‘There will be war': fear and defiance across border after Indian airstrikes in Pakistan
The crowd gathered in an angry frenzy, their slogans ringing out across the streets of the Pakistani city of Rawalpindi. 'There will be war,' they cried out in unison. 'The war will continue till Kashmir is freed. Till India is destroyed. There will be war.'
Just hours earlier, an alleged Indian drone had crashed amid the food stalls outside the cricket stadium, injuring a passing civilian. It was one of at least 25 drones that Pakistan claimed India had sent into Pakistani territory overnight, in what they described as a 'another blatant military act of aggression'.
The previous night, India had carried out the most extensive airstrikes on Pakistan in decades, as it used missiles and drones to target nine locations across the country.
India said it had struck only 'terrorist infrastructure', including alleged headquarters and training camps of militant groups behind some of the deadliest terror attacks carried out on India soil. However, women and several children were among the 31 killed in the strikes.
After India's alleged second incursion involving drones, which were shot down deep inside Pakistani territory early on Thursday, the mood on the streets of Rawalpindi was one of rage. The crowd had a single demand: 'Attack India and destroy India,' they roared. 'Hail Pakistan's military.'
Since the partition of India and the formation of Pakistan in 1947, the two countries have fought four wars. While people-to-people sentiments have often softened in times of peace, any sign of cross-border aggression is known to ignite deep-rooted suspicions and outright anger, and is often met with calls for powerful retaliation.
In Rawalpindi – home to the headquarters of Pakistan's military – there was deep frustration that Pakistan had yet to hit back at India after the strikes.
Usman Ali, 20, a tailor, said the military should not wait any longer to attack India in a show of strength. 'They fired missiles at us yesterday and today their drones have attacked Punjab again,' he said. ' We should respond to their military strike with more and more powerful military strikes inside Pakistan. Our military should not be silent. They should destroy India. They want a war. We must give them one very soon.'
The strikes on Wednesday were the first time since the 1971 war that India had launched missiles into Pakistan's most politically and militarily important province of Punjab. For many in the country, it was seen as a direct provocation that could not be ignored.
'What are we waiting for? Are we not a dignified and brave nation? Our military must strike now,' said a government servant, who asked to remain anonymous.
Many have argued that all-out war with India is the last thing that Pakistan needs. It is already fighting a shadow war with Taliban militants along the border with Afghanistan and with separatist militants in Balochistan, and is still emerging from a financial crisis that has left many Pakistanis facing severe economic hardship.
Even a few weeks ago, as the two countries exchanged mounting threats, the appetite for a hot war with India had remained largely lacklustre in Pakistan.
However, this week's aggressions have changed sentiments entirely, cutting across political divides and economic background, from vendors to students and lawyers. Nabeel Najaf, 34, a government employee, said that India was now 'taking advantage' of Pakistan's restraint. 'They want a war. The Pakistan military and the army chief should give them a war,' she said.
The decision on how Pakistan will respond now rests with its powerful military, in particular its chief, Gen Asim Munir. He is known for his hardline stance on India and his appetite for action over diplomacy, so many in the country believed that retaliatory strikes were imminent, especially given frustrations within the army rank-and-file at the lack of decisive action so far.
Pakistan's military has historically commanded vast loyalty among the masses, but that has been eroded in recent years. How Munir chooses to respond to India, and the success of any operation, could either re-ignite Pakistan's faith in its powerful generals or push the establishment into greater crisis.
Yet not all in the country were baying for war. 'The world must play its role to de-escalate the conflict,' said Yousaf Nisar, 30, a software engineer. 'The world powers are sleeping, sadly. If Pakistan strikes back, India will retaliate and this will go out of control into a full-fledged war.'
The consequences of war for Pakistan would be 'unbearable', said Nasir. 'People think war is a joke but imagine the cost to human lives, infrastructure, our economy.'
Over the border in India, a similar appetite for the full force of the military to rain down on Pakistan had been circulating for weeks, after a militant attack in Indian-controlled Kashmir killed 26 people. India accused Pakistan of involvement in the attack, in which Hindu men were singled out for their religion and killed, horrifying the Hindu-majority country.
