'Britain's strictest headteacher' Katharine Birbalsingh criticises Education Secretary over 'appalling' schools bill
Educators are split over the government's proposed Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, with some saying the move will improve fairness and accountability and others warning it could limit innovation in academy schools.
Pushed by the Department for Education (DfE) as a means to reform the education system, the bill seeks to improve school standards, strengthen attendance policies, and ensure that children receive a well-rounded education that prioritises their wellbeing.
The legislation also includes measures to increase school accountability, particularly for academies, by giving more oversight to the DfE.
Katharine Birbalsingh, headteacher of Michaela School in Wembley, north London, called it "absolutely appalling".
"I'm just really concerned because, at the moment, school leaders have the freedom to do various things that are right for their intake," she said.
"This bill will take those freedoms away."
Ms Birbalsingh, also known as 'Britain's strictest headteacher', added: "We got unlucky because we could have had Wes Streeting as education secretary, which would have been fine. Unfortunately, we got her [Bridget Phillipson].
"She [Ms Phillipson] is so arrogant. She's just marched in there and gone, 'I know what I'm doing, I'll just do what I want'."
But some argue that academies are left to their own devices and have a lack of accountability when it comes to things like parental complaints.
The bill will require all schools to follow the national curriculum and employ teachers who have Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) or are working towards it.
The founder of Oasis Academies, Steve Chalke, said: "We're excited about the changes because we feel that education has been in a very, very poor place for the last decade or more.
"Schools have been stripped of resources and there have been giant problems about the recruitment and retention of teachers.
"We feel that this important bill is beginning to address all of those issues."
The bill plans to provide all primary school children with breakfast, alongside uniform limits.
This would prevent schools from having more than three items of branded uniform clothing, potentially addressing concerns parents have about the cost of uniforms.
Mr Chalke said: "I am a fan of working hard collaboratively to create the best opportunities for any and every young person and their family.
"Because behind every struggling child is normally a parent who's struggling with that."
He added: "We at Oasis are excited about all of this, but that doesn't mean we don't have questions.
"It doesn't mean that we're being led blindly down the road, but our job is to be engaged in the discussion about how academies work more widely with their local authorities."
2:40
The bill will also give local authorities greater control over the pupil admission process.
Ms Birbalsingh said: "Any council could decide to reduce the number of children in one school and therefore reduce the money at that school and give more pupils to another school that's struggling."
Mr Chalke said: "Educational academy boards, academy groups, need to be accountable in strong partnership with others. And if this bill delivers everything it promises, wow. I think [it] will be an extraordinary outcome."
The bill is set to be debated further in the coming weeks as it moves through parliament.
A DfE spokesperson said: "This government is determined to drive high and rising standards for every child through our Plan for Change, to ensure every family has a good local school for their child.
"Our landmark Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill delivers on this mission, getting high-quality teachers into every classroom, and ensuring there is a floor on pay and no ceiling.
"These measures will make sure we are giving every child an education as good as the best."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
14 hours ago
- Spectator
Phillipson visits zero private schools in 11 months
It's been quite the year for Bridget Phillipson. The under fire Education Secretary is now regularly tipped as one of the ministers most likely to be moved at the next reshuffle. Her Schools Bill has been lambasted for its impact on academies while her private school tax raid is hitting the state school sector too. Yet despite dire warnings about the impact of putting VAT on independent school fees, Phillipson seems indifferent to their fate. For a Freedom of Information request by Steerpike has confirmed that she is yet to visit a single one in nearly a year in office. According to the Department for Education: Minister Morgan and Minister McKinnell have visited a private school in their ministerial capacities since 5 July 2024. Minister Morgan visited the Cavendish School. Minister McKinnell visited the Royal Ballet School. The Secretary of State for Education has not visited a private school in her ministerial capacity since 5 July 2024. Ministers also regularly engage with independent school bodies. So that's two visits by seven ministers in almost 12 months. The next reshuffle can't come soon enough…
Telegraph
17 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour under fire for touchscreen assessment plans for four-year-olds
