
Britain's ghost children
Photo by Sandy Johanson/Millennium Images
In the headteacher's office of a school in a deprived area of Barrow, Cumbria, Mrs Walker recounted the morning she'd climbed through the window of a vulnerable pupil's house. Inside, she found their parent, who had addiction issues, passed out. The head got them both up, out of the house and through the school gates, the kid headed to their classroom, the parent to her office to sober up. That day, they got to record that pupil as attending school.
It was summer 2022 when I sat and listened, agog at Mrs Walker's relentless commitment and chutzpah. We were two years on from the UK's first Covid-19 lockdown, and just one since Robert Halfon MP sounded the alarm on the country's other invisible epidemic: our 'ghost children'. The 93,000 pupils 'severely absent' from classrooms – missing at least half of school – after they re-opened.
Mrs Walker's school was a detail of that data made real: our poorest kids were, and are, significantly more likely to be absent. Its high free-school-meal eligibility (at 60 per cent, three times the then national average of 20 per cent) was matched only by its history of high absence. And yet, the head had taken the school's attendance rate from 91 per cent to 97 per cent. Her story spoke to what teachers could achieve – but also to the extreme, above-and-beyond measures some were forced to take.
Today, four years on from the alarm that few heard (or cared to hear), 173,00 students are missing at least 50 per cent of their schooling, with a further 1.6 million out at least 10 per cent of the time. Those receiving free school meals are nearly four times more likely to be absent – a statistic widely accepted as an underestimate given 900,000 kids living in poverty aren't poor enough to receive free school meals.
While few stories I've heard while speaking to teachers and visiting schools – both for the podcast series Terri White: Finding Britain's Ghost Children and my outreach work in deprived areas since – have been quite as wild as Mrs Walker's, they all offer the same reality check. There's the school that sends a minibus through the community to pick up every vulnerable child; the free breakfasts not just for pupils but for their parents; the sleeping bags for kids who've never had a duvet; hours spent helping parents struggling with job applications or the benefits system.
In total 1.8 million kids – one in four of all UK children, one in two at GCSE level – are caught up in our absence crisis. A large proportion of them live in deprived areas. (Or, to look at it another way, there are more than three times as many students absent in state schools as there are total kids in private education.) Food banks in schools now outnumber those in the community.
A recent survey of teachers revealed that 87 per cent have seen poverty-driven exhaustion in their pupils. Record numbers of our poorest kids are missing school, and when they do go in they're starving, drained in mind and body.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
And it's clear what comes next, when education is lost. Not only are pupils from low-income families almost six times more likely to be permanently excluded, but 90 per cent of those who are excluded don't pass GCSE English or maths. Three quarters of young people in prison have been suspended at least once.
But I know that it doesn't have to be that way. I grew up in poverty, and I looked to school to keep me fed – one school holiday, reports were made to social services after I was seen eating out of a bin behind the fish and chip shop – and to offer me opportunity. Not, as I viewed it at the time, the opportunity to escape my community, but the opportunity to escape a specific material reality that brutalised and dehumanised me.
And school delivered. I passed my GCSEs then, the first person in my family to study post-16, took A-levels and went to university. I moved to London, and later New York, where I worked as a journalist. Education didn't gift me a whole new life, it gave me the right to decide what my life would be. To break the cycle so that my own son wouldn't be ankle-deep in fish bits.
Where is that same right for the 4.5 million children living in poverty today? When school is increasingly looked to for the very basics of living, for survival; when they're not just feeding kids during school hours but, as teachers have reported, providing cookers, microwaves and beds.
This is a crisis that can only accelerate, with child poverty expected to reach 4.8 million by the end of Labour's first term. A crisis I fear will lead to opportunity being eradicated entirely for those in our most deprived areas. Because child poverty isn't just about kids in classrooms with bellies empty of food but full of pain. It's about the loss of learning, of qualifications, of a career, of earning potential. It's the loss of a life that every child should be entitled to have a crack at grafting for. It's a life stolen from our kids every single day while child poverty spreads unchecked, wrapping itself around every shoot of ambition, of self-belief, of hope, of desire.
There's only one teacher whose words have stuck with me longer than those of Mrs Walker: my own primary school teacher, Mrs Webley. 'You seemed to know that the only way out of poverty for a woman was education,' she once told me. And I did. But today, the doors and windows have been locked. The message to our poorest kids is that there's no possibility of escape. That they're worth less, if anything at all. And that is a scandal that should shame us all.
