'No regret' killer jailed for 22 years after knife murder
A man who said he had no regrets after stabbing an old school friend to death has been jailed for a minimum of 22 years.Stephen Kelly, 29, attacked 31-year-old Chris McMahon at the victim's flat in Lanark on 4 October 2023.He repeatedly stabbed father-of-two Mr McMahon in his neck and chest, hit him with a bottle and poured bleach into his mouth.During sentencing at the High Court in Kilmarnock, Lady Hood called Kelly's actions "brutal, sustained and deadly".
Kelly had been due to stand trial at the High Court in Glasgow but pleaded guilty to murder through his KC Richard Goddard.The killer, who already had a history of violence, was given a life sentence and will serve a minimum of 22 years in jail.
'No remorse'
The court previously heard how neighbours of Mr McMahon had heard "arguing, banging and furniture being thrown about" on the night of the murder.Prosecutor Wojciech Jajdelski said: "The noise calmed down after a loud scream, which sounded like one of fright."The whole incident lasted about 20 minutes."About an hour later, Kelly called his cousin and said: "I think I have killed him."Kelly was found by police the next day.He made a number of remarks about his victim to officers, including: "I will do the 25 years."I do not regret it one bit. I put bleach in his mouth and everything when he was dead."He later added: "I am guilty. Might as well just get it out the way."
Lady Hood said: "You inflicted stab wounds with a knife or similar instrument, struck him on the head with a bottle, and repeatedly stamped on his head causing blunt force trauma injuries. "Disturbingly, you poured bleach or a similar substance into Mr McMahon's mouth – behaviour which you remain unable to explain. "Although you admitted to the police after your murderous attack what you had done, you showed no remorse at all."She added that since being jailed Kelly had accepted full responsibility for the attack which he now "deeply regrets".Mr McMahon's family described him "as a loving man, with contagious energy, and a full life ahead of him"The judge continued: "His family's extreme distress and grief is obvious, as they explain how their lives have been ripped apart. No sentence which I impose will be enough to help Christopher McMahon's family with their loss."Det Ch Insp Campbell Jackson said: "Christopher's family has been left devastated and our thoughts remain with them at this difficult time."I hope this sentence brings at least a degree of closure for them."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man seriously injured in assault outside Huthwaite pub
Police are appealing for information after a man was seriously injured in an assault outside a pub in services were called to Main Street, Huthwaite, near the Market Inn, at about 21:20 BST on Police said a 31-year-old man had been arrested on suspicion of affray and remained in victim, a man in his 30s, was taken to hospital with "serious injuries" after what was believed to be an "isolated incident". Det Insp Matt Scott said: "Officers are following a number of lines of inquiry and residents can expect to see a police presence in the area during the rest of the day."We believe this was an isolated incident, but understand people in the village may be concerned. I'd urge them to speak to an officer."Detectives said they were analysing CCTV in the area and called for witnesses to come Market Inn said it was closed on Monday "out of respect due to what's happened".
.png%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Too low, now too high': Rachel Reeves' winter fuel U-turn reignites fairness debate
As the government hikes the winter fuel payment threshold to £35,000, many Independent readers say the means test was too low last year – and is now far too high. The sudden shift has sparked frustration, confusion and claims of political opportunism. Many readers criticised the move as politically motivated, coming just days before a crucial spending review and following electoral losses and pressure from Reform UK. Several argued the new threshold is too high, with one pointing out that a £35k salary should not warrant government support, especially when many working-age families and the unemployed receive far less help. Others echoed the IFS and Resolution Foundation's concerns that the policy is poorly targeted and administratively messy, potentially creating unfair outcomes for households just above the income line. Some welcomed the return of payments for lower-income pensioners but questioned why the government scrapped them in the first place without a clear plan. Pensioners themselves weighed in too – some said they managed perfectly without the payments and felt younger families in poverty needed the support more. One commented: 'We are mortgage-free and have enough – give it to those who really need it.' The overall feeling from our community was that the government had acted too late and without transparency. The move was described as a 'headless chicken' reaction, lacking clarity on implementation, repayment, and future policy direction. Here's what you had to say: I expect both the Tories and the Lib Dems are hoping everyone's forgotten that they have both, at one time or another, called for either means testing the WFA or restricting it to pension credit claimants only. It was, in fact, in the Conservatives' 2017 election manifesto. For the Libs, it was one Paul Burstow MP, who had served in the coalition government. In both cases, the money saved was to be diverted to social care reform, which was a pretty good idea, I think. RickC Not a U-turn, just a high threshold It's not a U-turn. They brought in the concept of means testing the WFA and now