IndyStar newsroom to grow with new positions, summer interns
AI-assisted summary
The newsroom is expanding with two grant-funded journalist positions focused on environmental reporting and First Amendment issues.
Multiple summer internships are being funded through grants from various organizations.
Google the term "building the boat while sailing it" and you'll inevitably come upon a number of articles on change management and leading in times of crisis.
The phrase is probably my most frequently uttered idiom of the past two decades, as it reflects my ever-changing experience as a journalist over the past 22 years.
Case in point: In my first 15 months here at IndyStar, we've hired 17 full-time journalists, seen eight colleagues leave for other opportunities, and helped 11 interns — with another eight about to join us this summer — grow through their early careers, all while significantly adjusting our deadlines and workflows amid the ongoing consolidation of U.S. newspaper printing facilities.
That may seem like a lot of turnover, but IndyStar is fortunate to have more than 25 journalists who have served Central Indiana with trustworthy local news for more than five years each.
Veteran photojournalists Kelly Wilkinson and Michelle Pemberton, reporters Dana Hunsinger Benbow, Scott Horner and John Tuohy, multimedia manager Clark Wade, administrative manager Kim Mitchell, investigative editor Tim Evans, sports editor Nat Newell and local news editor Shari Rudavsky have each been at IndyStar for more than 20 years.
That level of deep local knowledge and connection to Central Indiana has allowed our newsroom to take a teaching hospital approach as our newer hires — myself included — learn while working alongside these mainstays of the Indianapolis journalism scene.
That's also how you build the boat while sailing it — not by the effort of one person, but through the combined efforts of a dedicated crew. Today, I'm pleased to share news of a few upcoming additions to IndyStar's newsroom.
IndyStar to welcome two grant-funded journalists in May
Our newsroom of more than 60 full-time journalists is about to expand thanks to the generous support of funders who share our interest in strengthening local journalism in Central Indiana and beyond.
The Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust has supported IndyStar's environmental journalism since 2022. Through the trust's support, reporting from Karl Schneider and former IndyStar environmental reporter Sarah Bowman has been published free to all readers.
Early this month, Sophia Hartley will join the team, filling the position Bowman vacated last year. Hartley graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a Master of Science in Science Writing. We're excited for Sophia to join the team and share stories of the many ways Hoosiers interact with and impact our natural resources and environment.
Later this month we'll also welcome a new First Amendment reporter, as part of an effort that will bring new reporting to five USA TODAY Network newsrooms. Our new reporter will share stories of the increasingly frequent tensions involving the five freedoms of the First Amendment.
For review, the First Amendment states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
These positions are made possible thanks to the generous support of the Freedom Forum's Local Press Initiative and Journalism Funding Partners, a nonprofit that works to increase the depth, diversity and sustainability of local journalism.
Grant funding to support summer internships at IndyStar
We also have the Central Indiana Community Foundation and Ida B. Wells Society for Investigative Reporting to thank for their support of IndyStar's robust summer internship program.
Grant funding from the two nonprofits will place seven student journalists and recent college graduates into summer internships starting in May and June. Our 2025 Pulliam Fellows funded through CICF are: Marissa Meador, Indiana University; Sam Habashy, Northwestern University; Matthew Cupelli, University of Florida; HG Biggs, Ohio University, Joshua Heron, Arizona State University, and Dow Jones News Fund intern Ethan Hylton, Goldsmiths University of London.
Juliann Ventura, Northwestern University, will be our Ida B. Wells Society investigative fellow. We'll also bring on a video intern through our Gannett Forward Summer Internship Program.
We're recruiting for a pop culture reporter, with more to come
Finally, we're in active recruitment for a pop culture to join our staff and report on Central Indiana's many cultural offerings, from concerts and festivals to Hoosiers on TV and much more.
