Ngāti Oneone calls for unused land return in Gisborne protest
Ngāti Oneone people and supporters stand as one outside Te Pa Eketu Shed on Hirini St as the hapū starts an occupation which hapū chair Charlotte Gibson says will continue for "as long as it takes"
Photo:
LDR / Zita Campbell
Protesters carrying placards reading "We are the whenua" and "Public works, Private grief" marched through Gisborne on Monday, calling for the return of land taken from Ngāti Oneone nearly a century ago.
The hīkoi began at the Gisborne District Council administration building and visited Trust Tairāwhiti and Eastland Port before ending at the group's occupation site, Te Pa Eketū Shed, on Hirini Street.
There, a pou was erected and a fire lit - actions the group say will continue until their concerns are addressed.
"We will keep that fire burning until all of this is resolved," Ngāti Oneone chairwoman Charlotte Gibson told the crowd. "It's going to be a long haul, but we're up for it."
She told Local Democracy Reporting the group intended to remain at the site "as long as it takes".
This year marks 95 years since the hapū was displaced from its ancestral land under the Public Works Act. Te Poho-o-Rāwiri Marae, originally established on Hirini Street in 1852, was removed to make way for the development of the Gisborne Harbour.
Gibson said a tipping point came when the hapū realised the Eastland Port shed on Hirini Street was no longer being used for port-related operations.
"It sort of broke the back...we lost that whenua for you to store boats," she said.
Gibson said that returning the land was not about legalities, rather fairness, partnership and honouring Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
"We want all the lands back that you are not using for your core business," she said.
"If you look at the whole of Hirini Street, which was our marae, they've all been sold on."
A Ngāti Oneone hikoi makes its way up the main road of Gisborne en route to Te Pa Eketu Shed on Hirini St where an occupation is taking place as the hapū calls for the return of lands.
Photo:
LDR / Zita Campbell
Gibson said if further port developments were to proceed and the land was sold again, the hapū could lose any chance of reclaiming it.
"We would lose the opportunity in my lifetime."
Previous attempts to get the land back were made by her grandfather and father, Gibson said. The aim now was to avoid passing the burden on to future generations.
"We don't want it to fall on the next generation."
They want the land returned without it being the problem of the hapū to work out how that return happened.
"It always falls on us to 'make the case'," she said.
Ngāti Oneone is calling on the council, Trust Tairāwhiti and Eastland Port to return land not essential to their core operations.
Trust Tairāwhiti is the region's economic development and tourism agency and the sole shareholder of Eastland Port.
In separate statements, the council and Trust Tairāwhiti acknowledged the historical grievance and the right to a peaceful protest.
The council said it began exploring how land could potentially be returned following formal requests from Ngāti Oneone in 2024.
"This includes looking into the relevant legal processes, policy settings and the interests of other Treaty partners," council chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann said.
"The council recognises its part in past decisions that contributed to the loss of land and the lasting impacts of those actions."
Trust Tairāwhiti chair David Battin said the trust valued its relationship with Ngāti Oneone and had sought independent legal and cultural advice to understand the complexities of the request.
"Ultimately, we advised that the trust could not approve those requests and that the Crown is best placed to address their historical grievance," he said.
Battin said that because the trust was not a Crown entity, it did not have the authority or mechanisms to address historic Treaty breaches.
"Our commitment to Te Tiriti is about working in partnership with mana whenua to support hapū and marae development now and into the future.
"We are focused on solutions and remain open to constructive engagement with Ngāti Oneone."
