logo
State settles pandemic overpayment class-action lawsuit

State settles pandemic overpayment class-action lawsuit

Yahoo26-02-2025

Feb. 25—Previously shuttling around Albuquerque residents as an Uber and Lyft driver, Yohanna Gerges found himself without passengers when the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020. Left without a regular income, Gerges filed for unemployment with the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions in April 2020.
He didn't expect he'd be told by the state to pay back $13,432 of that claim.
But now, following a January settlement from a class-action lawsuit filed against the state over its pandemic-era overpayments, Gerges and tens of thousands of other New Mexicans are no longer expected to pay the department back, and those who already reimbursed the state could potentially get refunded.
Getting to this point
Like others amid the pandemic, Gerges went to the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions, or DWS, to find a temporary solution while the world adapted to a new life.
While Gerges found difficulties in filing because of what he said was a faulty system, he eventually received a claim of $461 a week.
But months later, DWS said it had given Gerges too much money and asked him to repay it, as the state agency did for thousands of other New Mexicans as well. Overpayments totaled $250 million, according to DWS.
Gerges joined four other workers in March 2023 in filing suit against the state. Less than two years later, the state and the five plaintiffs agreed to a settlement. The settlement states that New Mexicans who received unemployment insurance claims under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security, or CARES, Act aren't responsible for the overpayments.
Additionally, the settlement found that anyone who reimbursed the state could qualify for refunds.
"The New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions reevaluated overpayments for claimants who were paid incorrectly due to the unprecedented expansion of benefits and rapidly changing rules during the pandemic," said DWS Cabinet Secretary Sarita Nair.
The department has waived $100 million in blanket waivers, which forgive repayment obligations for some people, and will make individual waiver requests available so those affected can apply.
The key difference is that individual waivers require claimants to apply and demonstrate eligibility on a case-by-case basis, while blanket waivers apply automatically to a qualifying group based on a single set of facts, according to DWS.
More than 36,000 individuals will soon receive information on how to make an individual waiver request that they can apply for, according to the department.
"This waiver provides much-needed relief to individuals who were overpaid pandemic benefits through no fault of their own," Nair said.
Due to the number of overpayments, it may take DWS several months to complete the process, according to DWS.
Frustration and a lack of communication
During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, thousands of people were out of work in New Mexico and filed claims with the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions to receive unemployment benefits.
With the flood of unemployment applications, the department awarded more benefits than permitted by the programs, according to the complaint against the department. So in February 2021, it started issuing notices to the public that they needed to pay back the money.
Gerges said the website and the department made it hard for anyone to reach out for information.
"You try to call and reach anyone in the department and their lines were always either busy or on hold," Gerges said. "If somebody picked up, you'd be lucky if they knew what needed to be done."
Before he was asked to reimburse overpayments, Gerges said the department cut his weekly payments in half and did not provide an explanation or a chance to appeal. Then DWS asked him to repay money.
"They were taking money back without adjudication, without letting me appeal, without letting me contest, without trying to explain to me," Gerges said.
Stephanie Welch, workers' rights director with the New Mexico Center on Law and Poverty, which represented those who filed the class-action lawsuit against DWS, called the settlement a "major step toward addressing the challenges faced by workers during the pandemic." Ives & Flores also represented the plaintiffs.
"New Mexicans who lost their jobs through no fault of their own deserve to make ends meet, and they should not be burdened by circumstances beyond their control," Welch said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

B.C.‘s youth unemployment rate second-highest in Canada with 16.6 per cent in May
B.C.‘s youth unemployment rate second-highest in Canada with 16.6 per cent in May

Hamilton Spectator

time34 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

B.C.‘s youth unemployment rate second-highest in Canada with 16.6 per cent in May

VICTORIA - High school students walking across graduation stages this month will step into an uncertain job market as B.C. has the second-highest youth unemployment rate in Canada. Figures released by Statistics Canada this month show the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate among people ages 15 to 24 was 16.6 per cent in May, up from 13.4 in April 2025 and up from 10.5 per cent in May 2024. Only Alberta has recorded a higher unemployment rate in that age category with 17.2 per cent, while the national youth unemployment rate is at 14.2 per cent. B.C.'s youth unemployment rate for May 2025 is below the rate of June 2020, when the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate among youth hit 28.6 per cent based on figures from Statistics Canada because of COVID-19. But the current unemployment rate among youth exceeds youth unemployment 15 years ago when it hit annual peak of 15.6 per cent in June 2010 in the midst of the so-called Great Recession caused by the financial crisis of 2007-2008. B.C.'s overall employment rate for May 2025 was 6.4 per cent, up from 6.2 per cent in April 2025 and 5.6 per cent in May 2024. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

B.C.'s youth unemployment rate second-highest in Canada with 16.6 per cent in May
B.C.'s youth unemployment rate second-highest in Canada with 16.6 per cent in May

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

B.C.'s youth unemployment rate second-highest in Canada with 16.6 per cent in May

VICTORIA — High school students walking across graduation stages this month will step into an uncertain job market as B.C. has the second-highest youth unemployment rate in Canada. Figures released by Statistics Canada this month show the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate among people ages 15 to 24 was 16.6 per cent in May, up from 13.4 in April 2025 and up from 10.5 per cent in May 2024. Only Alberta has recorded a higher unemployment rate in that age category with 17.2 per cent, while the national youth unemployment rate is at 14.2 per cent. B.C.'s youth unemployment rate for May 2025 is below the rate of June 2020, when the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate among youth hit 28.6 per cent based on figures from Statistics Canada because of COVID-19. But the current unemployment rate among youth exceeds youth unemployment 15 years ago when it hit annual peak of 15.6 per cent in June 2010 in the midst of the so-called Great Recession caused by the financial crisis of 2007-2008. B.C.'s overall employment rate for May 2025 was 6.4 per cent, up from 6.2 per cent in April 2025 and 5.6 per cent in May 2024. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025. Wolfgang Depner, The Canadian Press