We'll have more recruiting news in the future, as getting to "fully staffed" is always a work in progress. Thanks for letting me share a few updates here, and thanks for reading IndyStar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court rules that Catholic groups were unlawfully barred from a religious tax exemption
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled in favor of Catholic Church-affiliated charitable groups, saying they were wrongly denied religious exemptions from a Wisconsin tax that funds unemployment benefits. The justices ruled unanimously that the state's decision unlawfully discriminated against the groups on the basis of religion under the free exercise clause of the Constitution's First Amendment. The court rejected a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that said that the groups operating under the Catholic Charities Bureau of the Diocese of Superior were not sufficiently religious in purpose. The state already provided exemptions for religious institutions. The First Amendment has long been interpreted to exempt religious entities from taxation. Writing for the court, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted the importance of the government remaining neutral when it comes to different religions. "When the government distinguishes among religions based on theological differences in their provision of services, it imposes a denominational preference that must satisfy the highest level of judicial scrutiny," Sotomayor said. But Wisconsin had "transgressed that principle," she added. The groups involved in the case — Headwaters, Barron County Developmental Services, Diversified Services and Black River Industries — primarily serve developmentally disabled people. Their programs are open to non-Catholics. The Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission had concluded the charitable groups were not 'operated primarily for religious purposes' under state law. The Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2024 upheld the state commission's finding, saying the groups' activities were mostly secular in nature and that they do not 'attempt to imbue program participants with the Catholic faith nor supply any religious materials.' The Wisconsin unemployment compensation system was set up in 1932 to provide a safety net for people who lose their jobs. Similar programs in other states and the Federal Unemployment Tax Act also include religious exemptions. The Catholic groups had strong backing at the Supreme Court from other Christian sects and different religious faiths. This article was originally published on
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Meathead feds target California movers over nonexistent age discrimination: ‘Weaponization of government'
Which would you be more likely to hire: a moving company whose ads feature energetic, youthful workers or one that highlights its less sprightly, aged employees? That's a no-brainer — even a meathead could answer such a simple advertising question. Yet the federal government has spent about a decade investigating California-based, family-owned Meathead Movers for age discrimination, citing its marketing materials — demanding $15 million in penalties and suing when the company wouldn't cough up the cash. And the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has done this without pointing to a single discrimination complaint. Advertisement Meathead, California's biggest independent moving company, and its CEO, Aaron Steed, are finally fighting back — after a think tank heard about the crazy case. 'The EEOC is not only targeting a successful American company on what appears to be pretextual grounds, but now it's refusing to tell the public why it did that. And we think the public has a right to know,' Jon Riches, the Goldwater Institute's vice president for litigation, tells The Post. Goldwater sent the agency a Freedom of Information Act Request in March, seeking basic facts such as the number of age-discrimination complaints against Meathead Movers and number of EEOC investigations into alleged age discrimination at any moving company since January 2016. The feds refused to 'fess up. Advertisement So this week Goldwater appealed, Riches tells The Post exclusively — and the EEOC has 30 days to respond before the Arizona think tank will sue. 'We bring legal actions to challenge government overreach and unconstitutional action,' explains Riches, an ex-Navy JAG who joined Goldwater in 2012. 'We've had cases of many, many, many other government agencies, and I've never seen anything this unprecedented in my experience.' Most EEOC lawsuits are the result of discrimination complaints. The agency has filed just eight in the last decade based on what it calls 'directed investigations' — those 'without a charge of discrimination filed by an individual.' Meathead Movers' case is one of them. 'We are hopeful that the EEOC stops this ridiculous prosecution of Aaron and his company, but we also want to know why it started and why the government made the decisions it was making,' Riches says. Advertisement Can the feds really fine a firm simply for its marketing — when it's not fraudulent? 'No, I don't think so. And I think that also raises First Amendment concerns. Obviously Meathead Movers has a right to communicate truthful information about lawful activities, including in its marketing materials' — and 'it markets individuals that are capable of performing the job,' Riches says. But, he adds, 'The EEOC doesn't really seem to be too concerned with the First Amendment.' It 'sent Aaron a very staggering gag-order letter. Aaron has not been shy about talking about the facts of the case and what the government's doing to him on social media, and the agency sent him a letter, basically telling him to stop doing that.' Aaron Steed won't stop. 'I'm aware of my constitutional rights, and I'm fighting for my company's existence and the 300-plus families that depend on us,' he tells The Post — noting EEOC 'sent the gag order after Goldwater sent a FOIA request.' Advertisement EEOC started investigating Meathead around 2015 and finally contacted Steed in 2017. He insists the company doesn't discriminate. 'So we welcomed and embraced the EEOC, answered all their questions,' he says. 'We fully cooperated with the investigation, and then we were just shocked when we got a bill for $15 million shortly after — and with the full weight of the federal government to collect it.' How did it arrive at that figure? 