
Professional Fighters League launches an MMA division in Australia and New Zealand
SYDNEY (AP) — The Professional Fighters League has launched a new international division in Australia and New Zealand to showcase mixed martial arts competitors in the Oceania region.
The PFL Pacific was launched in Sydney on Tuesday, expanding the league's reach into the southern hemisphere.
'It has been a priority of ours to bring the Professional Fighters League to Australia and the Pacific region,' PFL chief executive Peter Murray said in a statement. 'With the launch of PFL Pacific, we're also building a foundation for long-term growth and aiming to crown more Aussie champions than any other league over the next three years.'
The PLF is partnering with the streaming service Stan and Australia's Nine Network in a broadcasting deal that covers subscription, pay-per-view and free-to-air TV.
The first PFL Pacific tournament will take place next year across four live events featuring regional fighters in single-elimination brackets and using the league's 'win and advance' format.
The PFL Pacific launch was days after it emerged former France and Manchester United player Patrice Evra's PFL Europe debut scheduled for May 23 had been postponed.
The 43-year-old Evra, who retired from soccer in 2019, has been training in combat alongside MMA star Cédric Doumbé.
___
AP sports: https://apnews.com/sports

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
37 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Coco Gauff beats Loïs Boisson 6-1, 6-2 at the French Open to set up a 1 vs. 2 final against Aryna Sabalenka
PARIS (AP) — Coco Gauff beats Loïs Boisson 6-1, 6-2 at the French Open to set up a 1 vs. 2 final against Aryna Sabalenka.


Winnipeg Free Press
37 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
French Open: Swiatek says chair umpire's refusal to inspect a mark was unfair
PARIS (AP) — Iga Swiatek said it's unfair that the chair umpire refused her request to climb down and inspect a mark during her semifinal loss to top-ranked Aryna Sabalenka at the French Open on Thursday. The incident happened when Swiatek was 4-2 up in the second set and with Sabalenka serving on Court Philippe-Chatrier. After Sabalenka's first serve landed out, Swiatek stood still for moment before pointing her left finger at the mark while asking French chair umpire Kader Nouni to climb down and inspect it. 'I want him to come down, but he didn't. So I don't think that was fair, especially when he came down, like, every time Aryna asked him to. I don't get it, but I don't really care,' said Swiatek, whose 26-match French Open unbeaten streak ended a 7-6 (1), 4-6, 6-0 loss. 'When I had a mark that was out, he was convincing me that I only came there because I saw that my return was out.' After a brief exchange, Swiatek gave up. Thursdays Keep up to date on sports with Mike McIntyre's weekly newsletter. She walked back into position to receive three-time major winner Sabalenka's second serve, albeit with a wry smile on her face. ___ AP tennis:


Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Federal judges rule in favor of NASCAR in lawsuit filed by Jordan-owned 23XI and Front Row
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — A three-judge federal appellate panel ruled Thursday in favor of NASCAR in the antitrust lawsuit filed by two teams, one owned by Michael Jordan, and vacated an injunction that required 23XI and Front Row be recognized as chartered teams as their case snakes through the legal system. Both race teams sued NASCAR late last year after refusing to sign new agreements on charter renewals. The charter system is similar to franchises in other sports, but the charters are revocable by NASCAR and have expiration dates. 23XI, which is owned by Jordan and three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin, joined Front Row in suing NASCAR after 13 other organizations signed the renewals. The two teams sued and asked for a temporary injunction that would recognize them as chartered teams for this season. The antitrust case isn't scheduled to be heard until December. The teams said they needed the injunction because the current charter agreement prohibits them from suing NASCAR. 23XI also argued it would be harmed because Tyler Reddick's contract would have made him a free agent if the team could not guarantee him a charter-protected car. The original judge ruled that NASCAR's charter agreement likely violated antitrust law in granting the injunction. But when they heard arguments last month, the three judges at the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, indicated they were skeptical of that decision. The judges said in Thursday's ruling they were not aware of any case that supports the lower court's theory of antitrust law, so they vacated the injunction. The teams have 14 days to appeal to the full court. The injunction also has no bearings on the merits of the case. Thursdays Keep up to date on sports with Mike McIntyre's weekly newsletter. ___ AP auto racing: