logo
R.I. House passes human composting bill, shifting focus to Senate

R.I. House passes human composting bill, shifting focus to Senate

Boston Globe30-05-2025

Corvese said he realized the House was about to pass the bill. But, he said, 'I just want to assure my constituents back in District 55 in North Providence — I do not intend to compost grandma."
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
On Friday, the bill's sponsor, Representative Michelle E. McGaw, told the Globe that the legislation is meant to provide another option in addition to traditional burial in a coffin or cremation. So, she said, '(Corvese) doesn't have to compost grandma if he doesn't want to.'
Advertisement
Representative Michelle E. McGaw, a Portsmouth Democrat, has introduced a human composting bill.
Handout
McGaw, a Portsmouth Democrat, said some funeral homes in the state are interested in making this option available, and she has constituents interested in it.
'It's enabling legislation,' she said. 'Anyone who is not comfortable with these options can choose from one of the other options that are already available.'
Rhode Island would join 13 other states that have passed human composting legislation, including Maine, Vermont, and New York.
Advertisement
McGaw said human composting aims to reduce the impact on the earth. Burial involves occupying land and paying for things such as caskets, grave liners, and gravestones, while cremation requires the burning of fossil fuel, pouring an average of 534 pounds of carbon into the atmosphere for each cremation, she said.
With human composting, dead bodies are placed inside vessels along with organic matter that helps speed the natural decomposition process, McGaw explained. An indoor chamber keeps the vessels between 130 to 160 degrees, and the contents are blended regularly over the course of four to seven weeks.
The result is about a cubic yard of nutrient-dense soil.
This year, the legislation has been broadened to include alkaline hydrolysis, also known as water cremation, which is legal in 28 states, McGaw said.
For that process, McGaw said, a body is placed into a vessel with water and alkaline substances — potassium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide, or a combination. The vessel is heated up and the alkaline solutions return the body, which is already mostly water, to 'a clean water product, with no tissue or DNA,' she said.
Bone fragments are left over, similarly to cremation. Those remains are ground up, and a fine white ash is placed in an urn, McGaw said. 'Instead of soil, you get water,' she said.
McGaw said she hopes this is the year her bill becomes law.
'As you saw, the debate was far less on the House floor this year,' she said. 'When you see people at fundraisers or in the hallways, they say 'Tell me about this bill, help me understand it better.' It has definitely been a conversation piece. As people get more education about what the bill actually does, they are becoming more comfortable with it.'
Advertisement
The legislation would enable licensed disposition facilities, including those that also perform cremation, to offer natural organic reduction and/or alkaline hydrolysis, subject to licensing, inspection, and regulations set by the state Department of Health.
The bill, which would take effect on Jan. 30, 2027, would not affect burial or cremation as options Rhode Islanders can choose.
Attention now shifts to the Senate, which has new leaders following the
Senator Tiara T. Mack, a Providence Democrat, has introduced
On Friday, Senate spokesman Greg Pare said new Senate President Valarie J. Lawson, an East Providence Democrat, will be reviewing testimony on the bill and speaking with Senator Melissa A. Murray, the Woonsocket Democrat who chairs the Health and Human Services Committee.
Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lombardo notes education, housing advances in statement on Nevada Legislature
Lombardo notes education, housing advances in statement on Nevada Legislature

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lombardo notes education, housing advances in statement on Nevada Legislature

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Gov. Joe Lombardo emphasized progress on education and housing laws as he released a statement Friday on this year's legislative session. Lombardo, a Republican, also touched on decisions he made in vetoing a record 87 bills approved by the Democrat-controlled Nevada Legislature — just over 14% of everything that passed. He signed 518 bills into law. While contentious, this session had a smoother end than in 2023, when Lombardo called two special sessions immediately following adjournment. One session dealt with an unresolved budget that Republicans blocked, and the other passed the A's stadium deal. New Nevada traffic ticket laws to go into effect And despite this year's harsh criticism coming from progressive groups and advocates who cast many of his vetoes as betrayals, he thanked lawmakers for working in good faith toward 'a stronger, safer, and more affordable Nevada for all.' The Governor's Office said ceremonial bill signings are forthcoming for Senate Bill 460, the landmark bipartisan education reform package, and Assembly Bill 540, the Nevada Housing Access and Attainability Act. Lombardo's full statement appears below: I am proud of the meaningful progress we made this session – particularly in the areas of education and housing. Working together, we've taken important steps to expand educational opportunity, begin restoring accountability in our public schools, and make housing more attainable for working families across our said, I did not take lightly the decision to veto 87 bills. I do not enjoy using the veto pen, but as Governor, it is my responsibility to protect Nevadans from legislation that goes too far, expands government unnecessarily, or creates unintended consequences that hurt families, businesses, or our veto was carefully considered. My priority will always be to ensure that every law enacted serves the best interest of the people of Nevada – not special interests, and not bigger the legislators who worked in good faith throughout this session: thank you. I remain committed to working with you to build a stronger, safer, and more affordable Nevada for all. Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo The Nevada Legislature convenes once every two years for a 120-day session. The 83rd session ended on June 2. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump Celebrates Temporary Ruling Allowing Troop Deployment: ‘We Saved L.A.'
Trump Celebrates Temporary Ruling Allowing Troop Deployment: ‘We Saved L.A.'

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Celebrates Temporary Ruling Allowing Troop Deployment: ‘We Saved L.A.'

President Donald Trump celebrated after an appeals court signed off on his deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops against protestors in Los Angeles. 'The Appeals Court ruled last night that I can use the National Guard to keep our cities, in this case Los Angeles, safe,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'If I didn't send the Military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now. We saved L.A. Thank you for the Decision!!!' On Thursday, a federal judge had sided against Trump, ordering him to relinquish control of California's National Guard to Governor Gavin Newsom. Newsom, a Democrat who has sparred with Trump over the handling of protests over Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in L.A., was quick to take a victory lap of his own—even as the federal government appealed the decision. 'This win is not just for California, but the nation,' Newsom wrote on X. 'It's a check on a man whose authoritarian tendencies are increasing by the day.' But just hours later, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals intervened and paused the ruling in a one-page order, meaning that Trump can keep the troops in L.A. for the time being. The court set a hearing for Tuesday. It is still possible that Newsom could prevail over Trump once the court considers the case on its merits. The San Francisco judge who originally sided with the governor—Charles Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton—was vehement in rejecting Trump's justification for deploying the guard. 'His actions were illegal,' the judge wrote, 'both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.' Trump has also moved 700 Marines to L.A., but the judge's order didn't address these troops because they have not yet been actively involved in the protests. Typically, a state's governor must sign off before the National Guard is mobilized. However, Trump invoked a law that allows the president to do so in cases where there is a rebellion. Over the last week, as protests have raged in L.A.—at times becoming violent—Newsom and Trump have traded barbs. Newsom has likened Trump to 'failed dictators,' calling his deployment of troops a 'brazen abuse of power.' The president, meanwhile, has called Newsom 'grossly incompetent,' suggesting that he could be arrested for his handling of the protests.

After night of unrest, congressmen say ICE jail is 'shoddy,' should be evacuated
After night of unrest, congressmen say ICE jail is 'shoddy,' should be evacuated

