Kneecap's legal team for court battle to include Julian Assange lawyer
Kneecap's legal team for court battle to include Julian Assange lawyer
Rapper O hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, will be represented by a team that includes Gareth Peirce, solicitor for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange during his fight against US extradition, and Rosalind Comyn, who has represented Extinction Rebellion protesters in court.
(Image: Lorne Thomson, Redfernsvia Getty Images )
Irish rap trio Kneecap have named the legal team which will defend band member Liam O hAnnaidh against a terror charge.
Rapper O hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, will be represented by a team that includes Gareth Peirce, solicitor for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange during his fight against US extradition, and Rosalind Comyn, who has represented Extinction Rebellion protesters in court.
The 27-year-old was charged by postal requisition over the alleged display of a Hezbollah flag at a gig at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London, in November last year.
His legal team also includes Darragh Mackin from Phoenix Law, Brenda Campbell KC, Jude Bunting KC and Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC.
Mr Mackin was the solicitor for Sarah Ewart, whose successful legal challenge helped to usher in the decriminalisation of abortion in Northern Ireland, while Ms Campbell was the defence barrister in the collapsed case against Seamus Daly, who was accused of murdering people in the IRA bomb attack of 1998 in Omagh.
Mr Bunting acted for non-profit company Liberty in the Stansted 15's successful conviction appeal after they broke into Stansted Airport to stop a plane deporting people to Africa, which was a case Ms Ni Ghralaigh also worked on.
Article continues below
In an Instagram post the group said: "The British establishment is conducting a campaign against Kneecap which is to be fought in Westminster Magistrates Court... We are ready for this fight. We are proud to have such a strong legal team with us."
Mr Mackin told the PA news agency: "It is difficult to comprehend a case of greater international importance in recent years.
"Kneecap has played an unrivalled role in standing up for those without a voice in Gaza. They speak truth to power when others shy away.
"It is a great privilege to be instructed alongside my colleagues to defend the important principle of freedom of expression, in the pending battle before the London Court."
In May, the Metropolitan Police said Kneecap were being investigated by counter-terrorism police after videos emerged allegedly showing the band calling for the deaths of MPs and shouting "up Hamas, up Hezbollah".
They apologised to the families of murdered MPs but said footage of the incident had been "exploited and weaponised".
They also said they have "never supported" Hamas or Hezbollah, which are banned in the UK.
In 2024, the band released an eponymous film starring Oscar-nominated actor Michael Fassbender which is a fictionalised retelling of how the band came together and follows the Belfast group on their mission to save their mother tongue through music.
Formed in 2017, the group, made up of O hAnnaidh, Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh, are known for their provocative lyrics and merchandise as well as their championing of the Irish language.
Article continues below
Their best-known tracks include Get Your Brits Out, Better Way To Live, featuring Grian Chatten from Fontaines DC, and 3Cag.
O hAnnaidh is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on June 18.
His lawyers have been approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Public-private deal to invest £1bn in offshore wind supply chains unveiled
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said the 'unprecedented' collaboration would help deliver clean energy jobs, energy security and lower bills, with investment in areas such as Teeside, Scotland, South Wales and East Anglia. In addition to previously-announced funding of £300 million from publicly-owned Great British Energy, the Crown Estate has pledged £400 million to support new infrastructure including ports, supply chain manufacturing and research and testing facilities. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said the country was 'witnessing the coming of age of Britain's green industrial revolution' (Paul Campbell/PA) And £300 million from industry would match government funding, to deliver investments into supply chains such as advanced turbine technology and offshore wind turbine foundations, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) said. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: 'This is an unprecedented collaboration between public and private investors with Great British Energy crowding in millions of private sector investment from industry and the Crown Estate, to ensure that British companies and workers win the global race for clean energy. 