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
27-05-2025
- Newsroom
Climate solution all but buried before it begins
It is sold as a bold step into the future, a technological fix to one of the world's dirtiest problems. But is New Zealand's climate solution, its first carbon-capture and storage project, over before it begins? 'Having read the submissions from the various companies on the Government's regulatory plans, it just doesn't seem like it's going to happen in the next four-and-a-half years before 2030,' RNZ's climate correspondent Eloise Gibson tells The Detail. 'Maybe after that, but I can't see it happening at a scale that's going to take the pressure off, in terms of having to cut our emissions. It's going to be one of the things in the Swiss army knife, I hope, but we are not going to be putting it out in the next couple of years.' The project, led by Todd Energy and backed by the Government, aims to capture carbon dioxide from industrial processes and inject it deep underground in Taranaki, at the Kapuni gas field, locking it away for centuries. The start date has been pencilled in for around 2027, and from then until 2030 it is expected to store a million tonnes of CO₂, with a further almost million tonnes stored over the following five years. It's a big part of the Government's broader plan to meet its legal obligations to cut emissions by 2030 – about a third of the carbon savings needed. But Gibson tells The Detail the project's future is now uncertain unless Todd Energy gets 'more money or less liability or a combination [of both]'. 'There is a whole raft of things that have changed, one is the carbon price is low compared to other countries … then there is the issue of the liability regime, so if there is a leak 15 years after you have filled up a field and closed it off, who is responsible for that … so there is wrangling going on around the rules.' Globally, carbon capture and storage has a mixed track record. Some projects, like Norway's Sleipner, have stored CO₂ safely for decades. Others have failed spectacularly, costing billions and storing less than promised. New Zealand's unique geology – riddled with seismic faults – adds a layer of risk. And if CO₂ does leak, it could undo years of emissions gains and pose unknown threats to groundwater and ecosystems. Then there is the fear that the method becomes a get-out-of-jail-free card for polluters. But putting that aside, if the project does not go ahead in New Zealand, what replaces it so the Government can meet its emissions targets? 'I approached the climate minister, and he did stress that the Government takes an 'adaptive approach' with their emissions budget, which I guess means they can pivot if something doesn't pan out,' Gibson says. 'But given they have cut a bunch of Labour-era policies that could have given them about a million tonnes of savings – which is what they need if this falls over – they are not likely to start these up again and there's absolutely nothing on the table that I have seen that would fill that gap, that this Government would support, so it does give them a problem.' Ultimately, Gibson says she wants the Government to use 'everything in the toolbox'. 'I don't think this is a time to be ruling out solutions. But it's also not a time to be distracted by expensive solutions, when we have other stuff that we know works, right there.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Scoop
23-05-2025
- Scoop
Large Majority Of Gisborne Residents Want Local Control Of Water Services
Article – Zita Campbell – Local Democracy Reporter The favoured model could result in households facing an average rate increase of $100 per year. An overwhelming 90 percent of Gisborne submitters are in favour of keeping the region's water services in council hands, with ring-fenced funding and targeted rates. The favoured model could result in households connected to water services facing an average rate increase of $100 per year, while unconnected properties may have an equivalent decrease, according to council estimates. During a meeting on Wednesday, Gisborne District councillors voted to approve the modified in-house delivery model for its future water services delivery plan. Councils must submit their water plans to the Government by September 2025 under the Local Water Done Well reforms. Previous Mayor Meng Foon was among those who submitted, writing in his submission, 'water is a public good' and it should stay in public hands to prevent exploitation. 'CCO and private businesses are there for profit, as they are responsible for making a profit,' Foon said. Consultation ran from 1 April to 1 May this year, with 204 submissions received. Just one in 10 submitters supported establishing a council-controlled organisation (CCO), governed independently of the council, with water services funded through user charges and external financing. Under the CCO model, stormwater charges would remain with the council because of its connection with other services like roads and parks. This option would involve higher set-up costs and debt in the short term, but would have more borrowing capacity for upgrades. At the hearings, Foon spoke on his submission, supporting the council's recommended option to retain water services under council control. 'Your mana in ensuring that you control and have direction of our waters is utmost. 'Even though it's a CCO, your private organisation cannot borrow money as cheaply as the council.' However, Maraetaha Incorporated, a Māori land entity of Ngāi Tāmanuhiri shareholders, wanted the CCO option to enable an independent governance structure that could accommodate 'formal Māori representation and co-governance'. Trustee Beth Tupara-Katene said the Maraetaha lands were taken under the Public Works Act to develop the region's water infrastructure, including three supply dams. 'These sites now form a critical part of the city's municipal water supply, yet our shareholders and whānau have long been excluded from the decision-making, governance and benefit streams associated with that infrastructure,' Tupara-Katene told the hearings. She said the Waitangi Tribunal and Supreme Court have affirmed that Māori hold customary rights to water, which are protected under Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Local Water Done Well intends to make services more efficient, locally accountable and future-proofed. 'From our perspective, this can only be achieved if the model is built on the right foundations, recognising Treaty obligations, Māori property rights and our deep and enduring connection to our water,' Tupara-Katene said. Submitters opting to maintain council control emphasised the value of local control (60 mentions), trust in council governance (44) and concern over affordability (62), according to the council's meeting report. '[The CCO option] was commonly associated with increased bureaucracy, reduced community voice, and a risk of future privatisation.' 'Our preferred option avoids the high setup and transition costs associated with CCO, resulting in the lowest short-term impact on rates,' the document reads. The council could also choose to shift approaches later on if they choose to, by exploring shared service arrangements with other councils or a transition to a CCO. Tupara-Katene said if the in-house model is selected, iwi must be formal partners in decision-making alongside the council. 'One of the highest levels of participation in co-governance is the wastewater committee … and that has come through a consent condition,' she said as an example. There needs to be a formal decision-making group that can make those decisions alongside the council, she said. During deliberations, councillor Aubrey Ria said if an independent committee was set up to include mana whenua, it should reflect the Mangapoike dam, the Maraetaha community, Ngāi Tāmanuhiri Iwi and Waipaoa mana whenua, as water is drawn from the Waipaoa river. She also noted it could be like the Tairāwhiti Resource Management Plan committee, which had two technical specialists who gave 'really sound technical advice'. 'A make-up of another community board within the council to help guide, shape and mould the governance in that space, I think, would be really beneficial,' Ria said. The council signalled all water service costs will transition to a fully ring-fenced funding structure, from July 1, 2027, as required under the Local Water Done Well legislation. Borrowing under the in-house model still provides 'stable financial headroom' within the council's Local Government Funding Agency cap of 280 percent of operating revenue, according to the report. Under the ring-fenced housing structure, 'households connected to water services are expected to see an average rate increase of $100 per year, while unconnected properties may see an equivalent decrease.' The council will need to decide on introducing water metering, which had a 'mixed' reception during submissions, according to the council report. If approved, the new water service model will take effect on 1 July, 2027.
