U.S. Says Blast in Yemen Was Caused by Houthi Missile, Not U.S. Strike
A deadly blast on Sunday near a UNESCO world heritage site in Yemen's capital was caused by a Houthi missile, not a U.S. airstrike, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command said on Thursday.
The health ministry of the Houthi-led government said earlier this week that an American airstrike had hit a densely populated neighborhood of Sana, the Yemeni capital, killing 12 people and injuring 30 others. The blast struck an area adjacent to Sana's Old City, a UNESCO world heritage site filled with ancient towers.
Dave Eastburn, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command, which oversees operations in the Middle East, said in a statement that while the damage and casualties described by local health officials most 'likely did occur,' they were not the result of an American attack. While the United States had conducted military operations over Sana that night, the closest American strike was more than three miles away, he added.
The Pentagon's assessment that the damage was caused by a 'Houthi Air Defense missile' was based in part on a review of 'local reporting, including videos documenting Arabic writing on the missile's fragments at the market,' Mr. Eastburn said. The Pentagon did not provide those videos or evidence of its claims in its statements.
An initial review by The New York Times of local reporting and open-source material in Yemen found a video showing a missile fragment with Arabic writing posted to social media, however it was from a different location from the market in Sana's Old City.
Mohammed al-Bukhaiti, a member of the Houthis' Politburo, said in a phone interview that the American denial was an attempt to smear the Houthis. He reiterated that the group believed that the United States targeted the neighborhood on Sunday, 'just as it previously targeted ports, cemeteries and citizens' homes, resulting in the deaths of hundreds.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
China accuses U.S. of violating trade truce, vows "forceful measures"
China has accused the U.S. violating the trade deal that the world's two largest economies signed last month and vowed to take "resolute and forceful measures," per a briefing on Monday morning local time. Why it matters: It's the latest sign of deteriorating relations between the two nations since their Switzerland meeting led to a May 12 deal to lower tariffs on each other fo 90 days while they negotiated on trade. President Trump accused Beijing on Friday of violating the agreement, one day after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described negotiations as " a bit stalled." Driving the news: A Chinese Commerce Ministry spokesperson said Beijing "firmly rejects these unjustified accusations," per translations of the comments that were carried by state media. The spokesperson alleged the U.S. had "seriously undermined" and "violated" the trade agreement by issuing "export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software (EDA) to China, and announcing the r evocation" of visas for Chinese students. "If the U.S. insists on its own way and continues to damage China's interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests," unnamed official added, without elaborating further. The other side: While Trump didn't go into details on his claims that Beijing had "totally violated" the trade deal, administration officials have pointed to delays in sending critical minerals to the U.S., which are needed for American auto, electronics and defense industries, that formed part of the agreement. "What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe, and that is not what a reliable partner does," Bessent said during a Sunday interview on CBS News ' "Face the Nation." What we're watching: U.S. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said Sunday he expects Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jingping will hold a phone call this week as part of negotiations. Bessent said on CBS he's "confident" that the two sides' issues "will be ironed out" once Trump and Xi have spoken. "But the fact that they are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement — maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional," he told CBS' Margaret Brennan. "We'll see after the president speaks with [Xi]." Beijing had not commented on any plans for a call between the two leaders as of late Sunday.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
These are the safest places in America for gay and transgender people
