logo
Former Gov. George Ryan, who halted state's death penalty but was imprisoned for corruption, dies at 91

Former Gov. George Ryan, who halted state's death penalty but was imprisoned for corruption, dies at 91

Chicago Tribune02-05-2025

George Homer Ryan served one term as Illinois governor, his scandal-clouded tenure and subsequent imprisonment on federal corruption charges overshadowing a nationally historic move to halt the state's death penalty and empty its Death Row amid concerns of widespread misconduct in capital cases.
Ryan, a Republican whose 35-year public career spanned from local Kankakee County Board chairman, state legislator, Illinois House Speaker, lieutenant governor, secretary of state and ultimately Illinois' 39th governor from 1999-2003, died Friday in a hospice in his hometown of Kankakee, said former Illinois House GOP leader Jim Durkin. Ryan was 91.
Ryan's career was honed on old-school politics, reliant upon patronage and deal-making, as he also underwent an ideological metamorphosis that took him from hardline rural conservatism to more pragmatic progressive policymaking. Such was the case in moving from capital punishment supporter to placing a moratorium on the death penalty.
Ryan's bonafides as a conservative had been such that Republican Gov. James R. Thompson selected him as his running mate in 1982, believing he needed Ryan's conservative credentials to balance his own liberalism in seeking reelection.
As House speaker in 1982, Ryan singlehandedly blocked the legislature from voting to enact the Equal Rights Amendment to the federal constitution and he steadfastly opposed abortion. By 2000, as governor, he vetoed legislation that would have banned taxpayer funded abortions for poor women whose health was jeopardized by their pregnancy.
After announcing he would not seek reelection in 2001, with scandal engulfing his governorship, Ryan asked lawmakers to guarantee gay rights in public accommodations.
'As I have said before, I favor equal and fair treatment for everyone, regardless of who they are as a person,' Ryan wrote to lawmakers. 'I have never been in favor of special treatment for anybody, but I have always been in favor of fairness for everybody.'
That prompted then-state Sen. Patrick O'Malley of Palos Park, who already had prepared a GOP run for governor, to declare: 'This appears to continue to go against the very things he has historically been associated with.'
Ultimately, it was the federal investigation of Ryan's political and governmental operation called Operation Safe Road and its initial probe of commercial drivers' licenses exchanged for bribes in his secretary of state's office that proved Ryan's undoing as governor. Public support evaporated and he announced in 2002 he would not seek reelection. He was indicted in December 2003, less than a year after leaving office.
Ryan was born in Maquoketa, Iowa, and grew up in Kankakee. After serving in the U.S. Army in Korea in 1954, he came back to work in his pharmacist father's drug stores, turning them into a small successful chain. In 1956, Ryan married Lura Lynn Lowe, who he had met in high school.
A back room in Ryan's Kankakee pharmacy served as a hub for local Republican political activities and he was mentored by the powerful GOP county chairman and state legislator, Ed McBroom. People looking for state jobs had to get McBroom's approval–and sometimes buy a vehicle from his car dealership if they got hired or got a pay raise.
In 1962, Ryan ran McBroom's campaign for the state Senate; in 1968, Ryan was appointed to the Kankakee County Board; by 1971 he had become County Board chairman and was off to the legislature the next year and became House speaker a decade later.
After serving as Thompson's lieutenant governor for eight years, Ryan ran and won two terms as secretary of state when Jim Edgar gave up the office to make a successful bid for governor. After Edgar left the governorship following two terms, Ryan ran to replace him, winning the office while often campaigning to the left of former downstate Democratic congressman Glenn Poshard.
Ryan's lengthy tenure in Springfield and willingness to engage in horse-trading to get his agenda made him popular with lawmakers in both parties. Having served previously as House speaker, as a Republican he had a successful relationship with powerful Democratic Speaker Michael Madigan.
His ability to forge friendships and alliances worked for him early on, when he secured passage of a massive, $12 billion Illinois FIRST capital improvement spending program to reconstruct schools, roads, bridges, highways and sewers.
As governor, Ryan also mediated a $3.5 billion aid package for the coal industry, a bill of rights for HMO patients, tighter regulation of factory hog farms, $1.5 billion more in school funding, health insurance for 125,000 additional kids from low income families and added 30,000 acres of open space