'We are witnessing the coming of age of Britain's green industrial revolution as we build this new era of clean energy abundance, helping deliver new jobs, energy security and lower households' bills.' Industry body RenewableUK's deputy chief executive Jane Cooper said: 'A concerted focus from industry and Government on growing the offshore wind industry's supply chain in the UK could deliver an extra 10,000 jobs between now and 2035, boosting the UK's economy by £25 billion. £1 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐔𝐊 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡-𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐣𝐨𝐛𝐬 – RenewableUK and Offshore Wind Industry Council (OWIC) Media Release Today at RenewableUK's Global… — RenewableUK (@RenewableUK) June 17, 2025 'Our sector is stepping up, working closely with the Energy Secretary and the Crown Estate to create new opportunities for manufacturing high-value goods like turbine towers, blades, foundations and cables, and providing high-quality jobs building, operating and maintaining offshore wind farms.' In addition to the £1 billion funding, which has not yet been allocated to specific projects, the Government has announced it will allocate up to £544 million from its 'clean industry bonus'. The bonus scheme provides funding to offshore wind developers for prioritising investment in some of the UK's most deprived communities and in cleaner supply chains, with companies pledging to invest in regions such as Scotland, the North East and East Anglia. Up to £200 million has been allocated to clean energy facilities such as electrical equipment and heavy steel products in the North East, unlocking up to £4 billion in private sector investment, while up to £185 million will go to Scotland, unlocking up to £3.5 billion for ports and wind farm components. Great British Energy, @OWGPUK, @NatWealthFund, @thebankscot, @TheCrownEstate, @crownestatescot & @devbankwales have agreed to work together to support the UK's offshore wind. By coordinating our efforts, we'll give developers & supply chains confidence to invest in the sector. — Great British Energy (@GBEgovuk) June 17, 2025 The East of England will get up to £20 million from the bonus, and Northern Ireland has been allocated £25 million, with industry estimating the cash could support up to 14,000 jobs and drive up to £9 billion of private funding into the regions over the next four years. The funding will be delivered through the contracts for difference scheme, which pays clean energy developers an agreed price for the power they produce from their projects, and will be allocated to companies that are successful in the next round of auctions for the contracts. Those projects that win contracts in the auction can then finalise their investment into clean energy manufacturing factories, DESNZ said. The funding for the clean industry bonus would be paid for through bills, adding less than £2 a year over the next four years, officials said.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reeves' vindictive tax raid on the rich was doomed to fail
To no-one's surprise but the Treasury's, Rachel Reeves' attempts to heavily tax highly internationally mobile high-income or high-wealth individuals have backfired. After sparking an exodus sufficient to significantly undermine the revenues from the schemes – potentially even meaning these taxes cost money instead of raising it – she is reportedly considering a U-turn. The focus is now on finding an alternative to imposing a 40 per cent inheritance tax on world-wide assets – identified as the single biggest factor in driving rich people away from Britain. Whilst some specific measures may have bigger effects than others, changing one or two items is unlikely to be game-changing in stopping the UK's loss of high-income and high-wealth individuals – a drain that has persisted for some time now, going back to the 2008/09 Global Financial Crisis, but which has accelerated markedly in recent years. The UK was traditionally attractive to wealthy people, leading to our attracting a disproportionate share of the world's stock for a range of reasons. We had one of the top 'world cities' in London, with fantastic activities for rich people to engage in combined with much lower crime than cities in many other countries, low risk of revolution or civil disorder, a long tradition of opposing the arbitrary confiscation of wealth, little political support for extremely high taxes on high income, secure property rights, internationally famous schools for the children of the wealthy to attend, and a year-round gentle climate. Many of these factors are already gone and others are declining. London nightlife and other activities were already in decline but badly hit by Covid, never properly recovering. Casual crime has become endemic in many UK cities, along with unsightly rubbish in the streets. We came close to civil disorder in 2019 and fears of the same are now re-emerging. Talk of wealth taxes is popular. Property rights no longer seem secure. Retrospection is not unthinkable. Our private schools have seen sex scandals and taxes. Even the climate is less gentle. In such an unconducive environment, many rich people may not need much of a trigger to leave. And once they have adjusted emotionally to going, it will often be too late to get them back. Governments used to be very keen on the factors delivering 'competitiveness' – the attraction of high-income workers and of mobile capital. British government policy has, for a long time, apparently taken little to no interest in its impacts on competitiveness. Now we see the fruit.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Nothing has damaged Britain more than the fear of being labelled ‘racist'
