
Clearer policies and training essential to harness AI's full potential: Survey
A Michael Page report reveals India's lead in GenAI adoption, yet a preparedness gap exists, fueling job security concerns. While trust in leadership and transparency are high, professionals seek better pay and internal advancement. Inclusivity remains a challenge, with ageism prevalent. Flexibility is now a baseline expectation, with hybrid work holding steady.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
India is ahead of the curve when it comes to AI adoption, with six in 10 professionals using GenAI tools such as ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot. However, only 31% feel well-prepared by their employers to use these tools effectively, finds a new survey.While GenAI boosts productivity and job satisfaction, the lack of structured guidance is creating uncertainty, especially as 42% view AI as a threat to job security, according to the Talent Trends India 2025 report by global recruitment firm Michael Page, which states that clearer policies and training are now essential to harness AI's full potential.The report reveals a defining shift in what Indian professionals value most at work. Based on insights from nearly 3,000 professionals across the country, it highlights five critical areas where clarity is now the currency of trust and retention: culture, technology, salary, values, and flexibility.India leads the region in workplace trust, with 61% of professionals expressing high or complete trust in their leadership, well above APAC (57%) and global (49%) averages. Transparency is also a standout strength, with 65% of employees rating their organisations as open and communicative. From sharing financials to responding to feedback, Indian companies are increasingly building cultures rooted in openness and mutual respect.While 65% of professionals are actively seeking new roles, many are now negotiating for better pay within their current organisations. As much as 62% negotiated a raise this year, and 37% succeeded, signalling a shift toward internal advancement.Further, despite progress in gender equity—with 56% of women satisfied with pay gap efforts—inclusivity remains a challenge. About 76% of employees feel they cannot be their authentic selves at work, and ageism is the most reported bias, affecting 40% of respondents. Professionals are calling for workplaces that not only talk about inclusion but actively foster belonging and psychological safety.Hybrid work is holding steady at 43%. But 61% of hybrid workers say they would leave if required to spend more time in the office. Even those satisfied with their roles and pay are unwilling to compromise on flexibility, showing that flexibility is no longer a perk — it's a baseline expectation. Companies that fail to offer it risk losing top talent.'Indian professionals are asking direct questions about flexibility, values, technology, and trust—and they expect honest, transparent answers. The organisations that respond with clarity and purpose will not only attract top talent but also build the kind of resilient, future-ready cultures that thrive in uncertainty,' said Nilay Khandelwal, senior managing director, Michael Page, India and Singapore.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India opposes ADB's $800mn loan to Pakistan
India opposed a move by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to grant a $800 million loan to Pakistan citing evidence of Islamabad diverting development funds for military use, and cautioned the bank about impending credit risks, two officials familiar with the matter said. India shared deep concerns regarding the potential misuse of ADB resources, particularly in light of Pakistan's increasing defence expenditure, its declining tax-to-GDP ratio, and the lack of demonstrable progress on key macroeconomic reforms, they added, requesting anonymity. India's strong opposition to ADB's financial aid to Pakistan came almost a month after New Delhi protested the International Monetary Fund's decision to provide a $2.3 billion bailout package to Islamabad, which saw IMF imposing about a dozen stringent conditions attached with the credit facility, making diversion of funds almost impossible. The IMF loan to Pakistan came in the midst of Operation Sindoor, India's direct military response to the April 22 terror strike at Pahalgam in Kashmir that killed 26 civilians in what was the worst attack on civilians since the 26/11 Mumbai strikes. India launched the operation in the early hours of May 7, bombing nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). The pre-dawn strikes --- which killed at least 100 terrorists --- sparked four days of strikes and counterstrikes with fighter jets, missiles, drones, long-range weapons and heavy artillery. Between the launch of the operation in the early hours of May 7 and the ceasefire on the evening of May 10, Indian forces bombed nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, and the IAF struck targets at 13 Pakistani air bases and military installations. According to a PTI report from Islamabad on Tuesday, ADB approved a $800 million loan to Pakistan for strengthening its fiscal sustainability and improving its public financial management. The credit package included a $300 million policy-based loan (PBL) and a $500 million programme-based guarantee (PBG), the report said. Reacting to this, New Delhi 'vehemently' opposed the move and shared deep concerns regarding the potential misuse of ADB resources, the officials cited above said. The linkage between Pakistan's increase in expenditure on its military, as opposed to on development, cannot be fully explained solely in terms of its domestic resource mobilization, they said. India highlighted that Pakistan's tax collection as a share of GDP declined from 13% in FY18 to 9.2% in FY23 and continues to remain way lower than the Asia and Pacific average of about 19%. However, there has been a significant increase in defence spending in the same period. This points to the possibility of diversion of funds made available to the country by external agencies, the officials explained. 