Scoop
06-05-2025
- Scoop
Ngāti Oneone calls for unused land return in Gisborne protest
Article – Zita Campbell – Local Democracy Reporter Protesters marched through Gisborne, calling for the return of land taken from Ngti Oneone nearly a century ago. Protesters in Gisborne demand the return of land taken from Ngāti Oneone nearly a century ago Ngāti Oneone chairwoman Charlotte Gibson emphasised the need for fairness and honouring Te Tiriti o Waitangi The council and Trust Tairāwhiti acknowledge the grievance Protesters carrying placards reading 'We are the whenua' and 'Public works, Private grief' marched through Gisborne on Monday, calling for the return of land taken from Ngāti Oneone nearly a century ago. The hīkoi began at the Gisborne District Council administration building and visited Trust Tairāwhiti and Eastland Port before ending at the group's occupation site, Te Pa Eketū Shed, on Hirini Street. There, a pou was erected and a fire lit – actions the group say will continue until their concerns are addressed. 'We will keep that fire burning until all of this is resolved,' Ngāti Oneone chairwoman Charlotte Gibson told the crowd. 'It's going to be a long haul, but we're up for it.' She told Local Democracy Reporting the group intended to remain at the site 'as long as it takes'. This year marks 95 years since the hapū was displaced from its ancestral land under the Public Works Act. Te Poho-o-Rāwiri Marae, originally established on Hirini Street in 1852, was removed to make way for the development of the Gisborne Harbour. Gibson said a tipping point came when the hapū realised the Eastland Port shed on Hirini Street was no longer being used for port-related operations. 'It sort of broke the back…we lost that whenua for you to store boats,' she said. Gibson said that returning the land was not about legalities, rather fairness, partnership and honouring Te Tiriti o Waitangi. 'We want all the lands back that you are not using for your core business,' she said. 'If you look at the whole of Hirini Street, which was our marae, they've all been sold on.' Gibson said if further port developments were to proceed and the land was sold again, the hapū could lose any chance of reclaiming it. 'We would lose the opportunity in my lifetime.' Previous attempts to get the land back were made by her grandfather and father, Gibson said. The aim now was to avoid passing the burden on to future generations. 'We don't want it to fall on the next generation.' They want the land returned without it being the problem of the hapū to work out how that return happened. 'It always falls on us to 'make the case',' she said. Ngāti Oneone is calling on the council, Trust Tairāwhiti and Eastland Port to return land not essential to their core operations. Trust Tairāwhiti is the region's economic development and tourism agency and the sole shareholder of Eastland Port. In separate statements, the council and Trust Tairāwhiti acknowledged the historical grievance and the right to a peaceful protest. The council said it began exploring how land could potentially be returned following formal requests from Ngāti Oneone in 2024. 'This includes looking into the relevant legal processes, policy settings and the interests of other Treaty partners,' council chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann said. 'The council recognises its part in past decisions that contributed to the loss of land and the lasting impacts of those actions.' Trust Tairāwhiti chair David Battin said the trust valued its relationship with Ngāti Oneone and had sought independent legal and cultural advice to understand the complexities of the request. 'Ultimately, we advised that the trust could not approve those requests and that the Crown is best placed to address their historical grievance,' he said. Battin said that because the trust was not a Crown entity, it did not have the authority or mechanisms to address historic Treaty breaches. 'Our commitment to Te Tiriti is about working in partnership with mana whenua to support hapū and marae development now and into the future. 'We are focused on solutions and remain open to constructive engagement with Ngāti Oneone.'
