logo
Mushroom cook asks 'who died?' as police search home

Mushroom cook asks 'who died?' as police search home

Perth Now27-05-2025

Mushroom cook Erin Patterson asked police "who died?" when they arrived to search her home one week after serving up a poisonous meal to her estranged husband's family.
The 50-year-old is nearing the end of her triple-murder trial in regional Victoria, over the July 2023 toxic beef Wellington lunch she prepared which led to the deaths of three people, and near death of another.
Video from a police search seven days after the meal was shown to the jury on Tuesday as a detective gave evidence.
Detective Sergeant Luke Farrell said he arrived at Patterson's home in Leongatha, two hours' drive southeast of Melbourne, about 11.30am on August 5.
The jury was shown photos of dark-coloured, red-coloured and a multi-coloured plate in drawers and a dishwasher at the home, as well as Nagi Maehashi's RecipeTin Eats cookbook titled Dinner next to the stove.
Det Farrell said he opened the cookbook and found a beef Wellington recipe on a page that was "spattered" with cooking liquids.
Photos of digital scales, a Sunbeam dehydrator manual, computer hard drives and tablets found in the home were also shown to the jury.
He said the search concluded about 3.45pm that day but before leaving he sat down with Patterson and asked for her phone.
A video of that interaction was played to the jury, where Det Farrell sits opposite Patterson at her dining table.
"Thanks for your patience today, with the house search," he says to Patterson.
He said there was only one outstanding item, her mobile phone, and asked to "have a look".
Patterson replied "of course", handed her phone over and he then asked if a pin code was required.
She replied it was either a four-digit code or a six-digit code, but could not remember "which one", and then leaned over the table to assist him with the phone.
Under cross-examination by defence barrister Colin Mandy SC, the detective confirmed Patterson's two children and dog were home during the search.
She "expressed surprise" at being told Heather Wilkinson had died when police arrived, he said.
The detective was read transcript of a video from that day, which stated Patterson was told the search warrant was "in connection to the deaths of two people over the last couple of days".
"Her response is 'who died?'" Mr Mandy asked Det Farrell, to which he agreed.
Earlier on Tuesday, a public health adviser was cross-examined by defence over alleged changes to the information Patterson had given her during a search of Asian stores for deadly mushrooms.
Patterson had told Victorian Department of Health senior adviser Sally Ann Atkinson she'd purchased dried mushrooms from a store in Oakleigh, Clayton or Mount Waverley in April 2023 for a pasta dish.
Ms Atkinson claimed Patterson had changed her story, initially stating she had used some of the mushrooms in that dish, and later said she decided not to use them.
"At that time it sounded like she'd given me two conflicting pieces of information," she said on Tuesday.
Ms Atkinson said she was involved in public health efforts to track down mushrooms from July 31 to August 4, and said Patterson informed her on August 3 to also look at Asian stores in Glen Waverley.
After the investigation, which formally concluded on August 11, a report was compiled titled "The Patterson Family Outbreak", the jury was told.
Ms Atkinson confirmed the health department found the poisoning was an "isolated incident" and the risk to public health was "very low" with no recalls of products warranted.
It was "highly unlikely" the commercial supply chain of mushrooms had been contaminated with amatoxin, also known as death cap mushrooms, she said.
Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder, over Don and Gail Patterson and Ms Wilkinson's deaths, and one of attempted murder.
The trial before Justice Christopher Beale continues.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends
Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends

West Australian

time5 hours ago

  • West Australian

Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends

Disagree. Disagree. Disagree. Those were Erin Patterson's responses to the prosecution's final three questions in her murder trial. Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC rounded out her marathon cross-examination on Thursday with three suggestions: that Patterson deliberately sourced death cap mushrooms in 2023, deliberately included them in the beef Wellington she served her former in-laws and did so intending to kill them. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the murders of her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, his aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, and the attempted murder of Heather's husband Ian. She denies deliberately poisoning her lunch guests on July 29, 2023 when she served them meals that included death cap mushrooms. Patterson was accused of more lies on her eighth and final day in the witness box at the Supreme Court in Morwell in regional Victoria. The 50-year-old was asked about her evidence that she dehydrated dried mushrooms she had bought from an Asian grocer before adding them to the beef Wellingtons. She agreed she never said this to anyone at the time and didn't mention putting the fungi into the dehydrator when she earlier admitted adding them to the lunch. "I suggest this is another lie you made up on the spot," Dr Rogers said, accusing Patterson of hedging her bets to try to make it sound like there were multiple possible sources for the death cap mushrooms. "Incorrect," the accused killer responded. The prosecutor also suggested Patterson lied about taking diarrhoea treatment following the lunch after the 50-year-old earlier claimed one reason she went to hospital was because she thought they would have something stronger. Patterson agreed she did not tell medical staff at the hospital she had taken the medication, maintaining no one asked. "If you were looking for something stronger, you would've told medical staff you had already taken Imodium and it didn't work," Dr Rogers said. "I don't agree," Patterson responded. She was also questioned about her evidence that she had to stop by the side of a road and go to the toilet in the bushes while driving her son to a flying lesson, something the boy denied during his testimony. "I suggest he did not recall you stopping by the bushes on the side of the road because it did not happen ... I suggest this is another lie you told the jury about how you managed the trip to Tyabb," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson said. The mother-of-two said she had served her children reheated beef Wellington with the mushroom and pastry scraped off while she had a bowl of cereal the night after the deadly lunch. But Dr Rogers referred to her children's evidence, in which they suggested their mother had the same meal of leftovers the night after the fatal lunch. One of Patterson's children said she "ate the same as us", but Patterson told the court they were incorrect and denied eating the leftover food. She also denied that she "deliberately concealed" one of her phones, referred to at the trial as phone A, from police when they searched her house. Patterson said she switched from phone A to another, referred to as phone B, because the former was "not cutting it anymore". But the prosecution pointed to records that showed regular use from a SIM card in phone A until days after the mushroom lunch. Patterson said she conducted a factory reset of phone B because she wanted to use it and that was the phone she gave police. "I suggest to you that there was nothing wrong with phone A and this is another lie," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson responded. Under defence barrister Colin Mandy SC's re-examination, Patterson became emotional as she talked about her daughter's ballet lessons and son's flying lesson. With all evidence in the trial concluded, Justice Christopher Beale told jurors about discussions they could expect before dismissing them for the day.

Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends
Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends

Perth Now

time5 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends

Disagree. Disagree. Disagree. Those were Erin Patterson's responses to the prosecution's final three questions in her murder trial. Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC rounded out her marathon cross-examination on Thursday with three suggestions: that Patterson deliberately sourced death cap mushrooms in 2023, deliberately included them in the beef Wellington she served her former in-laws and did so intending to kill them. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the murders of her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, his aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, and the attempted murder of Heather's husband Ian. She denies deliberately poisoning her lunch guests on July 29, 2023 when she served them meals that included death cap mushrooms. Patterson was accused of more lies on her eighth and final day in the witness box at the Supreme Court in Morwell in regional Victoria. The 50-year-old was asked about her evidence that she dehydrated dried mushrooms she had bought from an Asian grocer before adding them to the beef Wellingtons. She agreed she never said this to anyone at the time and didn't mention putting the fungi into the dehydrator when she earlier admitted adding them to the lunch. "I suggest this is another lie you made up on the spot," Dr Rogers said, accusing Patterson of hedging her bets to try to make it sound like there were multiple possible sources for the death cap mushrooms. "Incorrect," the accused killer responded. The prosecutor also suggested Patterson lied about taking diarrhoea treatment following the lunch after the 50-year-old earlier claimed one reason she went to hospital was because she thought they would have something stronger. Patterson agreed she did not tell medical staff at the hospital she had taken the medication, maintaining no one asked. "If you were looking for something stronger, you would've told medical staff you had already taken Imodium and it didn't work," Dr Rogers said. "I don't agree," Patterson responded. She was also questioned about her evidence that she had to stop by the side of a road and go to the toilet in the bushes while driving her son to a flying lesson, something the boy denied during his testimony. "I suggest he did not recall you stopping by the bushes on the side of the road because it did not happen ... I suggest this is another lie you told the jury about how you managed the trip to Tyabb," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson said. The mother-of-two said she had served her children reheated beef Wellington with the mushroom and pastry scraped off while she had a bowl of cereal the night after the deadly lunch. But Dr Rogers referred to her children's evidence, in which they suggested their mother had the same meal of leftovers the night after the fatal lunch. One of Patterson's children said she "ate the same as us", but Patterson told the court they were incorrect and denied eating the leftover food. She also denied that she "deliberately concealed" one of her phones, referred to at the trial as phone A, from police when they searched her house. Patterson said she switched from phone A to another, referred to as phone B, because the former was "not cutting it anymore". But the prosecution pointed to records that showed regular use from a SIM card in phone A until days after the mushroom lunch. Patterson said she conducted a factory reset of phone B because she wanted to use it and that was the phone she gave police. "I suggest to you that there was nothing wrong with phone A and this is another lie," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson responded. Under defence barrister Colin Mandy SC's re-examination, Patterson became emotional as she talked about her daughter's ballet lessons and son's flying lesson. With all evidence in the trial concluded, Justice Christopher Beale told jurors about discussions they could expect before dismissing them for the day.

