US favorability tumbles since Trump return: global survey
Trump led to a downward shift in perceptions of the United States as a whole. REUTERS/ Evelyn Hockstein/ File photo
WASHINGTON — The image of the United States has deteriorated sharply in much of the world since President Donald Trump's return, with low marks both on his character and policies, a global survey said Wednesday.
The Pew Research Center found that favorability of the United States has dropped in 15 of the 24 countries surveyed.
Trump received his lowest marks in neighboring Mexico, which he has long disparaged and pressed on migration, with 91 percent of Mexicans saying they did not have confidence Trump would do the right thing on world affairs.
Trump led to a downward shift in perceptions of the United States as a whole.
In both Mexico and fellow neighbor Canada, which Trump has provocatively said should be the 51st US state, majorities now see the United States unfavorably after seeing the country favorably last year when Joe Biden was president.
Views of the United States also darkened in most of Europe, with an especially sharp drop in Poland, a frontline ally of Ukraine, as Trump reduces US support for Kyiv and seeks a negotiated solution with Russia.
Sweden, which entered NATO under Biden in the wake of the Ukraine invasion, gave the worst marks to the United States among all publics surveyed, with 79 percent having a negative opinion of the country.
The survey found that on average majorities from all countries surveyed disagreed with all of Trump's key global policies including on Ukraine, Gaza, immigration and climate change.
Eighty percent called Trump arrogant and only 28 percent found him honest.
Not as bad as first term
Israel, which has enjoyed robust support from its ally in the Gaza war, had the most favorable opinion of the United States at 83 percent, a notch higher under Trump.
Views of the United States remained positive in Nigeria and Kenya—which historically have given high marks to the United States no matter who is president—and India saw little change, with more than half seeing the United States favorably.
Since returning to office, Trump has pursued one of the most sweeping agendas of any US president which has included eviscerating foreign aid and aggressively deporting migrants.
Nonetheless, the global perceptions of Trump, while negative, were not as bad as they were in 2017 when he first entered the White House.
Trump in the first term succeeded Barack Obama, who remained wildly popular in most of the world.
This time, he followed Joe Biden, whose marks were similar to Trump's globally on the issue of the economy, according to Janell Fetterolf, a senior researcher at the Pew Research Center.
The past decade has also seen the growing normalization of right-wing populists.
In Brazil, which Trump's ideological ally Jair Bolsonaro led from 2019 through 2022, Trump has the confidence this year of 34 percent of the public—low, but well above the 14 percent he had when he started his first term.
Across the world, Trump consistently enjoyed more support from men than women and was seen more favorably by people on the right of the political spectrum.
But the study also showed the limits of his international appeal.
In both Sweden and France, Trump failed to win confidence of a majority of backers of far-right nationalist parties, although they were more supportive than the general public.
The annual survey contacted 28,333 adults across 24 countries between January and April. — AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
10 hours ago
- GMA Network
US defense official: US ready to defend PH despite growing China military
INDO-PACIFIC COMMAND, Hawaii — China's aggressive actions in the South China Sea, Taiwan and the East China Sea will continue because of its growing military capability and larger fleets of ships, but an attack on Taiwan may not be imminent as some fear, a United States defense official said. A collective security arrangement in Asia, similar to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Europe, the US official said, will deter any major act of aggression more than bilateral mutual defense treaties. China, for example, will have to worry about facing military forces from multiple countries because under such a security treaty, "an attack on one is an attack on all," the US official told a small group of journalists from Japan and the Philippines, including from GMA News Online, in an Asian security briefing here at the Indo-Pacific Command headquarters in Hawaii. The US official also said the deployment of the Typhon mid-range missile system and the Navy Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System, or the NMESIS anti-ship missile, to the northern Philippines was a calculated move aimed at increasing the perceived lethal risks for China so the country will be deterred from launching an attack on Taiwan or in disputed waters like the South China Sea. Both missile systems involve the launching of missiles from highly mobile trucks in highly secretive areas which could surprise the Chinese military, which is reputed for traditionally having less flexibility in dealing with combat unknowns, said the US official. "China's approach to war fighting I call very mathematical. They want to note all the variables: who's involved, who's not involved. What bases are available, what bases are not available? What weapons are in play, what aren't in play?" said the official, who has had extensive combat experience and intelligence and agreed to speak on background. "The more things become unknowns, the harder it is for them to get to a high confidence decision that they've accounted for everything because the Chinese fight according to plans. They don't adapt and adjust particularly well," the official said. Photo by: Michaela del Callar He added, "Where we're trying to get to is a whole series of mobile diverse spaces that bring threats to the Chinese in ways that they have to identify them, they have to track movement, they have to find them in the jungle." "It's finding a couple of missile launchers in northern Luzon. It's a completely different problem and so, we think, in the process of doing that makes conflict less likely. And that's the critical piece," he said. "We think ultimately, the deployment of Typhon or NMESIS or Japanese hypersonics is a very positive thing towards deterrence and war avoidance." Asked if the US would deploy more such high-tech weapons to the Philippines, the official said such strategic decisions are mutually made by the two sides. "If the Philippines government agrees to it, I'd say the answer is yes, if they say no, thanks, then the answer will be, no." Aggression to continue China claims the South China Sea virtually in its entirety and has deployed much larger fleets of coast guard, navy and suspected maritime militia ships in the past years to assert that extensive claim against smaller claimant states, which are the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan and Brunei. An international arbitration decision in 2016 ruled to invalidate China's territorial claims, but Beijing did not participate in the proceedings initiated by the Philippines and ignored the decision. President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. has developed closer military and defense ties with the US to