'India expects the ADB management to adequately ring-fence the ADB financing, to prevent any such misuse,' one of them said. New Delhi questioned the management's argument that improvements were noticed in certain areas of reforms in Pakistan, and said that had the previous programs, funded both from ADB and the IMF, succeeded in putting in place a sound macroeconomic policy environment, the country would not have approached the IMF for the 24th bail-out program, this person added. 'Such a track record calls into question both the effectiveness of the program designs, their monitoring and their implementation by the authorities,' he said. Pakistan's poor track record of implementation stems from the military's deeply entrenched interference in economic affairs, posing risks of policy slippages and reversal of reforms as has been witnessed in the past, he added. Even when a civilian government is in power now, the army continues to play an outsized role in domestic politics and extends its tentacles deep into the economy. The situation has not changed for the better; rather the Pakistan Army now plays a leading role in the Special Investment Facilitation Council of Pakistan, he said. 'In fact, India expressed strong reservations about Pakistan's existing governance system, which poses a continuing severe threat to regional peace and security. The country's policy of cross-border terrorism has led to a worsening of the security situation in the region and has significantly escalated macroeconomic risks for Pakistan, which also heightens the enterprise risks for the ADB.' India expects the ADB to closely monitor the implementation of the policy matrix to achieve the intended outcomes, this official said. Pakistan's continued reliance on external debt raises concerns about the long-term sustainability of future exposures, especially in view of the high debt-to-GDP ratio and poor credit rating of the country, he added.


Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
China's rare earth magnet policy: Foreign auto firms win export approvals, their Indian units are kept on hold
New Delhi/Mumbai: India's auto industry has flagged to the government that while China is approving rare earth magnet exports to other countries, applications from India remain stuck, said three industry executives in the know. As a result, India's production of conventional and electric vehicles could be hit as early as this month if China doesn't resume exports of its rare earth magnets to the country soon, auto industry representatives told the secretary of the ministry of heavy industries on 29 May. China has a near monopoly on rare earth magnets, which are essential for manufacturing electric-vehicle motors and other auto components. Representatives from several automotive companies and two industry bodies told the secretary that while foreign units of multinational auto component companies were receiving approvals for rare earth magnet shipments from China, their Indian subsidiaries were still awaiting approvals, according to three industry executives. While the industry body did not name any companies at the meeting, Mint has learned thatGermany-headquarteredBosch, Continental Automotive, and Mahle Group have received approvals for their foreign units but their applications from India are yet to be accepted. 'A supplier's German or US counterpart is getting approvals, but the same supplier's Indian unit is not getting it," said one of the three industry executives cited above. 'There are no written guidelines for applying for a licence. So, something or the other can be missed and they (China) can stop the approval for any flimsy reason." With rare earth magnet exports from China to India stalled, both conventional and electric vehicle production are at risk of slowdown. Major auto players have warned that disruptions could halt production as early as this month. A delegation of industry representatives is ready to head to China, with visas approved for some of them. However, the Chinese commerce ministry hasn't given an official appointment for a meeting, said thesecond of the three executivescited above. The Automotive Component Manufacturers Association of India (ACMA) and the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM), whose representatives were present at the 29 May meeting, the heavy industries ministry, and Mahle did not respond to Mint's emails seeking comment. Bosch and Continental declined to comment. Earlier in May, auto industry representatives rushed to the Prime Minister's office and the commerce ministry over concerns that disruptions in the supply of rare earth magnets from China could potentially bring their production lines to a stop. Last week, Bajaj Auto Ltd warned that its production would be severely affected if Chinese restrictions on rare earth magnets are not eased by July. Also read | China's restriction on rare earth magnets repel Indian EV players No immediate alternatives About 30 Indian companies have submitted applications to Chinese authorities for rare earth magnets. None has been approved so far. Two of these applications have been rejected, said asecond industry executive, adding that the rejections cited incorrect documentation. Rare earth elements are a group of 17 silvery white metals like neodymium, gadolinium, dysprosium, and terbium. These are crucial for manufacturing motors used in electric vehicles, electronics, medical devices, and military hardware. China controls over 90% of the global supply of these elements. An executive leading an