Driver who changed 3 lanes at once, causing crash, gets jail term
A suspended prison term for the 72-year-old driver, accused of hit-and-run and fleeing the scene of an accident, has been upheld by the appellate division of the Chuncheon District Court.
The court said Sunday it ruled against the defendant's appeal and retained the initial sentence of 18 months in prison, suspended for three years. The defendant was found guilty of aggravated hit-and-run, stipulated in Article 5-3 of the Act on Aggravated Punishment for Specific Crimes, and failing to take appropriate measures after causing an accident as defined by the Road Traffic Act.
The defendant was driving a compact vehicle on the freeway in Siheung, Gyeonggi Province, on Feb. 18, when he moved from lane 5 to lane 2 at once. The abrupt maneuver caused a sedan in lane 2 to collide with a van in lane 1, in an attempt to evade collision with the defendant's car.
The driver of the sedan and a 2-year-old child inside the car were hurt, and the car was totaled. The driver and passengers inside the van were also injured.
The defendant claimed not to be at fault, as he had signaled the lane change; the court said that simply turning on the signal light did not justify his reckless driving.
"Changing lanes without sufficiently considering the road situation violates the obligation (of a driver), which states that one should not change lanes if it interferes with the normal operation of other cars," the court said in its ruling.
On the defendant's claim of not being aware of the crash, the court pointed out that the black box footage on the car clearly picked up the noise from the crash, which would have been enough to alert the defendant.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
5 days ago
- Korea Herald
Comedian Lee Kyung-gyu under police probe for alleged DUI
Comedian Lee Kyung-gyu is undergoing a police probe for allegedly driving under the influence earlier this week, officials said Monday. Lee reportedly tested positive for substance use in a preliminary test after police stopped him Sunday for driving someone else's car. He reportedly drove the vehicle, which was the same model as his own, after a valet mistakenly handed it over to him at an indoor golf driving range in Seoul's southern ward of Gangnam. The Seoul Gangnam Police Station is currently looking into charges of violating the Road Traffic Act against Lee. Lee has reportedly denied the allegations, saying he only took medication prescribed for his panic disorder. A witness at the scene told Yonhap News Agency that Lee showed a piece of paper to police officers that appeared to be a medical prescription. A police official declined to elaborate on the details of the case.
Korea Herald
28-05-2025
- Korea Herald
Supreme Court says police can't take back lenient sanction
The Supreme Court recently confirmed a lower court ruling that said a defendant accused of violating the Road Traffic Act cannot be punished, because he had already been given a more lenient punishment by mistake. The defendant had been stopped riding an electric unicycle — a self-balancing single wheel personal transporter — under suspicion of riding it while drunk on June 28, 2023. He refused to take a sobriety test, and was ordered by police to pay an administrative fine of 100,000 won ($72), which he paid shortly the following month. The officer in question thought the unicycle was a "personal mobility" device, defined by the Road Traffic Act as a motorized personal vehicle with maximum speed of 25 kilometers per hour and weighing under 30 kilograms. Drunk-driving of a personal mobility vehicle, or refusing to take a sobriety test while driving one, is subject to an administrative fine but not to criminal punishment. But it was later found that the electric unicycle is actually categorized as a motorcycle. As such, the rider should have been subject to indictment and possible criminal punishment. Despite the indictment by the prosecution, the district court had said police do not have the authority to revoke a punishment that has already been administered. "Even if the law was wrongfully applied due to the mistake of those in charge, the defendant's rights must be protected. The appellate court upheld the ruling, as did the country's highest court, finding no errors in the previous rulings' interpretation of the law.
Korea Herald
18-05-2025
- Korea Herald
Driver who changed 3 lanes at once, causing crash, gets jail term
A suspended prison term for the 72-year-old driver, accused of hit-and-run and fleeing the scene of an accident, has been upheld by the appellate division of the Chuncheon District Court. The court said Sunday it ruled against the defendant's appeal and retained the initial sentence of 18 months in prison, suspended for three years. The defendant was found guilty of aggravated hit-and-run, stipulated in Article 5-3 of the Act on Aggravated Punishment for Specific Crimes, and failing to take appropriate measures after causing an accident as defined by the Road Traffic Act. The defendant was driving a compact vehicle on the freeway in Siheung, Gyeonggi Province, on Feb. 18, when he moved from lane 5 to lane 2 at once. The abrupt maneuver caused a sedan in lane 2 to collide with a van in lane 1, in an attempt to evade collision with the defendant's car. The driver of the sedan and a 2-year-old child inside the car were hurt, and the car was totaled. The driver and passengers inside the van were also injured. The defendant claimed not to be at fault, as he had signaled the lane change; the court said that simply turning on the signal light did not justify his reckless driving. "Changing lanes without sufficiently considering the road situation violates the obligation (of a driver), which states that one should not change lanes if it interferes with the normal operation of other cars," the court said in its ruling. On the defendant's claim of not being aware of the crash, the court pointed out that the black box footage on the car clearly picked up the noise from the crash, which would have been enough to alert the defendant. minsikyoon@