strengthen the country's external defense, including in the West Philippine Sea, that part of the South China Sea that is nearest to the archipelago. Chinese Coast Guard, Navy and suspected maritime militia ships have used high-pressure water cannons and dangerous maritime maneuvers to Philippine ships or vessels China has accused of entering its territorial waters illegally. Japan has a separate territorial dispute with China over a set of islands in the East China Sea. Continuing trend Such aggressive actions by China would continue, the US official said in response to a question. "It's going to be a continuation of all the trends we're currently seeing—pressure in various locations whether it's Taiwan or South China Sea or Senkakus," the official said. "All of that is going to continue in part because the capability is increasing. There's just more stuff, more coast guard ships, more maritime militia, more things to execute that with," he said. "The overall Chinese presence in the South China Sea," the official said, "has dramatically increased. It's facilitated by the operational use of their outposts in the Spratly Islands." US to 'rapidly' respond When asked how fast the US military can respond if the Philippines comes under an attack, the official said such a decision would be made more by officials in Washington than by the US military, which would execute them. "I think the best answer is we have made deliberate preparations to respond rapidly to a crisis and maintain the capability of doing that," the American official said. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in a visit to Manila in March reaffirmed the Trump administration's "iron-clad" commitment to its obligations under the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty, which obliges the allies to help defend one another in case of an external attack. 'May not be imminent' Regional worries over the prospect of China attacking Taiwan, the island democracy it claims and has threatened to re-annex by force, have escalated after Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. The official, however, said such an attack may not be imminent and Russia's destructive invasion of Ukraine may not necessarily embolden China. "I think the likelihood of a deliberate military operation, a significant operation against Taiwan is pretty remote in the next couple of years," the US official said. "We get asked a lot and have thought a lot about the idea of did the war in Ukraine accelerate China's plans, and I don't think so. I think what it caused them to do was to soberly look, 'Hey, we're not ready. This is a really hard thing and if we get into it and we goof it up, it's hard to recover from that.'" China would likely avoid employing massive military force against Taiwan if it eventually decides to launch actions to retake control over the island across the Taiwan Strait, the US official asserted. "China doesn't want to use military force against Taiwan. It's clear from everything they've said and… that's a really bad idea for a lot of reasons, economically. Politically, reputationally, loss of life, it's not the preferred method. They want to achieve unification," he said. — VDV, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
18 hours ago
- GMA Network
Judge temporarily bars Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles
A drone view shows California National Guard personnel outside the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building following protests against federal immigration sweeps in Los Angeles, California, June 10, 2025. REUTERS/ David Ryder LOS ANGELES — A US judge on Thursday temporarily barred President Donald Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, finding that the Guard was unlawfully mobilized by Trump. San Francisco-based US District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who sued to restrict its activity. Breyer's order will take effect at noon on Friday. Breyer said the protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion.' Trump justified the deployment of troops by qualifying the protests as a rebellion. "The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion," Breyer wrote. The Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order. Trump summoned military troops to Los Angeles to support a civilian police operation over the objection of Newsom, an extraordinary and rarely used measure. The ruling came hours after Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to "liberate" Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic US Senator Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him. The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarization generated by Trump's approach to immigration enforcement and use of presidential power. Trump summoned first the National Guard, then the Marines, to help federal police forces guard federal buildings from protesters and to protect federal immigration agents as they pick up suspected violators. Trump has defended his decision, saying if he had not done so the city would be in flames. The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence and restricted to a few city blocks. Some 700 US Marines will be on the streets of the city by Thursday or Friday, the military has said, to support up to 4,000 National Guard troops. In his ruling, Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters and depriving the state of California with the ability to use the Guard for other purposes, such as fighting fires and drug smuggling. Breyer noted that Trump's deployment threatened other states as well. — Reuters
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
Democratic US Senator Alex Padilla forced to ground, handcuffed by security agents
US Senator Alex Padilla is removed from the venue after interrupting the press conference held by US Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and others, in Los Angeles, California, US, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/ Aude Guerrucci WASHINGTON - Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padilla was shoved out of a room, forced to the ground and handcuffed by security after attempting to ask a question at a Thursday press conference by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. "I am Senator Alex Padilla, I have questions for the secretary," Padilla said during the press conference where Noem was discussing protests in Los Angeles over President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. "Hands off," Padilla said before the was ushered out of the room. Padilla said in a statement that he was forced to the ground and handcuffed by security. A video posted online showed three agents pushing Padilla to the ground and handcuffing his hands behind his back. Reuters was not immediately able to confirm the authenticity of the video. Lawmakers from both parties criticized the move. "Senator Padilla is a big, tall guy, and to see how he was handled out of that room is wrong and sick," Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski told reporters at the Capitol. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer blasted the incident in a speech on the Senate floor. "I just saw something that sickened my stomach-- the manhandling of a United States senator," Schumer said. "We need immediate answers to what the hell went on." — Reuters