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

After night of unrest, congressmen say ICE jail is 'shoddy,' should be evacuated

Sen. Andy Kim and Rep. Rob Menendez speak outside Delaney Hall on Friday, June 13, 2025, after touring the immigrant jail. (Sophie Nieto-Muñoz | New Jersey Monitor) Hours after unrest erupted inside a controversial migrant jail in Newark, two congressmen visited the site and confirmed 'major movement of detainees out of this facility.' Sen. Andy Kim, a Democrat, and Rep. Rob Menendez (D-09) visited Delaney Hall Friday morning to inspect the facility and talk with immigration and jail officials after detainees revolted late Thursday over insufficient or inedible food, undrinkable water, and overcrowding. 'Everything that they told me was that, yes, it's an insecure facility. They do not have confidence in this facility, which is why they're doing a security review, and it looks like moving most, if not all, of the detainees out of there while they do a review in that process,' Kim said. Four detainees escaped through a wall, made of drywall and mesh, that had toppled in the chaos, Kim said. 'It shows just how shoddy the construction was here, what happens when we are paying billions of dollars for for-profit prisons that are skirting the responsibilities they have and try to pocket as much of that money as possible,' Kim told protestors gathered outside the jail Friday morning. The Department of Homeland Security said the four escaped prisoners remain at large, but did not comment on Kim's concerns or the transfer of detainees. A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesperson did not respond for comment. DHS officials also refuted claims of a chaotic night, despite video posted on social media that included authorities pepper-spraying activists and journalists and protesters forming a human barricade to prevent cars from entering the facility on Doremus Avenue in an industrial section of Newark. 'Contrary to current reporting, there has been no widespread unrest at the Delaney Hall Detention facility. This privately held facility remains dedicated to providing high-quality services, including include around-the-clock access to medical care, in-person and virtual legal and family visitation, general and legal library access, translation services, dietician-approved meals, religious and specialty diets, recreational amenities, and opportunities to practice their religious beliefs,' Homeland Security officials said. Vans and buses lined up Friday morning alongside the jail to move detainees out. It's unclear where they will be taken. New Jersey is home to one other migrant jail, the Elizabeth Detention Center. Delaney Hall, a 1,100-bed facility, was the first immigration detention facility to open under President Donald Trump. The facility, run by prison operator Geo Group, opened just as the Trump administration ramped up efforts to mass detain and deport immigrants. Backlash began even before it opened, and near-daily protests have cropped up outside since it started housing migrants in May. Newark officials sued Geo Group, claiming it lacked the proper city permits and inspections to open, including a certificate of occupancy. The facility captured national attention when Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested and detained for five hours after attempting to enter. While a judge later dismissed his charges, federal authorities charged Rep. LaMonica McIver with felony assault over a scuffle that occurred when agents handcuffed Baraka. In a statement early Friday, Baraka demanded answers from Geo Group and the Department of Homeland Security and urged authorities to 'not allow this operation to continue unchecked.' 'This entire situation lacks sufficient oversight of every basic detail — including local zoning laws and fundamental constitutional rights. This is why city officials and our congressional delegation need to be allowed entry to observe and monitor, and why private prisons pose a very real problem to our state and its constitution,' he said. Kim echoed concerns that Geo Group was 'cutting corners' in a rush to open the facility. 'We need to see what exactly is going to be the future of this place and whether or not there will still be detainees in here past this weekend,' Kim said. A Geo Group spokesman did not respond Friday to a request for comment, but has said the facility holds a valid certificate of occupancy and complies with health and safety requirements. Attorneys were turned away from the facility Friday by guards. Franklin S. Montero, a Clifton-based immigration attorney, was there for his first visit with a client. When he arrived at the gate, guards told him a directive prohibited them from allowing anyone inside and offered no information on when he could enter. That means his client won't be able to sign necessary petitions and documents before a hearing, he said. 'Never, never, never have I seen this before. In my years of practicing immigration law, I've always been able to get inside the facility and meet with my client,' Montero said. 'Even during COVID. It's just — it's not normal, I'll tell you that.' Mustafa Cetin represents a man who has lived in South Jersey since 2022 and was detained during a routine check-in with immigration officials. His client now wants to be released to return to Turkey, Cetin said. Cetin also got turned away from a scheduled meeting with his client Friday afternoon. He said that's a due process issue that could be fought in court. 'I don't think that's legal. That should be decided by a court if it's reasonable for them to do that or not — weighing due process rights, our access to our clients, and them having the resources,' he said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store