Terri White is a journalist and author. Her book 'Coming Undone' is published by Canongate
[See also: Can you ever forgive Nick Clegg?]
Related
This article appears in the 21 May 2025 issue of the New Statesman, Britain's Child Poverty Epidemic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
12 hours ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Kennedy's new vaccine adviser was expert witness against Merck vaccine
June 12 (Reuters) - One of the new vaccine advisers picked by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has earned thousands of dollars as an expert witness in litigation against Merck's (MRK.N), opens new tab Gardasil vaccine, court records show. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who publicly criticized COVID-era lockdowns, is one of eight new members named by Kennedy on Wednesday to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a highly influential panel that recommends which shots should be administered to the American public. Kennedy fired the entire previous 17-member committee of expert vaccine advisers this week, claiming they were "plagued with persistent conflicts of interest" from financial ties to drugmakers. Kulldorff recently served as an expert witness for plaintiffs who accused Merck of concealing the risks of Gardasil, which is intended to prevent cancers caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). In March, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled in favor of Merck in one of those cases that included about 200 lawsuits. At a deposition in October, Kulldorff testified that the plaintiffs paid him $400 an hour and he had already billed for about $33,000 in legal work on the case through late September. He said he also received a $4,000 retainer in the North Carolina case, according to court documents. Kulldorff is also listed as an expert witness in a similar case pending against Merck in Los Angeles state court, records show. Under ACIP's rules, committee members cannot serve as a "paid litigation consultant or expert witness in litigation involving a vaccine manufacturer' during their tenure on the panel. Prior work as an expert witness against drugmakers may require a waiver from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and recusal from votes involving Merck and HPV vaccines. The agency has said in its rules it "will generally consider issuance of waivers in specific situations." Kulldorff did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Merck declined to comment. A spokesman for Kennedy's Health and Human Services Department said on Wednesday that "all newly appointed ACIP members were thoroughly vetted." HHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Kulldorff.


Daily Mirror
16 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
UK abortion laws set for huge overhaul as MPs vote on decriminalisation
According to proposed changes to UK abortion laws, MPs are set to vote on decriminalising terminations after 24 weeks or without approval from doctors in England and Wales Women will no longer face prosecution for terminating a pregnancy in England and Wales under a proposed law that is set to be passed following an MP vote. In the biggest overhaul of abortion law, terminations would be decriminalised and women would no longer be prosecuted for ending a pregnancy after 24 weeks or without approval from doctors. The proposed changes come after an e-petition created by Labour MP Stella Creasy calling for the decriminalisation of abortion was launched in December 2024, and has since received over 103,000 signatures. The petition stated: 'I am calling on the UK government to remove abortion from criminal law so that no pregnant person can be criminalised for procuring their own abortion.' The petition also pointed out that the UK is out of step with advice released by the World Health Organisation in 2022, which advises that medically unnecessary barriers to safe abortion, such as criminalisation, should be removed. It was brought forward for a parliamentary debate on June 2. The changes are said to be widely backed and now, MPs have been offered a free vote on a change to the law. Their free vote means they will not be told how to vote by their party. What are the current guidelines for abortion in England and Wales At present, all abortions after 24 weeks are illegal, with exception of limited circumstances. This includes the mother's life being at risk or if the child were to be born with a severe disability. The Abortion Act was introduced to Great Britain in 1967, and allowed women to legally terminate a pregnancy up to 28 weeks with the certification of two doctors. In 1990, the limit was changed to 24 weeks. This means that a woman who undergoes an abortion without the permission of two doctors – for example, by buying abortion pills online – can be charged with a criminal offence. READ MORE: Inside the Victorian era law of 1861 that governs abortion rights in the UK The Act states that abortions must be carried out either in a hospital or licensed clinic. However, this was changed during the Covid pandemic in 2020, when at-home abortion pills were made available by post for people seeking to terminate their pregnancy in the first 10 weeks. What are the proposed changes to abortion law in England and Wales? Labour MP Tonia Antonizzi is calling for an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill in her attempts to decriminalise abortion at any stage by a woman acting in relation to her own pregnancy. Consequently ending the threat of investigation or imprisonment. Access to abortion would remain the same, as would time limits in healthcare settings, and patients would still need sign off by two doctors. "The police cannot be trusted with abortion law – nor can the CPS or the wider criminal justice system," Antoniazzi told the BBC. "My amendment to the crime and policing bill will give us the urgent change we need to protect women." Katherine O'Brien, a spokesperson for BPAS, previously told The Mirror: 'In recent years, more than 100 women are believed to have been investigated by the police.' Help us improve our content by completing the survey below. We'd love to hear from you! She continued: 'These include women who have experienced a late miscarriage or a stillbirth, and women who were pressured to take abortion medication by abusive partners. Women have been arrested straight from hospital wards, their homes searched, their children taken away, all under our cruel and archaic abortion law.' However, Labour MP Stella Creasy told the Mirror that "decriminalisation isn't enough" and is putting forward a second amendment to make a woman's access to an abortion a human right. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle will decide whether to select one or both amendments for a vote, expect on June 17 and 18. According to the BBC, Rachael Clarke, head of advocacy at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) told Radio 4's Today programme: "For us, unfortunately, although we truly believe that we need overwhelming and generational change for abortion law, Stella Creasy's amendment is not the right way to do it."