In October 1999, Ryan made a much ballyhooed trip to Cuba and was feted by Fidel Castro as the governor bucked U.S. policy and urged the nation reopen trade with the communist island country.
As governor, Ryan had authorized only one execution to proceed and had exhibited emotional qualms about the power even though there was no doubt about the convicted man's guilt.
On Jan. 31, 2000, Ryan declared a moratorium on imposing the death penalty in Illinois, noting that since the state reinstated capital punishment in 1977, 12 people had been executed while another 13 had been exonerated.
'Until I can be sure that everyone sentenced to death in Illinois is truly guilty, until I can be sure with moral certainty that no innocent man or woman is facing a lethal injection, no one will meet that fate,' Ryan said.
He cited a Tribune investigative series that examined each of the state's nearly 300 capital cases that exposed how bias, error and incompetence had undermined many of them.
Ryan's moratorium was continued by his successors but it wasn't until a decade after he issued it that Illinois lawmakers approved and Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn signed a law abolishing the death penalty.
Ultimately, with only days remaining in his term, Ryan in early 2003 commuted the sentences of 167 Death Row inmates and pardoned four others–the largest such commutation in U.S. history. He was repeatedly nominated for a Nobel peace prize.
In many ways the simplest of men, Ryan's death row decision added a dimension of complexity to his otherwise straightforward legacy.
'Who the hell am I,' he said in speeches on the death penalty, 'to say that a man should die?'
In September of 2020, Ryan co-authored with former Tribune reporter Maurice Possley the book, 'Until I Could Be Sure: How I Stopped the Death Penalty in Illinois,' detailing Ryan's internal deliberations on the death penalty and discussing the national movement to abolish it.
Critics charged Ryan's Death Row moratorium was a desperate effort to deflect attention from the scandal that had enveloped his
administration. Supporters said Ryan was filled with genuine moral angst over a system that made quite real the possibility of sending an innocent person to their death.
It was during his tenure as secretary of state that his troubles with the law began.
As secretary of state, his campaign coffers were regularly loaded with money from his employees, who were compelled to sell tickets for Ryan fundraisers. Commercial driver's licenses were for sale, and among the unqualified motorists who paid for his license was a truck driver named Ricardo Guzman.
In 1994, part of the taillight assembly on Guzman's truck fell off onto Interstate 94 near Milwaukee. A minivan driven by Rev. Duane Willis and carrying his wife and six children hit the dropped part. The van exploded into flames and the children, aged six weeks to 11 years, were all killed.
Known in shorthand as the 'licenses for bribes' scandal, 75 people were convicted for various infractions as a result of the probe; 30 of them were employees of the Secretary of State's office.
During a six-month trial, Ryan was defended without charge by a high-powered legal team from Winston & Strawn, the law firm headed by former Gov. Thompson. Despite a defense put together by former U.S. Attorney Dan Webb at an estimated cost of $20 million, a jury found Ryan guilty of all 18 counts against him in April 2006. Also found guilty was Ryan's co-defendant and close friend, lobbyist Lawrence Warner, who made more than $3 million on insider deals.
Ryan became the third Illinois governor to be convicted of wrongdoing since the 1970s. Otto Kerner received 3 years in prison in 1973 for taking bribes while governor in the late 1960s; he was paroled after serving a year. Dan Walker was sentenced in 1987 to 7 years for bank fraud unrelated to his public duties but was released after 17 1/2 months.
Ryan's successor, Democrat Rod Blagojevich, was impeached, removed from office and convicted of federal corruption charges. He was sentenced to 14 years but was granted clemency by President Donald Trump after serving eight years,
Throughout Ryan's federal investigation and trial, he was steadfast in declaring he had done nothing wrong. At his sentencing, he relented a bit, saying of residents, 'When they elected me governor of this state, they expected better, and I let them down, and for that I apologize.'
Ryan's wife, Lura Lynn, died in Kankakee on June 27, 2011. Ryan had been allowed out of prison in Terre Haute, Ind., to be with her when she died. He was released from a federal prison in Indiana in January 2013, serving the final months of his term in home confinement at his home in Kankakee.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress' "doc fix" spurs value-based care concerns
Congress' "doc fix" spurs value-based care concerns