These are the safest places in America for gay and transgender people Which states are the best and worst for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer Americans to live and work? More and more, it's a question of partisan politics. Here's why. Show Caption Hide Caption See as rock climbers hang Transgender Pride flag in Yosemite Rock climbers unfurled a large Transgender Pride flag on El Capitan in Yosemite National Park. The National Park Service has since removed it. As Oklahoman legislators push to restrict trans rights and overturn the 2015 Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage, Zane Eaves says his identity as a transgender man has put a target on his back in his home state. One of 18,900 trans adults in Oklahoma, Eaves has received death threats as has his wife of 10 years and their two children. 'All the hatred and political stuff going on' are driving this Oklahoma lifer from the place he was born and raised, Eaves, 35, said. He has only crossed the state line three times in his life, but in recent weeks, he made the difficult decision to move his family to North Carolina to be closer to friends and allies. 'I am just trying to stay alive and keep my marriage,' Eaves said. Oklahoma ranks 44th in the nation on a list released Monday of the most and least welcoming states for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer Americans. More and more, the question of where LGBTQ+ people feel safe is one of blue vs. red, according to advocacy group Out Leadership. LGBTQ+ equality fell across the board for the third straight year, according to Out Leadership's State LGBTQ+ Business Climate Index shared exclusively with USA TODAY. But the sharpest declines came in Republican-led states. While progressive strongholds championed supportive policies and protections, conservative states elected a slate of leaders who openly oppose gay and trans rights and sponsored an unprecedented wave of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation, Out Leadership CEO and founder Todd Sears said. So-called 'Don't Say Gay' bills, religious exemptions and other legislation tanked the rankings of 19 red states in the Out Leadership index, according to Sears. Today, the divide between states that roll out the welcome mat and less hospitable parts of the country is wider than ever, he said. The least and most welcoming LGBTQ+ states Each year for the last seven, Out Leadership has released the State LGBTQ+ Business Climate Index to gauge the overall climate for gay and transgender people state by state, mapping out where they will face the most and the least discrimination and hardship. Out Leadership's index measures the impact of state government policies and prevalent attitudes about the LGBTQ+ community, weighing factors such as support for young people and families, health access and safety, political and religious attitudes, work environment and employment and nondiscrimination protections. The Northeast had six of the 10 highest-ranked states, while the Southeast had six of the lowest-ranked. Massachusetts, led by the nation's first openly lesbian governor, Democrat Maura Healey and New York, which guaranteed gender-affirming care and LGBTQ+ refugee protections, tied for first place in this year's index, with Connecticut and New Jersey close behind. The least LGBTQ+ friendly state was Arkansas, which ranked last for the third straight year. South Carolina, Louisiana, South Dakota and Alabama also received low scores. The states that had the largest gains in the index were Kentucky and Michigan, which Out Leadership attributed to 'pro-equality' leadership from governors Andy Beshear and Gretchen Whitmer, both Democrats. The steepest declines were in Ohio, Florida and Utah, all led by Republican governors. Where are the safest places to live? The Out Leadership index was created as a LGBTQ+ inclusion reference guide for business leaders. But gay and trans people soon began using it to figure out where they should – and should not – live and work, never more so than now as rights rollbacks from the Trump administration and red statehouses hit close to home. Opposition to transgender rights was a central plank in Trump's presidential campaign and since taking office he has signed a series of executive orders recognizing only male and female genders, keeping trans athletes out of women's sports, banning trans people from serving in the military and restricting federal funding for gender-affirming care for trans people under age 19. Even states seen as safer for LGBTQ+ people have been navigating these edicts around trans athletes. Trump threatened to cut federal funding to California if a trans girl competed in a state track and field event held Saturday. AB Hernandez, a junior from Jurupa Valley High School in Riverside County, shared first place in the high jump and triple jump and second in the long jump. She shared the awards podium with her cisgender competitors under a new rule drafted by state athletics officials days before the event to mollify critics. Republican-led states have been in the vanguard of anti-trans legislation, causing greater geographic polarization and prompting fears among LGBTQ+ residents, even those who live in liberal cities. Jordan McGuire, a 27-year-old gay man in North Dakota, said the years he spent living in the Deep South taught him about the repressive discrimination routinely faced by gay and genderqueer people. At the same time, socially progressive cities in conservative states like Fargo and Grand Forks are no longer the safe havens they once were, he said. Now that his fiancee is transitioning to female, the couple is exploring a move to a 'sanctuary' state that will be safer for them. 