
Terminally ill man proud of move to make access to benefits easier but says it is too late for him
A Jersey man says he is proud that new regulations have been passed by the States, allowing those with terminal illnesses to automatically qualify for the highest rate of personal care benefits.
However, he admits it has come too late to help him.
ITV News spoke to Wayne Lawson last December after he was made redundant just a week following his terminal cancer diagnosis.
At the time, he said he felt as though he had "fallen through the cracks of bureaucracy" as it took him seven weeks to receive any kind of income support from Social Services.
Despite making immediate applications for income support and impairment, it was almost two months before either claim was accepted.
Politicians have now unanimously approved an amendment put forward by the Social Security Minister, meaning those who have been assessed by a medical professional and are not expected to live more than 12 months can automatically access the highest level of personal care support available, worth £9,901 per year.
It also allows a family member, who is acting as a full-time carer, to claim Home Carers Allowance, which is £14,717 a year.
Previously, terminally ill islanders had to go through the standard process for claiming benefits.
Wayne has welcomed the move but says it came too late to remove the "panic" he faced trying to get much-needed support from Social Services.
He adds: "You need all your strength just to battle with the chemo. It gets that in your head where you think, 'I've got four months to live. I might as well do myself in now'.
"You're fighting the chemo, the illness. You could do without another fight.
"That could definitely push somebody over the edge."
Jersey's Social Security Minister, Deputy Lyndsay Feltham, says she brought forward the changes after becoming aware of individual cases like Wayne's.
She explains: "There were some cases that I was aware of where things seemed a bit more bureaucratic than they needed to be given a terminal diagnosis, so I did ask the team to look at ways that we could improve our processes."
When asked about what she would say to those, like Wayne, who had gone through significant stress and lost time trying to access financial support from Social Services, the minister adds: "We'll always work as hard as we possibly can to rectify things.
"I think it's really important that we look to how we can continually improve our processes and that's something I'm very keen to do as minister."
Tess Watson, a nurse who helps people with terminally ill family, says the law change could not come quickly enough.
She adds: "Like most of the things in our government, sadly, it's taken a long time to adapt.
"We ought to take on a new way of doing things to help the general public.
"Nobody really knows until they actually experience it themselves and at that moment where you experience it yourself, it's almost too late."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
DOGE will be allowed to access Social Security data for now, Supreme Court rules
The Department of Government Efficiency will be permitted to access sensitive Social Security data while litigation over the matter continues, the U.S. Supreme Court said in an order on Friday. Lifting an injunction that a lower court judge placed to protect the privacy of Americans, the conservative wing of the court agreed the DOGE staffers assigned to the Social Security Administration 'need' to access the information to perform their jobs.


NBC News
8 hours ago
- NBC News
Supreme Court allows DOGE to access Social Security data
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday allowed members of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency to access Social Security Administration data. The conservative-majority court, with its three liberal justices objecting, granted an emergency application filed by the Trump administration asking the justices to lift an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland. The unsigned order said that members of the DOGE team assigned to the Social Security Administration should have "access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work." Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a dissenting opinion questioning the need for the court to intervene on an emergency basis. "In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes," she added. DOGE, set up by billionaire Elon Musk before his falling out with President Donald Trump, says it wants to modernize systems and detect waste and fraud at the agency. The data it seeks includes Social Security numbers, medical records, and tax and banking information. 'These teams have a business need to access the data at their assigned agency and subject the government's records to much-needed scrutiny,' Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in court papers. The lawsuit challenging DOGE's actions was brought by two unions — the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers — as well as the Alliance for Retired Americans. They alleged that allowing broader access to the personal information would violate a federal law called the Privacy Act as well as the Administrative Procedure Act. "The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure — and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it," the challengers' lawyers wrote in court papers. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander had ruled that DOGE had no need to access the specific data at issue. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginua declined to block Hollander's decision, leading to the Trump administration to file its emergency request at the Supreme Court. In a separate order issued at the same time in another case involving DOGE, the Supreme Court granted another request filed by the Trump administration. That decision allows the Trump administration to, for now, shield DOGE from freedom of information requests seeking thousands of pages of material. The move formalizes a decision issued by Chief Justice John Roberts on May 23 that temporarily put lower court decisions on hold while the Supreme Court considered what next steps to take. The court also told lower courts to limit the scope of what material could be disclosed. It means the government will not have to respond to requests for documents and allow for the deposition of the DOGE administrator, Amy Gleason, as a lower court had ruled, while litigation continues. The three liberal justices noted their disagreement with that decision too.