‘We're lucky we didn't die': Driver tells of terror during Princes Freeway crash caused by road works
‘We're lucky we didn't die': Driver tells of terror during Princes Freeway crash caused by road works

Sydney Morning Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

‘We're lucky we didn't die': Driver tells of terror during Princes Freeway crash caused by road works

'After that, [while] I was still talking to the cops, an abalone truck did exactly what I did – skidded left, then skidded right, and then he flipped right in front of me and slid an extra 100 metres past me. 'If I was on the road still, he would have run right into me. I watched him like I was in a movie.' Nguyen saw a few other cars hit either the exposed road or the loose plate before police arrived and closed the freeway. 'If they didn't close the road it could have been murder, man,' he said. Nguyen was one of five drivers involved in collisions on the freeway at Werribee, in Melbourne's outer west, about 4.20am on Wednesday following road works on the same stretch of road earlier that morning. The crashes caused major disruptions and hours-long delays for thousands of drivers, closing the city-bound lanes of the main road between Geelong and Melbourne for much of the day. A 200-kilogram steel plate that came loose was blamed for causing the four cars and a truck to crash. The truck rolled and spilled diesel across the lanes. The temporary steel plate was put over an expansion joint at the Duncans Road bridge near Werribee, following routine maintenance work which was completed at 3am. The plate quickly came loose, exposing the steel spikes of the joint and causing vehicles to crash as they drove over it. The Department of Transport's executive director of road maintenance Michael Bailey apologised on Wednesday afternoon for the incident, which he blamed on 'human error'. Bailey said multiple road maintenance firms had been involved in the works to replace the expansion joint. He said a temporary plate had been bolted into place over the joint, but it was not clear if it had been secured with asphalt too, as would typically happen. Transport department officers had been on site during the job and had deemed that the work was up to standard. 'They were very satisfied,' Bailey said. 'The plate installed was deemed safe at 3am. By 4am the plate had become loose. There's a failing by someone at some point.' The crash has left Nguyen's $50,000 van a write-off. He needs the vehicle for his livelihood carting Asian vegetables grown at his market garden in Anakie, north of Geelong, to sell at Box Hill in Melbourne's east. Nguyen is one of five motorists now weighing up whether to seek compensation from the government, or use their insurance to cover the cost of repairs. In Victoria, the Department of Transport and Planning is liable for any damage to vehicles caused by the roads it maintains, provided the cost of that damage is greater than $1640. On Wednesday, Bailey said the department would consider paying for repairs below the $1640 threshold as well. People can lodge notice of incident and claim forms if they feel the government is liable for the damage, and can request a review if they are unhappy with the resulting assessment. Nguyen said his van was worth about $55,000, and that by early Thursday afternoon he was yet to hear from anyone from the transport department. Nguyen said his van was insured, but that he would still have to pay an excess of $1500 to get it repaired. Heath Shepherd was travelling not far behind Nguyen in his Nissan Qashqai. The first thing he saw was hazard lights in the distance. 'As I'm driving, the car in front of me swerved to his right, hit the plate, and I tried to swerve left but got the full brunt of [the hole],' he said. 'It hit the left-hand tyre, under the radiator. I don't know how much damage there is yet because it hasn't been assessed.' Like Nguyen, Shepherd had also just discovered on Thursday that he has to pay an excess on his insurance, even though the damage to his vehicle wasn't his fault. 'I just found out when I did the online form through Bingle, and because there were no [other] cars involved [in the crash] we have to pay an excess, which I find a bit hard to stomach,' he said. Loading 'I think it's about $1000.' Shepherd said the tyres and rims on his car were write-offs, and he's waiting to see if the Nissan's undercarriage was also damaged, adding further costs to the repair job. Nguyen said a Country Fire Authority volunteer took a photo of the hole in the road and showed it to the people who crashed, but it wasn't until he saw TV footage hours later that he realised how big it was. 'We're lucky we didn't die,' he said. He's since had to hire a van at about $550 a week to continue making deliveries to Box Hill. He even salvaged some of the vegetables from his damaged van and continued on to the market after the crash to recoup some money. Shepherd is a truck driver who lives in Craigieburn, but was down in Ocean Grove for a fortnightly stay in his caravan. He starts work early each morning, which is why he was driving on the Princes Freeway just after 4am on Wednesday. He said he was also facing daily dilemmas as a result of the crash. 'I'm using my daughter's car at the moment because I still have to go to work every day, and then I've got to take my wife's car the next day because my daughter's got something on – she has to work herself,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store