
Catholic League Tells Washington to Adopt Church's Law
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Catholic League President William A. Donohue has written to Washington state Senator Noel Frame, urging the state to "follow Canon law" on assisted dying.
The letter followed Frame's suggestion that the church could "change their rules" to allow priests to disclose any allegations of child abuse heard during confession to the relevant authorities.
Newsweek contacted the Catholic League and the state senator for comment on Thursday via email outside regular office hours.
Why It Matters
Earlier this month, the state of Washington passed a law requiring clergy to report any suspected child abuse they learn of during confession, a requirement they were previously exempt from for religious reasons.
In response, the Archdiocese of Seattle said, "Catholic clergy may not violate the seal of confession—or they will be excommunicated from the Church."
What To Know
On Tuesday, the Catholic League published the letter Donohue sent to Frame under the title "Washington State Should Adopt Canon Law."
In his letter, Donohue cited an interview Frame did with NPR's Dave Miller earlier this month, in which she suggested church law could be amended to match state law.
"I am reminded that Canon law has changed many times over the years in the Catholic faith and there's nothing to say they cannot change their rules to allow the reporting of real time abuse and neglect of children. That is within their power to change and I think they should so," Frame said.
Donohue wrote in response: "Funny thing is I feel the same way about your state legalizing assisted suicide. Except I would recommend that state law follow Canon law. We the Catholic Church have a theological purpose that is to protect the vulnerable from assisted suicide and that is why state legislators should choose to follow Canon law to protect such persons, as we do not want to be complicit in killing them."
The sun rising behind a stone cross atop the historic Cathedral Basilica of St. Francis of Assisi in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
The sun rising behind a stone cross atop the historic Cathedral Basilica of St. Francis of Assisi in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Robert Alexander/GETTY
The Catholic League president added: "I am reminded that state law has changed many times over the years in secular society and there's nothing to say they cannot change their rules to follow Canon law and put an end to assisted suicide. That is within their power to change and I think they should do so."
The Washington Death With Dignity Act became law in 2008, allowing "some terminally ill patients" in the state to ask for "lethal doses of medication" from health care providers.
In April 2023, then-Governor Jay Inslee approved a law that sought to reduce the wait time between when a patient asked for life-ending treatment and when they received it.
Frame also told NPR, "We the state of Washington have a secular legislative purpose that is to protect children from abuse and neglect and if faith communities choose through their rules not to protect children from abuse and neglect, we the state are choosing not to be complicit in that choice by their rules."
Donohue responded in his letter: "You do not cite one instance where any child has ever suffered abuse or neglect, in any state, because a priest chooses not to disclose what he has learned in the confessional. That's largely because molesters tend not to be the kind of persons who like to 'fess up.' In other words, your bill is only tangentially related to this issue."
What People Are Saying
Anthea Butler, the chair of the department of Religious Studies at the University of Pennsylvania, previously told Newsweek: "This is about 'the seal of the confessional.' That is, the rule that when a priest hears a confession, it cannot be shared. If it is shared, it's breaking Canon Law. A priest can be excommunicated for breaking the seal of the confessional.
"The situation, which the Trump administration is looking at, is interesting because there has always been this collision between the law of the local, state and national level and some aspects of canon law. Think about this not only on this level, but in issues of other types of transgressions, like murder. Terrible situation, but for the priest, they are subject to canon law."
The Washington State Catholic Conference, which represents five Catholic bishops, previously told Newsweek: "The Catholic Church in Washington supported adding clergy as mandatory reporters. We have required clergy to report since at least 2002. The church has made several policy changes over the decades to ensure abuse survivors are supported, prevention is emphasized and suspected abuse is reported. We asked for a limited exception for the time a priest is engaged in the Sacrament of Reconciliation, an exception the majority of states with clergy reporting laws have granted.
