
IND vs ENG: 'Disappointed' - Ex-India cricketer questions ECB's move to drop Pataudi name
Sachin Tendulkar (left) with James Anderson (Image credit: England Cricket)
Former India cricketer
Farokh Engineer
has slammed the England Cricket Board (ECB) for renaming the India-England Test series trophy. The trophy, which was previously named the Pataudi Trophy, was renamed the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy at the start of the ongoing five-match Test series.
"Well, Tiger Pataudi was a great friend of mine. A great colleague of mine. We played a lot of Test cricket together. Great heritage, great family. I was most happy when the trophy was named after him back in 2007," Engineer told PTI.
Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel.
SUBSCRIBE NOW!
"On one hand, I was very disappointed that the Pataudi name was removed. I would have loved Tiger's name to go on, but instead, the powers that be decided on Anderson and Sachin, who are legends of the game.
"It (introducing the Pataudi Medal) was obviously an afterthought. They should have announced it in the beginning—that would have had more credibility—but at least they have done something. Common sense has prevailed, and I hope the Pataudi name always remains.
Leeds to Birmingham: On the road with TOI Sports
"...the achievements of Tendulkar and Anderson can't be argued against. There are two sides to the story. They have named the medal after the Pataudis, which is a very thoughtful thing.
"That must be a second choice to appease a lot of Pataudi supporters, of which I am one, but you can't blame them for naming the trophy after Sachin and Anderson," Engineer said.
"The whole issue is debatable, but they have kept the name. I hope they invite Sharmila Tagore (Mansur's wife) and his son Saif Ali Khan to present the medal. Last series, they didn't do that. Fingers were pointed at the ECB for that. Hopefully, they give them due credit."
India trail the five-match series 0-1 after losing at Headingley from a commanding position.
Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
41 minutes ago
- India Today
ENG vs IND: Yashasvi Jaiswal axed from slip cordon training after Leeds nightmare
Yashasvi Jaiswal dropped Ben Duckett on 97 in Headingley Test. (Reuters photo) Jaiswal was not part of India's main slip cordon practice India focused on close-in catching ahead of Edgbaston Test Karun, Rahul, Gill formed new slip trio in training As India prepare for the second Test against England at Edgbaston, their training sessions have placed special emphasis on fielding â€' especially slip catching â€' following the fielding debacle in Leeds. The most notable change during Monday's practice was the absence of Yashasvi Jaiswal from the slip cordon. Jaiswal, typically a key figure in India's slip setup, had a nightmare outing in Headingley, dropping four catches, including one when Ben Duckett was on 97. Duckett went on to score 149 in what turned out to be a match-defining innings. With fielding under the scanner, the team appears to be recalibrating roles. In Monday's session, fielding coach T Dilip oversaw slip drills that featured Karun Nair at first slip, KL Rahul at second, and Shubman Gill at third. Jaiswal was shifted to leg slip â€' a less central position than usual â€' while Dhruv Jurel was placed at short leg. To simulate real-match pressure, the team created a blind spot using a black cloth, from behind which T Dilip flung catches to the slip fielders â€' testing their reflexes and reactions in unpredictable scenarios. India's bowlers, including Jasprit Bumrah, were also involved in high-catching drills. Assistant coach Ryan ten Doeschate oversaw the broader fielding preparations, while bowling coach Morne Morkel supervised another batch focused on catching practice. India's overall fielding in the Headingley Test was far below par. The slip cordon dropped multiple chances, outfielders misjudged easy balls, and even Rishabh Pant looked off-colour behind the stumps. The team is clearly attempting to address those flaws before the second Test begins on July 2. It remains to be seen whether Jaiswal will return to the slip cordon during the match. But given the importance of seizing every half-chance in English conditions, the message from the Indian camp is loud and clear â€' fielding could well decide the course of this series. With the series hanging in the balance and England leading 1-0, India know there's little room left for error. As India prepare for the second Test against England at Edgbaston, their training sessions have placed special emphasis on fielding â€' especially slip catching â€' following the fielding debacle in Leeds. The most notable change during Monday's practice was the absence of Yashasvi Jaiswal from the slip cordon. Jaiswal, typically a key figure in India's slip setup, had a nightmare outing in Headingley, dropping four catches, including one when Ben Duckett was on 97. Duckett went on to score 149 in what turned out to be a match-defining innings. With fielding under the scanner, the team appears to be recalibrating roles. In Monday's session, fielding coach T Dilip oversaw slip drills that featured Karun Nair at first slip, KL Rahul at second, and Shubman Gill at third. Jaiswal was shifted to leg slip â€' a less central position than usual â€' while Dhruv Jurel was placed at short leg. To simulate real-match pressure, the team created a blind spot using a black cloth, from behind which T Dilip flung catches to the slip fielders â€' testing their reflexes and reactions in unpredictable scenarios. India's bowlers, including Jasprit Bumrah, were also involved in high-catching drills. Assistant coach Ryan ten Doeschate oversaw the broader fielding preparations, while bowling coach Morne Morkel supervised another batch focused on catching practice. India's overall fielding in the Headingley Test was far below par. The slip cordon dropped multiple chances, outfielders misjudged easy balls, and even Rishabh Pant looked off-colour behind the stumps. The team is clearly attempting to address those flaws before the second Test begins on July 2. It remains to be seen whether Jaiswal will return to the slip cordon during the match. But given the importance of seizing every half-chance in English conditions, the message from the Indian camp is loud and clear â€' fielding could well decide the course of this series. With the series hanging in the balance and England leading 1-0, India know there's little room left for error. Join our WhatsApp Channel


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
IND vs ENG: It could be Washington Sundar for 2nd Test, precedent says so
In their 5-wicket defeat to England at Headingley, India went from 430/3 to 471 all out in the first innings and 333/5 to 364 all out in the second. They also failed to take 20 wickets, managing just 15 in close to 200 overs that their five bowlers bowled. In the bowling unit for the first Test was the world's best pacer Jasprit Bumrah. So how is India expected to react after losing the Test they should have won? They could think out of the box, and switch personnel, notably bringing in Kuldeep Yadav without heeding to the pitch calculations. And going purely by past team selection trends where all-rounders get summoned as fixing-all-bases-solutions, it could well see them adding an extra bowler without compromising on their batting strength. Washington Sundar for a specialist batsman could be an idea the team management might be toying with, before the Edgbaston Test starting Wednesday. That's only because this thinking has history. On Monday, at the nets, he bowled with Ravindra Jadeja and Kuldeep Yadav for long and batted against throw-downs. Though added to the mix of options was Nitish Kumar Reddy who also had extended nets. This is exactly the way coach Gautam Gambhir, and captain Rohit Sharma, had reacted after the loss to New Zealand in the first Test at Bangalore. It was once again a game they were expected to win. After two easy wins against Bangladesh, that was Gambhir's first Test defeat as India coach. So who did he think of in this time of crisis? Who was his go-to man for the second Test at Pune? Tamil Nadu's No.3 batsman with a formidable reputation as a competent white-ball off-spinner – Washington. Who did he replace? Kuldeep Yadav, a formidable Test spinner who bats at No.9 for India and even for UP. It is no secret that Gambhir prefers bowlers who can bat – be it when he is picking his KKR sides in IPL or the Indian team for Tests. Be it the brownish cracking pitch at Pune or, as Wednesday will prove, the track with a greenish tinge baking under the Birmingham sun. Courses change, horses don't. The decision to drop the non-batting spinner Kuldeep from the playing XI and include Washington for the Pune Test against New Zealand had come as a surprise. It was a brave call and an ambitious punt. Had Washington not succeeded, the new coach would have faced a barrage of questions. Washington wasn't in the squad for the New Zealand series, he hadn't even played a Test since 2021. He was to be in Coimbatore for a Ranji game for TN. He got into the Test squad that already had four spinners – R Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja, Kuldeep and Axar Patel. India went on to lose the Test to New Zealand to go down 0-2 but Washington's 7/59 justified his inclusion. He also had a huge impact on the mind of Team India's decision-makers. Post-match no one questioned the choice of the spinner. Washington for Kuldeep – had worked for Gambhir. One Test later, India was in Perth, Australia. It was here, that a very significant decision for Indian cricket was taken. Rohit was not with the