Ireland faces top EU court over delay in removing terrorist and bomb-making content online
IRELAND IS BEING taken to the European Union's top court for failing to follow key rules on removing terrorist and bomb-making content from the internet.
The European Commission announced today that it has referred Ireland, along with Bulgaria and Portugal, to the Court of Justice of the EU, as the government has not fully implemented the Terrorist Content Online (TCO) Regulation.
The regulation requires countries to make sure terrorist content is taken down from websites and social media platforms (within one hour of being told to do so).
The rules, which came into effect in June 2022, are meant to stop extremist groups from spreading propaganda, recruiting people, or encouraging attacks online.
Under the regulation, terrorist content includes any material that promotes or glorifies terrorist acts, encourages others to join or support terrorist groups, gives instructions for making or using weapons or explosives, or threatens to carry out an attack.
The regulation also covers content related to explosives precursors — substances and materials that can be used to make bombs and other explosive devices.
TCO regulation is designed to ensure that this type of content is removed swiftly to limit its spread and potential harm.
Advertisement
According to the Commission, Ireland has not met several basic requirements under the regulation.
These include appointing and notifying a competent authority to issue and enforce removal orders, setting up a public contact point to handle questions and complaints about those orders, and putting in place a system of penalties for companies that fail to comply.
Delayed Irish response
While the Commission said that the Irish government has made some progress, it added it came too late and still falls short of full compliance.
It wasn't until September 2024 – over two years after the rules came into force – that Coimisiún na Meán was appointed to handle penalties on service providers for breaches of the TCO Regulation.
At the same time, the government confirmed that An Garda Síochána would act as the authority responsible for issuing takedown orders for terrorist content.
The Commission has criticised the delays, arguing that these steps should have been in place much earlier to ensure effective enforcement.
It had already warned Ireland in January 2023 through a formal notice, followed by a legal opinion in February 2024.
With those concerns still unresolved, the Commission has now referred the case to the Court of Justice.
If the court finds that Ireland has failed to meet its legal obligations, it could face financial penalties.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish woman Lorraine Nolan appointed head of EU's drug agency
Lorraine Nolan has been appointed to the high-profile role as head of the EU's drug agency. She was appointed executive director of the European Union Drugs Agency after receiving a two-thirds majority in a secret ballot, holding off competition from two other candidates. Since 2016, Ms Nolan has been the chief executive of Ireland's Health Products Regulatory Authority, the agency in charge of regulating medicines, medical devices, and similar products. She is a former chair of the management board of the European Medicines Agency, and has been lead support to Irish ministers for health in drug policy development. She holds a PhD in pharmaceutical chemistry from Trinity, and has also worked as a forensic scientist for the Department of Justice. Ms Nolan will take the role at the beginning of next year. Based in Lisbon, Portugal, the EU's Drugs Agency aims to support bloc-wide policymaking by providing evidence-based information on drugs, drug addiction, and their consequences. Last week, for example, it warned that Europe is facing an emerging threat from synthetic drugs — including artificial substances that mimic cannabis, heroin, and stimulants. Read More Hiqa CEO apologises at Oireachtas committee for 'failings' over nursing home abuses
Dublin Live
4 hours ago
- Dublin Live
Smartphone bans have little to no impact on student well-being, study reveals
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Smartphone bans have little or no impact on education, online bullying and wellbeing among students, according to a new study by Dublin City University. Last week, new national guidance was issued to schools on restricting mobile phone use. Primary schools now require a policy to ban the use of and access to mobile phones during the school day, while secondary schools require a policy to restrict mobile phone use during the school day. Some €9million in funding has been allocated for schools to look at a range of storage solutions, including lockable boxes, cubby holes for drop-off and collection at the school office. It followed opposition criticism of a plan to fund 'phone pouches' across secondary schools. A €9million scheme to provide the pouches to second-level schools, announced in last October's budget, sparked controversy at the time, and it was labelled 'wasteful' . The Government then U-turned, telling schools last week they can apply for up to €25 per student to purchase secure storage solutions for mobile phones, such as pouches or lock boxes. However, doubts have been cast over the policy's effectiveness. Researchers from DCU's Anti-Bullying Centre found that the stricter the phone ban, the more students look for ways to subvert it. A new report has looked at existing international research as well