"The state telling the church to change its centuries of practice in the Sacrament of Reconciliation is exactly the type of government intrusion in religion that the First Amendment protects against. It also ignores the current practices and policies of the church that are successfully helping to prevent abuse and ensure reasonable suspicions of abuse are reported to proper authorities. There are many ways to accomplish the states' goal, which we share, of protecting children, that do not require the state to trample on our rights."
What Happens Next
The Washington law, which is set to go into effect on July 27, has highlighted the national conversation about the boundaries between church and state. The Justice Department has launched a civil rights investigation into whether the legislation violates the First Amendment right to religious freedom.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Before-and-After Satellite Images Reveal Russian 'Pearl Harbor' Devastation
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Newly available satellite imagery reveals the devastating aftermath of Ukraine's long-range drone strike on multiple Russian airbases in what pro-Moscow bloggers are calling "Russia's Pearl Harbor." The operation, codenamed "Operation Spiderweb," saw the deployment of 117 drones that targeted at least four strategic sites deep inside Russian territory. The drones were smuggled across the border, placed in wooden containers with removable roofs fixed on trucks. The Belaya air base in Irkutsk Oblast, more than 2,500 miles from Ukraine's border, bore the brunt of the assault. Ukrainian intelligence reported the destruction of at least 13 aircraft across all targeted sites. Satellite images provided to Newsweek from Maxar Technologies shows rows of strategic bombers reduced to scorched wreckage. A wide-angle before-and-after image of Belaya air base shows intact bomber aircraft in revetments replaced by charred remains and blackened craters. Ukraine's Security Service (SBU) stated that the drone barrage disabled 34 percent of Russia's cruise missile bomber fleet and inflicted an estimated $7 billion in damage. Among the aircraft confirmed destroyed at Belaya were at least three Tu-95MS bombers and one Tu-22M3 aircraft. Others were damaged but not obliterated, according to Ukrainian officials. A close-up image shows a cluster of Tu-95MS bombers with visible fire damage and blast debris surrounding their parking spots. Satellite images that captured the damage at multiple airfields show previously pristine runways now marked by burn scars and aircraft fragments. A detailed damage shot captures melted fuselage sections, crumpled wings, and residual fire damage across the concrete apron. Blast Zone and Aircraft Wreckage in the Belaya Air Base. Blast Zone and Aircraft Wreckage in the Belaya Air Base. MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES Russia's Ministry of Defense admitted that aircraft caught fire at multiple sites but framed the strikes as "terrorist attacks" by the Kyiv regime. In a statement to Tass, the ministry said some drones were intercepted and added that several perpetrators had been detained. It denied any casualties among servicemen or civilians. Other airbases targeted included Olenya in Murmansk Oblast and Diaghilev in Ryazan Oblast. The Kyiv Independent cited Ukrainian sources who said the drones were smuggled into Russia in trucks outfitted with wooden cabins and deployed from beneath removable roofs. Wreckage of two Russian bombers at the Olenya base. Wreckage of two Russian bombers at the Olenya base. MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES Analysts at the Institute for the Study of War noted that the operation "will likely force Moscow to reconfigure its air defenses," possibly expanding coverage and introducing mobile air defense groups to counter future drone threats. Open-source analysis has suggested one A-50 spy plane was damaged or destroyed at Ivanovo air base, as well as four Tu-95 aircraft and three Tu-22M3 bombers at the Belaya air base, the U.S.-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) think tank said on Monday. Satellite imagery showing two Russian A-50 airborne early warning and control aircraft with tires and debris on the wings at the Ivanovo air base, Russia, on May 3, 2025. Satellite imagery showing two Russian A-50 airborne early warning and control aircraft with tires and debris on the wings at the Ivanovo air base, Russia, on May 3, 2025. Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies The drone strikes came on the eve of fresh rounds of face-to-face talks between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Turkey. Initial discussions last month produced the largest prisoner swap of the war but little shuffling toward a peace deal that U.S. President Donald Trump vowed to broker.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