'Even though there was not a single complaint against my company that initiated this, their logic was that there's at least 500 class members' — all hypothetical, as Steed notes. EEOC decided lost wages would total $15,000 per person, 'which is a record for age discrimination. No settlement has ever been reached for that amount. And then they multiplied it times two.' Why times two? 'Fees and penalties. And we quickly explained to them, 'Hey, we can't afford that,'' Steed replies. 'It has felt like this has never been about age discrimination. It's been about them trying to run over my company, trying to put us out of business,' he adds. 'It feels personal, and it doesn't make sense.' The 45-year-old started the company as a high-school junior in 1997. 'I wrestled in high school and in college, and this was a perfect job for me to support myself and my friends and my brother while going to school playing sports,' he recalls. 'Once I turned 21, 22, I saved up enough money to buy a truck. And now we have hundreds of employees and 80 trucks.' Steed says he has employees over 40 — even over 60. Still, he notes, 'The reality of our job is that a lot of younger people tend to gravitate towards it. The job description is to move heavy things all day, up and down stairs, and then at Meathead Movers, you're expected to jog.' That's right: After you've put furniture or boxes in the truck, you hustle back for more. 'That's part of what makes us different than typical moving companies,' Steed explains. 'It kept the momentum going, kept us focused as an athlete. It kept us in our flow state. It always really impressed the customers. It made move day more of an athletic event, and since all moving companies charge one hourly rate, we save our clients time and money, and this is what we've done since the get-go.' Advertisement It's a win-win situation: 'My employees love getting paid to work out, and the customers get a great value.' 'We pay $18 to $20 an hour, and you've got to be able to pass a drug test and a criminal-background check to work for us and have a great attitude,' he says. 'We have a reputation for doing really good quality work with people you can trust in your home, and we give back to the community. We're most known for offering unlimited free services to women fleeing abusive relationships, in partnership with eight different domestic-violence shelters across central and southern California.' Steed reflects, 'This has been my life's work.' He hopes to pass the company onto his and his wife's 3½-year-old son one day — if it survives. 'I've already spent well over a million and a half dollars defending myself for a crime I haven't committed, and it is just absolutely destroying us,' he says. 'I can't afford to keep litigating against the federal government. It's incredibly expensive, it's crazy, very time consuming and very stressful.' Advertisement He doesn't know why the feds targeted him. 'Last week, a friend of mine said, 'Hey, did you run over someone's cat over there at the EEOC?'' he says. 'It feels deeply personal, and I really don't understand it.' Goldwater, which is working pro bono, is flummoxed too. Perhaps a former competitor is involved. What it does know: 'The case raises serious questions about the weaponization of government.' 'This would be a really different sort of case if it was based on actual complaints of people who are actually harmed. But for a government agency to concoct these very thin allegations against a successful American company should trouble all your readers,' Riches says. 'Why would the federal government target a company whose job is moving because it hires people who can perform that job, regardless of their age? If it can do that to Meathead, it could do that to anybody. This is a bigger issue than just the EEOC and just Meathead Movers.' Steed spoke to The Post from LAX, where he was awaiting a flight to Washington, DC — where he'll meet Thursday with EEOC Acting Chair Andrea Lucas. Was that a tough meeting to get? Steed laughs. Advertisement 'Yeah,' he finally responds. 'We've been wanting to meet with them for a while, and I'm grateful that the chair has taken time out of her busy schedule to meet with us.' Lucas did not respond to The Post's request for comment. Spokesman Victor Chen said, 'We cannot comment on ongoing litigation, but we can point you to our public statement at the time the suit was filed.' He also sent the 2023 lawsuit filed in federal court. It complains 'Meathead Movers' founders and executive management . . . describe 'young and energetic-student athletes' as part of their founding vision.'
Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
Chambers USA Ranks Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch Among Nation's Top Law Firms
WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--In its 2025 USA Guide, Chambers and Partners has awarded Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch LLP a prestigious Band 1 ranking in First Amendment Litigation (Mainly Plaintiff), affirming the firm's commitment to excellence in legal advocacy. This accolade follows the firm's recognition in the Chambers High Net Worth Guide for Defamation / Reputation Management. Clients commend the firm, stating, 'You could not wish for a more dedicated, relentless team to represent you.' Share Since its inception in 2023, Meier Watkins has expanded to include eleven attorneys and three paralegals, building a team renowned for its dedication and relentless pursuit of justice in plaintiff-side defamation cases. Clients commend the firm, stating, 'You could not wish for a more dedicated, relentless team to represent you.' All four founding partners—Megan Meier, Daniel P. Watkins, Andrew Phillips, and Dustin Pusch—have been individually recognized by Chambers as leaders in their field. Notably, the firm now boasts more Chambers-ranked partners in First Amendment Litigation (Mainly Plaintiff) than any other law firm globally. About Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch LLP Headquartered in Washington, D.C., Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch LLP specializes in plaintiff-side defamation, trade libel, and First Amendment litigation. The firm represents a diverse clientele, including companies, organizations, executives, founders, high-net-worth individuals, and public figures facing reputational challenges.