Bridget Phillipson has come under fire over guidance calling for children as young as four to be tested using touchscreen devices. The Department for Education (DfE) has written new guidelines, to come into effect from the next term, requiring schools to assess reception-age pupils using screens. Campaigners have said that the change 'implicitly endorses and normalises device use in reception classes' and risks 'undermining the rights of parents' to restrict their children's screen time. Politicians, teachers and campaigners sent a letter to the Education Secretary and Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, urging that the guidance be immediately revoked. Signatories include Katharine Birbalsingh, known as Britain's strictest headteacher, Justine Roberts, the founder of Mumsnet, and Sophie Winkleman. The letter said: 'We are united in our deep concern at this retrograde step which pushes our youngest schoolchildren, the majority of whom will be just four years old, on to touchscreen devices, and which implicitly endorses and normalises device use in reception classes.' The new statutory Reception Baseline Assessment will involve a teacher using a device to conduct the assessment, with the child carrying out the test with a second touchscreen device. The assessment, done within six weeks of a child starting at reception, has usually involved the use of toys and teddy bears. The Government now says: 'Your child will complete the assessment by: using a touchscreen device; answering questions verbally with the teacher; working with materials given to them by the school.' A spokesman for the DfE defended the guidance, telling The Telegraph that 'digital assessments reduce the administrative burden on teachers, freeing up their time to focus more on teaching and supporting pupils' learning.' Campaigners said that, with some exceptions for children with special educational needs, a screen-based assessment 'can only be inferior' to the previous model. They added that doing so risks 'undermining the rights of parents to raise their children in a screen-free, or 'screen-lite', environment, as many are now choosing to do'. 'Protect childhood' The letter has also been backed by Laura Trott, the shadow education secretary, as well as other MPs from the Conservatives, Reform UK and the Liberal Democrats. Ms Trott told The Telegraph: 'Testing children as young as four on screens, instead of using books or physical objects, undermines their development. The evidence of lasting damage to children so young is now overwhelming. We must change course and protect childhood. 'We've sleepwalked into a society where children are increasingly glued to screens rather than engaging with the world and each other.' The Conservatives are working to ban smartphones in schools and stop exam boards from shifting assessments to online-only. Ms Trott said: 'If we don't act now, future generations will not forgive us.' Mr Kyle has repeatedly stated the Government's aim to protect children from online harms, including restricting their time on social media. Earlier this month, it was reported that he was considering introducing a time limit on social media apps for children and a 10pm curfew. A spokesman for the DfE said: 'Giving every child the best start in life is central to our mission to break the link between background and success, and our Plan for Change will help get thousands more children school-ready by age five. 'These assessments give a clear picture of children's abilities when they start reception to measure progress by the end of primary school. They are carried out one-on-one with a teacher, so for children who are unable to use a device, verbal responses can be input by their teacher, and paper-based versions are available. 'Digital assessments reduce the administrative burden on teachers, freeing up their time to focus more on teaching and supporting pupils' learning.'
Western Telegraph
2 days ago
- Western Telegraph
Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees
Several schools, children who attend them and their parents, previously brought legal action against the Treasury, claiming the policy of applying VAT to fees is discriminatory and incompatible with human rights law. This includes children and families at faith schools, and families who have sent their children with special educational needs (Sen) to private school. The Treasury defended the challenges over the policy, which was introduced on January 1, with HM Revenue and Customs and the Department for Education (DfE) also taking part. Nearly 20 families and several faith schools brought the legal challenge (Aaron Chown/PA) Three judges at the High Court dismissed the three challenges in a decision given on Friday. Dame Victoria Sharp, Lord Justice Newey and Mr Justice Chamberlain said in a 94-page decision that while the legislation does interfere with some of the group's human rights, there is a 'broad margin of discretion in deciding how to balance the interests of those adversely affected by the policy against the interests of others who may gain from public provision funded by the money it will raise'. During a hearing in April, Lord David Pannick KC, representing one group of children and their parents, previously told the court in London that for some children currently in private schools their needs are not met by state schools, but the new law applies 'irrespective' of a family's need. The High Court was told that as well as religious beliefs and SEN, some children are privately educated because of a need for a single-sex environment because of previous abuse, or because they are only temporarily in the UK and need to be educated in line with their home national curriculum. Bruno Quintavalle, representing four small Christian schools and parents who have sent their children to them, also previously said the 'ill-thought-out proposal introduced in haste' placed parents in 'impossible positions'. However, Sir James Eadie KC, representing the Treasury, HMRC and the DfE, said abolishing the VAT exemption for private school fees was a prominent feature of Labour's manifesto at the last general election and is expected to yield between £1.5 and £1.7 billion per year.