After Wednesday's strikes, a mood of jubilance gripped Delhi. 'I thought it was a very smart strike by India,' said Amitav Gosal, a lawyer in Delhi. 'Pakistan can't get away with being a haven for terrorists who sit over the border and plot to kill innocent Indians. Taking out those terrorist camps makes us all safer.'
Yet others expressed anxiety, as fears of a Pakistan military response and an escalation of the conflict mounted on Thursday. Sheikh Abir, a security guard, shook his head nervously at the prospect. 'We have seen this issue with Pakistan many times before,' he said. 'It never ends well.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
41 minutes ago
- BBC News
Families of Ukraine's missing fear peace will not bring them home
Tatyana Popovytch had contacted every agency she could think of. She had walked every step her son Vladislav could have taken after the Russians opened fire at his car, leaving him to flee with a bullet in his leg. She had looked in mass graves, reviewed pictures of the dead, watched exhumations. And after a month, she knew no more than when she had a stranger had just been released from a Russian prison in Kursk. At morning roll call, the prisoners could not see one another, but they could hear each person state their full name and home village. Serhii memorised as many names and places as he could – 10 in total, he said – and on 9 May 2022 he called Tatyana to say that he had heard her son's Vladislav, Serhii was a civilian captured from Bucha at the start of the war, when hundreds of civilians were taken from this area. Vladislav was 29 at the time. Now 32, he is still in the prison in Kursk. Serhii couldn't explain to Tatyana why he had been released and Vladislav hadn't. Tatyana was just glad to hear that her son was alive. "I was so overjoyed I lost the stutter I'd had since he was taken," she years later, to the day, Tatyana was sitting in a café in Bucha, not far from where her son was abducted, looking over the scant evidence that he was still alive: two letters from him – short, boilerplate texts, written in Russian, telling her he was well fed and well looked after. Each letter had taken around three months to reach Tatyana, making it hard for her to feel very connected to her son at any point in time."My son is very gentle and sensitive," she said, with the pained expression of a parent who cannot protect their child. She was looking at pictures of Vlad ballroom dancing – a hobby from a young age. "He is so vulnerable," she said. "I worry that he will lose his sanity there." According to Ukrainian authorities, nearly 16,000 Ukrainian civilians are still in captivity in Russian prisons after being abducted by the invading army – not counting the more than 20,000 Ukrainian children estimated to have been taken to Russia. There are growing fears now among their many thousands of loved ones, amid the apparent progress towards peace talks, that they could be forgotten or lost in the process. And those fears appear to be justified. Under the Geneva Convention, there is a recognised mechanism for exchanging prisoners of war, but no such mechanism exists for the return of captured civilians, leaving even top Ukrainian and international officials searching for an explanation as to how they might be brought home."When I attend official meetings, at the ombudsman's office or elsewhere, no one talks about getting the civilians back in the event of a ceasefire," said Yulia Hripun, 23, whose father was kidnapped early on in the war from a village just west of the weeks after learning of her father's captivity, Yulia used Facebook to contact another daughter of an imprisoned Ukrainian and the pair launched a new organisation to campaign for all the civilians' release. The group has met representatives from the UN, the European Parliament, the governments of several EU countries and the US embassy in Ukraine."We spoke with them but it came down to the fact that they honestly don't understand what's going to happen," Yulia said, of meeting the Americans."The only thing they said is that Trump is interested in the issue of deported children and that maybe civilians could somehow fit into that category. But they are actually different categories that can't be combined."Worryingly for Yulia and other relatives of the captured civilians, top Ukrainian officials are not pretending to have a stronger idea."I do not see the real, effective approach to returning the civilian detainees to Ukraine," said Dmytro Lubinets, the country's human rights ombudsman. "We do not have a legal basis or the mechanisms for returning them," he said, frankly. Further complicating the problem is Russia levelling criminal charges against some of those captured during the invasion. "And when you see these charges, it is often 'actions against the special military