Donald Trump's intervention in Iran worries some Iranians abroad
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025, following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/Pool/File Photo
LONDON/PARIS/BERLIN - U.S. intervention in Iran's aerial war with Israel has provoked mixed feelings among Iranians abroad, with some fearing for the safety of relatives back home and questioning whether bombing is the best way to topple the leadership in Tehran.
After U.S. bombers struck three Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday, U.S. officials said the goal was not "regime change", but President Donald Trump later raised the possibility of Iran's hardline clerical rulers being toppled.
Some members of the Iranian diaspora have long dreamt of the Iranian leadership being toppled and Reza Pahlavi, son of the U.S.-backed shah overthrown in the 1979 Islamic Revolution, urged Western leaders on Monday to pursue "regime change".
But others have reservations about the U.S. intervention, according to several interviews with members of the Iranian diaspora in European cities including Paris, Berlin and London.
Some said they feared that if the current authorities survive, they will take revenge on the Iranian public.
Tooran Dana, an IT engineer who left Iran 37 years ago, voiced concern that bombing the Islamic Republic - causing destruction and possibly more deaths - would strengthen the country's leadership.
"This war, apart from destruction, means poverty for the Iranian people," Dana said at a rally in Paris against the war, the Iranian leadership and Israel's military campaign against the Palestinian militant group Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
"The Iranian people do not need the major powers. We ourselves will liberate our country," Dana said.
Also in Paris, sociologist Bahar Azadi, 39, said she feared Iran could suffer the same chaos as Libya if Khamenei's government was overthrown by foreign powers.
Libya has had little stability since a 2011 NATO-backed uprising ousted longtime autocrat Muammar Gaddafi and the country split in 2014 between rival eastern and western factions.
FEARS THAT CHAOS COULD SPREAD
Iranian officials did not immediately comment on the remarks made by members of the Iranian diaspora but Tehran has threatened to retaliate for the U.S. bombing. Iran's military said on Monday it had launched a missile attack on the Al Udeid U.S. airbase in Qatar.
The United States and Israel say their actions are intended to prevent Iran developing nuclear weapons. Tehran says its nuclear programme is peaceful and that it is not seeking atomic arms.
Accountant Mina Zamani, 41, fears chaos in Iran could spread across the Middle East.
"History has shown us that every time the Americans... have decided to intervene somewhere it has only brought chaos, problems, instability," Zamani said, speaking in Paris.
Hamid Nowzari, an Iranian who has lived in Berlin since 1980 and manages a counseling centre for Iranian and Afghan refugees, said that he opposes Iran's leadership but does not agree with the war.
"My wish is that the regime will one day be abolished through the initiative of the people in Iran, through political demands," he said. "This is a wish that is very important to us, and it must not be forgotten in the shadow of war."
In London, supporters of Pahlavi welcomed U.S. intervention and called for a transitional government.
"We have all the organization," said Sara Sabet, a doctor in biochemistry. "We have the set-up for transition time. We're ready for a change, and we just need the international support."
Said Behnaz, an Iranian who has lived in Western Europe for over a decade, said she didn't trust the U.S. and Israel's motivations but that many exiles welcomed the war if it brought about the regime change they have sought for decades.
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend," she said, declining to give her surname out of concern for family members in Iran.
"I'm not thinking Trump or Israel are after freedom, democracy. They're after their own agenda, especially (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu.... But if that war can help regime change in Iran, we support that." REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
22 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump says Iran and Israel agree to a ceasefire
People wave Iranian flags as they celebrate Iran's attack on a U.S. military base in the street in Tehran, on Monday, June 23. PHOTO: ARASH KAMOOSHI/NYTIMES Trump says Iran and Israel agree to a ceasefire WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump said on June 24 that a ceasefire has been agreed between Israel and Iran. 'It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE... for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED!,' he said in a post on Truth Social. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
22 minutes ago
- Straits Times
North Korean leader Kim presides over key party meeting, state media says
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un attends the 12th Plenary Session of the 8th Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, in Pyongyang, North Korea, in this picture released by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency on June 24, 2025. KCNA via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. REUTERS IS UNABLE TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THIS IMAGE. NO THIRD PARTY SALES. SOUTH KOREA OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN SOUTH KOREA. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un attends the 12th Plenary Session of the 8th Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, in Pyongyang, North Korea, in this picture released by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency on June 24, 2025. KCNA via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. REUTERS IS UNABLE TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THIS IMAGE. NO THIRD PARTY SALES. SOUTH KOREA OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN SOUTH KOREA. SEOUL - North Korean leader Kim Jong Un presided over the 12th plenary meeting of the eighth central committee of the ruling Workers' Party of Korea, state media reported on Tuesday. The meeting held between Saturday and Monday reviewed the implementation of party and state policies for this year, KCNA reported. "The plenary meeting issues of radically accelerating the revitalization and modernization of major industrial sectors of the national economy," the report said. A decision on convening the Ninth Congress of the Workers' Party of Korea was approved and measures were taken to hold it, KCNA added. The report did not say when it would be held. Leader Kim also made a speech at the meeting, it said without disclosing the content. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