North Korea Celebrates Triplets Amid Birth Rate Crisis
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. North Korean state media has released a special report hailing the birth of three triplets —a rare moment of positivity amid what analysts believe to be a steady demographic decline in the reclusive country. Newsweek reached out to the North Korean embassy in China via email with a request for comment. Why It Matters The North Korean authorities don't regularly publish population figures. United Nations estimates based on records released in past decades put the country's fertility rate at 1.78 births per woman last year—below the 2.1 threshold needed to sustain a population. This is higher than fertility rates of South Korea, Japan, and China, which are already scrambling to adapt to their aging populations. However, international sanctions over the Kim Jong Un regime's nuclear weapons program have deprived the country of 26 million of many types of advanced automated machinery and left it more reliant on manual labor than its East Asian neighbors. What To Know The three boys were born in February to Kim Hyang Mi, a resident of Tokchon City, whose husband, Kim Nam Il, works at a local coal mine, according to the state-run Korean Central News Agency. After learning she was pregnant with triplets, Kim was transferred to Pyongyang Maternity Hospital, where she reportedly received the best care available. Children play picking toys game as the 75th Joint Friendship Meeting is held at the Taesongsan Pleasure Park to mark the International Children's Day in Pyongyang, North Korea, Sunday, June 1, 2025. Children play picking toys game as the 75th Joint Friendship Meeting is held at the Taesongsan Pleasure Park to mark the International Children's Day in Pyongyang, North Korea, Sunday, June 1, 2025. Jon Chol Jin/Associated Press The weight of one of the newborns was only 1.18 kg (4 pounds)—a cause for concern. All three now weigh over 4 kg (8.8 pounds) and are considered healthy, according to the report. They were discharged from the hospital on Monday. The extent of medical attention given to Kim and the triplets signals the seriousness with which the authorities are taking the declining birthrate. The announcement follows a September report by Radio Free Asia that authorities had punished doctors for performing secret abortions and cracked down on marketplace vendors selling contraceptives. While the government has in recent years made some efforts to improve the health of its youngest citizens—such as mandating free dairy products—human rights groups citing local sources have detailed harsh punishments meted out to children, including lengthy prison camp terms for offenses committed by family members. On Saturday, the regime published images of a celebratory event marking International Children's Day, which critics saw as an attempt to whitewash its image amid international condemnation over its human rights record. What People Are Saying Young-Jin Choi, a professor at South Korea's Yonsei University, wrote in a March report for North Korea-focused outlet 38 North: "North Korea is expected to enter into an aging society, with more than 14 percent of its population being 65 or older by 2025. "If these trends continue, North Korea will likely face a vicious cycle in which the low birth rate and an aging population will cause a further decline in economic vitality, which in turn will further aggravate the low birth rate and aging population problems." What's Next This trend is also likely to worry Kim as his military, the fourth-largest in the world, with roughly 30 percent of the population serving in active or reserve roles, amid ongoing tensions with the U.S.-allied South.