EV motor manufacturing company in India said his application for importing rare earth magnets remains pending with the Chinese foreign ministry. The company's vendor in China helped file all necessary documentation for the application and is awaiting a response from Chinese authorities, without which it cannot ship even samples, the executive said. At the 29 May meeting with the heavy industries secretary, the domestic auto industry also explored alternative solutions to the problem, including building motors that do not use rare-earth magnets. However, these are long-term solutions as taking any new technology to production could take at least two years, the industry executives cited above said. The only viable alternative is to import aggregate parts like entire motors from China instead of importing just the magnets, they added. There are no restrictions on the export of parts containing rare-earth magnets from China. 'Frankly there is no alternate solution right now except importing the higher-level aggregates. But if larger aggregates are imported, 'Make-in-India' will be hurt," said the first executive quoted above. 'China is weaponizing trade. The government now needs to find a diplomatic solution behind closed doors." Also read | Automakers race to find workaround to China's stranglehold on rare earth magnets Analysts at investment banking firm Jefferies said in a note dated 21 May that while importing motors from China was a solution, automakers would need to realign their supply chains and vehicles might require fresh homologation approvals. Homologation is the approval process for a vehicle to ensure that it meets the technical standards of a country. Import of the entire motor could also reduce domestic value addition, which is a requirement for claiming benefits under the government's production-linked incentives scheme, the Jefferies analysts noted. Rajat Mahajan, partner and automotive sector leader at Deloitte India, said the situation needs to be resolved through diplomatic channels. 'This situation will hopefully get resolved via diplomatic channels. But if it continues then we may see a shift towards other powertrains for large OEMs (original equipment manufacturers)," he said.


New Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
How your AI usage is impacting the environment
Meanwhile, companies are not required to disclose how much energy or water their AI systems use. They focus more on business metrics — speed, accuracy, and ROI. Rahul laments, 'The general public and policymakers are not aware of the effects of AI on the environment. They can't connect the dots about how generating one image or asking one question can affect the environment.' However, there's also a push toward efficiency. 'Companies are now looking at using low-power chips, better parallelism, and optimised training techniques,' states Rijin. Solutions ahead AI engineers and developers are looking for the blind spot and are trying to find solutions to solve the environmental puzzle. With AI, a general rule of thumb is: the bigger the model, the better the performance. Hence, the next-generation accelerators like NVIDIA's Blackwell series and Google's TPU v5 deliver up to twice the performance per watt compared to the previous generation. 'That improvement can cut the electricity needed for a given training run by 30 to 40 percent,' shares Harsh. At the same time, software techniques like model quantisation help reduce computation without sacrificing accuracy. 'When you combine those hardware and software gains, the energy needed per training job has dropped, but only partially. Model sizes and dataset scales continue to grow, so total consumption remains high,' adds the entrepreneur. While amends are being made for the future, the present is still in crisis. G Sundarrajan, an environmental activist with Poovulagin Nanbargal, says, 'AI has an impact on climate and global warming. People might say it is not direct. But the power consumption results in carbon emissions. We are talking about mitigating carbon emissions, and when you set up a data centre as a backbone, you need more power, which means you build more thermal power plants and more carbon emissions and more destruction.' As a solution to this rippling effect, Sowmya Dutta, trustee of Movement for Advancing Understanding of Sustainability and Mutuality (MAUSAM), suggests the government intervene. He mentions, 'The government should take recognition, and demand that the number of searches are brought down to a manageable energy level. There could be better algorithms to do this.' He adds that a policy should ensure that the energy utilised and released should be 'non-carbon, at least non-impactful waste.' Even before the government could step in, service providers are increasingly switching to renewables, air-cooling, and certified circular-economy recycling. While AI contributes to environmental challenges, it's also part of the solution by improving efficiency and reducing its impact. In Europe, some enterprise clients now ask about energy use and compliance with green standards, a step towards a less-destructive future. 'AI is being used to optimise cooling systems in data centres, predict energy loads, and even design more efficient chips. There's a kind of circular benefit here — AI can help monitor and reduce its own impact, if we design it with that goal in mind,' concludes Rijin. While you might be mindful of the water usage at home, consciously switch off lights and fans when not in use, and try to reduce your carbon footprint, you might still be contributing to environmental damage. From this World Environment Day, make it a point to pause before you ask the bots to write your assignments, help you get on an Instagram trend, or aid in coping with personal struggles, and reflect on the harm you might be causing.