'It feels like five or 10 years ago, trans people were not under the same microscope they are now and that has definitely influenced our move,' McGuire said. 'Yeah, people were prejudiced but it wasn't a witch hunt. They weren't looking for people in bathrooms and schools. But now things are so polarized.' That rising anxiety was captured in a post-election survey from UCLA's Williams Institute which found that nearly half of transgender people had already fled unsupportive communities and nearly 1 in 4 were considering uprooting their lives. The most frequently cited reasons for wanting to move were concerns about LGBTQ+ rights – 76% – the sociopolitical climate – 71% – anti-trans rhetoric and climate – 60% – and anti-trans laws and policies – 47%. LGBTQ+ Americans on the move Interest in relocating to friendlier states is even higher today than it was after Trump's reelection, say nonprofit workers who aid trans and gender-diverse people relocate to more liberal states with broader protections. So far in 2025, Rainbow Railroad in Canada has received more than 3,000 requests from LGBTQ+ people living in the United States, up more than 1,000% from the same time last year, according to communications director Timothy Chan. Nearly all requested international relocation support. For now, Rainbow Railroad can't aid Americans with resettlement services because of immigration restrictions, Chan said. TRACTION has heard from a record number of people from states as far away as Texas, Oklahoma and Arkansas with many of them reporting being threatened or feeling unsafe in their homes and neighborhoods, said Michael Woodward, the executive director of the trans-led organization in Washington state. Trans and gender-diverse people historically face financial hardship due to systemic oppression and discrimination, and need assistance finding jobs and housing as well as with interstate moving expenses that can run tens of thousands, Woodward said. TRACTION used to get a few applications a week until Trump won a second term. In the two weeks following the election, 'we received as many requests for assistance as we'd received in the entire life of the project thus far,' he said. After the inauguration, TRACTION started getting three to five applications every day. With one employee and a handful of volunteers, his organization is struggling to keep up with demand, Woodward said.
Buzz Feed
2 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Americans Share Shocking Tariff Costs Hitting Wallets
On May 12, President Trump reached a deal with China that cut tariffs on imported goods from the country from 145% to 30% for 90 days. But for companies that had to restock while the higher tariffs were in effect, like the open-source hardware retailer Adafruit, the costs of the highest tariffs are still being felt. In a blog post about its tariff bill, Adafruit wrote, "We'll have to increase the prices on some of these products, but we're not sure if people will be willing to pay the higher cost, so we may well be 'stuck' with unsellable inventory that we have already paid a large fee on." The co-founder and president of Popsmith and Franklin's Popcorn also took to X to share how the tariffs are affecting his business: He went on to clarify that yes, the tariffs will cause higher prices. Some companies have announced layoffs related to the higher costs of doing business under Trump's tariffs. Higher prices are also beginning to show up on store shelves. It can be harder to tie these increases directly to the tariffs because big American companies are currently not being very transparent about how these new import taxes are affecting prices. For example, this Target employee captured the moment they changed an imported 6-foot USB cable's price from $9.99 to $17.99 in mid-May, before the highest tariffs were paused. The timing would seem to line up with the tariffs' first round of effects, but there's nothing on the price tag to indicate why the price went up by so much so quickly. BuzzFeed has reached out to Target for comment, but they did not immediately respond to our request. A Walmart employee also shared the price jump on an 8-ounce container of cocoa powder from $3.44 to $6.18. Walmart recently announced that it would be raising some prices due to the tariffs. If you work in retail, please pop into the comments and let us know what you're seeing in your store — and post pics if you've got 'em! Or, if you'd like to remain extra anonymous, email me. On the other hand, some smaller brands, like the inclusive underwear company tomboyx, have started showing a tariff charge on their products. The