team, he was at home in India for the birth of his second child. Jasprit Bumrah was the interim captain. Gambhir was among the decision makers when Washington was preferred over the senior off-spinner of the team, Ashwin and left-arm orthodox Ravindra Jadeja. This time it wasn't Washington making the cut because of his batting skills, since both Ashwin and Jadeja are competent Test batsmen. This was about the coach, captain and selectors feeling that Washington was the best all-rounder for Perth. India won the Test with Washington doing his bit. He got a couple of tailenders out, made a useful 29 and had a respectable bowling average of close to 3 runs. Was it a message for Ashwin? Those details haven't yet emerged but Ashwin announced his retirement at the next Test match, the pink ball game that he was included for. Washington went on to play a couple of more Tests in the series but he was unspectacularly average. Though, he did plug the run flow, mostly restricting the Aussie batsmen to score around 3 runs. He wasn't quite the bowler who took 7/59 at Pune against New Zealand. And surely not the batsman who hit a 62 in the first innings and a more precious 21 in the secolnd, which included that iconic 'no-see' six, in the historic win at Gabba in his debut Test during the 2021 BGT series. At Headingley, India had leaked runs all through the Test match. The team's designated wicket-taker, Jasprit Bumrah, didn't get the support that he would have liked. The bowlers didn't have discipline, they didn't create pressure. They didn't even score many runs. Washington could play that role. Even while the first Test was on, the team management seemed to be thinking ahead, keeping their Plan B ready. On the morning of the final day, when England needed 350 runs, the reserve all-rounder could be seen bowling at a single stump in the company of coaches. The only dilemma for India could be the marginal role that spinners play in the first half of the Tests in England. As Headingley showed, there is a uniform spread of about close to 8 mm of grass on pitches. Heavy rolling makes the grass blades sleep, making the 22 yards smooth like a green carpet. It's a surface that doesn't allow the ball to spin, there is no mud that grips the ball. At Headingley, Jadeja was wicketless in the first innings and Shoaib Basheer got one, though he got Shubman Gill after he had scored 147. It was a tired shot that got the Indian captain out, not some magical ball. It is only in the second half of the Test that the footmarks come into play and that's when the slow bowlers seek to exploit the roughs. But India will hope that in case Washington gets a game at Edgbaston, he does his usual run-restriction act in the first and turns into a wicket-taker in the second. They can also pray that he bowls like he did in Pune and bats like he did at Gabba.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
When a 17-year-old Sachin Tendulkar took his 10th standard school text books on 1st England tour
A first-time series against England in England can be a daunting tour for any cricketer, the kind that can forge a career or shatter confidence. But for Sachin Tendulkar, it was the first tour of England at the tender age of 17 where he gave the world a glimpse of what the next decades were going to look like. Cricket fans might recollect that Tendulkar scored a match-saving century at Old Trafford in the second Test of the 1990 Tour of England. In fact, Tendulkar had scored 68 in the first innings before an unbeaten knock of 119 in the second innings had helped the visitors stave off defeat. This was Tendulkar's maiden Test century, one which made him the second youngest player back then to score a Test hundred. But what was even more remarkable was that the teenaged Tendulkar had reportedly carried his school textbooks to England to study for his class X exams. 'He (Tendulkar) was very quiet. On that first tour he was carrying his school books to study in tenth grade. He was shy, did not talk too much and he was just a normal kid. He did not involve himself in topics. He used to observe,' cricket legend Kapil Dev had revealed in a 2013 interview with the BBC Radio 5 Live show. Kapil went on to add how he was also surprised by a few aspects of Tendulkar's batting and his personality on that tour. 'Two things were very different about him at that age. His balance was so good… unbelievable! And he did not hit the ball, he pushed the ball! He had a heavy bat. During that period I had never seen someone using that heavy bat and he held the bat low down,' Kapil added. 'With his left hand, he did writing and eating. But batting, bowling was with right hand. Later on, I realised he must be a genius who has power in both hands. That is the future of cricket. If you can have balanced power you can control the ball and balance of your body.'