Trans guidance is 'important resource' for schools in Jersey
Jersey's minister for education and lifelong learning is standing by trans guidance in schools after a petition called for it to be revoked until parents were fully consulted, he says.In a response to the 1,062-signature petition, Robert Ward said the guidance was an "important resource for schools" when children were questioning their gender.He said it would not be revoked and was only for the use of teaching and non-teaching staff when a child disclosed to them "their thoughts around their gender".He said this would be "a very small proportion of the school population and most children and families will not be affected by the guidance".
Open dialogue
He added that the guidance stressed the "vital role" of working with parents.The petition raised concerns that parents "should be involved in any discussions on the issue of their child's gender identity".Ward said: "The guidance makes it clear that open dialogue with parents is our goal."He added that information about a child's gender identity would only be withheld or masked in "exceptional circumstances".Ward said: "We won't be 'outing' them to anyone on the sole basis of their identity."
He said staff do not need to tell parents if a child who was exploring their gender identity did not ask the school to "facilitate any social transition".If they do, "schools cannot simply choose to not include parents", he said. Petitioners also objected to books parents may consider "unsuitable" placed in school libraries and in the children's section of public libraries.Ward said the three books recommended as part of the guidance were professional education resources and were not recommended for children.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
11 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Work to get US steel tariffs removed to go on in coming ‘days, weeks and months'
US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer signed off a US-UK deal that will slash trade barriers on goods from both countries at the G7 on Monday. But US tariffs for the steel industry will stand at 25% for now rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. This is less than the US global rate of 50% for steel and aluminium. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said the UK Government is keen for the site to be part of a commercially-operated business (Chris Radburn/PA) The two leaders pledged to 'make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed', the Department for Business and Trade said. The Chinese ownership of the British Steel could be a sticking point in the deal on steel as the executive order signed by Mr Trump suggests the US wants assurances that the metal originates in the UK. 'The United Kingdom also committed to working to meet American requirements on the security of the supply chains of steel and aluminium products intended for export to the United States and on the nature of ownership of relevant production facilities,' the order states. After signing it, the US President was asked whether steel tariffs would be eliminated, to which he replied: 'We're gonna let you have that information in a little while.' In April, the UK Government used emergency powers to take control of British Steel and continue production at the site after Chinese owners Jingye proposed shutting the Scunthorpe site's two blast furnaces and other key steelmaking operations. But its future is still uncertain, with Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander saying the Government is eager for it to be 'part of a commercially-operated business with private investment'. 'We're talking to a number of third parties about that. At the moment, no options are off the table,' she told Sky News. She said there was still 'more work to do' to get steel tariffs eliminated, including on 'technical detail'. 'We're working through some technical detail around steel because we want to bring that 25% tariff that applies at the moment obviously down further,' she told BBC Breakfast. She said the UK is 'working on getting that implemented'. 'And we're determined to go further and we'll be working on those issues around steel in the coming days, weeks and months,' she added. Alasdair McDiarmid, assistant general secretary of the Community union, said it was 'absolutely vital' to secure a deal on steel as quickly as possible. Mr Trump did not say when the tariffs would be eliminated (Suzanne Plunkett/PA) 'Our steel producers and their US customers need an end to the current state of uncertainty to allow normal business to resume. 'Crucially, we must see a full exemption for all UK steel exports to the US – without that guarantee some of our leading steel businesses could be left behind, with a threat to jobs and livelihoods.' It comes as a £500 million five-year deal has been struck between Network Rail and British Steel, which Ms Alexander said was a 'vote of confidence'. Workers at the British Steel site in Scunthorpe will make rail tracks (Danny Lawson/PA) British Steel is to supply 337,000 tonnes of rail track, with a further 80-90,000 tonnes to be provided by other European manufacturers. The Network Rail contract will start on July 1 and is set to provide the company with 80% of its rail needs. Jingye, which bought British Steel in 2020, launched a consultation in March which it said would affect between 2,000 and 2,700 jobs, despite months of negotiations and a £500 million co-investment offer from the Government. The Scunthorpe plant has been producing steel for Britain's railways since 1865. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is finalising the deal (Joe Giddens/PA) The Network Rail agreement is the first major public procurement since the Government's emergency legislation was passed. Network Rail's group director for railway business services Clive Berrington said: 'We are committed to buying British where it makes economic sense to do so and British Steel remain extremely competitive in the provision of rail and will remain our main supplier in the years ahead.' Craig Harvey, British Steel's commercial director for rail, added: 'The contract represents a huge vote of confidence in UK workers and British industry, underpinning the vital role we play in ensuring millions of passengers and freight operators enjoy safe, enjoyable and timely journeys on Britain's railways.' Charlotte Brumpton-Childs, national officer at the GMB union, said it was a 'crucial first step in securing the future of our steel industry' and urged ministers to make sure British Steel has a 'constant flow of orders' from other infrastructure projects.
Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Indonesia disburses less than 3% of budget for Prabowo's flagship free meals programme
JAKARTA, June 17 (Reuters) - Indonesia spent 4.4 trillion rupiah ($270.35 million) by June 12 on President Prabowo Subianto's flagship programme to give students and expectant mothers free meals, just 2.6% of this year's allocation, finance ministry data showed on Tuesday. Launched in January, the programme has faced challenges, including concerns in financial markets about the government's tight budgetary constraints as well as cases of food poisoning in some regions. The programme had reached around 4.9 million recipients by June 12, served by 1,716 catering units, deputy finance minister Suahasil Nazara told a press conference. This year's total budget for the programme is 171 trillion rupiah ($10.51 billion), which assumes that authorities are gradually expanding outreach to eventually serve 82.9 million recipients from 32,000 catering units by the end of the year. The programme was Prabowo's key campaign promise during the 2014 presidential election. During rallies, Prabowo estimated the programme would cost 450 trillion rupiah per year when fully implemented. ($1 = 16,275 rupiah)
Spectator
15 minutes ago
- Spectator
The good and bad news about the UK-US trade deal
Donald Trump and Keir Starmer's transatlantic trade deal has finally been signed. Before making an early exit from the G7, the US president approved an executive order giving legal effect to parts of the US-UK deal. The outline of the agreement was settled weeks earlier during a conference call, with Trump in the White House and Peter Mandelson, the UK ambassador in Washington, standing, slightly creepily, over his shoulder, as Starmer dialled in from 4,000 miles away. If the deal is to progress further, an almighty row could be brewing The delay in any further announcement left conservatives, and businesses, wondering whether the deal outline a month ago was turning into a fiction. But the executive order Trump signed on Monday gives effect to the agreement at the end of the month. There are, however, some changes to what had originally been trailed one month ago. Tariffs on UK car exports to the United States (the UK's biggest goods export) will come down from 27.5 per cent to 10 per cent. But the 100,000 limit on the number of cars we can export to the US effectively puts a cap on growth within that part of the industry, as we already export roughly that amount of cars anyway. There was a bonus announcement too with Britain's aerospace sector exempted from even the baseline 10 per cent tariffs. It was bad news for steel, though. The agreed reduction of tariffs from 25 per cent to zero was absent from the president's executive order. Civil servants working on the deal say talks are ongoing, with disputes remaining over quotas on the amount of steel we'd be allowed to send before steeper tariffs kick in. Fingers crossed. There also seem to be complications surrounding Chinese ownership of British steel – something the Americans clearly don't like. Trump wasn't his best as he announced the singing of the deal alongside Starmer outside the G7 meeting in Canada. A slip of the tongue led him to say the deal was with the EU, rather than the UK. He then managed to drop the papers everywhere before Starmer helped pick them up. The Prime Minister fared better with Trump saying: 'He's slightly more liberal than I but for some reason we get along.' The deal finally being given legal effect by the president is clearly good news for Britain and undeniably a Brexit win. Had the UK had a closer relationship with the EU we'd be lumped in with the higher tariffs they're having to put up across all goods; we'd also get carried along with any retaliatory measures imposed by Brussels. These might please voters but they are, in reality, economic self harm. We shouldn't pretend this deal is more than it is though. This is not a wide-ranging free trade agreement – something which the government says it is still striving towards – but measures that mitigate the tariffs Trump unleashed on the world on his 'liberation day' in April. We are certainly better of, both compared with much of the world and with when those tariffs were initially announced. But we are still in a worse position than at the start of the year. What's also clear is that the White House is calling the shots. They feel under no pressure to further the deal with us and will only sign incremental steps as and when it suits them. If the deal is to progress further, an almighty row could be brewing. One of the aspects of global trade that reportedly enrages Trump is how much Americans – and American hospitals – pay for drugs, even those produced domestically. The NHS, as a single buyer purchasing in bulk on a massive scale, secures medicines at far lower prices. Trump sees that as unfair. He can't do much to force companies to lower prices for US customers, but he can try to push them up for the UK. Indeed, documents released after the agreement was outlined in May say the NHS will 'look at the concerns of the president' on this issue. But it's hard to see how any British Prime Minister or Health Secretary could agree to anything that increases NHS costs – politically or fiscally. This aspect of the deal may be flying under the radar for now, but it could well stop further progress towards free trade in its tracks.
