
Theo Nichols obituary
My friend Theo Nichols, who has died aged 86, was a social sciences professor dedicated to the critical study of the relationship between capital and labour.
Theo's first book, Ownership, Control and Ideology (1969), was followed by Workers Divided (1976) and Living With Capitalism (1977), two case studies of work at a large chemical complex, while The British Worker Question (1986) employed his powerful prose to critique dominant accounts of low productivity and the performance of the British economy. He went on to publish another 15 books and edited collections including the classic study The Sociology of Industrial Injury (1997).
Theo was born in Rugby, Warwickshire, as the only child of Wally and Min (nee Baker), both factory workers. Educated first at St Andrew's Murray secondary modern school and then Lawrence Sheriff grammar school, both in Rugby, in 1957 he went on to take up social studies at Hull University.
Drawn to industrial sociology, and after stints lecturing at the universities of Aston (1963-64) and Bath (1964-68), in 1969 he took up a lectureship at Bristol University, where he and I were part of the second tranche of appointments to its new department of sociology. In 2000 he left Bristol to take up a distinguished research professorship in social sciences at Cardiff, working there until his retirement in 2010.
Theo was a principled man who had little time for authority figures, valued hard work and disliked unfairness. An avid reader, he loved walking his dog and watching Bristol City at Ashton Gate.
His second wife, Nancy Lineton, whom he married in 1994, died 15 days before Theo. He is survived by three children, Rob, Jo and Claire, from his first marriage to Joyce Sage, which ended in divorce, by Nancy's three children from a previous marriage, and 15 grandchildren.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Danny Cahalane: Nine in court after fatal acid attack in Plymouth
Nine people have appeared in Plymouth Crown Court in connection with the murder of a 38-year-old man from Cahalane was taken to hospital on 21 February following a serious assault involving acid on Lipson Road. He died in hospital three months later on 3 nine defendants have been charged with involvement in an organised crime group which was supplying drugs or storing drugs. It is also alleged the group was involved the enforcement of drug debts through of the defendants, five men, all in their 20s and from London, and a 34-year-old woman from Plymouth have been charged with murder. Three of the accused pleaded not guilty. The nine defendants include seven men in their 20s from London, and two women in their 30s from of the nine defendants pleaded not guilty to involvement in an organised crime group: Paris Wilson, 34, of The Quay, PlymouthJenna Said, 38, of Ernesettle Green, PlymouthIsrael Augustus, 25, of Pulford Road, LondonIsanah Sungum, 21 of Sterling Way, LondonJean Mukuna, 23, from Werrington Street, LondonArrone Mukuna, 24, of Werrington Street, LondonThe remaining three from London, Brian Kalemba, 22, of Eastbury Square, Abdul-Rasheed Adedoja, 22, of North Circular Road and Ramarnee Bakas-Sithole, 22, of Junction Road are yet to be asked to enter Augustus, Mr Adedoja, Mr Bakas-Sithole, Kalemba and Mr Sungum all from London, and Ms Wilson of Plymouth, have been charged with the six, Ms Wilson, Mr Sungum and Mr Augustus pleaded not guilty. The remaining three had yet to be asked to enter defendants have been remanded in custody, while one has been remanded on conditional bail.A trial is due to take place at Winchester Crown Court on 13 January.


Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
British 'arson gang' recruited by Moscow-backed Wagner Group to 'firebomb Mayfair restaurant and kidnap 'Russian dissident' owner after torching Ukrainian parcel firm warehouse', court hears
Two British men were recruited by Russia 's Wagner Group to firebomb a Mayfair restaurant and kidnap its owner after carrying out a £1million arson attack on a warehouse with equipment bound for Ukraine, a court heard yesterday The terrorist group conducting a sabotage campaign on behalf of Russian intelligence is said to have recruited two men to set fire to a warehouse in Leyton, East London, destroying over £100,000 worth of equipment, including generators and vital Starlink satellite equipment destined for Ukraine. The Old Bailey heard that the blaze at 11.40pm on March 20 last year was livestreamed on Facetime to the 'architect' of the plot who then reported back to the Russians on the success of the 'mission'. The attack was orchestrated by Jake Reeves, 23, and Dylan Earl, 20, from Leicestershire who went on to plan an arson attack on a restaurant and wine business in Mayfair by kidnapping the owner of the businesses. The owner of the Hide Restaurant and Hedonism Wines, which were valued at over £30million and employed 200 people, was described as a 'high profile dissident' and 'refugee' who was open about his criticism of Putin, the court heard. The duo planned to kidnap him in a bid to 'influence the Government' to further 'a political and ideological cause', jurors were told. Their kidnapping and arson plot was unearthed after a group of men, who were supposedly enlisted by Reeves and Earl, stood trial on allegations of setting a east London warehouse storing Ukrainian bound equipment alight. Prosecutor Duncan Penny, KC, said: 'Acting at the behest of the Wagner Group, [Earl] planned a similar arson attack on two businesses – a wine shop called Hedonism and a restaurant called Hide – in West London. Jake Reeves (pictured left) and Dylan Earl orchestrated an attack on satellite equipment bound for Ukraine before planning an arson on a restaurant in Mayfor, a court heard 'The businesses belong to a high-profile Russian dissident and refugee who has been vocal in his criticism of president Putin and the war in Ukraine. He has, for example, driven aid trucks from the UK to Ukraine personally.' Mr Penny added: 'You might think that it is self-evident that these actions were designed to influence the government and to intimidate at least a section of the public and furthermore were made for the purpose of advancing a political and ideological cause.' Both have also already admitted aggravated arson on behalf of the Wagner Group and an offence under the National Security Act, jurors heard. They also have admitted the separate plot to set fire to the firms in west London, as well as to kidnapping their owner on behalf of the Wagner Group. Yesterday the four men who were allegedly recruited to carry out the attack, Jakeem Rose, 23, Ugnius Asmena, 20, Nii Mensah, 23 and Paul English, 61, went on trial accused of aggravated arson. Mr Penny told jurors: 'This was deliberate and calculated criminality - at the behest of foreign influence. 'In the case of these defendants at the time of the fire they may have been ignorant of that influence and the motive may have been financial - good old-fashioned greed. 'For others, however, it appears to have been both political and ideological.' Mr Penny said the warehouse was targeted because of its connection to Ukraine, with the premises also being used to store humanitarian aid bound for the war zone. The fire started by a jerry can of petrol caused more than £1million in damage to the buildings, with eight fire crews battling to bring it under control. The driver of a lorry parked nearby tried unsuccessfully to put out the fire which was started within 10metres of houses, but no one was hurt in the attack. Earl, described as the 'architect' of the plot, was said to have knowingly acted at the behest of the Wagner Group, a proscribed terrorist organisation 'under the direct command of the Russian government'. The Briton contacted the Wagner Group on the encrypted social media application Telegram expressing a willingness to undertake 'missions' of which the Leyton arson attack was the first, Mr Penny said. 'It is apparent that Dylan Earl knew he was acting against Ukrainian, and for Russian, interests,' he told jurors. 'The reason for the selection of this building as a particular target in East London in March of last year appears to have been its connection to Ukraine.' The warehouse housed a logistics company which was frequently delivering goods to Ukraine, including StarLink satellite equipment. Reeves only discovered afterwards the motive for the attack but was 'still prepared to agree to accept money from a foreign intelligence service in respect of further planned offences,' the court was told. Mr Penny said the four alleged arsonists 'may have been ignorant of that influence', but acted out of 'old-fashioned greed'. The group were captured on CCTV with Rose seen pouring a jerry can of petrol onto the doors of the warehouse units and setting them alight, jurors heard. Mensah is alleged to have filmed the blaze with a mobile telephone, livestreaming it to Earl. The court heard that there is 'overwhelming evidence' against the defendants, including a knife with Rose's DNA dropped at the scene. Following the attack, Mensah allegedly messaged Earl saying: 'Bro there was bare smoke... You saw it on Face Time. He added: 'Bro lol it's on the news... we dun damagees (sic).' Rose, of Croydon, Asmena, of no fixed address, Mensah, of Thornton Heath and English, of Roehampton, have denied aggravated arson. The case continues.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