they've raised the limit. A U-turn would be going back to universal WFA. Personally, I think they've set it far too high. I know plenty of families that would love to be earning £35k and getting guaranteed pay rises every year, plus money towards their fuel bill. KrakenUK Means test still not right Means test was too low before and is too high now – and should be based on household income. We're both pensioners with a joint income of close to £50k, no dependent kids, no mortgage. Added to this, we've got the protection of the triple lock. There is no way we need this money, whereas many young families do. WokeUp 4,000 lives at risk The enduring problem is that the government's own estimate said that 4,000 people would die of the cold if this policy was introduced. The excess deaths figures will not be published for another year and, in any case, are now very complicated. The question for me is: would I ever vote for people who were prepared to allow 4,000 old people to die because they don't understand economics? MrBishi We manage, give it to those who need it I've always said the same. We are mortgage-free, I'm on a state pension and get a small private pension. My wife, who is younger, still works part-time and gets around £600 per month. We manage perfectly. We know a lot of younger people who work and struggle with rents, children to keep, etc. Give it to them. Some pensioners out there are just plain greedy and want every penny piece they can grab. Ian Why should wealthy pensioners get it? I barely earn £35K as a 45-year-old professional in the NHS and certainly won't get that kind of money for a pension. Why should so many get a £300 handout when they've more than likely paid their mortgage and don't have to spend money on children, etc., any more? OnlyFishLeft Social care funding was the original point I expect both the Tories and the Lib Dems are hoping everyone's forgotten that they have both, at one time or another, called for either means testing the WFA or restricting it to pension credit claimants only. It was, in fact, in the Conservatives' 2017 election manifesto. For the Libs, it was one Paul Burstow MP, who had served in the coalition government. In both cases, the money saved was to be diverted to social care reform, which was a pretty good idea, I think. RickC Help paying the gas bill on £35k? Thirty-five grand coming in a year and you get help paying your gas bill? Truly outrageous. This suggests a person needs £35k a year, minimum, to live. So how about getting disabled people and the unemployed up to that rate then? Because they are far, far below. BigDogSmallBrain A compromise, but poorly communicated This sounds a more sensible compromise rather than going back to the old universal payment, but the government should have made this announcement last year so people would have been prepared for it, and it wouldn't have looked so much as if they were frightened of Farage. ruthmayjellings What if one earns over the limit? I suppose we will have to wait for the detail, but what happens if a couple claim the WFA (one per household) through the non-earning spouse, while the other has income over £35,000? That's not very clear. SteveHill Why not last year? Last year there was no money so they cut WFA and they can blame it on the Tories. This year the economy is in an even worse mess and they reinstate it, against all logic, and then they put the level far too high. No details as to how it will be paid for, how it will be recouped, nor how they will ID those who can get it and those who will have to pay it back. And if they suddenly found a system, why did they not use it last year? And I do not suppose the shellacking they got in May has anything at all to do with it, has it? Headless chickens, the lot of them — especially Reeves and Starmer. ListenVeryCarefully
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Life ban for Malton man who mistreated two wild birds
A man found guilty of mistreating two injured wild birds has been given a lifetime ban on keeping Jefferson, 30, from Malton, was found by an RSPCA inspector to be keeping a jackdaw with a damaged foot and a pigeon with a broken wing in a pen at his birds had suffered the effects of marijuana, with the jackdaw found with a bell around its neck and its claws painted with nail polish and the pigeon found with a wing wrapped in gaffer tape, the court was given an 18-month community order and ordered to pay £194 towards the costs of the case having admitted two offences under the Animal Welfare Act. The court heard the birds had been seen by RSPCA Inspector Laura Barber during a visit to Jefferson's home in Scarborough for an unrelated matter in June told the court Jefferson claimed to have found both birds injured, but had not sought veterinary treatment for either. The court was told on 2 June that Jefferson had been treating the jackdaw with an immune protection vitamin paste, later identified as a paste used to treat cats. It was described by Insp Barber as appearing "quiet, withdrawn and lethargic".When vets later examined it they found it had a dislocated toe, with "sparkly glittery nail polish" painted on each of its vet added: "Marijuana toxicity could explain the lethargic, glazed demeanour of this bird in an environment that would usually cause panic."The bird was treated for dehydration before being transported to an RSPCA wildlife RSPCA spokesperson said the wood pigeon had been put down as a result of the damage caused by "inappropriate use of the grey gaffer tape". Insp Barber added: "Keeping these injured wild birds was unlawful. "Whatever the intentions towards the birds, this was not an appropriate way to treat them." Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
