Nationwide protests loom over Trump's upcoming military parade
WASHINGTON — Donald Trump is getting the parade he wanted showcasing America's military power — but he'll also be getting mass protests exposing the nation's partisan divisions.
The tanks and artillery launchers rolling through Washington on Saturday will honor the Army's 250 th anniversary, which falls on the day Trump turns 79.
About 7,000 soldiers will march. Hundreds of thousands of people are expected to line up along Constitution Avenue on the co-birthdays and cheer. Trump is set to watch the spectacle from a viewing stand south of the White House.
But in Washington and in all 50 states, organizers will be staging protests that could dwarf the parade in size. A coalition of pro-democracy, labor and liberal activists is arranging a full day of counterprogramming to make the case that Trump is hijacking the Army celebration to venerate himself.
'The goal here is to deprive Trump of what he wants in this moment, which is a story about him being the all-powerful political figure of our time, and instead create a contrast with normal, everyday people demonstrating that power in this country still resides with the people,' said Ezra Levin, a co-founder of the progressive group Indivisible, who is helping organize what participants have dubbed a nationwide 'No Kings' demonstration.
If past protests are a guide, the participants could number in the millions, he said. A total of 1,800 rallies are expected, with events in each congressional district, he added.
Another group called Women's March is also arranging protests to coincide with the parade, with a theme of 'Kick Out the Clowns.' Organizers expect up to 5,000 people to participate in Madison, Wisconsin, alone, said Tamika Middleton, chief political and strategy officer of Women's March.
'Nothing feels more absurd than the idea of this president having a massive military parade on his birthday,' she said. "It feels surreal for many of us.'
NBC News reached out to the White House for comment.
On Tuesday, Rand Paul of Kentucky became the first Senate Republican to criticize the parade, citing the imagery. Showing off lethal hardware is something other countries do, not the United States, he said.
'I wouldn't have done it," Paul told reporters. He added that "we were always different than the images you saw in the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that."
Trump isn't deterred. Speaking in the Oval Office on Tuesday, he warned that protesters this weekend will face " very big force." He didn't distinguish between those who demonstrate peacefully or violently.
"And I haven't even heard about a protest," Trump added, "but you know, this is people that hate our country. But they will be met with very heavy force." (At a news briefing this week, a Secret Service official said thousands of agents and officers will be on hand to provide security.)
The parade is happening at a fraught moment when Trump has drawn the military — among the nation's most trusted institutions — into a tense standoff in Los Angeles over his aggressive efforts to deport people living in the United States illegally. The Trump administration this week activated about 700 Marines to help quell demonstrations over his immigration enforcement methods, despite warnings from California officials that he is inflaming the situation.
The military's main purpose is to fight and win foreign wars, and it has largely retained its reputation as an apolitical body carrying out a national mission. Only in rare instances has the nation held military parades: The last one took place 34 years ago after the United States defeated Iraq in the first Gulf War.
Saturday will open with a festival on the National Mall. Soldiers will be on hand to meet people and take part in special military demonstrations.
The parade will start at 6:30 p.m. ET and follow Constitution Avenue from near the Lincoln Memorial to the Ellipse south of the White House. Workers have been laying down steel plates to protect the roads from the heavy tanks. Bradley Fighting Vehicles will also be on display, while dozens of helicopters will take part in a flyover. At the Senate Armed Services hearing last Thursday, Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll put the cost at $25 million to $40 million.
Driscoll justified the expense as a 'once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to fill up our recruiting pipeline with young Americans.'
'We have the greatest missiles in the world. We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest Army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it,' he said in an interview with "Meet the Press."
Some military experts echoed that sentiment, seeing merit in an event that gives Americans a chance to thank their soldiers and see them up close.
'Only 9% of young Americans have an inclination toward military service,' said Kori Schake, who has worked at both the Defense Department and the White House National Security Council. 'And so, exposing more Americans to our Army, where kids can talk to soldiers about their experience, is good for the country.'
Others said the money is being wasted. A better idea would be to restore programs serving veterans or rehiring some of those who lost their jobs in the Trump administration's effort to shrink the government workforce, some lawmakers and veterans groups said.
Department of Government Efficiency cuts have fallen heavily on veterans, who make up a disproportionate share of the federal workforce. Meanwhile, the Veterans Affairs Department cut a program that provides mortgage assistance to veterans so they don't face foreclosure on their homes.
The mortgage program 'helped tens of thousands of veterans stay in their homes. And they want to spend $50 million on a parade?' said Chris Purdy, who heads the Chamberlain Network, a pro-veterans group. 'It really shows this is about an individual's pride and not the nation's pride.'
Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., a member of the House Armed Services Committee, criticized the parade's price tag in an interview.
"The military is being required to spend resources and time on this, instead of training and preparing to meet the national security needs of the country," he said, adding, 'It's a horrible idea."
Trump has long championed a military parade. In 2017, he attended the Bastille Day ceremony in Paris with French President Emmanuel Macron and got a firsthand look as tanks rumbled past the reviewing stand.
