La Grange area candidates invited to make election pitches online
The La Grange Area League of Women Voters has been around for over a century, but its next round of candidate forums will be anchored in the internet age as it takes the informative sessions online.
Residents will be able to submit questions to candidates for the La Grange Park Village Board, La Grange School District 102 Board of Education and the Lyons Township High School District 204 Board of Education.
League member Ann Lee said they've 'transitioned to Zoom Candidate Forums since COVID,' and have stayed with the format because of several advantages, including not needing a venue, and making it easier for candidates to participate .
Trained moderators will be chosen for the events, and the online format will help them manage the time allotted to each candidate while avoiding audience disruptions.
The League is hosting forums only in contested races and has scheduled forums for La Grange School District 102 (Feb. 4), La Grange Park Village Board (Feb. 5), and Lyons Township High School District 204 (Feb. 11). Each will be an hour long and will begin with candidates' opening statements that will include their backgrounds, qualifications and reasons for running for office.
Residents can submit questions at LaGrangeLWV@gmail.com for LWV moderators to ask candidates but the League won't guarantee using them, citing time restraints. For other information on how to participate is on the League's web site, lagrangearealwv.org. The forums will be recorded and posted the following day on the League's website.
In La Grange Park four candidates are running for three trustee seats: incumbents Jamie Zaura, Karen Koncel and Jermaine Stewart, and newcomer Nick Diaferio. Village President James Discipio and Clerk Meghan Kooi are running for reelection unopposed.
Four seats are open for the Lyons Township High School District 204 Board. Incumbent Gioia Giannotti Frye is facing challengers Elias Lopez, Christine Kozelka Campbell, and Shawn Kennedy. Frye was appointed last year to fill the seat of a board member who was moving away. Board President Jill Grech and board members Arlene Farolan Cabana and Michael Thomas are not running for reelection. A new board president will be chosen among board members after the election.
With none of the incumbents running for the three open seats on the La Grange School District 102 Board, the district will seat three new members. The candidates are Joanna Lago, Brian M. Grogan, Jr., Jordan Beach, Shannon Rischow and Erik K. Toman.
Although no forum is planned for La Grange village elections, there are four candidates running for three open seats, including incumbents Lou Gale, Peggy Peterson, and Glenn Thompson. A fourth candidate, newcomer Carla Carter, an attorney specializing in intellectual property and a La Grange resident since 2018, is also vying for one of the three trustee positions. La Grange Village President Mark Kuchler and Clerk Paul Saladino are running for reelection unopposed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Matildas teammate makes stunning statement after 'really sad' news about Sam Kerr
Matildas star Amy Sayer has led the way for the Matildas having returned after 11 months out from an ACL injury to score a brace against Argentina, following news Sam Kerr has re-injured herself. Sayer had not played for her national side in 549 days after undergoing gruelling rehab to strengthen her leg after an ACL injury. But the star returned in Canberra to play Argentina on Monday night and helped send interim coach Tom Sermanni off with a win having scored a double. In front of 25,125 fans at GIO Stadium, the 23-year-old was a star for the Matildas scoring both her goals in the first-half to help secure a 4-1 win. Sayer admitted she was once doubting whether she would ever reach the same heights again that had her playing for the Matildas. But Sayer shut down any doubts over her star power with two excellent goals in an encouraging performance for the national side. "I worked really hard to get to this point, and I think it showed on the field, the work that I put in and the time," she said after the game. "There was a point in my rehab where I didn't even think I'd be able to walk properly again. So, yeah, the biggest thing is just for me to be on the field, and anything extra is just a bonus." Caitlin Foord and Amy Sayer combine late in the first half to regain the CommBank Matildas' lead 🎯#Matildas #AUSvARG — CommBank Matildas (@TheMatildas) June 2, 2025 And Sayer's return could give Kerr a boost for when she returns from a similar injury. Kerr has not played football in more than 16 months after tearing her ACL during training for her club side Chelsea. The Matildas superstar has been undergoing her recovery and was a hope to line-up for Chelsea, before their record breaking Women's Super League season came to an end. She was also a hope to join the Matildas squad for the clashes against Argentina. However, Kerr couldn't get to the field before the end of the season and will continue her recovery during Chelsea's pre-season. Kerr did shock fans when she made a surprise appearance at the Women's A-League final a couple of weeks ago, but more news has come out of her visit to Australia. On Monday night ahead of the Matildas' clash against Argentina, it was revealed Kerr has suffered another minor injury during her recovery. Kerr unfortunately suffered a setback during her rehab and underwent a surgery on a separate injury, however reports suggest she is now back running. "This is really sad news for Sam on a personal and professional level," commentator Andy Harper said on Channel 10. "The frustration of being injured is bad enough, a long-term injury is even then to have this late a significant mental hurdle she has to overcome." New Matildas coach Joe Montemurro confirmed the setback, but claimed he has only just been briefed on the situation. "Look, I think there was some complications and I've only caught up with the scenario in the last 24 hours," he told Channel 10. "There was a subsequent intervention, but I do believe she is now back running. I think it was something completely different (to the existing knee injury). I think the knee is fine. I think there was some other issues, but again I've only been briefed in the last 24 hours." Bad news for Sam Kerr fans 😩All the #AUSvARG pre-match chat continues on Paramount+ — Paramount+ Australia (@ParamountPlusAU) June 2, 2025 Sermanni faced a difficult job to coach the Matildas while Football Australia searched for a new long-term coach with the likes of Mary Fowler and Kerr out injured. But after an uplifting win over Argentina, Sermanni feels he passes the team over with a little more confidence instilled among the playing group. "I felt, when I came into squad, the confidence and the belief in the players, collectively and individually, was at a fairly low ebb," Sermanni said. "I think what's happened in that time is that we've been able to bring back a little bit more confidence in the squad. But also able to start to bring players who have been kind of on the outside of the squad into believing that they feel part of the squad - players like Amy."
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
It was ChatGPT, says Italian who ‘hoped Meloni's daughter would meet same fate as murder victim'
An Italian teacher who called for Giorgia Meloni's eight-year-old daughter to be murdered has blamed ChatGPT for his online post. Stefano Addeo, 65, who teaches German in a school near Naples, caused fury at the weekend when he wrote on social media that he hoped Ginevra, the Italian prime minister's daughter, would 'meet the same fate' as a 14-year-old girl who was recently allegedly murdered by her jilted boyfriend. The post was condemned across the political spectrum, with opposition MPs as well as members of the governing coalition saying it was unacceptable. He is now under investigation by the authorities for inciting hatred. Mr Addeo attempted on Monday to justify the message, saying that it had been created by the artificial intelligence chatbot, albeit at his request. He told the La Repubblica newspaper: 'It wasn't me, it was artificial intelligence. I saw on television on Friday that the government was not distancing itself from the war in Israel. I asked ChatGTP to create a message critical of Meloni. This crazy thing emerged and I posted it.' Asked why he had not taken a moment to reflect on the gravity of the post, he said: 'I just wanted to post something. ChatGTP is more harmful than you think. I'm a Catholic, I'm in favour of animal rights, I'm a vegetarian. 'I'm on the Left but that does not excuse this type of message. I've had to cancel all my social media platforms, the consequences have been really ugly. I've had to shut myself away at home. 'People are throwing tomatoes at my front door. I have been depicted as a monster. I'm really shocked – people are issuing threats against me. I did a really stupid thing.' He said furore over the incident meant he had been harangued in the streets of his home town. The teacher, who has no children and lives with his 90-year-old mother, said that if he had the opportunity to meet the prime minister, he would apologise. 'I would hug her, asking her forgiveness. I wish only the best for her daughter, although I would advise her to be careful about social media,' he said. But it has emerged he has also posted messages threatening the children of other members of the Right-wing coalition – Matteo Salvini, the transport minister and head of the League party, and Antonio Tajani, the foreign minister and a former European commissioner. 'This is intolerable – you can attack me, but not my daughter,' said Mr Salvini. The teacher's social media post was a reference to the horrific case of Martina Carbonaro, a 14-year-old schoolgirl who was beaten to death with a rock a few days ago, allegedly by her 18-year-old ex-boyfriend. He was allegedly furious that she had ended their relationship. After attacking her, he attempted to hide her body beneath rubbish and debris in an abandoned farmhouse near the town of Afragola, north of Naples, it was reported. Ms Meloni, who is halfway into her five-year term as premier, has decried what she called a 'sick climate' in Italian political discourse. She said that threats made against her and her young daughter represent 'a spiral of hatred fed by an ideological fanaticism that has exceeded every limit. No political differences or ideological cause can ever justify attacks on children'. Matteo Renzi, the leader of a centre-Left party and a former prime minister, said the teacher should lose his job. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
Court filings reveal opposition to intervening motion in Arkansas direct democracy lawsuit
Efforts to collect signatures for two proposed ballot measures for the 2026 election will begin this fall, following the attorney general's approval of ballot language Thursday. (Mary Hennigan/Arkansas Advocate) The League of Women Voters of Arkansas and the state attorney general argued in federal court filings this week that two ballot question committees are not entitled to intervene in the League's lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of direct democracy laws. Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids filed a motion to intervene in the case on May 14, arguing that their interests aren't 'adequately represented' because the League's suit didn't challenge all the laws they intended to. The committees also argued that intervening is more efficient than filing a separate lawsuit, which they said would likely be consolidated with the League's complaint under federal court rules. Arkansas grassroots organizations seek to intervene in lawsuit challenging direct democracy laws In its response to the motion, which was filed by Little Rock attorney David Couch on Wednesday, the League of Women Voters of Arkansas and ballot question committee Save AR Democracy (SARD) argue the two ballot question committees don't have standing and have no right to intervene because they are not questioning LWVAR's ability to challenge the laws in the original complaint. LWVAR filed a federal lawsuit against the Arkansas secretary of state in April alleging that eight recently approved state laws governing direct democracy violate the First and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Direct democracy is the process by which Arkansans can propose new laws or constitutional amendments and place them on the ballot for a statewide vote. Arkansas is one of 24 states that allow citizen-led initiatives, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The motion to intervene from Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids seeks to challenge two laws not included in the League of Women Voters' suit — Act 602 of 2025, which prohibits ballot titles from being written above an eighth-grade reading level, and Act 236 of 2023, which mandates petition signatures must be collected from at least 50 counties instead of 15 as directed in the Arkansas Constitution, according to court filings. Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids also seek to add an additional defendant, Attorney General Tim Griffin, who is not a party to the pending litigation but is counsel for the secretary of state, which would further complicate the matter, according to LWVAR's response. In the defendant's response, also filed Wednesday, Griffin noted that when he certified For AR Kids' popular name and ballot title for a proposed education-related constitutional amendment on Feb. 26, the ballot title didn't need to meet the reading-level requirement because Act 602 was not yet in effect. The League and Save AR Democracy made the same point in their filing to argue that For AR Kids lacks standing to challenge the reading-level law. Protect AR Rights submitted its own proposed direct-democracy ballot title on May 19 that's still under review by the attorney general. LWVAR argues this group also does not have standing because its proposed ballot title has not been rejected because of Act 602. LWVAR argues that challenging Act 602 is further complicated because Griffin substituted and certified Save AR Democracy's ballot title on May 21 so that it would meet the eighth-grade reading level test. 'Even if Protect AR Rights had standing, the inclusion of that issue in the litigation would unnecessarily complicate this matter,' the response states. 'Nothing would prohibit Protect AR Rights from instituting litigation if it is denied a ballot title to meet the eighth grade reading level test.' Griffin argues that the motion to intervene should be denied because Protect AR Rights is the only party that can challenge Act 602. This is also the only claim that can be made against the attorney general, he said. State law requires the attorney general to certify or reject proposed ballot titles within 10 business days. The deadline for a response to Protect AR Rights' proposal is June 3. Because it is still under review, allowing the ballot question committee to intervene 'would require finding an injury in fact where such harm is hypothetical and not concrete,' Griffin wrote. 'Because Plaintiff SARD was able to satisfy the Act 602 requirement, the court has to resort to speculation to determine that Protect AR Rights' ballot title could never be at an eighth-grade reading level,' he said. 'For the same reasons, Protect AR Rights cannot bring a cause of action against Attorney General Griffin.' Regarding the proposed intervenors' challenge to the 2023 law requiring signatures from 50 counties, LWVAR's response notes that this law is already being challenged by the League in Pulaski County Circuit Court. The case has been fully argued, briefed and is awaiting the court's ruling. Plaintiffs argue there is no need for the claim to be pursued at this time and if it were allowed, it should be held in abeyance under the Pullman Doctrine, which provides that federal courts defer to state courts if the state ruling would resolve the federal issue. 'The issue before the Circuit Court is simply, can the Arkansas General Assembly amend the Arkansas State Constitution by statute? The League believes that it cannot, and a ruling in its favor would resolve the federal issue,' according to court documents. Griffin also cited the Pullman Doctrine and noted that the losing party in the case is expected to appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court. 'Thus, the [federal] Court should abstain from exercising jurisdiction over this claim, which is only being made by Movants to intervene,' he wrote. 'Standing alone, this claim cannot be a basis for Movants to be entitled to intervention.' LWVAR further argues that Protect AR Rights' proposed ballot measure 'would conflict with and be in direct competition with' Save AR Democracy's approved measure because both seek to amend Article 5, Section 1 of the state Constitution, which governs the state's initiative and referendum process. 'It would be improper for the Protect AR Rights to intervene in litigation filed by SARD to get a measure approved that directly competes with the measure already approved and being circulated by SARD, in that it would create unnecessary conflict,' according to LWVAR's response. Save AR Democracy also argues Protect AR Rights' proposed ballot measure contradicts with a claim made in the complaint — that the 'exhaustive list of disqualifying offenses' that prohibits individuals from collecting signatures is unconstitutional. 'The measure submitted by Protect AR Rights to the Attorney General for approval would enshrine this very prohibition in the Arkansas constitution,' the response says. 'This represents a core political and policy difference between SARD and Protect AR Rights and would inject unnecessary controversy and conflict into the litigation.' Protect AR Rights' proposal also sets forth a procedure regarding a legal challenge to the ballot title that 'differs substantially' from Save AR Democracy's procedure. Save AR Democracy's measure would require an approved ballot title to be submitted to the secretary of state who publishes notice of approval and the procedure for challenging the approval. The measure would establish a 45-day window during which a challenge could be filed with the Arkansas Supreme Court. The Protect AR Rights measure would require a challenge to be filed within 10 business days of the attorney general sending the sponsor a letter approving the ballot title, but it provides for no notice. Providing the public 'adequate notice and opportunity' is essential to due process, the response states. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
