Does Britain need 24-hour slot machines? There must be better things to do at 3am
I was in the West Midlands early one morning this week when I got a message from an Irish friend in Abu Dhabi. It was a link to a story that had shocked him – about the proliferation of 24-hour high street gambling arcades in parts of Britain.
This friend is so into horse racing that when he starts banging on about it, I can understand hardly a word he says. In fact, I'd get more sense from the neighing of one of his horses. And obviously he's no stranger to the business of betting. He likes a flutter. My point is that if he is shocked at the number of 24-hour high street gambling arcades, then so am I.
It was 7.30am when I glanced at this article while I was walking up a quiet high street. It was then I saw that I was passing a branch of one of these arcades, which I'd surely passed a thousand times before without really clocking it. It was one of the few places already open, for the very good reason that it never closes. Here it is, open 24/7, for anyone to wander in and get going on the machines whenever it takes their fancy.
Two reviews jump out of Google at me: 'Staff nice and friendly and was nice and clean.' Also, 'Do yourself a favour and stay away from this place.' These takes aren't as contradictory as they initially appear. The former may well lead to the latter. If anything, I'm slightly more on board with the first than the second. While I'm painfully aware of the misery of gambling addiction and the particular problem with some slot machines, many people get a lot of blameless pleasure from having a flutter. But to have this place, and thousands more like it, open all day and night every day and night? What's that all about? At 3am, apart from the BP garage on the ring road, it must be the only place open.
It's not my business to diagnose or judge anyone, but is being able to gamble at 3am really necessary?
Yes, I know you can gamble online any time you want, but perhaps we could keep the physical slot machines to office hours, or at least pub opening hours? I don't know how this madness came to pass, but please can someone make it stop?
Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster, writer and Guardian columnist
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Tycoon buying up North Sea fighting fresh fraud claims
An energy tycoon in talks to buy 5pc of Britain's North Sea gas production is facing new claims of fraud, The Telegraph can reveal. Francesco Mazzagatti has been accused of stealing £23.5m from his former employer to help fund a deal for a London-listed energy producer, according to recently submitted court documents. It is claimed that the oil trader extracted funds from Alliance Petrochemical Investment (API), a Singaporean trading company he previously worked for, to purchase RockRose Energy in 2020. The acquisition established Mr Mazzagatti as a key player in the UK energy market. He is now racing to expand his empire by acquiring 11 North Sea gas fields owned by Shell and ExxonMobil for £403m. Shell hopes to complete the deal by the end of this year, although it is still awaiting sign-off from the UK Government. The planned acquisition would hand Mr Mazzagatti control of 5pc of Britain's total gas production, making him critical to the country's long-term energy security. However, the transaction has been overshadowed by claims made against Mr Mazzagatti of fraud and theft. Theft accusations API is already fighting a High Court battle against Mr Mazzagatti in the UK and has launched separate proceedings in Singapore. Recently submitted court documents in the Singaporean case claim to show how Mr Mazzagatti syphoned funds to himself, allegations he denies. Ngoo Sin Hung Justin, an API director, has sworn an affidavit accusing Mr Mazzagatti of stealing at least £23.5m from API and its subsidiary APT. He is alleged to have done so via Petrochemical Industries Ltd (PIL), a company he controlled. In his affidavit, Mr Ngoo Justin alleges Mr Mazzagatti controlled APT's finances for his own benefit and made unexplained transactions to third-party entities. He said: 'Mazzagatti has deliberately withheld documents pertaining to APT, including the bank statements of all bank accounts held in its name, so as to conceal his misappropriation of funds from APT.' As part of its lawsuit, API claims to have obtained Mr Mazzagatti's bank statements. 'Mazzagatti's bank statements show that considerable sums were transferred from the accounts of API and APT to Petrochemical Industries and subsequently to Mazzagatti,' court papers said. 'The evidence of Mazzagatti's bank statements is damning and clearly shows direct misappropriation of funds from API by Mazzagatti through PIL.' Copies of Mr Mazzagatti's bank statements were included in the court filings in Singapore, allegedly showing the flow of funds from API to Mr Mazzagatti and onwards to other entities. The alleged transactions are set out in a range of currencies, underlining the global nature of the claimed fraud. For example, on Nov 19 2020, €15.5m (£13.2m) was allegedly transferred from API to Mr Mazzagatti before another €3.2m allegedly landed in his account a month later. In one transaction, Mr Mazzagatti allegedly transferred £2.9m of API's funds directly to RockRose Energy. Another alleged $6.3m transaction is also referenced. 'Contrived and disingenuous' In his response to the latest claims regarding his bank statements, Mr Mazzagatti said it was a 'contrived and disingenuous' attempt to accuse him of wrongdoing. The energy tycoon denies the allegations and claims they are part of a 'vexatious campaign of defamation, harassment and extortion'. He also denies deliberately failing to disclose relevant documents in the case to conceal his alleged wrongdoings. The latest allegations follow previous claims in the English High Court by API that Mr Mazzagatti faked bank statements, forged documents and misappropriated a total of €143m. The API lodged its UK claim last October, just three months after Shell announced the sale of its Southern North Sea assets to Viaro, Mr Mazzagatti's start-up energy company. In his reply to the affidavit filed in Singapore, Mr Mazzagatti strenuously denied any wrongdoing and said the issue of the misappropriated funds has 'not yet been determined by the UK court'. An earlier defence submitted to the High Court in England also attacked the 'false' fraud claims, as he stressed that he was 'not responsible for any unlawful payments'. According to his defence, 'it is denied that Mr Mazzagatti misappropriated any sums from API' or that he 'made any false representations to the board of API'. His defence also claims that he 'was not responsible for overseeing or making payments, and did not control API's affairs'. In the months after his takeover of RockRose, Mr Mazzagatti rapidly expanded his assets in the North Sea, notably purchasing SSE's portfolio of gas exploration and production assets for £120m. Shell is proceeding with its plans to sell 11 gas fields to Mr Mazzagatti's Viaro Energy despite the fraud allegations. Viaro said the deal would hand it control of 'the backbone of the UK's energy production and security'. A source close to Mr Mazzagatti has said the lawsuits will have no bearing on the North Sea deal with Shell. They also claimed that 'there is not a single piece of credible evidence' to support the claims. Joe Robertson, Conservative MP, urged the Energy Secretary to scrutinise the deal. He said: 'Ed Miliband should look very carefully at these proposed plans to offload 5pc of Britain's North Sea gas production to a man currently accused of fraud in the High Court.' Lawyers for Mr Mazzagatti pointed to a recent court ruling in the UAE where there was no finding against him regarding claims of embezzlement. An allegation of forgery was also dismissed. A Shell spokesman said: 'The sale of Shell's offshore gas assets in the UK Southern North Sea to Viaro Energy has received a number of regulatory approvals and is expected to complete this year. 'We have a well-established due diligence process and continue to work with all relevant regulators, including the North Sea Transition Authority.'
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
American Golf owner tees up Endless sale process
The owners of American Golf, Britain's biggest specialist golf retailer, are teeing up a sale of the chain nearly seven years after rescuing the company. Sky News has learnt that Endless, the investment firm, is lining up advisers to oversee an auction. Sources said that Alvarez & Marsal (A&M) was expected to be formally appointed in the coming days. American Golf, which trades from 95 stores and employs about 600 people including part-time staff, sells products manufactured by leading golf brands such as Garmin and TaylorMade. It was rescued by Endless in 2018 after a sale process which also involved the Frasers Group billionaire Mike Ashley. The chain's ownership has included the Covid pandemic, when non-essential retailers were shut for prolonged periods, with Endless said to have supported the business financially during the pandemic. The retailer's likely valuation today is unclear. It was previously owned by Sun European Partners, another investment firm, which acquired it from LDC< the private equity division of Lloyds Banking Group.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Britain says Google's online-ad commitments no longer needed
LONDON, June 13 (Reuters) - Britain's antitrust regulator said commitments it secured from Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab in 2022 related to online advertising were no longer needed after the tech company decided against a standalone prompt for third-party cookies in April. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) had been concerned that Google's original plan to downgrade third-party cookies could have weakened competition in digital advertising. In 2022 it accepted commitments from Google that addressed its concerns about its "privacy sandbox" proposals, specifically around plans to remove some third-party cookies from its Chrome browser. "The CMA believes the commitments are no longer necessary and is now consulting before it takes a decision on whether to release them later this year," it said on Friday.