operation'," Lubinets said. "Can you imagine opening an investigation against a Ukrainian civilian for simply resisting the invading Russian army, on Ukrainian territory?"In May, Russia released 120 civilian detainees as part of a larger swap of prisoners of war, and further exchanges are expected. But the numbers are still vanishingly small compared to the tens of thousands said to have been seized – adults and children. And great uncertainty remains over the path towards a negotiated peace."You want to believe he is coming home, at the same time you can't believe it," said Petro Sereda, 61, a bus driver from Irpin, near Kyiv, whose son Artym was taken prisoner more than three years ago. "It is extremely difficult." Petro and his wife live in shipping container-style temporary accommodation in Irpin, because their home was destroyed in the invasion. Even three years on, every time the phone rings Petro thinks it might be Artym. "It is one thing to have a letter saying he is alive, but to hear his voice… That would be the joy that he is really alive."The families live like this, in desperate hope. The dream is that they get to see their loved ones again. It is not a straightforward dream, though – some fear that Russian captivity will have caused lasting damage. Tatyana, whose ballroom-dancing son Vladislav was abducted from Bucha, said she shuddered to hear the Russian language now "because it is the language my son is being tortured in."There is also the issue of what is missed. During Vladislav's detention, his father passed away unexpectedly at just 50, carrying a well of guilt that he was not able to protect his Tatyana can do is prepare mentally for Vladislav's return. She expected to "feel every possible emotion," she said. "It is all I think about. All the time, every day."Daria Mitiuk contributed to this report. Photographs by Joel Gunter
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Russian shells on Kharkiv leave four dead and 60 injured - including a baby - after 'most powerful attack since the start of the war in Ukraine'
At least four people have been killed and more than 60 people injured after Russia unleashed 'the most powerful attack' since the start of the war with Ukraine, officials said on Saturday. Drones, missiles and guided bombs pelted down on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv during the overnight assault, with the injured said to include a baby. One of Ukraine's largest cities, Kharkiv is located just a few dozen kilometres from the Russian border and has been under constant Russian shelling during more than three years of war. 'Kharkiv is currently experiencing the most powerful attack since the start of the full-scale war,' city mayor, Ihor Terekhov, said on Telegram on Saturday. Dozens of explosions were heard in the city throughout Friday night and Russian troops were striking simultaneously with missiles, drones and guided aerial bombs, he said. Multi-storey and private residential buildings, educational and infrastructure facilities were attacked, Terekhov noted. Photographs released by local authorities and Reuters showed burnt and partially destroyed houses and vehicles, and of rescuers carrying those injured to safety and removing debris. Kharkiv governor Oleh Syniehubov said that one of the city's civilian industrial facilities was attacked by 40 drones, one missile and four bombs, causing a fire, adding there may still be people under the rubble. In the evening, Russian aircraft once again attacked Kharkiv with guided bombs, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy called 'another brutal murder'. 'It was a brutal blow to the city in broad daylight, and in fact, they have been attacking our city of Kharkiv for the entire day,' Zelenskiy said in his evening statement. 'Last night, there was a massive drone strike on Kharkiv, and now there are aerial bombs. Dozens of people have been injured in the past 24 hours.' he said. The Ukrainian military said Russia launched 206 drones, two ballistic and seven other missiles against Ukraine overnight. It said its air defence units shot down 87 drones while another 80 drones were lost - in reference to the Ukrainian military using electronic warfare to redirect them - or they were drone simulators that did not carry warheads. Ten locations were hit, the military reported. The attack took place amid a stalling of a large-scale prisoner exchange between Russia and Ukraine expected to have taken place this weekend. Both sides accused the other of delaying and thwarting the swap, which has been the only concrete outcome of peace talks to date. At talks in Istanbul on Monday, Kyiv and Moscow agreed to release all wounded soldiers and those aged under 25 who had been captured - more than 1,000 people on each side. Russia said it would also hand back the remains of 6,000 killed Ukrainian soldiers. Moscow on Saturday accused Ukraine of not turning up to collect the bodies and not agreeing a date to swap the captured soldiers, while Kyiv said Russia was playing 'dirty games' by not sticking to the agreed parameters for the exchange. 