26 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: Asian leaders sidelined at G7 summit amid global turmoil
OTTAWA, Canada: The G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, opened amid multidimensional crises. The summit epitomised the fragmentation and uncertainty that have come to characterise our age. Host, Canada, along with most of the other G7 members and Asian invitees, were looking to forge a baseline consensus on stabilising trade and the global order, while accommodating US concerns for a more robust and self-reliant defence and security posture. But events intervened. In the early hours of Jun 13, just prior to the summit's opening, Israel began its anticipated and feared assault on Iran's nuclear and security infrastructure. US President Donald Trump abruptly left the summit in the evening after its first day. The anticipated one-on-one meetings with many of the participants (including those between Indian Prime Minister Modi and Australian Prime Minister Albanese and President Trump) never took place. Trump appeared pleased that the agenda was set around his tariff threats, viewing the other participants as mere supplicants. Unable to meet up with Trump, Modi was deprived of an opportunity to represent the Global South in navigating shifts in global power dynamics. His participation was instead more important for restoring bilateral ties with Canada, which had been badly strained since the state-sponsored assassination of Khalistan separatists on Canadian soil. In the end, there was very little opportunity to forge a common consensus, especially as the host and other participants were wary of confronting – and fearful of provoking – the US president. MISSED OPPORTUNITIES Perhaps the single outcome referencing Asia, though indirectly, was Trump's meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The two leaders jointly unveiled the trade deal they had outlined earlier in Washington, but in addition, Trump pledged to safeguard AUKUS, despite the announcement of the Pentagon's review of the deal. The deal with the United Kingdom represents an outlying concession to Trump's demands for tariffs. Not only did the United Kingdom concede a 10 per cent tariff, but it also agreed to swallow the 25 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium pending improvements in some vaguely defined future. The United Kingdom agreed to cooperate in a game of prisoner's dilemma, exposing all the other 'prisoners' to a protectionist tariff baseline that other countries may be compelled to meet. There was no time or room to reach a broader consensus on security to address the challenges posed by China and Russia. Issues like securing supply chains and critical mineral stockpiles were afforded little time in the discussion. Newly elected South Korean President Lee Jae-myung never had the chance to meet Trump, while Japan made no progress in securing an economic security arrangement with the United States. Nikkei concluded that the Japanese Prime Minister had come away 'empty-handed'. Trump, for his part, lamented the absence of Russian President Vladimir Putin, blaming former Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau. The opportunity to showcase the joint efforts of US allies to meet the security challenge – and in doing so, reinforce the framework of the global economy – slipped away, much like Trump himself. The summit ended without a comprehensive joint statement. Instead, the Canadian host had to make do with a Chair's Statement. The summit ended with six joint statements. The one on critical minerals failed to move much beyond the framework agreed to in 2023, despite the urgency of China's recent retaliatory imposition of export controls. Worthy but barely actionable initiatives on quantum computing and artificial intelligence served to dress up the relevance of the meeting, alongside a statement on combating wildfires – a topic particularly relevant to Canada and the province in which the summit was held. A SNAPSHOT OF TURBULENT TIMES The outcome of the summit in many ways belied the closing remarks by the host, Canadian Prime Minister Carney. Carney referenced the origins of the G7 fifty years ago at Rambouillet amid war in the Middle East, economic turmoil surrounding the end of Bretton Woods and stagflation resulting from the oil price shock of the Arab embargo. He called for a new era of cooperation to overcome the current economic challenges and claimed this new era had been initiated. But overall, the summit ended without rising to the challenge. There was little evidence that progress had been made in forging the 'resilience' that Carney called for to combat such challenges as climate change. The 'wildfire charter' joint statement – endorsed by Australia, India, the Republic of Korea and South Africa – fails to mention climate change. This, as much as the failure to agree on a joint statement with respect to Ukraine and a statement on the Middle East that failed to call for an end to the fighting, points to the limited cooperation among putatively 'like-minded' allies of the United States. The conclusion by one Canadian editorialist was that a G6 without the United States may have done more to advance international cooperation. When the G7 began, its members accounted for 75 per cent of global GDP – they now account for 45 per cent. When it began, the United States accepted the initiative of French President Giscard d'Estaing to address turmoil in the global economy. With the global economy again in turmoil – largely at the instance of US President Trump – the challenge is both to gain cooperation with the United States and to work cooperatively around the United States when required. On the evidence of this year's summit, it is not clear that the G7 provides the framework to do both simultaneously.