Business News Wales
21 hours ago
- Business News Wales
Denbighshire's Prosperous Business Fund Opens for Second Phase Applications
Businesses in Denbighshire are being invited to bid for a share of a £1 million fund. This is the second round of the Prosperous Denbighshire Business Fund being distributed by regeneration agency Cadwyn Clwyd. It follows an initial fund worth £1.3 million that benefited almost 100 companies across the county. Now an extra £1 million is up for grabs in grants of up to £35,000, with the closing date for applications on Thursday, July 31. Smaller grants of up to £2,000 are also available and Cadwyn Clwyd are expecting a similarly high level of interest this time round. Funding from the first tranche of cash helped save a 150-year-old village chemist shop in Dyserth which has seen its business boom thanks to a computerised appointment booking system. Pharmacist Ravi Kiran Palutla developed an on-line appointment booking system for Dyserth Pharmacy which allows customers to book in-person consultations so Ravi can then prescribe medicines and treatments or, where appropriate, refer patients to a doctor's surgery. The computerised appointment system has driven customer numbers up by 44 per cent and seen appointments soar from 20 a month to 300. The system was paid for by a £1,897 grant from the Prosperous Denbighshire Business Fund. Ravi added: 'A grant of just £1,897 enabled me to update the website to make it more functional and install a computerised booking system and the difference it has made has been amazing. 'The population of the Dyserth area is about 2,000 and for me to have a viable business I need a patient base of 4,000 plus and the computerised system has allowed me to build that. 'Because the appointments are made online we don't have the pressure of taking phone calls and making bookings so we have been able to develop new services. 'These range from treating migraines, chest and urinary infections, providing morning after contraceptive pills and giving Covid vaccines which have brought us patients from as far afield as Dolgellau and Criccieth. 'We are already doing virtual travel consultation securely via the internet. This reduces the need for the patient to travel twice to the pharmacy, once for consultation, second for vaccine administration. We will be developing a private phlebotomy business soon. 'I know health authorities in Wales are looking at what we have done and at the possibility of rolling it out across the country and it is the Prosperous Denbighshire Fund that has made all this a reality for us. 'We will be doing it at a smaller scale in Denbighshire pharmacies first which will then give us the opportunity to learn from the implementation. The learnings will be useful for the national project yet to come in the next 18 months. Cadwyn Clwyd Business Partnership Officer Donna Hughes said: 'It is remarkable the difference it has made to Ravi's business and to access to healthcare in North Denbighshire. 'He was in the first phase of the Prosperous Denbighshire rollout which can pay up to 70 per cent of the value of a project to a maximum of £35,000 of a £50,000 scheme. 'The success of what Ravi has done just shows that this kind of funding can do wonders for a business. 'It opens up tremendous possibilities and that's why we're delighted to be able to offer a further £1 million in grants which also include smaller schemes of between £1,000 and £2,000. 'The first phase proved hugely popular which was shown by the number of grants we were able to make and it also shows the need and the effectiveness of this kind of support for local people to build businesses with all the benefits that has for them and the communities in which they live.' The money comes from the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, administered by the UK Government.