'The Ukrainian side has unexpectedly postponed for an indefinite period both the acceptance of the bodies and the exchange of prisoners of war,' Russia's top negotiator Vladimir Medinsky said on social media. A defence ministry spokesman said 'the Ukrainian side is still refraining from setting a date' for the first stage of the prisoner swap. The exchange was set to be the largest of the war, topping last month's 1,000-for-1,000 swap that was agreed at a first round of talks in Istanbul. After the Istanbul talks, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said it would take place this weekend, while Russia said it was ready for Saturday, Sunday or Monday. Responding to Russia's accusations, Ukraine's Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War said no date had been agreed for the return of bodies. It also said a list of names Russia said would be released did not match the terms of the agreement. 'Unfortunately, instead of constructive dialogue, we are again faced with manipulations,' it said in a statement on social media. 'We call on the Russian side to stop playing dirty games and return to constructive work to bring people back to both sides and to clearly implement the agreement in the coming days,' it added. Following the attack on Kharkiv, Zelensky urged Kyiv's Western backers to heap more 'pressure' on Russia, with at least 10 people killed in the barrage. Three people were also killed in the frontline Donetsk region, which has seen the most intense fighting of the war, and three more in the Kherson region, also partially occupied by Moscow's forces. Since Russia invaded in February 2022, tens of thousands have been killed, with millions forced to flee their homes as cities and villages across eastern Ukraine have been destroyed. The Ukrainian air force said Russia had fired 206 drones and nine missiles in the overnight barrage. Russia's defence ministry said it had launched a 'group strike' against 'military-industrial' facilities in Ukraine. Despite talks, the two sides have made no progress towards halting the fighting. Russian President Vladimir Putin has issued a host of sweeping demands on Ukraine as preconditions to a truce. They include completely pulling troops out of four regions claimed by Russia, but which its army does not fully control, an end to Western military support and a ban on Ukraine joining NATO. Zelensky has rejected them as 'old ultimatums' and on Saturday repeated his call for sanctions on Moscow. 'The Russians are preparing to continue the war, ignoring all peace proposals. They must be held accountable for this,' he said in his evening address. 'Pressure forced Russia to enter the negotiation process. Pressure can force Russia to become realistic in the negotiation process,' he added.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Britain is ALREADY at war with Russia and ‘we are in pretty big trouble' admits defence expert in bombshell warning
RUSSIA is already at war with Britain, an author of the Government's defence review has warned. Fiona Hill, who was the White House's chief Russia adviser during Donald Trump 's first term, delivered the stark warning of the threat posed by Vladimir Putin. 4 4 4 She said: 'We are in pretty big trouble. "Russia has hardened as an adversary in ways that we probably hadn't anticipated.' Ms Hill said Moscow has been ' menacing the UK in various different ways ' for years, including poisonings and assassinations on British soil, carrying out cyber attacks and cutting sea cables. In her grim alert, the Kremlin expert said: 'Russia is at war with us.' And she warned that Britain can no longer rely on US military might to protect itself from enemy states. Ms Hill co-wrote the Strategic Defence Review, which warned the UK is facing its biggest threats since the Cold War — and set out plans to urgently build more bombs and guns to arm ourselves. Her comments came as Russian missiles blitzed Kharkiv, killing three people and injuring at least 22, including a six-week-old baby and a 14-year-old girl. The eastern Ukrainian city was struck by 48 drones, two missiles and five glider bombs as part of a huge, countrywide bombardment by Putin in retaliation for last week's Spider Web attack on his nuclear bombers. PM Sir Keir Starmer used an article in last week's Sun on Sunday to deliver his starkest warning yet of the danger of war. Putting the nation on a war footing, he said Britain must prepare to 'sight and win' against our enemies. New footage of Op Spiderweb shows drone blitzing Putin's burning aircraft 4