company explained on its website, "The tariff surcharge helps us stay sustainable while we move quickly behind the scenes—developing new styles and expanding production to other countries. We're adapting fast, but building responsible manufacturing relationships takes a bit of time — and we refuse to compromise on the quality you expect from us." And people genuinely appreciate the transparency: Meanwhile, at the "old-fashioned" grocery store, this Iowa shopper noticed a wild price tag on a container of pre-cut imported fruit: Restaurant prices are also creeping up. One restaurant owner told CBS News, "We're not importing fresh ingredients like vegetables, but everything else around it — spices, seasonings, even our beers. Now it's double. Who's going to pay $20 for a beer?" If you've got kids who maaaybe do a little online shopping, you should probably talk to them about the tariffs to avoid any nasty surprises like what this parent discovered: And if you're planning to buy any new shoes or clothing for the summer season, be warned: most of these products are manufactured in Asia. Scientists who are lucky enough to still have funding for their research are now facing higher prices on lab equipment: While all of this is going on, many everyday shoppers are still asking, "Are 'import charges' the same thing as tariffs?" The answer is yes, yes they are. Finally, before you say "just buy American," there are many things that people and businesses rely on to survive that we do not (or in some cases, can not) make here. It could take years for manufacturing to gear up, and paying high prices in the meantime is a financial pain that few Americans are equipped to meet. Now it's time for Comment Corner. A few weeks ago, I shared some of the first tariff receipts making the rounds online, and members of the BuzzFeed Community joined the conversation to share where they've noticed the tariffs going into effect. Here's what they had to say: "Jasmine rice is usually imported from Thailand. Costco is already showing how tariffs affect consumers and hardworking citizens like me. In March 2025, a bag of jasmine rice cost $15.99 (25 lbs). April 2025: $17.99 (25 lbs). In the month of May, it already jumped to $25.73 (25 lbs)." —Anonymous, 41, Florida "I'm an assistant store manager at Skechers, and maybe a week ago, we were given updated/higher prices for EVERYTHING in our store — shoes, socks, backpacks, apparel, and even the cleaning supplies we have for your shoes!! I wish I was kidding when I say our three pack of quarter crew socks went from prices between $14.00, $16.00, and $18.00 (which was already, in my opinion, kinda pricey) to $20.00." "The cost of my home repairs is three times the amount previously quoted due to an increase in materials costs. I canceled all repairs unless absolutely needed. I'll just sell my house 'as is' or not at all. Someone quoted me $18k to put up a fence. Not going to happen." —Anonymous, 66, Florida "I own a small wedding company in California. I have noticed that people are opting for the less expensive package we offer, which is just elopements. Flowers for weddings are going sky high. People are just cutting way back and not having the wedding they've always dreamed of." "My contact lenses went from $750 last year to $1,248 this year. They updated the prices the week before my appointment, saying it was due to the tariff charges." —Anonymous, 35, North Dakota "I work for a patio furniture company. Two weeks ago, they started raising all of our prices up 40-70%, which is an incredible amount. We had a chaise lounge chair go from an already high of $1,000 to $1,600 while others doubled. I don't believe all these increases are due to tariffs. A lot of companies see an opportunity to raise prices on a product that wasn't necessarily hit that high simply because they can. We have no way of actually knowing if that product was really part of it." "I was laid off from my job because of tariffs. When they called me in, they said that because they were an 80% import business, they were decreasing their staff by 25% because of the Trump tariffs. I was on track to be promoted next month." —Anonymous, 48, Los Angeles "I have a small business where all of my stock comes from overseas. There simply aren't any US-based producers. My suppliers started raising their prices in January due to 'expected tariffs,' and they're still rising. What cost me $3 a year ago now costs me $6.50. This is unsustainable for businesses and customers." And finally, "My partner and I were in the process of purchasing an apartment here in Spain (he is Spanish, I am American) when the bank rescinded our mortgage offer due to 'economic uncertainty in the global market caused by Trump's changing policies.' Even abroad, we can't escape the effects of all this." —Anonymous, 36, Spain Have you been charged a tariff fee or noticed prices going up on imported goods? Tell us all about it in the comments or via this anonymous form:
