
Almost 1,500 buildings in Scotland ‘at risk' from cladding
Almost 1,500 buildings in Scotland are 'at risk' from cladding which has yet to be removed, despite the Grenfell Tower disaster, the Scottish Liberal Democrats said.
There are about 13,400 blocks of flats higher than 11 metres in Scotland, according to figures published by the Scottish Government this month.
However new figures show that an estimated 1,260-1,450 of them need remedial work to alleviate external wall system (EWS) life-safety fire risk.
In statistics published by the Scottish Government in Scotland's cladding remediation programme, it was said that by April 30, two single building assessments (SBAs), based on specification published in June 2024, had been completed and a further 13 assessments had been started.
By April 30, two completed assessments identified that remedial works were required, and work had begun for one but not the other, the statistics showed.
In June 2024, the Housing (Cladding Remediation) (Scotland) Bill was passed, giving ministers powers to 'to assess and remediate certain types of buildings with unsafe cladding'.
On Friday the Scottish Government said latest estimates indicate its cladding remediation programme could cost £1.7 billion over a 15-year period.
About 250 of the residential high-rise buildings in Scotland may require work to alleviate external wall system (EWS) life-safety fire risk, while 1,020-1,200 of the mid-rise residential buildings require work to alleviate the same issue, according to a breakdown of the figures.
In contrast, by May 2025 in England, 2,477 buildings identified with unsafe cladding have started or completed remediation works, representing 49% of buildings within the programme.
There is a target to complete the remediation of high-rise buildings by 2029 and for mid-rise buildings to have either been completely remediated by the date, or to have a plan in place with a date set.
Of these, 1,652 buildings (33%) have been completed, according to UK Government statistics published in May.
Scottish Liberal Democrat communities spokesman Willie Rennie MSP accused the Scottish Government of 'refusing to set' a similar deadline.
He said the remediation work was happening 'inexplicably slowly' and called for progress.
Mr Rennie said: 'In the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower disaster, ministers should be bending over backwards to remove unsafe cladding.
'But these figures show that the SNP are nowhere: they have made next to no progress, leaving so many homeowners and residents in a distressing limbo.
'The Scottish Government have repeatedly failed to appreciate the dangers posed by certain building materials.
'They have refused to set a deadline for removing cladding and they have taken an unbelievably blase approach to the problems of RAAC concrete.
'The SNP have acted inexplicably slowly. They must urgently step up the pace in remediating at-risk buildings and keep everyone who is potentially affected informed and updated on progress.'
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'We have moved at pace to try to identify buildings in Scotland with unsafe cladding.
'For our actions to be effective, legislation was necessary and since the Cladding Remediation Act came into effect in January we have launched a £10 million scheme to support the assessment of affected buildings.
'All relevant buildings that had previously been part of our pilot programme are now either undergoing assessment or will have an assessment funded through this £10 million programme.
'We will also be launching the second stage of that scheme later this month, allowing owners to be able to apply for Scottish Government funding for measures recommended by an assessment.
'Any homeowners, including social landlords or residents with concerns about cladding issues, are encouraged to contact the Cladding Remediation Programme directly.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
27 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Hugely-delayed Glen Rosa ferry suffers flooding in latest Ferguson Marine setback
The Glen Rosa has experienced a hiccup while under construction at Ferguson Marine's Port Glasgow yard. Sign up for the latest news and analysis about Scottish transport Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The long-delayed Glen Rosa ferry has been hit by a fresh setback, with the vessel flooding while in dock during heavy rain last month. Rain entered the vessel a fortnight ago after the under-construction vessel's funnels were removed to complete internal work while at the Ferguson Marine shipyard in Port Glasgow, The Times first reported. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The MV Glen Rosa. Picture: Jeff J Mitchell | Getty Images The Scotsman understands covers installed over where the ferry's funnels had been had come loose, ultimately leading to the flooding a fortnight ago. The characteristic red funnels were installed on the Glen Rosa last year. However, the vents needed to be removed again to allow for works, including the fitting of engine parts. Details of the setback have emerged after Ferguson Marine last month announced the Glen Rosa would be delayed by up to another nine months and cost an extra £35 million. Newly appointed chief executive Graeme Thomson had revealed the ferry would not be completed until between April and June next year compared to the previous deadline of September this year. The ferry is six years' behind its original schedule. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad John Devlin/The Scotsman It is not believed the flooding has added to the revised delivery deadline for Glen Rosa. Claire Baker, the Scottish Labour transport spokeswoman, told The Times: 'This is yet another embarrassing mishap in the SNP's seemingly endless ferry fiasco. The workers at this yard have been let down time and time again by the chaos created by those at the top, including the SNP Government.' Sue Webber, the Scottish Conservative shadow cabinet secretary for transport, said: 'There seems to be no end to the mishaps afflicting the Glen Rosa. This latest fiasco with its funnels should have been easily avoided.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The completion cost of the ferry has increased from £150 million to £185m - up 23 per cent since the previous estimate last year. Hugh McKenzie, the general manager of operations at Ferguson Marine, said: 'During a period of heavy rainfall at the end of last month, the MV Glen Rosa experienced some internal water ingress. 'The issue was identified quickly, and immediate action was taken to resolve it. The affected area has been dried out and inspected thoroughly, and no damage or lasting impact was identified.'


BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Plan to demolish Leicester GP surgery for homes approved
A project to demolish a former GP surgery in Leicester and build homes in its place has been Saffron Lane scheme has been given the go ahead despite three applications being refused by the city council since approved plans are for two three-bed semi-detached houses at the front of the site and a two-storey block featuring four one-bed last application was rejected by Leicester City Council in December 2023, the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) said. Th reasons for refusal included the design of the building, living standards for future residents, a lack of storage space in one of the homes, poor outdoor communal space and issues of privacy for the future majority of the concerns related to flat block A, which would have been at the front of the APKA removed that building from its plans in the most recent submission in August last officers have now deemed the scheme to be acceptable, adding it is for "residential use in a residential part of the city", the LDRS added the GP surgery had been closed "for a long time" so there would be "no loss" to the community from its demolition.


Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
London council to spend £100m from gold-plated pensions on homelessness
But experts questioned whether it was appropriate for Kensington and Chelsea to use its pension fund to 'indulge political objectives'. Neil Record, a former Bank of England economist, said: 'Local Government Pension Funds benefit from a de facto government guarantee which allows local councils to indulge their political objectives at the expense of prudent investment management. This is a particularly egregious example.' The Conservative-led council's pension scheme is worth £2bn, twice the amount needed to fully meet obligations to its members, meaning it is in rude health financially. The vast savings pot has become a target for councillors seeking to raise money for more spending without significantly increasing council tax bills. In February it was announced payments into Kensington and Chelsea's defined benefit scheme would be halted temporarily to save £9m earmarked for survivors of the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire. This went against the advice of the fund's actuaries who said it would be 'inappropriate' to lower contributions before next spring but agreed the move would 'not have a detrimental effect' on the council's ability to pay out pension benefits. Michael Hayles, of law firm Burges Salmon, said: 'The Kensington and Chelsea fund has a well-publicised strong funding level. 'However, as things stand, this investment will still need to stand up as an appropriate investment, with appropriate returns, bearing in mind the fiduciary duties of the pension fund when making investment decisions, notwithstanding the funding surplus.' There is no blanket legal guarantee that would compel the Government to meet the costs of all funds within the LGPS or make good their deficits. More than a quarter of schemes within the LGPS were in deficit in 2022, according to an official review published last year. Drawing down £100m is 'very low risk' Cllr Emma Will, who oversees property at the town hall, said more local authorities could follow Kensington and Chelsea's example, as many struggle to fund the costs of meeting their statutory obligations. She added: 'We are fortunate to have an extremely well-managed pension fund, it's been the best performing for 30 years [and] it's very over-funded, which is terrific.' Ms Will said that the unusual move was 'completely above board' and should not be discredited simply because 'it hasn't been done before'. She said that investing £100m was 'very low risk' because the council plans to pay its pension fund for use of the new properties with government grants it receives to tackle homelessness. 'It is innovative and we are quite excited. If we get this right it's like the holy grail. We believe it does work, and it's nil cost to the council and it's low risk and win-win for everyone.' Last year bills in Kensington and Chelsea for the average Band D property were £1,569.46 a year, up from £1,508.98 the previous year.