During the Vietnam War, this luxury hotel sheltered celebs like Joan Baez and Jane Fonda from US air raids
Hanoi's Metropole Hotel sits imposingly on a corner in the city center, bright white with neat black shutters. As guests pull up in front of the French Colonial building, they are greeted by staff members wearing chic silk tunics.
Framed photos throughout the lobby show some of the hotel's most famous guests, from French presidents Francois Mitterand and Jacques Chirac to the writer Graham Greene, actress Jane Fonda and silent film star Charlie Chaplin. In 2019, the Metropole hosted US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un for a summit.
But below the elegant tile floors, there's another, darker layer of history.
As Vietnam marks the 50th anniversary of reunification this week, the hotel — now called the Sofitel Legend Metropole Hanoi — is highlighting its war heritage.
April 30, 2025 marks half a century since the the fall of Saigon and the helicopter evacuation of US ambassador Graham Martin, ending what Americans call the Vietnam War and what Vietnamese call the American War.
While most of the big, formal anniversary events like a military parade and a new airport terminal opening will be held in the southern metropolis of Ho Chi Minh City (formerly Saigon), Hanoi, as Vietnam's capital, has plenty of its own history to share.
The Metropole opened in 1901 when Vietnam was under French control. It passed through multiple owners until it was taken over by the Communist government in the 1950s and renamed the Reunification Hotel.
It was one of the few hotels allowed to house foreign visitors during the war, so many famous politicians, journalists and artists passed through.
In 1965, the hotel built an underground bunker where guests could shelter during US air raids. According to hotel manager Anthony Slewka, the space could hold about 100 people — roughly the same as the number of guests — and was divided into four chambers with two access points.
After the war, the bunker was forgotten — until 2011, when a contracting company remodeling the hotel's Bamboo Bar re-discovered it.
Now, the Metropole offers two daily tours of the bunker to hotel guests at 5:00 and 6:00 p.m.
While in the bunker, visitors can see original light bulbs and other fixtures while listening to the Joan Baez song 'Where Are You Now, My Son?,' which she recorded while staying at the Metropole. The song incorporates music, spoken word, clips of a Vietnamese woman crying out for her son, and the sound of air raid sirens.
Baez spent time in the bunker during her Vietnam visits and has spoken about how seeing the war's effect on people made her a peace activist.
Travelers to Hanoi who want to learn more about the war era can also visit the Hoa Lo Prison, where American prisoners of war — including, famously, the late Senator John McCain — were held. Nicknamed 'the Hanoi Hilton,' it has been converted into a multimedia history museum and has extensive English-language materials.
Meanwhile, Hanoi's Vietnam Military History Museum is the largest museum in the country following an upgrade in fall 2024. The outdoor section displays planes, tanks, rockets and artillery that were used by the American military during the war.
The embalmed body of Ho Chi Minh, the revolutionary who led the North Vietnamese army and became the president of Vietnam, is on public display at a large building in central Hanoi.
The mausoleum is just a short walk from the Presidential Palace complex, which features a traditional wooden stilt house he lived in.
These days, Americans comprise the largest group of visitors to the Metropole, says hotel manager Slewka. Some are veterans of the war and want to come back to see the country again, but others are young people of the post-war period who are simply interested in Vietnam's food, culture and scenery.
According to Vietnamese government data, the US is the fourth largest source of international tourists and the largest market outside of Asia, with 717,000 American tourists traveling to Vietnam in 2023.
While the Metropole's bunker tours prove popular with guests, Slewka says that the majority of their questions are about much more than the structure itself.
'Mostly, they want to know if they like Americans here or not.'
Slewka, who was born in the US and raised in Canada, always gives the same answer.
'Vietnamese people are very forward-facing. They are looking to the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr. Is Barely Even Pretending Anymore
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. accepted his new position as health secretary, he made a big show of distancing himself from his past life. 'News reports have claimed that I am anti-vaccine or anti-industry,' Kennedy, who has for decades promoted the debunked notion that vaccines cause autism and has baselessly sown doubt over the ability of the U.S. government to vet shots, said at his confirmation hearing in January. 'I am neither. I am pro-safety.' But for all Kennedy's talk, this week, he did exactly what a person would do if they were trying to undermine the scientific consensus on vaccination in the United States. He abruptly dismissed the entire expert committee that advises the CDC on its nationwide vaccine recommendations—and began to fill the roster with like-minded people ready to cast doubt on the benefits of vaccination. Like Kennedy, few of these new appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice, or ACIP, have openly embraced the notion that they are anti-vaccine. But among them are individuals who have spoken out against COVID vaccines and policies, claimed vaccine injuries for their own children, and falsely linked COVID shots to deaths—or even baselessly accused those vaccines of 'causing a form of acquired immunity deficiency syndrome.' In January, I wrote that remaking the committee in exactly this way would be an especially harmful blow to Americans' health: Perhaps more than any other body of experts in the U.S., ACIP guides the nation's future preparedness against infectious disease. By appointing a committee that is poised to legitimize more of his own radical views, Kennedy is giving his skewed version of scientific reality the government's imprimatur. Whether he will admit to it or not, he is serving the most core goal of the anti-vaccine movement—eroding access to, and trust in, immunization. In an emailed statement, Health and Human Services Press Secretary Emily G. Hilliard reiterated that 'Secretary Kennedy is not anti-vaccine—he is pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-accountability,' and added that his 'evidence-based approach puts accountability and radical transparency first, which will restore trust in our public health system.' (Kennedy, notably, promised Senator Bill Cassidy during his confirmation process that he would maintain ACIP, as Cassidy put it, 'without changes.') Since the 1960s, ACIP has lent government policy on vaccines the clout of scientific evidence. Its mandate is to convene experts across fields such as infectious disease, immunology, pediatrics, vaccinology, and public health to carefully vet the data on immunizations, weigh their risks and benefits, and vote on recommendations that guide the public on how to use them—who should get vaccines, and when. Those guidelines are then passed to the CDC director, who—with only the rarest of exceptions—accepts that advice wholesale. 'These recommendations are what states look to, what providers look to,' Rupali Limaye, an expert in vaccine behavior at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told me. Medicare, for instance, is required to fully cover the vaccines that ACIP recommends; ACIP also determines which vaccines are covered by the Vaccines for Children Program, which provides free vaccines for children whose families cannot afford them. The experts who serve on ACIP have the opportunity, more than just about any of their scientific peers, to translate their vaccine rhetoric into reality. So far, Kennedy has dismissed the 17 people who were serving on ACIP, and filled eight of the newly open slots. Most of the new nominees have an obvious bone to pick with at least some vaccines, especially COVID shots, and have publicly advocated for limiting their use. Among the new members, for instance, is Robert Malone, a controversial physician who has spoken at anti-vaccine events, where he has denounced COVID vaccines and, without evidence, suggested that they can worsen coronavirus infections. Another appointee is Vicky Pebsworth, who serves on the board of the National Vaccine Information Center, an anti-vaccine nonprofit previously known as Dissatisfied Parents Together. A third, Retsef Levi, a health-care-management expert, called for the administration of COVID vaccines to be halted in 2023, and has questioned the shots' safety, despite a large body of evidence from clinical trials supporting their continued use. Overall, 'this is not a list that would increase confidence in vaccine decisions,' Dorit Reiss, a vaccine-policy expert at UC San Francisco, told me. (None of these new ACIP members returned a request for comment.) The next ACIP meeting is scheduled for the end of this month—and the agenda includes discussion about anthrax vaccines, chikungunya vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines, cytomegalovirus vaccine, the human-papillomavirus vaccine, influenza vaccines, the Lyme-disease vaccine, meningococcal vaccines, pneumococcal vaccines, and RSV vaccines. That's a big slate of topics for a brand-new panel of members, Paul Offit, a pediatrician and a vaccine expert who has previously served on ACIP, told me: Depending on how the meeting is structured, and on the input from CDC scientists, these new committee members could substantially alter the guidelines on several immunizations—perhaps so much so that certain shots could stop being recommended to certain groups of Americans. Based on the composition of the committee so far, Offit predicts that the new ACIP will eventually push the CDC away from full-throated endorsement of many of these vaccines. Even subtle changes in the wording of CDC recommendations—a should swapped for a may—can have big ripple effects, Limaye told me. Insurers, for instance, may be more reluctant to cover vaccines that are not actively endorsed by the CDC; some states—especially those in which vaccines have become a political battleground—may stop mandating those types of shots. If the CDC softens its recommendations, 'we will likely see more partisan divides' in who opts for protection nationwide, Jason Schwartz, a vaccine-policy expert at Yale, told me. Pharmaceutical companies may, in turn, cut down production of vaccines that don't have full CDC backing, perpetuating a cycle of reduced availability and reduced enthusiasm. And primary-care physicians, who look to the CDC's vaccination schedule as an essential reference, may shift the language they use to describe childhood shots, nudging more parents to simply opt out. Historically, medical and public-health associations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, have aligned their vaccine recommendations with ACIP's—because those recommendations were all driven by scientific evidence. Now, though, scientific consensus and government position are beginning to diverge: Multiple groups of physicians, scientists, and public-health scholars have issued statements condemning the vaccine decisions of Kennedy and his allies; a number of prominent scientists have now banded together to form a kind of alt-ACIP, dubbing themselves the Vaccine Integrity Project. As the views of fringe vaccine groups become the government's stance, Americans may soon have to choose between following the science and following what their nation's leaders say. Identifying as 'anti-vaccine' has historically been taboo: In a nation where most people remain largely in favor of shots, the term is pejorative, an open acknowledgment that one's views lie outside of the norm. But the more vaccine resistance infiltrates HHS and its advisers, the more what's considered normal may shift toward Kennedy's own views on vaccines; ACIP's reputation for evidence-backed thinking could even gild those views with scientific legitimacy. Assembling one's own team of friendly experts is an especially effective way to sanewash extremism, Reiss told me, and to overturn the system through what appear to be normal channels. If the nation's most prominent group of vaccine advisers bends toward anti-vaccine, the term loses its extremist edge—and the scientists who argue, based on sound data, that vaccines are safe and effective risk being labeled anti-government. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S.-Canada travel tensions raise questions ahead of tourist season
BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — With summer nearly here, many are wondering how this tourist season will fare amid recent tensions between the U.S. and Canada. Both countries have updated their travel advisories recently, though officials stress there's no reason for alarm. For decades, the U.S. and Canada have each placed the other at Level 1 — their lowest travel advisory rating — and that status remains unchanged as of Thursday despite recent updates. In April, the Canadian government updated its advisory, telling citizens to 'expect scrutiny at ports of entry, including of electronic devices' when crossing into the United States. The advisory went on to say: 'Comply and be forthcoming with border authorities, and if you are denied entry, you could be detained.' On Wednesday, the U.S. Department of State reissued its Level 1 travel advisory for Canada, continuing to consider it a 'safe destination.' The department also encouraged U.S. travelers to enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP) in case of emergencies. 'Hopefully this designation will help relieve some of those fears or concerns on both sides of the border,' said Patrick Kaler, president and CEO of Visit Buffalo Niagara. 'We have always had a very strong relationship with Canada.' Mory Di Maurizio, chief operating officer of City Cruises Canada, said: 'A Level 1 travel advisory … I think the whole planet probably has a Level 1 travel advisory. Wherever you go, be safe, don't do dumb things. I don't think anybody's paying attention to it. I think they're paying more attention to, OK, what's the travel? What's the tariff deal? What's the current thing being talked about right now?' WIVB News 4 also spoke with the mayors of Niagara Falls and Fort Erie, Canada, who say summer is the perfect time to move beyond political tensions. 'Every time we hear something out of Ottawa or Washington (D.C.) — any kind of geopolitical comments and whatnot — I think most people have become a little desensitized. We've made up our mind. We're traveling, we're going there,' said Jim Diodati, mayor of Niagara Falls, Ontario. 'We've been allies for more than 200 years. No matter what any politician says, we're going to continue having this incredible relationship hosting the world's longest un-militarized border.' 'I don't think that it's going to interfere with the good people of Western New York coming to Fort Erie, participating in some of the summer events that we have here,' said Wayne Redekop, mayor of Fort Erie, Ontario. 'And I hope it doesn't because everyone that I know is quite interested in having their friends and neighbors come back.' Despite the optimism, the U.S. Travel Association estimates a drop in Canadian visitors to the U.S. this summer, potentially resulting in over $2 billion in lost revenue. 'Canadians and Americans should just continue to live our lives the way we've always lived them and whatever's happening 50 levels higher than us, well, cooler heads will prevail, and they'll figure it out,' said Di Maurizio. Dillon Morello is a reporter from Pittsburgh who has been part of the News 4 team since September of 2023. See more of his work here and follow him on Twitter. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former ICE Chief Of Staff Blasts Trump's 'Unprecedented' Move Amid LA Protests
A former chief of staff of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ripped President Donald Trump's administration for taking the 'unprecedented' action of deploying Marines and National Guard troops to protests in Los Angeles. Jason Houser, who served under former President Joe Biden and once was a top official in the Department of Homeland Security, told MSNBC's Ana Cabrera that troops from those forces have never accompanied his old agency on operations. 'The National Guard has been focused on the rioters and protesters but when they finally jump that line and you begin to see National Guard, Marines carrying out domestic immigration enforcement, that's a very scary line,' he said, 'both for law enforcement and also those migrants that were here legally, who had status and are now being targeted for arrest.' Houser emphasized that the Marines' training reflects a 'lethal tool' and, in terms of national security, the U.S. needs them to keep Americans safe from 'global threats.' 'But to have Marines and National Guard to begin doing knocks and bangs on doors, going to get families, children, vulnerable populations — it's not within their mission set or their training,' Houser said. As demonstrations continue against the president's aggressive immigration policies, photos shared by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement this week showed National Guard troops protecting federal immigration agents as they made arrests in Los Angeles. The president suggested using the National Guard to carry out his mass deportation campaign last year. Officials told the Associated Press that the troops weren't participating in enforcement activities but were providing security for agents in the L.A. area instead. Houser stressed that as the administration seeks to fulfill arrest quotas of non-criminal 'vetted and screened' migrants, it's 'turning our national security apparatus away' to enforce domestic immigration matters instead. In April, Houser struck a similar tone in a New York Times op-ed and later knocked the administration on MSNBC for engaging in 'dangerous political theater' through the misuse of federal law enforcement to 'drive a narrative' that migrants seeking protection under the law are here to harm Americans. 'It's risky, it's risky for our Constitution, it is inhumane, it is against our American values and, quite frankly, it's getting in the way of federal law enforcement carrying out the public safety protections that we need,' he told MSNBC at the time. Marines Deployed To Los Angeles Will Be Able To Detain Civilians Miley Cyrus Tells Monica Lewinsky About Losing 'Everything': 'My 2013 Is Your 1998' Kristi Noem Ripped For Latest 'Dehumanizing' Dig About People In Los Angeles ... And It's Bad