as a new Irish study on the experiences of students. In the DCU report, researchers examined existing international research on smartphone bans and related research on smartphones and their use among children and adolescents. It found that international research is 'clearly mixed and somewhat conflicting', with most studies showing that smartphone ban policies can have 'little or no impact on education and wellbeing among students' in different countries. The study found no current research can be said to definitively demonstrate that smartphone bans completely protect children and adolescents from online bullying or harmful content. The Anti-Bullying Centre is also recommending that online safety and digital citizenship education should be a compulsory topic in schools. Researchers also conducted focus groups in six schools in the east. Students reported that they were not taught enough in school about online safety and digital citizenship, leading them instead to rely on their peers for guidance and skills. Some pupils also reported that teachers cause distractions to the learning environment with their phone use. Others were concerned that smartphone bans may inhibit students from learning resilience and skills for life beyond school. And the report found that students' voices have not been included in decision-making on smartphone restrictions in schools. Lead author of the report, Dr Megan Reynolds, said: 'Our research shows that we need to listen to students on issues that directly impact them and ensure that they are included in the decision-making process regarding policies on smartphone bans and related issues. 'My hope is that this research will allow adolescents to finally have their voices heard and it will provide an opportunity for more nuanced conversations on smartphones.' The director of DCU's Anti-Bullying Centre and Unesco chair on Bullying and Cyberbullying, Prof James O'Higgins Norman, added: 'Students have also indicated that there are more pressing issues for students than smartphones in schools that they believe require action, including vaping.' But while a ban for secondary students remains under scrutiny, there is growing support for a veto on phones for younger students. Several primary schools located in Co Louth have asked parents not to give their children a phone for use in school, or at home, until they finish sixth class. And almost 90% of parents who responded to a survey circulated by the schools last year have agreed and signed this voluntary charter. Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.
The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
Inside and outside the Kneecap courtroom: Film directors, The Fields of Athenry, and a few police
Rónán Duffy reports from London The Journal / YouTube MARYLEBONE ROAD IN central London is a busy thoroughfare on any morning, but today a section of it was completely thronged, thanks to Kneecap's ability to draw an audience. The crowd was noisy and numbered in several hundred – but confined as it was to the path and the area immediately outside Westminster Magistrates' Court, from within it, it felt like more. There was some pushing, given the numbers and the tight space available. A small but visible police presence prevented the protest from spilling over onto rush hour traffic. Around the corner, there was a much larger fleet of police vans, presumably on standby, but the full contingent was not required or deployed. 'Spancil Hill' and 'The Fields of Athenry' Outside the court building, there was even a stage erected to provide the tunes. 'Spancil Hill' and 'The Fields of Athenry' got an airing before the mic was handed to high-profile solicitor Darragh Mackin, once the legal business of the day was done. Kneecap's Moglaí Bap (Naoise Ó Cairealláin) also addressed the crowd and attendant media to big up the band's upcoming – and, in the UK, controversial – performance at Glastonbury. 'For anybody going to Glastonbury, you can see us there at 4pm on the Saturday. If you can't be there we'll be on the BBC, if anybody watches the BBC. We'll be at Wembley in September. But most importantly: free, free Palestine. Smoke bombs were let off as Kneecap exited the court. TheJournal TheJournal The man of the moment, Mo Chara (Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh), did not speak outside, speaking only briefly inside the court to confirm his identity . Inside the packed courtroom, such was the number of journalists that media spilled over from the press benches to the public gallery, there were no spare seats once the hearing began. Also in the public gallery were Mo Chara's bandmates and their manager, Daniel Lambert, who were seated with film director Trevor Birney, who produced the Kneecap film. Film director Jim Sheridan was also in the public gallery. Speaking to The Journal , Sheridan said he 'knows the lads', meaning Kneecap, after attending their gigs and meeting them at the Irish Film and Television Awards. Sheridan directed In The Name of the Father, about the Guildford Four miscarriage of justice, which featured Emma Thompson as human rights lawyer Gareth Peirce. Peirce is now a member of Kneecap's legal team and Sheridan said that knows her too. The Journal / YouTube Ó hÁnnaidh is being prosecuted under the anglicised name O'Hanna and chief magistrate Paul Goldspring referenced Ó hAnnaidh's Irish name. Goldspring said that unsuccessful attempts were made to have an Irish language interpreter present in court today but that 'we'll try and sort one' for the next court date on 20 August. Ó hAnnaidh's team confirmed that he speaks English but said it's his second language, and they therefore formally requested an interpreter for the next hearing. Northern Ireland-based Irish-language coalition An Dream Dearg had members both inside and outside the courtroom supporting Mo Chara. The hearing was delayed by almost an hour such was the chaos that greeted the band's arrival. Ó hAnnaidh arriving at court today. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo A van emblazoned with the words 'More blacks, more dogs, more Irish, Mo Chara' did laps of the area, drawing cheers each time it passed by. The arrival of Kneecap was heralded by a post on their Instagram stories which said they were '20 mins away a chairde Gael'. Given the traffic and general madness of the entire scene the band arrived bang on 10am and had to force their way through the crowd of protesters and media to the glass doors of the court building. Mo Chara was wearing a keffiyeh scarf around his neck and dark sunglasses. Advertisement The third member of the band, DJ Provaí (JJ Ó Dochartaigh), was wearing his trademark tricolour balaclava and was able to wear the balaclava inside the court building for a number of minutes before a member of security told him he would have to remove it to walk through the metal detectors. About 20 people spilled into the building along with Kneecap, while about 50 more were content with staying in the narrow foyer between the metal detectors and the doors. The scene outside the courthouse as Mo Chara arrived. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo The Met Police inside the building kept a distance from the scrum, although they reminded supporters that there was strictly no photography allowed inside the building. The actual hearing lasted about 15 minutes and was adjourned until 20 August, when both sides will present arguments relating to a dispute over the jurisdiction of the court. The dispute relates to the time period between the date of the alleged offence on 21 November 2024 and Ó hAnnaidh being charged in May 2025. Brenda Campbell, for Ó hAnnaidh, said his team would be arguing that the charge was brought outside the six-month limit and that if this is found to be the case the prosecution would fall. The judge agreed that this would be the case should the defence win the argument on the disputed dates. During the hearing, the allegations against Ó hAnnaidh were summarised by prosecutor Michael Bisgrove, who said: 'It's not about Mr Ó hAnnaidh's support for the people of Palestine or his criticism of Israel. 'He's well within his rights to voice his opinions and solidarity, as is anybody else. 'The allegation in this case is a wholly different thing and deals with a video recording showing that, in November of last year, Mr Ó hAnnaidh wore and displayed the flag of Hezbollah, a proscribed terrorist organisation, while saying 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah'. Outside Rónán Duffy / X (Formerly Twitter) After the hearing, Kneecap emerged from the courthouse when Mackin took to the makeshift stage. There, Mackin framed the case as one about freedom of expression. 'Oppression fears the freedom of expression, but the reality is Kneecap will stand up for freedom of expression and defend not only their rights but the rights of artists all around the world,' he said. Do not be afraid, we are on the right side of history. Fifty-one people were shot an killed yesterday in Gaza as they queued for flour. 'If the British government had any sense of history, they will know they have already lost.' Many people present at today's protest expressed similar sentiments, saying the case was about the right to freedom of expression and freedom to protest. Several referenced the fact that while Mo Chara is getting significant publicity for the charges he is facing, other pro-Palestine protesters are facing similar charges – and are being held on remand in some cases. Pepper, from Essex, attended the protest with her friend Kiki. 'It's really important to protect the right to free speech and standing up against the genocide in Palestine, especially with the pro-Palestine prisoners right now. 'Activists in general are getting criminalised and called terrorists for no reason. Meanwhile, the UK government is getting away with so much, so many war crimes. They're complicit and actively participating in the genocide,' Kiki said. Kiki and Pepper from Essex. The Journal The Journal Pepper, said they were both fans of Kneecap and had been to see them at the Wide Awake Festival in London a few weeks ago. 'We wanted to be here to not let Mo Chara go down quietly or let this slip under the radar, because that's not fair. 'It is completely hypocritical, considering all the time, effort, and money that's going into it. I'm really happy everyone showed up today to make an example of how ridiculous it is, and to highlight what we really need to be focusing on,' she said. Andrea Torrejon, originally from Spain but now living in the UK, said Kneecap were targeted after they spoke out at Coachella and people then 'dug up' clips from a concert months before. 'I think the fact is they were trying to bring up stuff that happened last year, just because they dared to speak out at a concert, a concert where other people also spoke out,' she said. 'They went through Twitter, they went through everything. It makes no sense, and it's really worrying not just for them, but for everyone.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