Axios

time32 minutes ago

  • Axios

Congress' "doc fix" spurs value-based care concerns

Physicians are divided over how the massive Republican budget bill moving through Congress would insulate doctors from future Medicare cuts without continuing financial incentives to provide better care through alternative payment models. Why it matters: The "doc fix" championed by the American Medical Association, among other groups, would solve a long-standing complaint about the way Medicare pays physicians. But some physician groups worry it would maintain a system long criticized for tying pay to the volume of procedures delivered and the number of patients seen. State of play: Physician practices that agree to be paid based on patient outcomes get bigger payouts in exchange for taking on the extra financial risk are in line, under current law, for a pay boost through a key adjustment called the conversion factor, starting next year. But the version of the GOP budget bill that passed the House of Representatives would instead create a single conversion factor for all physicians that's updated based on Medicare's measure of inflation. That would leave providers in the performance-based payment models getting higher payments than currently prescribed from 2026 through 2028, but lower payments than outlined in current law after that through 2035, according to an analysis from Berkeley Research Group viewed by Axios. Primary care physicians and providers embracing value-based care worry that removing an incentive for participating in the models will set back efforts to move Medicare toward a more holistic payment system that's meant to improve patient care. "Signals matter in health care," said Shawn Martin, CEO of the American Academy of Family Physicians. "I think it's a signal [to physicians] of an entrenchment back in fee-for-service." The American College of Physicians, the trade group for internal medicine doctors, told lawmakers last month that it's concerned the policy as structured will disincentivize doctors' participation in value-based care. "It's being marketed as a long-term fix," said Mara McDermott, CEO of value-based care advocacy group Accountable for Health. "I don't read it that way. I read it as creating a new cliff." Zoom out: Many provider groups are also concerned that the legislation doesn't fix the 2.83% cut to physicians' Medicare payment that took effect in January. The American College of Surgeons in a May statement praised lawmakers for recognizing that Medicare physician payments have to be adjusted for inflation, but that the legislation's provision "is not sufficient to make up for the 2025 cut, and more work is needed." The other side: The AMA wrote to House leadership last month that it "strongly supports" the provision to consolidate into one conversion factor and tie updates to inflation starting in 2026. Reductions made to the conversion factor over the past half-decade to keep the physician fee schedule budget neutral have made private practice financially impossible for many doctors, the AMA said. "It is absolutely vital that this issue be addressed," the letter to House leaders said. The AMA disagrees that the provision would discourage participation in alternative payment models, it told Axios in an email. Although payment updates to alternative payment model physicians starting in 2029 would be lower than current law provides, those doctors will still get positive payment updates overall, it said. Between the lines: The policy would go into effect as the Trump administration seeks to leverage Medicare alternative payment models to drive HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s priorities of prevention and personal choice in health care. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services told Axios it does not comment on proposed legislation, but said it's continuing to prioritize policies that encourage providers to join payment models that reward high-value and coordinated care. Reality check: Just about all physicians and physician trade organizations agree that stable Medicare payment updates with some link to inflation is necessary to ensure continuous access for Medicare patients, AAFP's Martin said. It's "extraordinarily healthy" for physician advocacy groups to have different opinions on exactly how to reach that conclusion, he added. The Senate is currently debating what to include in its own version of the reconciliation bill.

Mikie Sherrill's Chances of Beating Jack Ciattarelli in New Jersey: Polls
Mikie Sherrill's Chances of Beating Jack Ciattarelli in New Jersey: Polls

Newsweek

time33 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Mikie Sherrill's Chances of Beating Jack Ciattarelli in New Jersey: Polls

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Democratic New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill is set to beat her Republican rival Jack Ciattarelli in the upcoming election for governor, according to a poll. According to a SurveyUSA poll, released the day after Ciattarelli and Sherrill secured their respective nominations on Wednesday, the Democrat led his GOP rival by 13 percentage points. The Context Along with Virginia, New Jersey is one of the two states holding gubernatorial elections this year to replace New Jersey's incumbent Democratic governor, Phil Murphy, who has a term-limit. The Republicans have not won a gubernatorial election in New Jersey since 2013 and has voted for a Democrat in every presidential election since 1988. But the GOP has seen increasing success in the state in recent years, with Trump increasing his vote share by 10 points in 2024. This was the best showing by a GOP presidential nominee in two decades. Split image of Democratic Representative Mikie Sherrill, left, and former Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, right, who will face Sherrill in New Jersey's gubernatorial contest. Split image of Democratic Representative Mikie Sherrill, left, and former Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, right, who will face Sherrill in New Jersey's gubernatorial contest. AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, Mike Catalini, file What To Know Ciattarelli is a former New Jersey state representative who has said he would end any sanctuary policies protecting immigrants without permanent legal status. Sherrill is a United States representative who worked in the navy and as a federal prosecutor. According to the SurveyUSA poll of 785 adults, 51 percent of likely voters said they'd support Sherrill in the November general election, compared to 38 percent who said they'd back Ciattarelli. The poll was conducted between May 28 and May 30. However, a previous survey by the same pollster found that 40 percent of Garden State voters have a favorable view of Ciattarelli, while 41 percent had the same view of Sherrill. There was a larger gap between the two candidates when it comes to their negative ratings, with 29 percent of voters having an unfavorable view of Sherrill, compared to 36 percent who have an unfavorable opinion of the Republican. What People Are Saying Micah Rasmussen, director of the Rebovich Institute for New Jersey Politics at Rider University, previously told Newsweek that while Democrats are the majority party in the state. "It is certainly possible that New Jersey could elect a Republican governor in November. [Incumbent] Governor [Phil] Murphy was the first Democrat to be reelected in more than 40 years, and in that same span, three Republican governors were elected and reelected. President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social: "The Great State of New Jersey has a very important Primary coming up on Tuesday. Get Out and Vote for Jack Ciattarelli, who has my Complete and Total Endorsement! His Opponents are going around saying they have my Endorsement, which is not true, I don't even know who they are! We can't play games when it comes to Elections, and New Jersey is a very important State that we must WIN. The whole World is watching. Vote for Jack Ciattarelli to, MAKE NEW JERSEY GREAT AGAIN!" What Happens Next The election takes place on November 4. Five third-party or independent candidates are also running for the seat.