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Harvard Students 'Incredibly Afraid' Over Future Career After Trump's Move
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. There has been a chill in the air at Harvard University since President Donald Trump began his unprecedented attack on the college. Harvard University is going toe-to-toe against the administration in a high-stakes legal clash and many students have been left in a state of uncertainty as their futures are clouded by the White House's actions. "I am incredibly afraid," Alfred Williamson, a Harvard student from Wales, currently studying in Denmark, told Newsweek. "The day of my acceptance was the happiest day of my life. Now that opportunity is being stripped away from us." In addition to pulling nearly $3 billion in federal grants, the administration has accused Harvard of antisemitism stemming from pro-Palestine protests and collusion with the Chinese Communist Party. Chinese nationals account for about 20 percent of Harvard's international student body. Harvard University graduates attend the university's 374th commencement ceremony on May 29, 2025, in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Harvard University graduates attend the university's 374th commencement ceremony on May 29, 2025, in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Photo by Zhu Ziyu/VCG via AP Trump has demanded sweeping reforms such as ending its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, reforming student discipline policies, and implementing a mask ban. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that Harvard should be held accountable for "fostering violence, antisemitism and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party" on its campus. The Trump administration said it would pull the certification for Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program, which allows the university to enroll international students. A judge issued a temporary restraining order to halt the new policy, but uncertainty looms large. "Harvard University has turned its campus into a hotbed of antisemitic, pro-terrorist agitators that pose a threat to the safety of all students," Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, told Newsweek. "It has repeatedly failed to take action to address the violence and radicalism on campus, refused to share relevant information about foreign students' illegal or dangerous activities with DHS, and entangled itself with foreign adversaries. International students who are here for the right reasons should be furious with Harvard." The billion-dollar dispute between the university and the White House has sent shockwaves across campus and beyond, igniting widespread fear and frustration among students. "It feels incredibly dehumanizing. We have been caught in the crossfire between two entities that are far more powerful than ourselves, and it feels like we are being used like pawns in a game we cannot control. The White House is making decisions about our futures that we fought so hard for," Williamson said. "People are scared because they do not know what will happen; they may never get to set foot on Harvard's campus again, which is a terrifying prospect when you've fought your whole life for that opportunity." Graduation students, faculty, and family gather in Harvard Yard on May 28, 2025, in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Graduation students, faculty, and family gather in Harvard Yard on May 28, 2025, in Cambridge, said he is clinging on to hope that Harvard will win this fight, adding that many international students worked tirelessly for their place at the institution. He has discussed potential transfer options with friends at Oxford and Cambridge Universities in the U.K. as a last resort. He described his time at Harvard as the best year of his life and said he is determined not to give up on that opportunity without exhausting every option. 'Lifeblood of the Campus' Harvard College student body president Caleb Thompson, a U.S. citizen from Colorado, describes the atmosphere on campus as one of rare unity. "Rarely do 95-plus percent of Harvard students agree on something," he said. Williamson said that individuals across the political spectrum share concerns about the issues. He added that people have overcome their differences to unite in defense of academic freedom and the rights of international students. He says there is a common consensus that the unjustified targeting of international students is harmful. Thompson, who shares accommodation with eight international students, emphasized how central they are to Harvard's culture: "Harvard would not be Harvard without its international students. They are the lifeblood of our campus." "I'm really proud of the way that Harvard has stood up against this move by Trump," he added. "When the government is allowed to go into private institutions and dictate the way that they are run and dictate who gets to say what, when that is not democracy, that is not freedom of thought." Jack Masliah, a fourth-year international student from Mexico studying at Northeastern University, says Trump's actions go far beyond Harvard. "This was not an attack against Harvard's international student community; it was an attack against all university students—international and American." He warns the move jeopardizes U.S. innovation and global prestige. "It shows that this administration does not really understand—or doesn't really care about—the impact these universities have on the American economy, on the country's global prestige, and on the advancement of this country's technological dominance. He told Newsweek that students have been canceling travel plans, limiting what they post on social media, and withdrawing opinion pieces from campus publications over fears of reprisal. Harvard Community Pushing Back Behind the fear lies a growing resistance. Students are pushing back to defend the integrity and inclusivity of higher education. "The attempt to revoke Harvard's ability to bring in international students has felt like a real turning point; it was the moment where international students—as well as our American peers—realized the extreme measures this administration is willing to take to get what they want," Masliah said. The administration's actions, including the revocation of thousands of student visas, have drawn concern over infringements on free speech, while proponents view the move as a long overdue federal response to concerns over antisemitism. "You also cannot claim to be a proponent of free speech, the freedom of expression, and the freedom of assembly and want to shut down Harvard when it stands up to you," Thompson said. "Cracking down on anyone who opposes you and doing so in a vindictive manner is what an authoritarian does, and that's not acceptable, and that's not how things work in a democratic society," he added. For now, life on campus remains tense for students, the legal battle remains unresolved, and thousands of international students are left in limbo. But one thing is for certain: the Harvard community isn't backing down from this fight.