The trip left an impression. After he returned to the White House, Trump spoke often about holding a similar parade at home, a former White House official said. Aides delayed and diverted him, mentioning the potential cost and telling him the United States didn't make a point of flaunting its hardware, the person said.
'Certainly, the French do it a lot and the North Koreans do it a lot and the Russians, but we don't really tend to do those things,' the former official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
'He brought it up quite a bit,' the person continued, adding that in Trump's view, the Bastille Day celebration was 'in honor of Macron.'
'And he wanted that.'
In his Oval Office remarks, Trump didn't mention the parade in the context of his birthday. He noted instead that the day is Flag Day.
"We're going to have a fantastic June 14th parade, Flag Day," he said. "It's going to be an amazing day. We have tanks, we have planes, we have all sorts of things. And I think it's going to be great. We're going to celebrate our country for a change."
Whether the day comes off as a tribute to the Army or to Trump hinges on how Trump behaves in the moment, analysts said.
'The degree to which this is a violation of norms depends in part on what the president says and does on the margins of this event,' said Peter Feaver, a Duke University political science professor who has written about the military's relationship with political leaders.
In the run-up to the parade, Trump is capitalizing on the Army's milestone birthday in partisan terms. Speaking Tuesday at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, he took aim at various Democratic foes, including the last commander in chief, Joe Biden. He invoked Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, another Democrat, eliciting boos from the audience.
Mentioning Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the Democratic vice presidential nominee last year, Trump said: "I think he's running for president, but he's a radical lunatic."
Linking the military to the sitting president's birthday and sending it into the streets to confront fellow Americans risk tarnishing its credibility while pushing the country away from its democratic roots, Trump's critics warn.
'Displays of hardware, whether its tanks or Stryker vehicles, is more characteristic of totalitarian militaristic states like North Korea or Russia,' said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, who questioned the event's cost at a recent hearing with Army leaders. 'And they are used in part to glorify the dictator in those countries. This parade falls on President Trump's birthday and is as much a celebration of his birthday and him — at least it's designed to be — as it is our Army.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
Britain ready to implement US tariff deal, trade minister says
LONDON, June 12 (Reuters) - Britain is ready to implement its side of a tariff deal with the United States and is hopeful for a proclamation from U.S. President Donald Trump to put the agreement into effect in the coming days, trade minister Jonathan Reynolds said on Thursday. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Trump on May 8 agreed to reduce tariffs on UK imports of cars and steel to the U.S., with Britain agreeing to lower tariffs on beef and ethanol, but implementation of the deal has been delayed. Reynolds met U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday and discussed the implementation of the deal. Asked on Thursday if there would be an update by the end of the week, Reynolds said he was "very hopeful". "We're ready to go, and as soon as the president and the White House are ready to go on their side, we'll implement (our) part of the deal," Reynolds told reporters. Reynolds said he would issue a government order known as a statutory instrument to implement the changes to reciprocal tariffs. Officials said that the update on implementation was likely to come early next week. One of the details to be ironed out before the deal can be implemented is steel quotas. Reynolds added that he wanted to make sure the tariff reductions applied to every bit of the UK steel industry, as the U.S. finalises quotas that will place supply chain requirements on British steel exports to the United States. The bioethanol industry has warned its future is under threat, with Associated British Foods (ABF.L), opens new tab deciding on the fate of a plant later this month. Reynolds acknowledged the deal could increase competition but said the industry was already struggling. "We are very sensitive to the ethanol issue... (but) they're losing a lot of money already," Reynolds said, adding regulatory tweaks could help, but that for financial support: "any intervention I make has to be a clear route to profitability." "So there are much wider issues for these partners than just the U.S. trade deal."
Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's tax-cut bill could hold back US critical minerals projects
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill would make it harder for American critical minerals companies to compete with China because it eliminates a tax credit for boosting domestic production of nickel, rare earths and other materials used in advanced electronics and weaponry. With Trump and Republican lawmakers aiming to cut government support for green energy projects, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a version of his "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" last month that eliminates the so-called 45X credit. The Senate is now debating the bill. Former President Joe Biden's 2022 climate change law, the Inflation Reduction Act, created the 10% production credit - a reduction in corporate taxes for critical minerals extraction and processing. The tax break also covers solar, battery and wind projects. The version of the bill that passed the House treats government incentives for wind turbines the same as those for mining projects that many view as crucial for national security. Critical minerals companies now say their projects are collateral damage to the political feud over renewable energy. The tax credit is already law and part of the current federal budget. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which scores the cost of legislative proposals when asked by Congress, has not studied how much would be saved by removing the credit. The Republican majority in Congress is seeking savings to fund other priorities such as tax cuts, defense and balancing the budget. This month, the hard-right House Freedom Caucus said it "will not accept", opens new tab attempts to "water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation." Miners, though, say they need the credit to compete with China. Beijing has halted exports of some critical minerals, used its control of rare earths to strike a trade agreement with Washington, and flooded global markets with cheap supply of nickel, cobalt and lithium. The traditionally conservative mining industry now finds itself in the unusual position of needing Washington's support to grow and, in some cases, survive. The owner of the only U.S. cobalt mine went bankrupt this year after Chinese miners depressed global prices of that metal. "If we do not have that tax credit, critical minerals producers in the U.S. are at risk of succumbing to closures," said KaLeigh Long, founder and CEO of Westwin Elements, which is building the country's only commercial nickel refinery. Westwin might not be able to service its debt without the tax credit, Long said, noting the company's loans were modeled using the expectation it would be permanent. Last month, Long wrote a letter asking the Senate to keep the credit. It was co-signed by 30 industry executives. Any changes the Senate makes to the bill must be reconciled with the House version before being sent to Trump. Several House members have admitted they did not read the entire bill before voting for it, including Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green, a Georgia Republican, and Congressman Mike Flood, a Nebraska Republican. House Democrats unanimously voted against the bill but their criticism has focused on tax cuts they say will widen the deficit while requiring cuts in health care, food assistance, education, scientific research and other programs. "There's so many issues right now under consideration in Congress and this one isn't breaking through, but it will certainly break through when we have a shortage of minerals in five years," said Jeff Green, a critical minerals industry consultant. Senator John Hickenlooper, a Colorado Democrat who voted for the IRA in 2022, said in a statement to Reuters that cutting the credit would "kill jobs ... just to fund tax breaks for the ultra-weathy" and would be a "bad deal" for the country. Trump, who has issued several executive orders aimed at boosting U.S. minerals production, has not commented publicly on the 45x debate. The White House did not respond to requests for comment. "The tax credit just adds a phenomenal bump to a project's economics and gives us advantages that China already gives its own companies," said Alex Grant, CEO of magnesium processing startup Magrathea, who signed the letter. China controls most of the world's production of the metal, used in alloys for steel and aluminum. Abigail Hunter, executive director of SAFE's Center for Critical Minerals Strategy, described the tax credit as the "only tool currently available to support industry exposed to market manipulation." The House version also removes any remaining IRA funding for the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office (LPO), which under Biden awarded billions of dollars in loans to Nevada lithium projects from ioneer ( opens new tab and Lithium Americas ( opens new tab. Potential for the LPO's closure led miners to rush to finalize loans last year, as Reuters reported in August. Republican senators this week said they were in discussions about how to extend some green energy tax credits, especially for businesses with large capital investments. No firm commitments have been made. For Mahesh Konduru, CEO of minerals processing startup Momentum Technologies, the credit is one way for Washington to show industry support. "We need to have the appropriate tools to build, nurture and grow that supply chain inside the United States," he said.
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Dollar slides to three-year low after Trump repeats tariff threats
The dollar sank to its lowest in more than three years on Thursday as Donald Trump's latest trade threats and the weakening economy appeared to bring forward interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. Foreign exchange traders sold the dollar in favour of the yen and the euro, which both climbed by about 1% against the US currency to leave it almost 10% down on its value against a basket of currencies since the beginning of the year. Analysts said there was little appetite to buy dollars at a time when recent data showed the jobs market weakening and while erratic White House policies clouded the outlook for the US economy. The slide came after the US president revived last month's threat to unilaterally impose country-specific tariff rates within the next two weeks. 'We're going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries, telling them what the deal is,' Trump told an event in Washington on Wednesday. Markets were also unsettled by growing speculation that the Federal Reserve would begin to cut the cost of borrowing more quickly than expected after consumer inflation came in lower than expected and producer inflation dropped. Weaker job hiring was another factor after the four-week average number of initial applications for unemployment support rose by 5,000 to 240,250 in May, the highest since August 2023. 'There's clearly solid dollar selling,' said Kit Juckes, the chief foreign exchange strategist at Société Générale. Talks between India and the US over tariffs on steel and aluminium imports imposed by Washington – and the threat of import duties on Indian pharmaceuticals – were also reported to be at loggerheads, leading to speculation that if talks break down, New Delhi may retaliate with tariffs on US imports. Bloomberg reported that India's negotiators had objected to a long list of US demands that included allowing genetically modified crops to be imported and the easing of price controls on medical devices. However, the UK is expected to get a trade boost after Trump indicated that he would put into force the bilateral trade deal signed with Keir Starmer last month, allowing the UK to avoid the extra import duties on cars in return for more relaxed quotas on US beef and ethanol exports to the UK. However, the pound's rise against the dollar to almost $1.36 was choked off by concerns that the UK economy was also suffering more than expected, and that an earlier intervention by the Bank of England to cut interest rates would reduce the demand for sterling. Sign up to First Thing Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The UK economy slumped by 0.3% in April, potentially bringing forward the date when the Bank of England cuts interest rates again. Policymakers meet next week, but are not expected to reduce the cost of borrowing from its 4.25% level until August at the earliest. Vasileios Gkionakis, a senior economist at Aviva Investors, said the consistent depreciation of the dollar since Trump's inauguration was probably due to a lack of faith in the US economy under Trump to grow at an exceptional pace, as it had in recent years. He said higher US government debts, which Trump has signalled will escalate once his tax bill passes both houses of Congress, was another deterrent to buying dollars. 'All this is agitating markets, who in order to lend to the US would require a combination of higher [interest rates] and a weaker exchange rate,' he said.