Democratic governors Pritzker, Walz, Hochul to testify before House GOP panel about immigration policy

time33 minutes ago

Democratic governors Pritzker, Walz, Hochul to testify before House GOP panel about immigration policy

The House Oversight Committee will hear from the high-profile Democratic governors of Illinois, Minnesota and New York on Thursday during a timely hearing about their states' immigration policies that some members of the Republican-led committee call "sanctuary" policies that they claim shield criminal illegal aliens from immigration enforcement. JB Pritzker of Illinois, Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York will appear at the U.S. Capitol for a closely watched hearing that comes as another Democratic-led state -- California -- is grappling with a slew of immigration-related protests that triggered President Donald Trump to deploy U.S. Marines and the National Guard to the area. House Oversight Chair James Comer requested in April that these Democratic governors testify, claiming that the "Trump administration is taking decisive action to deport criminal illegal aliens from our nation, but reckless sanctuary states like Illinois, Minnesota, and New York are actively seeking to obstruct federal immigration enforcement." "The governors of these states must explain why they are prioritizing the protection of criminal illegal aliens over the safety of U.S. citizens, and they must be held accountable," Comer said in a media advisory for the upcoming hearing. Sanctuary states still enforce U.S. federal immigration laws, but the term often refers to a limited collaboration with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement while enacting policies that are more favorable to undocumented people. The Democratic governors have been preparing to testify and getting ready to defend their records on immigration and public safety, according to hearing material reviewed by ABC News. They'll also highlight how their states cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. "Despite the rhetoric of Republicans in Congress, Governor Pritzker will share facts about how this bipartisan public safety law is fully compliant with federal law and ensures law enforcement can focus on doing their jobs well," a spokesperson for the Illinois governor said in a statement ahead of the hearing. Also ahead of the hearing, the state of Illinois retained outside counsel to provide expertise in order to respond to the committee's requests, the spokesperson said, claiming that "congressional Republicans are wasting taxpayer dollars all to find out that Illinois has always followed the law." A spokesperson for the Democratic Governors Association also suggested that their leaders were focused on governing rather than spending time on "political stunts." "While Republicans in D.C. spend their time pulling political stunts, Democratic governors are busy getting real things done for their states, lowering costs, and keeping people safe," Johanna Warshaw, a spokesperson for the group, said in a statement. In March, the Oversight Committee held another newsy hearing with "sanctuary city" mayors including Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, Denver Mayor Mike Johnston and New York City Mayor Eric Adams. Those leaders defended their actions on immigration enforcement while Republicans on the committee accused them of increasing crime by defying Trump administration immigration policies. On Wednesday, House Oversight Republicans released a three-minute digital ad to show "how sanctuary polices do not protect Americans," which features buzzy news broadcasts about immigration-adjacent crimes, testimony from mayors earlier this spring at the "sanctuary cities" House hearing and video clips of Pritzker, Walz and Hochul speaking about immigration policy. "Sanctuary governors are shielding CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS, then pretending the consequences don't exist. Tomorrow Hochul, Walz, and Pritzker will be in the hot seat as their policies cause CHAOS in their states. Here's what they don't want you to see," the Committee's official account posted on X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store