It's fair to criticise ‘activist' Hermer, says his lawyer friend
Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, can be 'fairly' criticised over his 'activism' as a lawyer, a legal friend has said. Ben Williams KC said Lord Hermer was an 'open activist' throughout his career, and claimed Sir Keir Starmer would have known this when he appointed him Attorney General. He suggested this provided an insight into the Prime Minister's own views on how the law could be used to pursue a political agenda. The suggestion comes despite Lord Hermer's claims that lawyers only take cases based on the 'cab rank' principle, which requires barristers to accept cases within their area of expertise, regardless of the client. Mr Williams, who has presented cases with Lord Hermer, made his comments on Twitter in response to a video issued by Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, in which he attacked Lord Hermer for spending his career 'defending Britain's enemies' in court. Saying the Attorney General was unfit for the job because of his past legal activism, Mr Jenrick linked him to a range of controversial figures he has represented, including Gerry Adams, Shamima Begum, the Isis bride, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi, described as Osama Bin Laden's 'right hand man'. Mr Williams tweeted: 'As a lawyer [and] a friend of Rich Hermer, I find this unpleasant. But before the usual suspects erupt, it's also entirely fair political comment. 'RH was an open activist throughout his career, [and] Starmer knew this when he chose to knife his shadow AG [Emily Thornberry] to appoint RH instead. 'This is obviously revealing about Starmer's own position on using the law as a political instrument; [and] both he and Rich will have known perfectly well that the latter's long history of acting against the UK Government would be subject to legitimate political attack. 'On reflection, I should have said that I find it discomfiting. It is not unpleasant.' Lord Hermer has come under increasing pressure over several controversial moves in Government, including a key role in Britain's surrender of the Chagos Islands. He was also forced to apologise for a 'clumsy' remark that compared Conservative and Reform calls to quit the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) with the early days of Nazi Germany. Sir Keir has faced calls to sack his Attorney General, with Kemi Badenoch arguing that Lord Hermer 'believes in the rule of lawyers, not the rule of law'. Lord Hermer and his allies have previously argued that he has only represented controversial figures as a result of the 'cab rank rule', an ethical principle that requires lawyers to accept instructions from clients, even if they disagree with the views or alleged crimes. However, in a previous tweet, Mr Williams challenged the concept barristers are strictly forbidden in any case from refusing to represent a client on the grounds they found them objectionable. 'Cab rank' principle questioned Responding to a Twitter user making that argument, he said: 'This is at best unreal. You know perfectly well that the Bar is full of people who say 'I only defend', 'I won't represent alleged rapists', or 'I won't represent landlords'. 'As to the last, I went to a judicial valedictory last year where this specific position was openly celebrated. There are entire chambers that declare themselves 'radical'. 'The idea that one can't extrapolate revealed preferences from a career of acting only for a specific demographic is absurd.' In his video, Mr Jenrick challenged Lord Hermer's cab rank defence, saying he 'would have been inundated with cases, able to choose the pick of the bunch'. A Tory source said: 'Starmer and Hermer's mate, Philippe Sands, admitted he refused to represent Augusto Pinochet. The selective use of the cab rank rule is widespread amongst so-called human rights lawyers. Activist barristers now actively boast of their ideological purity.' However, Lord Hermer has been defended by some Tory legal experts. Dominic Grieve, the former attorney general, said Mr Jenrick's video was a 'disgraceful' attack on the UK's 'principles of justice and freedoms' which relied on a 'level playing field' for individuals' legal representation under the cab rank rule. A spokesman for the Attorney General's Office said: 'Law officers such as the Attorney General will naturally have an extensive legal background and may have previously been involved in a wide number of past cases. Barristers do not associate themselves with their clients' opinions.'