Kenya's ride-hailing drivers say their jobs offer dignity despite the challenges
Kenya's ride-hailing drivers say their jobs offer dignity despite the challenges

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Kenya's ride-hailing drivers say their jobs offer dignity despite the challenges

Many argue that gig work involves exploitation, as research and media coverage have highlighted. But that doesn't seem to deter ride hailing drivers on platforms like Uber and Bolt. In Kenya, in fact, many new drivers continued to join platforms even as fares were slashed starting in 2016. As a PhD student studying the role of digitalisation in development, I spent several years trying to understand how digital drivers experienced the quality of their work. My research found that in 2019, a typical digital driver in Nairobi worked about 58 hours a week and earned well below the minimum wage on an hourly basis. What made this work attractive? Why did drivers stay? In a new paper, I draw on a 2019 survey of 450 drivers in Nairobi and 38 subsequent qualitative interviews in Nairobi and Kenya's second largest ride hailing market, Mombasa, in 2021 that explored drivers' experiences in detail. In addition to measuring working hours and incomes, my survey team asked drivers if they considered their work 'dignified'. Nearly eight in ten (78%) of our survey participants said yes. While that specific share of drivers may have changed since then, the underlying reasons drivers found the work dignified remain unchanged. In the global north, scholars have rung alarm bells about what 'gig work' means for the erosion of standard jobs with legal protections around working hours, minimum wage and other benefits. But the drivers my team and I spoke with in Kenya felt that digital driving was a step towards formalisation rather than a drift away from an ideal formal job. Driving had diginity in contrast to the indignities of low-wage work and the vast informal sector, which was their realistic alternative for making a living. My findings highlight that workers' experiences on global platforms like Uber are not universal and that digitisation may deliver some improvements in work quality relative to informal work in African contexts. Drivers explained that app companies imposed rules and structure that provided 'discipline' in a transport sector more broadly associated with rudeness, unruliness, and disrespect towards passengers. Requirements for things like driving licences, proof of insurance, and ratings seemed to make drivers feel more professional and make passengers see them as such. Drivers felt proud to be part of a driver community that behaved professionally under these conditions. A 38-year-old male driver in Nairobi who had been working on the platforms for three years told us: We are very respected … Everyone trusts you to carry them. It's not like the old days, when the taxi driver might rob you and dump you or even kill you. We are getting attraction from the society, even in the slums. They know you are an app driver, and they trust you because app drivers are good people. They know you can deliver, that you will be honest. Read more: On platforms, drivers were matched digitally with riders. Respondents said this brought dignity by ensuring drivers would receive a fairly steady stream of clients. This meant that a driver could rest assured he would earn money every day. The alternative was to 'hustle' in the informal economy to shake loose opportunities and constantly solicit those who might use their labour and beg for payment after a job was done. Constant solicitation and bargaining were exhausting and degrading. One driver explained: Most of us are poor. I have never walked out every morning sure that I would do a job. But now I know that if my car has been serviced and my phone is charged and working, I am going to work and not to some charity job. I used to wait at the base all day without getting a customer. Now, ….. at least two, three days are going to be good for you. Digital matchmaking also meant that drivers were not limited to serving the few clients they already knew or who happened to pass them at a fixed base. They found themselves serving new parts of the city and carrying important people, including business people, celebrities and local politicians. Serving these high-end customers made them feel proud and important. Wealthy neighbourhoods, luxury hotels and high-end restaurants felt more open to them in otherwise exclusionary and segregated cities. Some drivers felt that digitalisation had removed barriers to entry for taxi driving, like paying to join a parking base and building a client list. The app did away with parking bases, and about half of drivers joined the system through a 'partner', paying a fixed weekly fee to rent their car instead of buying it themselves. In efforts to make rides cheaper, in 2018 app companies in Kenya allowed smaller, less expensive cars on their platforms, lowering costs of ownership. Drivers in our survey showed that both formal and informal financiers were willing to offer loans to digital drivers, knowing they would have regular revenue to service their debt. Buying a car was seen as a huge, dignifying accomplishment. One driver in the survey told us: Growing up, I thought vehicles were owned only by the rich, but now digital driving has provided a means for me to own one and earn the respect of society. David Muteru, then chairman of the Digital Taxi Association of Kenya, echoed this sentiment: 'Owning a vehicle, that's an asset'. The dignifying value of order was only possible when app companies enforced their own rules and did so fairly. Drivers preferred the stringent rule enforcement of one major app over the lax enforcement of another, which made for more stressful and undignified interactions with riders. When the rules were enforced, drivers could be sure that the app company would help if a rider refused to pay or if there was a dispute with the client. Drivers felt the stricter environment kept bad actors out. Over time, though, app companies slashed prices, competing for market share. Drivers felt less respected by riders who saw them as desperate for money. Low fares pressed drivers to negotiate with riders for offline trips and higher rates, reintroducing the indignity of haggling. Digitally mediated work raises many questions about labour standards. This research shows how important it is to keep local context in mind. Digital driving is not the same experience for drivers in every context. Where people suffer indignities and deprivations in the informal sector, digitalisation may offer gains. But this potential depends on rule enforcement and pay. Material and subjective dignity are intertwined. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Julie Zollmann, Tufts University Read more: Australia's lowest paid workers just got a 3.5% wage increase. Their next boost could be even better Can ASEAN build a sustainable data centre future? Malaysian legal lessons may offer a wake-up call The biggest barrier to AI adoption in the business world isn't tech – it's user confidence Julie Zollmann received funding from Mastercard Foundation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store