that the patient is not being coerced. The request would then have to be approved by the person's attending physician as well as a consulting physician. The legislation was first introduced in 2016, Hoylman-Sigal said, though it has stalled year after year in the New York statehouse. Dennis Poust, executive director of the New York State Catholic Conference, which has opposed the measure, said 'This is a dark day for New York State." Eleven other states and Washington, D.C., have laws allowing medically assisted suicide, according to Compassion & Choices, an advocacy organization that backs the policy. Corinne Carey, the group's local campaign director, said lawmakers had 'recognized how important it is to give terminally ill New Yorkers the autonomy they deserve over their own end-of-life experiences.' 'The option of medical aid in dying provides comfort, allowing those who are dying to live their time more fully and peacefully until the end,' said Carey.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas' GOP congressional delegation meets to discuss redrawing districts ahead of midterms
Republicans from Texas' congressional delegation met at the U.S. Capitol Monday night to discuss a proposal to redraw the lines of their House districts, GOP Rep. Pete Sessions said. Emerging from a meeting attended by most of the 25-member GOP delegation, Sessions said there was 'a lot we don't know,' including whether Gov. Greg Abbott would be in favor of the idea. Abbott has the lone authority to call members of the Texas Legislature back to Austin for a special session, which would be required to carry out the rare and extraordinary move of reshaping the state's political boundaries in the middle of the decade, years before the next census in 2030. Sessions, a Waco Republican, told reporters the delegation has scheduled another meeting to discuss the issue further and 'share data,' but declined to give further details beyond confirming that President Donald Trump would not be attending. The meeting came shortly after The New York Times first reported that Trump's political team has been urging Texas political leaders to examine how they could redraw some of the state's 38 U.S. House districts to help preserve the GOP's narrow majority in the lower chamber in the 2026 midterms. Sessions emphasized that Republicans, in weighing whether to push for a mid-decade redistricting battle, should consider how it would impact 'the entire delegation.' 'We want to make sure all of our members, even those that are brand new, have an opportunity to see this for what it is,' Sessions said, declining to say whether he was concerned specifically about stretching Republican districts too thin by moving voters around to maximize the GOP's advantage. Other Republicans exiting the meeting — including Reps. Chip Roy, Michael McCaul, Beth Van Duyne and Dan Crenshaw — did not directly answer any questions about the meeting. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Disclosure: The New York Times has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.