STV News
12 hours ago
- STV News
Trump says he won't speak to Musk 'for a while' as public feud escalates
The relationship between Donald Trump and Elon Musk has collapsed less than a week after the pair poured praise on each other in the Oval Office, as ITV News Correspondent Geraint Vincent reports Donald Trump has said he won't be speaking to Elon Musk 'for a while' after the billionaire speculated about the US president's links to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Trump's comments come a day after his falling-out with Musk turned into a public row, sparked by the president saying he was 'very disappointed' with Musk's opposition to his key policy plans. Musk hit back, claiming Trump wouldn't have won the election without his financial backing. Trump then threatened to cancel Musk's government contracts, prompting Musk to accuse Trump, without evidence, of hiding Epstein files that mention him. On Friday, Trump told ITV News' US partner CNN that he is 'not even thinking about' the tech billionaire. 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem,' Trump said. He went on to say: 'No. I won't be speaking to him (Musk) for a while I guess, but I wish him well.' Trump is also planning to get rid of the Tesla he bought in March, a senior White House official told CNN. Another official said the red car may be sold or possibly given away. In March, Trump turned the South Lawn at the White House into what looked like a Tesla showroom – an apparent nod to Musk, who was then an adviser. That same day, Trump announced he was buying a Tesla and had also purchased a Cybertruck for his granddaughter. Musk's speculation, including reposting a 1992 video of Trump and Epstein on his platform X, has drawn global attention. On Thursday night, he wrote: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' The insinuations tapped into long-standing suspicions among conspiracy theorists and online sleuths that incriminating and sensitive files in the government's possession have yet to be released. Last year, Trump lashed out at allegations that he was on the plane of the disgraced financier, saying: 'I was never on Epstein's Plane, or at his 'stupid' Island.' How did their public spat unfold? The spectacular blow-up between the president of the United States and the world's richest man played out on their respective social media platforms after Trump first broached the topic in a White House meeting with Germany's new leader. He suggested using the US government to financially harm his fellow billionaire. He told reporters during a sit-down with Friedrich Merz on Thursday: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' The bitter breakup happened just days after they appeared together at the White House, and Trump thanked Musk for his brief but tumultuous time in the government. Trump had largely remained silent as Musk stewed over the last few days on his social media platform X, condemning the president's signature tax cuts and spending bill. But Trump clapped back Thursday in the Oval Office, lamented their frayed relationship and said he was 'very disappointed in Musk.' Musk responded on his social media as Trump's meeting with Merz was aired. Trump then turned to his own social media network, Truth Social, and threatened to use the US government to hurt Musk's internet company, Starlink, and rocket company, SpaceX. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on his social media network. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' 'This just gets better and better,' Musk quickly replied on X. 'Go ahead, make my day.' The public row quickly unfurled online, and very quickly hit Musk financially. Elon Musk and Donald Trump in the White House last week. / Credit: AP Shares of Tesla, his electric vehicle company, accelerated following Trump's speech, falling by 9% – their latest notable move since the election. The shares doubled in the weeks after Trump was elected, gave back those gains and more during Musk's time at Doge and then rallied after he vowed in April to focus much more on Tesla and his other companies. Musk later offered up an especially stinging insult to a president sensitive about his standing among voters: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk retorted. 'Such ingratitude,' Musk said in a follow-up post. Trump and Musk have not spoken since Musk's initial outburst, multiple sources told CNN. The back-and-forth between Trump and his megadonor, former 'first buddy', marked a very public breakup of a former centre of power for the second Trump administration. The pair's stunning statements on Thursday called into question what Musk would do with his expansive wealth in future elections. Musk, who was the largest publicly disclosed donor in last year's federal elections, had vowed to give millions to Republican candidates in 2026, then later indicated that he planned to scale back his political spending. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country