Have you ever been unjustly accused of ' racism ' in public? I have, and I can tell you it was one of the most sickening, paralysing moments of my career. During a broadcast interview, and only after listing some of the ways in which immigration has benefited Britain, I expressed concern that the current levels were unsustainable economically and incompatible with effective integration. My fellow panellist, a prominent member of the Green Party, who incidentally once claimed it was possible to enlarge women's breasts via hypnotherapy, then erupted into eye-bulging outrage. Harbouring such worries was manifestly bigoted and 'racist', he declared. In that stomach-churning moment I realised there was no smear greater and, importantly, no insult less likely to backfire on those hurling it, than this one. This is how authoritarians always operate, whether in Soviet Russia, Communist China or the committee rooms and seminars of modern-day Britain. They use taboos and speech restrictions to consolidate power, anathematise dissenting opinions and punish those showing the slightest reluctance to endorse progressive orthodoxy. And all under the banner of promoting unity in diversity and shielding marginalised groups from 'offence '. In the UK, reached a stage where people didn't care what happened to the country, provided they could say, from the rubble, 'well at least no one accused me of racism'. It's why Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner, plus a thousand bemused footballers, famously took the knee – and it was right where the guilt grifters wanted us. Knowing the terror this labelling would elicit, politicians and activists gaslit the British public on an industrial scale. They didn't need to concede the economic costs of immigration were in danger of outweighing the advantages; they could just declare the country was built on hardworking asylum seekers, and denounce those who challenged this assertion as xenophobes. They didn't need to listen to warnings that discrete communities were living parallel lives, with some groups almost entirely sequestered from wider society; the received wisdom was that importing large numbers of people, whose values might be unreconcilable with our own, was unquestionably positive. What particularly aroused woke anger was when minorities refused to stay in Victim Street. Thus when Sir Trevor Phillips, the former head of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, voiced concerns about integration and community cohesion he was suspended from the Labour Party. Tony Sewell's Race and Ethnic Disparities Commission was denounced for Uncle Tomism when it suggested that perhaps the UK wasn't Full Fascist. And it wasn't enough to not be racist, we had to be 'anti-racist': a theory advanced by ludicrous pseudo-scholars such as Kehinde Andrews or Ibram X Kendi, for whom 'the claim of 'not racist' neutrality' is apparently a 'mask for racism''. New terms entered our lexicon, such as 'the global majority', which helped feed the narrative of an oppressive West, prosperous only through exploiting the poor. Parliament's useful idiots brought in the legislation – the 2010 Equality Act and 2015 Modern Slavery Act – that would facilitate and underpin the migration dogma. HR teams – now 450,000 strong in this country – played their part, squandering corporate time with mandatory unconscious bias training and telling colleagues that rolling their eyes could constitute a racial microaggression. But after years of this claptrap, we can begin to see the tide is on the turn. First, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), hitherto a reliable ally of the open borders brigade, released modelling showing the true cost of a 'low-wage migrant' to the British taxpayer. Then, Nigel Farage's Reform crossed the tipping point – 30 per cent – at which our electoral system starts to work in its favour. And this week, the Casey review put into black and white what we already knew: that thousands of vulnerable white girls were systematically abused by predominantly Pakistani men whilst our authorities turned a blind eye. Now, finally, we can talk freely about Pakistan's sexist culture and its incompatibility with notions of civilised behaviour. We can openly discuss reports of rape and assault perpetrated by those allegedly seeking asylum here. We can admit we are not realising a 21st-century version of Theodore Roosevelt's 'melting pot'. We can unashamedly demand a visa system which welcomes only those who subscribe to our values and contribute to our society. The fear of being labelled racist is toxic. It pushes discourse underground, driving people towards the very divisions which 'anti-racism' claims to oppose. It hands politicians carte-blanche to pursue ruinous policies and duck difficult decisions. And it waters down the term, when we ought to preserve its meaning so that demonstrable injustice isn't dismissed as noise. And remember, it's not just immigration. It's also 'transphobia' and climate change 'denialism'. We have to stop being so terrified. To believe we need market solutions to rising temperatures is not tantamount to denying the science. To believe in biological sex is not to discriminate against trans people. Enough is enough.
